Extremely High-Velocity Outflow (EHVO)

• EHVOs are extreme outflows characterized by gas moving at velocities from ∼50 km/s up to 60,000 km/s, distinct from standard stellar or AGN winds.
• They exhibit a unique chemical and kinematic signature, such as enhanced SiO and O-bearing molecules, indicative of strong shock activity and high kinetic power.
• Observationally, EHVOs are identified via high-resolution spectroscopy and multi-wavelength imaging, crucial for studying feedback effects in star formation and galaxy evolution.

An Extremely High-Velocity Outflow (EHVO) is a phenomenon observed in diverse astrophysical environments, defined by the presence of gas flowing at velocities far exceeding those of typical outflows or winds from young stellar objects, evolved stars, and active galactic nuclei (AGNs). In the literature, EHVOs are typically identified either as sharply separated velocity components in molecular or atomic line profiles in star-forming regions (protostellar jets and outflows), or as ultra-fast broad and narrow absorption troughs in quasar/AGN spectra, often spanning velocities from ∼50 km s⁻¹ up to 0.2c (∼60,000 km s⁻¹).

1. Definition and Distinguishing Properties

EHVOs are characterized by their extreme bulk gas velocities, which systematically separate them from the broader population of molecular outflows, quasar broad absorption line (BAL) winds, or standard stellar winds. In molecular outflows from young stars, the EHVO manifests as a discrete spectral feature at the highest velocities, isolated from lower-velocity "wing" emission—typically identified in CO, SiO, or high-J transitions—and often exceeds 50–100 km s⁻¹ with respect to the local standard of rest. In AGN and quasar environments, EHVOs are found as broad ultraviolet/optical absorption troughs, especially in C IV, N V, and O VI lines, at blueshifts up to 0.2c, standing apart from the typical BALQSO wind velocities of 5,000–25,000 km s⁻¹.

Table: Typical velocity ranges for outflow classes

Context	Standard Outflow Velocity	EHVO Velocity Range
Protostars (CO)	10–50 km s⁻¹	50–100+ km s⁻¹
Quasars (UV)	< 25,000 km s⁻¹ (BAL)	30,000–60,000 km s⁻¹ (0.1–0.2c)

Distinctive attributes of EHVOs include:

• High velocity separation and often second kinematic component in spectral lines
• Velocity-dependent chemical or ionization structure, not seen in typical outflowing gas
• Large kinetic luminosity due to kinetic power scaling as $P_{\rm kin} \propto v^3$ (where $v$ is the outflow velocity)
• In some extragalactic cases, large and variable absorption troughs with rapidly changing profiles over months to years.

2. Chemical and Physical Differentiation of EHVOs in Star Formation

Surveys of molecular outflows in very young (Class 0) protostellar sources (e.g., L1448, IRAS 04166+2706, Serpens Main, MMS 5/OMC-3) reveal a systematic chemical differentiation between the EHVO component and lower-velocity wings (Tafalla et al., 2010, Tychoniec et al., 2019, Matsushita et al., 2018).

Key findings include:

• Elevated abundances of O-bearing species in the EHVO regime (CO, SiO, SO, CH₃OH, H₂CO), with a simultaneous sharp decrease in C-bearing species (e.g., HCN, CS). This is interpreted as a low C/O ratio in the EHV gas, where most free carbon is locked in CO.
• SiO is often enhanced at the highest velocities, a signature of recent, strong shock activity and/or primary wind composition.
• In the outflow "wings," slower components (s-wing) are relatively richer in molecules like CH₃OH and H₂CO, while fast wings show enhanced SiO and HCN before a steep drop in C-bearing species in the EHV regime.

Such velocity-dependent chemistry is not explained by classic shock models alone; the EHV gas chemical signature is best interpreted as reflecting a primary, dense, jet-like wind from the inner protostar or disk, while the wings trace shock-accelerated ambient gas (Tafalla et al., 2010).

3. Origins, Kinematics, and Emission Structure

The physical origin of EHVOs differs across contexts but is always closely related to the dynamics of powerful outflows and their launching mechanisms.

Star-Forming Environments

• In protostellar sources, EHVOs manifest as compact, high-density "bullets" (n ≈ 10⁵–10⁶ cm⁻³) with kinematically distinct, high-velocity SiO/CO emission, sometimes associated with observable knots or episodic mass ejections (Gómez-Ruiz et al., 2013, Tychoniec et al., 2019, Matsushita et al., 2018).
• Observed dynamical timescales are shorter for the EHV jets than the associated lower-velocity outflows, and precession or wiggling is sometimes seen, evidencing episodic or variable jet launching (Matsushita et al., 2018).
• Excitation conditions (from LVG analysis) indicate higher kinetic temperatures (≥100 K, in some cases up to 1000–1800 K at the fastest velocities) and high gas densities in the EHV regime (Gómez-Ruiz et al., 2012, Su et al., 2011).
• Jet-driven bow shocks are often invoked as the primary mechanism for the observed gas acceleration and heating; Hubble-like kinematic structures, where velocity increases with distance from the central driving source, are common (Su et al., 2011, Qiu et al., 2011).
• EHV jets generally carry a significant, though not always dominant, share of the outflow force and momentum, indicating a complex interplay between jet and wind components (Tychoniec et al., 2019).

Extragalactic Environments

• In quasars and luminous AGN, EHVOs are revealed by extremely broad (Δv up to 50,000 km s⁻¹) C IV, N V, O VI absorption troughs, often with multiple components or rapid variability (Hidalgo et al., 19 Aug 2025, Hidalgo et al., 2010, Rogerson et al., 2015, Hidalgo et al., 2020).
• In certain sources, blueshifted CIV emission lines co-occur with fast absorption, linking the BLR dynamics directly to wind launching processes (Vietri et al., 10 Sep 2025).
• EHVOs are often found in the most luminous, optically/X-ray weak, or heavily dust-reddened systems (ERQs) where feedback effects may be maximized (Vietri et al., 10 Sep 2025, Perrotta et al., 2019).
• The velocity structure can exhibit changes over timescales of months to years, often indicating clumpiness and dynamical evolution in the outflowing gas (Hidalgo et al., 19 Aug 2025, Rogerson et al., 2015).
• In massive starbursts or post-AGB phases (e.g., W49N, IRAS 08005-2356), EHVOs are associated with extremely energetic, often bipolar, jet-like outflows interacting with the circumstellar/interstellar medium (Liu et al., 2015, Sahai et al., 2015).

4. Observational Diagnostics, Analysis Techniques, and Representative Formulas

The identification and quantification of EHVOs employ high-resolution spectroscopic measurements, molecular line mapping, and multi-wavelength photometry.

Key diagnostics and techniques:

• For molecular outflows: spectral imaging (e.g., CO, SiO, SO, CH₃OH), position–velocity diagrams, LVG and RADEX modeling for temperature and density estimation (Gómez-Ruiz et al., 2012, Qiu et al., 2011).
• In AGN/quasars: Voigt or Gaussian decomposition of broad absorption features, Apparent Optical Depth (AOD) analysis, forward-modeling with non-parametric codes (e.g., SimBAL) to constrain column density, covering fraction, and ionization (Hidalgo et al., 19 Aug 2025, Rogerson et al., 2015).
• Formulas for column density (e.g., for subthermal excitation):

$$N_{u} = \frac{8 \pi k \nu^{2} W}{h c^{3} A_{ul}}\left[1 - \frac{e^{h \nu / k T_{ex}} - 1}{e^{h \nu / k T_{bg}} - 1}\right]^{-1}$$

• For AGN, the kinetic luminosity of the outflow scales steeply with velocity:

$L_{KE} = \frac{1}{2} \dot{M}_{out} v^2$

Or more generally, given the mass outflow rate $\dot{M}_{out}$, distance $R$, column density $N_H$, and global covering factor $C_f$, the expression used is:

$L_{KE} = \frac{1}{2} \Omega R \mu m_p N_H v^3$

where $\Omega$ is the global solid angle fraction, $\mu m_p$ is the mean particle mass.

The balnicity index (BI), a measure of the absorption depth and width, quantifies the overall outflow strength in quasar spectra (Vietri et al., 10 Sep 2025).

5. Impact on Feedback, Evolution, and Astrochemical Processing

EHVOs are hypothesized to be critical mediators of kinetic feedback in both galactic and extragalactic scales.

• Owing to the steep scaling $P_{\rm kin} \propto v^3$, even a small fraction of gas at extreme velocities can dominate the kinetic energy and play a decisive role in regulating star formation (negative feedback) or driving evolutionary transitions (e.g., transitions in quasar/host properties, shutdown of star formation).
• In protostellar systems, EHVOs carry momentum and energy that can shape the natal envelope, influence disk evolution, and set the initial conditions for further collapse or dispersal (Tychoniec et al., 2019, Matsushita et al., 2018).
• In AGNs and quasars, massive EHVOs with $\log\,L_{KE}\sim46.5$–$47.2$ [erg s⁻¹] are found to have $L_{KE}/L_{Bol}$ ratios ($>0.1$) sufficient to drive feedback in semi-analytic models of galaxy-quasar co-evolution (Hidalgo et al., 19 Aug 2025).
• The chemical processing in EHV gas, notably enhanced SiO and O-bearing molecules, underpins shock astrochemistry and the enrichment of the surrounding interstellar medium (Tafalla et al., 2010, Tychoniec et al., 2019).

Table: Selected physical properties of EHVOs in different environments

Context	Kinetic energy	Column density (log N_H [cm⁻²])	Distance from source	Mass outflow rate [M_☉/yr]
Protostar jets	$10^{45}-10^{46}$ erg	20.5–22	100–10,000 au	$<$1–10
Quasar EHVOs	$10^{46.5}-10^{47.2}$	21.6–21.8	5–30 pc	20–290+

6. Special Cases and Outlier Phenomena

Several noteworthy phenomena and sources exemplify or challenge the canonical EHVO paradigm:

• Eta Carinae’s Great Eruption light echoes reveal velocities ($\pm$20,000 km s⁻¹) unprecedented in non-terminal star eruptions, representing wide-angle explosive mass loss and highlighting the possibility of blastwave acceleration mechanisms in massive stars (Smith et al., 2018).
• In pre-planetary nebulae, EHVOs are sometimes attributed to accretion disk-driven jets rather than radiation pressure or single-star winds, with inferred scalar momenta exceeding what can be supplied by the stellar luminosity (Sahai et al., 2015).
• In the most luminous quasars (e.g., SMSS J2157–3602), EHVOs persist over years, with unusual properties such as strong blueshifted CIV emission and extreme X-ray weakness (likely facilitating the necessary ionization conditions for sustained, efficient line driving) (Vietri et al., 10 Sep 2025).

7. Outstanding Issues and Future Directions

Critical open questions remain regarding the launching mechanisms, covering fraction, spatial structure, and feedback coupling efficiency of EHVOs.

• Theoretical challenges arise in reproducing single or multi-component ultra-fast outflows, as current radiation-pressure and MHD wind models often have difficulty reaching $v>0.1c$ without overionization, unless specific conditions (such as X-ray weakness, high covering factor, or favorable SED) are invoked (Hidalgo et al., 2010, Vietri et al., 10 Sep 2025).
• The variability properties and time-domain evolution of EHVOs are yet to be fully mapped; multi-epoch monitoring is required for accurate distance, density, and structure determinations (e.g., recombination time analysis, coverage fraction variability) (Hidalgo et al., 19 Aug 2025, Rogerson et al., 2015).
• Dedicated high-resolution, multi-wavelength (including UV, mm, and X-ray) campaigns are needed to characterize the geometry, multiphase structure, and energy budget of EHVOs, and to combine emission–absorption diagnostics (Hidalgo et al., 2022).
• Quantifying the overall occurrence rate, redshift evolution, and feedback impact of EHVOs, both in star-forming disks and AGN-driven flows, is a central focus for future observational and theoretical research (Hidalgo et al., 2020, Hidalgo et al., 2022).

---

EHVOs thus represent a distinct high-velocity and high-energy phenomenon with unique chemical and physical signatures, crucial for understanding the feedback processes that regulate the growth and evolution of stars, protostellar systems, and galaxies on cosmic scales.