Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Entanglement Wedge Cross-Section (EWCS)

Updated 5 January 2026
  • EWCS is a geometric quantity that quantifies mixed-state entanglement in holographic QFTs by identifying the minimal bulk surface bisecting the entanglement wedge.
  • It is conjectured to be the holographic dual of measures like entanglement of purification and reflected entropy, offering refined insights into quantum correlations.
  • EWCS dynamics reveal critical behaviors, phase transitions, and multipartite entanglement, making it a vital tool for exploring holographic quantum systems.

The entanglement wedge cross-section (EWCS) is a geometric quantity defined for mixed states in holographic quantum field theories, corresponding to the minimal-area bulk surface that bisects the entanglement wedge between prescribed boundary regions. EWCS offers a refined measure of mixed-state quantum correlations and is conjectured to be the holographic dual of several correlation measures, including entanglement of purification, reflected entropy, odd entropy, and logarithmic negativity. Its behavior encodes the structure and dynamics of entanglement in holographic models beyond the capabilities of entanglement entropy and mutual information.

1. Geometric Definition and Holographic Prescription

For two disjoint boundary regions AA, BB in a quantum field theory with a gravity dual, the entanglement wedge W[AB]\mathcal{W}[A \cup B] in the bulk is defined as the spacetime region bounded by ABA \cup B and the minimal (Ryu–Takayanagi, RT) surface γAB\gamma_{A \cup B}. The EWCS, denoted EW(A:B)E_W(A:B), is the minimal-area codimension-two surface ΣA:B\Sigma_{A:B} contained within W[AB]\mathcal{W}[A \cup B], homologous to a partition into AA and BB, i.e., splitting the wedge into two subregions anchored to AA and BB respectively. The holographic dictionary reads: EW(A:B)=minΣA:BW[AB]Area(ΣA:B)4GNE_W(A:B) = \min_{\Sigma_{A:B} \subset \mathcal{W}[A \cup B]} \frac{\mathrm{Area}(\Sigma_{A:B})}{4G_N} where GNG_N is the bulk Newton constant. In AdS3_3/CFT2_2, the formula reduces to EW(A:B)=(c/6)log[(1+x)/(1x)]E_W(A:B) = (c/6) \log[(1+\sqrt{x})/(1-\sqrt{x})] for two intervals at cross-ratio xx (Basak et al., 2020, Dutta et al., 2019, Tamaoka, 2018).

2. Relation to Mixed-State Entanglement Measures

EWCS has been proposed as a holographic dual for several entanglement measures:

  • Entanglement of Purification (EPE_P): EP(A:B)EW(A:B)E_P(A:B) \equiv E_W(A:B) in large-NN holography (Dutta et al., 2019).
  • Reflected Entropy (SRS_R): SR(A:B)=2EW(A:B)S_R(A:B) = 2E_W(A:B), with SRS_R defined via canonical purification (GNS state) (Dutta et al., 2019).
  • Odd Entanglement Entropy (OEE): EW(A:B)=So(ρAB)S(ρAB)E_W(A:B) = S_o(\rho_{AB}) - S(\rho_{AB}) for the partially transposed density matrix (Tamaoka, 2018).
  • Logarithmic Negativity: For certain cases (e.g., intervals in AdS3_3), logarithmic negativity is related to EWCS through algebraic geodesic combinations (Basak et al., 2020).

These identifications have been established via replica methods, cosmic brane backreaction, modular flow, and explicit CFT computations, particularly in the large central charge limit (Dutta et al., 2019, Basak et al., 2020, Tamaoka, 2018, Kusuki et al., 2019). The Markov gap—a universal additive constant relating SRS_R and mutual information—is observed in AdS3_3/CFT2_2 (Basak et al., 2020).

3. Critical Behavior and Dynamical Properties

EWCS displays distinctive critical and dynamic signatures in diverse holographic models:

  • Superconducting Phase Transitions: In holographic pp- and ss-wave superconductor models, EWCS exhibits critical behavior at phase transition points, including an exponent αEWCS=1\alpha_{EWCS}=1, twice that of the condensate, and more rapid convergence to its asymptotic exponent than entanglement entropy (HEE), rendering EWCS a sharper probe for critical phenomena (Yang et al., 2023).
  • Massive Gravity and Axion Gravity: EWCS characterizes both first- and second-order phase transitions, decreasing as temperature is lowered through TcT_c, and diverging in slope at criticality (scaling exponents 1/3\sim1/3 or model-dependent) (Liu et al., 2021, Cheng et al., 2021).
  • Non-monotonicity: EWCS exhibits non-monotonic dependence on certain parameters (e.g., Lorentz-violation, axion coupling), unlike HEE or MI, signaling its sensitivity to intricate mixed-state correlations (Chen et al., 2021, Cheng et al., 2021).
  • Mutual Information vs. EWCS: Near transitions, the mutual information can exceed EWCS in relative growth rate, reflecting that MI includes both classical and quantum correlations while EWCS isolates quantum purifiable correlations (Yang et al., 2023, Liu et al., 2021).

4. Multipartite Entanglement and Inequalities

EWCS serves as a probe of multipartite and assisted entanglement structure:

  • Weak Monogamy: EWCS does not universally satisfy conventional monogamy or polygamy but obeys weaker inequalities, such as W(A:BC)+12I(A:BC)W(A:B)+W(A:C)W(A:BC) + \tfrac{1}{2} I(A:BC) \geq W(A:B) + W(A:C), and squared-EWCS monogamy, [W(A:BC)]2[W(A:B)]2+[W(A:C)]2[W(A:BC)]^2 \geq [W(A:B)]^2 + [W(A:C)]^2 (Jain et al., 2022).
  • Triangle Information and Assistance: EWCS triangle information EIΔ(A:BE)EI_\Delta(A:B|E) quantifies assisted entanglement among AA, BB, and EE, is nonnegative, and is bounded above by entanglement of assistance; its maximization displays rich phase-structure governed by boundary cross-ratios (Ju et al., 25 Dec 2025).
  • Tripartite Correlations: The large discrepancy between EWCS (or reflected entropy) and mutual information demonstrates that holographic theories require genuine multipartite (especially tripartite) entanglement at leading order in 1/GN1/G_N (Akers et al., 2019).

5. Covariant Formulation and Higher-Derivative Corrections

The computation and interpretation of EWCS extend beyond Einstein gravity and static setups:

  • Covariant EWCS and Anomalies: In 2D CFTs, balanced partial entanglement (BPE) in various purifications coincides with EWCS and reflected entropy, even in covariant scenarios and in the presence of gravitational anomalies. In topological massive gravity (TMG), additional boundary data (e.g., Chern–Simons terms encoding boost angles) must be supplied to properly define EWCS (Wen et al., 2022).
  • Gauss–Bonnet Gravity: Higher-curvature corrections increase EWCS and shift the disentangling transition to larger separation; dynamic quenches display non-monotonic evolution of the critical separation for disentanglement (Li et al., 2021).

6. Time-Dependent Phenomena and Quenches

EWCS dynamics under time evolution reveal detailed features of thermalization, quenches, and operator insertions:

  • Vaidya Thermalization: EWCS exhibits three scaling regimes after a global quench: early quadratic growth, intermediate linear growth, and late saturation. The linear growth velocity matches that of entanglement entropy, and in nonrelativistic backgrounds, EWCS scaling is governed by the dynamical Lifshitz exponent zz but not hyperscaling violation parameter θ\theta (Velni et al., 2023, Velni et al., 2020).
  • Localized Shock and Quenches: EWCS in shock wave geometries shows plateauing behavior and late-time correspondence with reflected entropy, consistent with line-tension (bit-thread) pictures and analytic results in high-TT limit (Boruch, 2020).
  • 2D CFT Quenches: The time-dependent EWCS following local operator quenches encodes both quantum and classical correlations, exhibiting regimes where reflected entropy exceeds or falls below mutual information, highlighting the role of classical information in dynamical holographic subregion/subregion duality (Kusuki et al., 2019).

7. Physical Significance and Implications

EWCS constitutes a universally UV-finite, geometry-based diagnostic of mixed-state correlations in holographic QFTs:

  • It discriminates quantum, distillable (purifiable) entanglement from total correlation captured by mutual information (Yang et al., 2023, Liu et al., 2021).
  • It encompasses classical correlations in addition to quantum ones and can exceed conventional quantum measures in appropriate regimes (Umemoto, 2019).
  • It is particularly sensitive to critical behavior, capable of resolving phase transitions and order onset more sharply than entanglement entropy, mutual information, or other geometric observables.
  • Its behavior persists in nonrelativistic theories, singular geometries (corners, creases), and RG flows, with area-law scaling present in all cases (Velni et al., 2019, Jokela et al., 2019).

Together, these findings position EWCS as a central tool in the study of mixed-state entanglement, multipartite correlations, and phase structure in strongly coupled holographic systems, highlighting both universal properties and model-dependent subtleties relevant for quantum information theory, gravitational physics, and condensed matter applications.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Entanglement Wedge Cross-Section (EWCS).

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube