Fine-Tuned Transformer Models

• Fine-tuned transformer models are specialized architectures that update pre-trained weights on target datasets to optimize performance for specific downstream tasks.
• Layer-wise analysis shows early layers retain general semantics while later layers specialize, leading to strategies like adapter tuning, bias tuning, and layer freezing for efficiency.
• Parameter-efficient techniques such as LoRA, prompt tuning, and adapter tuning reduce computational costs while maintaining high accuracy in diverse applications from NLP to computer vision.

Fine-tuned transformer models are transformer-based architectures whose parameters are updated on target datasets or tasks after initial large-scale pretraining. Fine-tuning customizes pre-trained models for specific tasks, adapting general representations to downstream objectives in domains including natural language processing, computer vision, multilingual modeling, and federated or resource-constrained environments. This article systematically reviews the formal underpinnings, sample complexity, representational dynamics, practical protocols, advanced parameter-efficient and federated strategies, as well as recent theoretical advances and limitations of fine-tuned transformer models.

1. Formal Framework of Fine-Tuned Transformer Models

Fine-tuning transforms a base transformer model $M_{\text{base}} = M(\cdot; \theta_{\text{base}})$ into a specialized model $M_{\text{fine}} = M(\cdot; \theta_{\text{fine}})$ by minimizing the empirical cross-entropy loss on a downstream dataset $D = \{(x_i, y_i)\}_{i=1}^N$: $$\mathcal{L}(\theta_{\text{fine}}) = -\frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^N \log P_{\text{fine}}(y_i|x_i)$$ where $$\theta_{\text{fine}} = \theta_{\text{base}} + \Delta \theta$$ encodes all changes during supervised fine-tuning (SFT) (Sharma, 9 Jun 2025). In practice, architectures such as BERT, ViT, RoBERTa, and XLM-RoBERTa serve as starting points in a diverse range of applications.

Certain theoretical results extend fine-tuning’s reach: under idealized conditions (arbitrarily long context windows, unlimited compute, and access to the full fine-tuning data), the fine-tuned model’s behavior can be approximated—up to arbitrarily small error—by inference-time techniques such as in-context learning (ICL) applied to the base model without parameter updates (Sharma, 9 Jun 2025). For linear classification with feature dimension $d$, a dataset size $O(d/\varepsilon)$ suffices under unbounded context to closely match the fine-tuned model within error $\varepsilon$.

2. Layer-Wise and Representation Dynamics during Fine-Tuning

Fine-tuning induces systematic and often highly structured changes in pre-trained transformer representations (Phang et al., 2021, Nadipalli, 23 Feb 2025). Empirical CKA analyses reveal a block-diagonal pattern: layers in the first half of the network remain closely aligned with pre-trained subspaces (CKA $\geq 0.85$ for RoBERTa), while later layers cluster into a distinct, task-specialized regime (CKA $\geq 0.90$ intra-late, CKA $0.15$–$0.30$ inter-cluster). Cosine similarity studies reinforce this, with top-layer representations drifting furthest on complex tasks, particularly for topic classification (cosine as low as $0.60$ on the BERT-base final layer) (Nadipalli, 23 Feb 2025).

Sparse AutoEncoder (SAE) probing shows early layers retain general, structural features, middle layers encode a mix of general semantics and task-specific cues, and late layers become specialized for the downstream objective. These insights motivate strategies such as freezing lower layers, applying adapters in the middle, and fully updating higher layers to optimize efficiency and avoid catastrophic forgetting.

Table 1. Layer similarity and specialization

Layer Block	Representation Shift	Fine-tuning Strategy
Early (1–3)	Minimal, general semantics	Safe to freeze
Middle (4–8)	Transitional (mixing)	Prefer adapters/partial FT
Late (9–12 or 11–24)	Task-specialized, high drift	Full fine-tuning

3. Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) and Specialized Schemes

Direct full-model fine-tuning incurs prohibitive compute/memory costs; as such, parameter-efficient alternatives have been developed and widely adopted.

• Prompt tuning: Introduces learnable “soft” tokens prepended to inputs; modifies no backbone weights. Practically ultra-lightweight but typically converges slower or to slightly suboptimal accuracy compared to bias or adapter tuning (Chen et al., 2022, Zhao et al., 10 Aug 2024).
• Adapter tuning: Small, trainable bottleneck MLPs inserted per layer; only adapter weights are updated. Offers moderate parameter savings and can cover complex feature adjustments.
• Bias tuning: Updates only bias terms in linear projections across all layers. FedTune demonstrates that bias tuning achieves high accuracy and rapid convergence, especially when applied to strong backbones such as CLIP-ViT (Chen et al., 2022).
• LoRA and derivatives: Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) injects trainable low-rank matrices into attention and feedforward projections, updating only a tiny fraction of the parameters (O(0.1%) for $r=4\ldots16$) (Bahador et al., 24 Mar 2025, Zhao et al., 10 Aug 2024). It can be combined with quantization (QLoRA), adapters, or the new “Coeff-Tuning” approach, which tunes only the combination coefficients of multi-head attention maps, further expanding attention expressivity with negligible extra cost (Miao et al., 24 Mar 2025).
• Layer freezing and streamlined fine-tuning: SlimFit and CAFF propose freezing layers with minimal parameter change during training, dynamically choosing which layers are trainable according to memory and compute constraints (Ardakani et al., 2023, Pfeiffer et al., 12 Nov 2024). In federated learning, CAFF freezes bottom layers, allowing resource-constrained devices to optimize only the upper layers (Pfeiffer et al., 12 Nov 2024).

Table 2. Representative PEFT and resource-constrained strategies

Method	Principle	Updated Params	Memory/Compute Impact
Prompt	Input token insertion	$\sim$KB	Minimal, fastest convergence
Adapter	MLP bottlenecks	$\sim$MB/layer	Moderate, more flexible
Bias	Biases only	$\sim$0.5 MB (full model)	Fast, communication-efficient FL
LoRA/QLoRA	Low-rank deltas	O(0.1–1%)	Minimal, state-of-the-art results
Coeff-Tuning	Attention coefficients	O($H^2$/attention layer)	Plug-and-play with any PEFT
SlimFit	Layer freezing	Dynamic	2–3× memory reduction (≤0.4% acc)
CAFF (FL)	Top-$t$ layer tuning	Top $t$ layers only	Activation-bound, optimal for edge

4. Practical Fine-Tuning Protocols and Engineering

Standard fine-tuning protocols are dataset and task-specific but share several core ingredients:

• Optimizer: AdamW with weight decay $\sim 0.01$ dominates; learning rates $1$–$2 \times 10^{-5}$ for text, $1$–$3\times10^{-5}$ for vision, constant or linearly decayed (Mobin et al., 21 Jan 2025, Yildirim, 30 Jan 2024).
• Batch size and early stopping: Small batches (4–32) and patience-based early stopping (monitoring validation loss or F1) are used to control overfitting, especially in cross-domain and adversarial setups (Mobin et al., 21 Jan 2025).
• Preprocessing: Dataset-specific tokenization (e.g., WordPiece, BPE, or sentencepiece) and careful input normalization (padding, truncation) are mandatory for stable downstream adaptation (Mosin et al., 2021, Yildirim, 30 Jan 2024). For vocabularies differing from pretraining, corpus-specific re-tokenization (“vocabulary transfer”) plus embedding partial inheritance via VIPI ensures convergence and accuracy gains (Mosin et al., 2021).
• Objective functions: Cross-entropy for classification, span-based NLL for question answering, mean squared error for regression. Binary and multi-class settings depend on downstream annotation (Yildirim, 30 Jan 2024, Bahador et al., 24 Mar 2025).
• Regularization: Dropout (usually $p=0.1$) and label smoothing in encoder/decoder blocks, with weight decay, minimize overfitting (Trad et al., 26 Mar 2024).

Modern toolkits (e.g., SWIFT) provide unified support for LLM/MLLM fine-tuning, distributed training, and quantization, integrating PEFT schemes for practical, scalable deployment across modalities (Zhao et al., 10 Aug 2024).

5. Sample Complexity, Inference-Time Equivalents, and Theoretical Results

Theoretical analysis shows that, with access to the full fine-tuning data and under Turing-completeness, any capability acquired by SFT can be mirrored via in-context learning with a sufficiently long prompt and enough examples, even with the base model’s parameters fixed (Sharma, 9 Jun 2025). Specifically, for text generation over $m$ contexts and vocabulary $V$, $O(\frac{mV}{\varepsilon^2} \log \frac{m}{\delta})$ prompt examples yield an $L_1$-distance to the fine-tuned conditional distribution within $\varepsilon$ with failure probability $\delta$. In bounded context, $$O(\frac{l \log V}{\varepsilon^2} \log \frac{1}{\delta})$$ suffices for output of length $l$.

For linear classification in $d$-dimensional input, $O(d/\varepsilon)$ examples suffice in unbounded context with ICL, or $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon^2} \log \frac{1}{\delta})$ in fixed context. Practically, retrievers choose a small, relevant subset (via nearest neighbors or embedding distance), refining theoretical minimal sample sizes and improving empirical efficiency.

Hybrid inference-time techniques and SFT can be combined: fine-tuning selected low-rank modules while using retrieval for relevant context minimizes required updates and context size (Sharma, 9 Jun 2025).

6. Specialized Protocols: Multilingual, Federated, Quantized, and Modular Architectures

• Multilingual and cross-domain: Fine-tuned massive multilingual transformers (e.g., XLM-RoBERTa-Large) outperform even much larger LLMs in classification-focused tasks, including fact-checking over 90+ languages (Setty, 19 Feb 2024). For domain adaptation, corpus-specific tokenization plus embedding inheritance (VIPI) yields improvements in accuracy and training speed, especially for technical or out-of-domain corpora (Mosin et al., 2021).
• Federated learning and edge deployment: Techniques such as bias tuning, CAFF (layer freezing), and personalized FedAvg allow on-device adaptation of transformer models with strict communication, memory, or compute constraints (Chen et al., 2022, Pfeiffer et al., 12 Nov 2024). Bias tuning and careful client selection ensure robustness and accuracy even in non-iid or data-scarce regimes.
• Quantization and compression: Tensor decomposition (Tensor Train/TTM) and quantization-aware training enable up to 63–88$\times$ compression with ≤2% accuracy loss and up to 2$\times$ speedup. Layer-by-layer distillation stabilizes fine-tuning for heavily compressed students (Yang et al., 2023). QLoRA and related approaches marry low-bit precision with low-rank modules for memory-efficient, high-throughput fine-tuning (Zhao et al., 10 Aug 2024).
• Architectural modularity: Divide-and-conquer via fine-tuning multiple specialized transformers for subtasks (bias type detection, span extraction, reformulation) increases transparency and control in complex NLP pipelines (Helland et al., 2023). Systematic design of sub-model composition, small curated training sets per module, and iteration-based application outperform monolithic fine-tuning for nuanced or multi-step objectives.

7. Advanced Techniques, Limitations, and Future Directions

New finetuning and inference protocols extend model capabilities:

• Recurrence in transformers removes context window barriers by passing learned summaries between segments for longer-context decoding, reducing computation while preserving perplexity (Yoshida, 29 Aug 2024).
• MLM weight transfer to non-autoregressive decoders yields significant BLEU gains by initializing both towers from a shared MLM, mitigating cold-start issues in generative tasks (Yoshida, 29 Aug 2024).
• Conditional inference (conditional beam search, hidden-state optimization) enables output control and degeneracy prevention at inference time, without retraining (Yoshida, 29 Aug 2024).

Limitations and challenges persist:

• PEFT vs. full fine-tuning: Small PEFT modules can miss higher-order interactions, especially when only updating few parameters on domain-shifted data.
• Layer redundancy: Later layers often become redundant after fine-tuning, motivating structured pruning or dynamic early-exit schemes (Phang et al., 2021).
• Resource-constraint trade-offs: Memory and compute bottlenecks in federated or quantized models require careful balancing of parameter/activation footprints, sample selection, and communication protocols (Ardakani et al., 2023, Pfeiffer et al., 12 Nov 2024).
• Prompt sensitivity and in-context error ($\eta$): Approximating fine-tuned distributions via ICL relies on prompt design and effective example selection; reducing this gap remains an open area (Sharma, 9 Jun 2025).
• Overfitting in model attribution and complex classification: Generalization errors increase in low-sample, multiclass or adversarial scenarios, calling for better regularization and richer prompt engineering (Guggilla et al., 7 Jul 2025).

Open research problems include establishing systematic recipes to minimize ICL error, robust hybridization of in-context and low-rank adaptation, scalable methods for non-i.i.d. and multilingual data, and attributing performance sources in prompt-combination and modular architectures.

---

References

• Eliciting Fine-Tuned Transformer Capabilities via Inference-Time Techniques (Sharma, 9 Jun 2025)
• Fine-Tuned Transformers Show Clusters of Similar Representations Across Layers (Phang et al., 2021)
• Layer-Wise Evolution of Representations in Fine-Tuned Transformers: Insights from Sparse AutoEncoders (Nadipalli, 23 Feb 2025)
• LuxVeri at GenAI Detection Task 3: Cross-Domain Detection of AI-Generated Text ... (Mobin et al., 21 Jan 2025)
• FedTune: A Deep Dive into Efficient Federated Fine-Tuning with Pre-trained Transformers (Chen et al., 2022)
• Coeff-Tuning: A Graph Filter Subspace View for Tuning Attention-Based Large Models (Miao et al., 24 Mar 2025)
• Fine-Tuning Transformers: Vocabulary Transfer (Mosin et al., 2021)
• Towards Reasonably-Sized Character-Level Transformer NMT by Finetuning Subword Systems (Libovický et al., 2020)
• SlimFit: Memory-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Transformer-based Models Using Training Dynamics (Ardakani et al., 2023)
• Efficient Federated Finetuning of Tiny Transformers with Resource-Constrained Devices (Pfeiffer et al., 12 Nov 2024)
• Divide et Impera: Multi-Transformer Architectures for Complex NLP-Tasks (Helland et al., 2023)
• Making the Most of your Model: Methods for Finetuning and Applying Pretrained Transformers (Yoshida, 29 Aug 2024)
• SWIFT: A Scalable lightWeight Infrastructure for Fine-Tuning (Zhao et al., 10 Aug 2024)
• Quantization-Aware and Tensor-Compressed Training of Transformers for Natural Language Understanding (Yang et al., 2023)
• Surprising Efficacy of Fine-Tuned Transformers for Fact-Checking over Larger LLMs (Setty, 19 Feb 2024)
• Fine-tuning Transformer-based Encoder for Turkish Language Understanding Tasks (Yildirim, 30 Jan 2024)
• Chirp Localization via Fine-Tuned Transformer Model: A Proof-of-Concept Study (Bahador et al., 24 Mar 2025)
• Evaluating the Efficacy of Prompt-Engineered Large Multimodal Models Versus Fine-Tuned Vision Transformers in Image-Based Security Applications (Trad et al., 26 Mar 2024)
• AI Generated Text Detection Using Instruction Fine-tuned Large Language and Transformer-Based Models (Guggilla et al., 7 Jul 2025)