Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Energy Bounds for Kantorovich Transport Distances

Updated 27 December 2025
  • The paper establishes sharp energy bounds for Kantorovich transport distances by relating optimal transport costs with dual Sobolev-type norms using general convex cost functions.
  • The approach leverages Kantorovich duality and variational optimization techniques to extend classical Wasserstein estimates to a broader class of super-linear cost functions satisfying a Δ₂ condition.
  • Results unify multiple functional inequalities in analysis, probability, and geometry, enabling applications in nonlinear PDEs, empirical measure convergence, and concentration phenomena.

Energy bounds for Kantorovich transport distances quantify the relationship between optimal transport costs for general convex cost functions and certain dual Sobolev-type norms of signed measures. These energy bounds unify and extend fundamental inequalities for Wasserstein distances, most notably estimates originating with Ledoux for power costs, to the full class of convex, super-linear cost functions satisfying a generalized Δ₂ condition. The structure of these results illuminates deep connections among optimal transport theory, functional inequalities, nonlinear PDEs, and regularity theory, and provides explicit constants dependent on the Young function geometry associated to the cost.

1. Mathematical Setup: Convex Costs and Young Functions

Let X=Rn\mathcal X=\mathbb R^n, and define a Borel measurable cost function c:X×X[0,)c:\mathcal X\times\mathcal X\to[0,\infty) via

c(x,y)=L(xy),c(x,y) = L(x-y),

where L:Rn[0,)L:\mathbb R^n\to[0,\infty) is convex, L(0)=0L(0)=0, and strictly positive away from the origin. The function LL must satisfy super-linear growth,

L(x)x+as x,\frac{L(x)}{\|x\|} \to +\infty \quad \text{as} \ \|x\| \to \infty,

as well as a two-sided Δ2\Delta_2–condition: there exists C>0C>0 such that

L(2x)CL(x)xRn.L(2x) \leq C\,L(x) \quad \forall x\in\mathbb R^n.

Associated to LL is the “Young function”

ΦL(r)=supx0L(rx)L(x)(r0),\Phi_L(r) = \sup_{x\neq0} \frac{L(rx)}{L(x)} \quad (r\geq0),

which is finite, convex, increasing, with ΦL(1)=1\Phi_L(1)=1. The one-sided derivatives at $1$,

p=ΦL(1),p+=ΦL(1+)p_- = \Phi_L'(1-), \quad p_+ = \Phi_L'(1+)

satisfy 1pp+1\le p_-\le p_+ and play a central role in determining the constants in energy bounds.

The Kantorovich transport distance for LL is

WL(μ,ν)=infπΠ(μ,ν)Rn×RnL(xy)dπ(x,y),W_L(\mu,\nu) = \inf_{\pi\in\Pi(\mu,\nu)} \int_{\mathbb R^n\times\mathbb R^n} L(x-y)\,d\pi(x,y),

for probability measures μ,ν\mu,\nu with finite LL-energy.

The dual Sobolev (“energy”) norm is defined by using the Legendre transform LL^*,

L(u)=supvRn{u,vL(v)},L^*(u) = \sup_{v\in\mathbb R^n} \{ \langle u,v\rangle - L(v) \},

so that for a reference probability λ\lambda,

νμH1,L(λ)=sup{fd(νμ):L(f)dλ1, fCc}.\|\nu-\mu\|_{H^{-1,L}(\lambda)} = \sup \Big\{ \int f\,d(\nu-\mu) : \int L^*(\nabla f)\,d\lambda \leq 1,\ f\in C_c^\infty \Big\}.

When L(v)=vpL(v)=\|v\|^p, this recovers the negative Sobolev norm H1,p\|\cdot\|_{H^{-1,p}}.

2. Main Energy Bounds and Sharp Constants

The two central theorems generalize Ledoux’s estimate from power costs to general convex LL. For μ,νP(Rn)\mu,\nu\in\mathcal P(\mathbb R^n) with L(xy)dμ(x)dν(y)<\iint L(x-y)\,d\mu(x)\,d\nu(y)<\infty:

  • Theorem 1 (absolutely continuous case): If νμdx\nu\ll\mu\ll dx,

WL(μ,ν)AΦL(νμH1,L(μ)),A=ΦL(p+).W_L(\mu,\nu) \leq A\,\Phi_L\left(\|\nu-\mu\|_{H^{-1,L}(\mu)}\right), \quad A=\Phi_L(p_+).

For power costs L(v)=vpL(v)=\|v\|^p, ΦL(r)=rp\Phi_L(r)=r^p, A=ppA=p^p, and this yields Wp(μ,ν)pνμH1,p(μ)W_p(\mu,\nu)\le p \|\nu-\mu\|_{H^{-1,p}(\mu)}.

  • Theorem 2 (general case): If p>1p_->1, for arbitrary μ,ν\mu,\nu,

WL(μ,ν)AΦL(νμH1,L(μ)),W_L(\mu,\nu)\leq A\,\Phi_L\left(\|\nu-\mu\|_{H^{-1,L}(\mu)}\right),

with improved constant

A=ΦL(p+)ΦL(1γ),γ=sup{a+br:a+brmin(rp+,rp)    r0}(0,1].A = \Phi_L(p_+)\,\Phi_L\left(\frac{1}{\gamma}\right), \qquad \gamma = \sup\left\{ a+br : a+br\le\min(r^{p_+},r^{p_-})\;\;\forall r\ge0 \right\}\in(0,1].

The exact form of AA reflects the local geometry determined by LL near the identity.

3. Proof Techniques: Dual Formulations and Optimization

The establishment of these energy bounds relies on several key analytic structures:

  • Kantorovich duality and Hopf–Lax formula: The transport cost WL(μ,ν)W_L(\mu,\nu) admits the dual representation,

WL(μ,ν)=supfCb(Rn){Q1fdνfdμ},W_L(\mu,\nu) = \sup_{f\in C_b(\mathbb R^n)} \left\{ \int Q_1 f\,d\nu - \int f\,d\mu \right\},

where QtQ_t is the Hopf–Lax semigroup,

Qtf(x)=infyRn{f(y)+tL(xyt)},Q_t f(x) = \inf_{y\in\mathbb R^n} \left\{ f(y) + t L\left(\frac{x-y}{t}\right) \right\},

satisfying the Hamilton–Jacobi equation tQtf=L(Qtf)\partial_t Q_t f = -L^*(\nabla Q_t f).

  • Coupling with dual-norm: For φ=dν/dμ\varphi=d\nu/d\mu, g=φ1g=\varphi-1, and smooth ff, consideration of the path ux(t)=(1+θ(t)g(x))Qtf(x)f(x)u_x(t) = (1+\theta(t)g(x)) Q_t f(x) - f(x) with suitable path θ\theta and exploitation of the dual Sobolev inequality enable bounding the dual formulation in terms of νμH1,L(μ)\|\nu-\mu\|_{H^{-1,L}(\mu)}.
  • Variational optimization: Optimizing over the path θ:[0,1][0,1]\theta:[0,1]\to[0,1] subject to a specific ODE yields the sharp constant AA and ensures the energy bound is attained.

These steps generalize the “infimum-convolution + dual-Sobolev” approach pioneered by Bobkov and Götze to arbitrary convex cost functions.

4. Special Cases and Connections to Orlicz and Mixed Norms

The framework encompasses and unites several important cases:

  • Power costs L(v)=vpL(v)=\|v\|^p: Recovers Ledoux’s sharp energy bound with A=ppA=p^p.
  • Orlicz costs L(v)=V(v)L(v) = V(\|v\|), where VV is a convex Young function: The resulting bounds are governed by the associated Young function ΦL(r)=sups>0V(rs)/V(s)\Phi_L(r) = \sup_{s>0}V(rs)/V(s), extending energy bounds into the Orlicz–Wasserstein regime.
  • Mixed costs such as L(v)=vplog(1+v)L(v) = \|v\|^p\log(1+\|v\|): Provided the two-sided Δ2\Delta_2-condition holds, energy bounds apply, capturing a broader class of transportation metrics beyond polynomial growth.

These generalizations reveal how the underlying geometry induced by the cost LL dictates both analytic and probabilistic properties of the associated optimal transport metric.

5. Applications in Analysis, Probability, and Geometry

Energy bounds for transport distances have deep implications across several domains:

  • Quantitative rates for empirical measures: The inequalities control the expected optimal transport error, e.g., for WL(μN,λ)W_L(\mu_N, \lambda) where μN\mu_N is an empirical measure, in high-dimensional statistical settings.
  • Nonlinear PDEs: The Hamilton–Jacobi formalism allows derivation of gradient-flow structures and large deviation-type estimates for models of diffusion with non-quadratic mobility or transport cost.
  • Geometric analysis: The transport-inequality framework extends isoperimetric and concentration results to metric-measure spaces with convex cost structure, pushing beyond classical W2W_2 settings.
  • Functional inequalities: The approach simultaneously encompasses Poincaré, log–Sobolev, and Orlicz-type inequalities, integrating them in a single transport-energy perspective, unifying previously distinct analytic inequalities.

A plausible implication is a more unified treatment of concentration and stability phenomena in geometric analysis, driven by the explicit energy control afforded by these bounds (Bobkov et al., 20 Dec 2025).

The work on energy bounds for Kantorovich distances is situated within a wider context that includes:

  • The Kantorovich–Rubinstein duality, which for W1W_1 connects integration error to LL^\infty bounds of gradients, and recent work interpolating between such dual formulations and endpoint spaces, notably via Lorentz and Orlicz norms (Steinerberger, 2020).
  • The scaling limits and convergence of discrete optimal transport metrics, where analogous energy and Dirichlet-type functionals govern convergence of discrete-to-continuous transport structures in both finite and infinitesimal mesh settings (Gladbach et al., 2018).
  • The extension of transport inequalities to new metric-measure spaces, pointing toward broader classes of geometric or functional inequalities derivable via transport-energy methods.

Open questions persist regarding the precise spectrum of intermediate spaces linking various WpW_p and dual norms, and the potential to further generalize energy bounds to more singular or degenerate transport costs.


This synthesis encapsulates the sharp and general structure of energy bounds for Kantorovich transport distances, highlighting the explicit dependence on cost geometry through Young functions, the duality-driven analytic machinery, and the substantial breadth of applications in mathematics and statistics (Bobkov et al., 20 Dec 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (3)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Energy Bounds for Kantorovich Transport Distances.