Extragalactic Background Light (EBL)

• EBL is a diffuse radiation field spanning ultraviolet to far-infrared wavelengths that records the integrated energy release from stellar nucleosynthesis, AGN activity, and potentially exotic sources.
• High-precision measurements employ space-based photometry and gamma-ray absorption techniques to overcome challenges posed by dominant foregrounds such as zodiacal light and interstellar dust.
• Analyzing the EBL aids in constraining the universe’s star formation rate, reionization epoch, and the potential contribution of diffuse and unresolved cosmic components.

The Extragalactic Background Light (EBL) is the diffuse radiation field permeating the universe from the ultraviolet through the far-infrared, representing the cumulative, redshifted radiative output of all extragalactic sources since the epoch of recombination. The EBL encodes the integrated history of energy release by stellar nucleosynthesis, accretion processes in active galactic nuclei, and potentially non-stellar and exotic phenomena across cosmic time. A precise, absolute measurement of the EBL spectrum is crucial to quantifying the total radiative content of the universe, uncovering the history of galaxy and structure formation, and constraining the contribution from any diffuse or truly non-resolved sources. Despite its importance, the EBL remains one of the least precisely measured backgrounds due to dominant foregrounds, particularly zodiacal and interstellar dust emission, and complex instrumental systematics (0902.2372).

1. Measurement Strategies and Challenges

Measuring the EBL with astrophysically significant precision requires direct absolute photometry across the UV/optical to far-infrared wavelengths, which is made difficult by intense foregrounds such as zodiacal light (scattered sunlight by interplanetary dust, with a radial density profile ∝ r^–3/2), diffuse galactic light, and the Earth's atmosphere. The typical EBL signal lies orders of magnitude below these foregrounds.

Several key methodologies are identified:

• Space-based absolute photometry with instruments such as HST (optical/UV), DIRBE on COBE (1.25–240 μm), IRTS (1–4 μm), and FIRAS (>200 μm), to establish the EBL baseline.
• Integrated galaxy counts and stacking (indirect method): Deep surveys provide cumulative intensities (e.g., 6–9 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹ at 3.6 μm from counts versus ~13.3 ± 2.8 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹ from DIRBE).
• High-energy gamma-ray absorption: Analysis of TeV spectra of blazars, where γ + γ (EBL) → e⁺ + e⁻ pair production creates a detectable absorption feature, indirectly constraining the EBL spectral shape.
• Foreground mitigation: Performing observations at >5 AU or above the ecliptic plane reduces zodiacal light by over two orders of magnitude, enabling more reliable absolute photometry and on-board spectroscopy (e.g., monitoring scattered Fraunhofer lines).

Foreground subtraction and instrumental calibration are principal limiting factors. Even advanced zodiacal light models can yield 50–100% differences at EBL-relevant wavelengths. In the far-IR, confusion from the large PSF and diffuse galactic emission complicates source separation. Instruments not dedicated to absolute photometry (e.g., HST) require meticulous calibration (e.g., dark current subtraction) (0902.2372).

2. The EBL as a Record of Cosmic Star Formation and Accretion

The EBL is the integral record of the photon production by the first stars, protogalaxies, galaxies, and accreting supermassive black holes across cosmic history. Its UV–IR spectrum reflects both direct emission from stellar nucleosynthesis and dust-reprocessed starlight, with additional potential contributions from non-stellar processes:

• Stellar nucleosynthesis: The dominant energy source, primarily from 85% of galaxy light emitted at z < 1.5, as inferred from deep surveys and stacking. The EBL thus serves as a fossil record of the cosmic star formation rate (SFR), metal enrichment, and accretion history.
• Reionization era: The EBL encodes the luminosity and timing of the first-light sources' contribution to reionization, manifesting as a redshifted recombination line signature (notably Ly α) in the near-infrared.
• Non-stellar energy sources: Discrepancies between absolute photometry and integrated star count intensities suggest possible additional contributions from highly obscured AGN dust torii, early black holes or miniquasars, or even exotic particle decay.

The EBL thus constrains the cosmic histories of accretion (e.g., AGN growth through obscured phases), nucleosynthesis, and reionization, providing complementary information to direct observations and SFR reconstructions (0902.2372).

3. Diffuse and Unresolved Components

A critical ongoing issue is the existence (and origin) of any diffuse component of the EBL not attributable to discrete, resolved sources:

• Optical/near-IR: Integrated light from galaxies is consistently less than direct EBL measurements (e.g., from DIRBE or IRTS), which may indicate a faint, diffuse background.
• Interpretation ambiguity: Residual foregrounds, especially zodiacal light, complicate assessment of whether excess EBL is truly extragalactic. For example, the IRTS excess at 1 μm may arise from incomplete zodiacal subtraction.
• Far-IR: There may be a significant diffuse component in the far-infrared from intergalactic dust, not associated with individual galaxies. The presence of such a component would impact both the energy budget and observational probes (e.g., supernova-based dark energy measurements).

Any detection of significant diffuse EBL beyond the resolved galaxies would imply either new poorly-detected astrophysical populations or genuinely diffuse cosmological sources (0902.2372).

4. The Reionization Epoch Signal

The reionization epoch is expected to imprint a distinct, redshifted near-infrared signature in the EBL. Theoretical estimates predict a contribution of ~1 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹ to the near-IR EBL from first stars during reionization.

• Chronometry of reionization: Detecting this faint EBL increment (with <0.1 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹ uncertainties between 0.8 and 2 μm) would enable robust timing and luminosity constraints for first-light sources, independent of ambiguities in the optical depth detected by CMB experiments.
• Observational requirements: Achieving this precision necessitates wide-field imaging (≥1 deg²) with deep sensitivity (~few hundred nJy), best accomplished outside the zodiacal cloud to suppress foregrounds—an essential consideration for future dedicated missions (0902.2372).

5. Observational Uncertainties and Foreground Mitigation

Accurate EBL measurement is hindered by multiple systematic and astrophysical uncertainties:

• Zodiacal light (ZL): The most severe foreground for optical/near-IR EBL, exceeding the EBL by several orders of magnitude. Foreground modeling and subtraction are highly uncertain, with density scaling as r^–3/2 (where r is heliocentric distance).
• Dust and source confusion: At far-IR wavelengths, the principal challenges are interstellar dust emission and confusion noise due to the diffraction-limited PSF.
• Instrument systematics: Absolute photometry demands careful removal of instrumental artifacts, such as dark current and scattered light, which are difficult for non-dedicated instruments.
• Mitigation strategies: The only robust method to minimize ZL is to observe at heliocentric distances of 5 AU or more, or at high inclination above the ecliptic, where ZL is reduced by >2 orders of magnitude. Onboard absolute spectroscopy, including monitoring scattered solar line strengths (Fraunhofer lines), can further aid in constraining and subtracting residual ZL.

The paper notes that current techniques can reliably determine the EBL to only within an order of magnitude. Achieving astrophysically interesting accuracy (e.g., <15%) will require integrated imaging and spectroscopy outside the main foreground sources (0902.2372).

6. Quantitative Discrepancies and Energy Budget

A notable feature of current EBL research is the observed deficit between the summed light from known galaxies and the directly measured EBL, particularly at 3.6 μm (6–9 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹ from counts versus ~13.3 ± 2.8 nW m⁻² sr⁻¹ from DIRBE). This discrepancy:

• May reflect* underestimated contributions from the faint end of population distributions or low-surface brightness galaxies missed in surveys.
• Alternatively suggests energy release via channels other than standard stellar nucleosynthesis, including AGN, compact objects, or speculative particle decay processes.

To resolve these discrepancies and accurately establish the total radiative budget of the universe, there is a need for precision photometry extending across the full optical to far-IR EBL spectrum and down to the relevant flux limits (0902.2372).

---

In summary, the EBL is both a cumulative cosmological energy reservoir and a sensitive probe of the universe’s star formation, accretion, and reionization history. Direct measurement is hampered by bright foregrounds, particularly zodiacal light, and high-precision observation requires vantage points beyond 5 AU or outside the ecliptic plane. Discrepancies between integrated galaxy counts and absolute EBL measurements suggest either the presence of genuinely diffuse background components or new, faint populations or processes contributing to the cosmic photon budget. Future missions capable of precise, foreground-free absolute photometry and spectroscopy across the entire EBL spectrum will be required to resolve the cosmic radiative content to the level demanded by astrophysical and cosmological studies.