Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Endpoint Boundedness of Toeplitz Operators

Updated 5 February 2026
  • The criterion characterizes boundedness by requiring weights to meet u-adapted Bekollè–Bonami conditions coupled with reverse Hölder regularity.
  • The approach uses sparse domination and dyadic decompositions to obtain weak-type (1,1) estimates for Toeplitz operators on weighted Bergman spaces.
  • Illustrative examples with radial and conformal Jacobian weights demonstrate both the sharpness of the result and its limitations in broader settings.

The endpoint boundedness criterion for Toeplitz operators describes necessary and sufficient conditions for extending these operators as bounded linear maps at critical values of the involved function space exponents, particularly in weighted Bergman spaces on the unit ball Cn\mathbb{C}^n. Central to this theory is the control exerted by the symbol uL(Bn)u \in L^{\infty}(\mathbb{B}_n) and the weighted classes σ\sigma drawn from the adapted Bekollè–Bonami weights, denoted BpB_p and related families, along with further regularity encoded by reverse Hölder conditions. Endpoint refers specifically to the weak-type (1,1)(1,1) result, addressing the most singular L1L^1 range where classical Calderón–Zygmund methods require significant modification.

1. Toeplitz Operators and Weighted Bergman Spaces

Toeplitz operators TuT_u on the Bergman space are defined via integral kernels,

Tuf(z)=BnK(z,w)u(w)f(w)dV(w),K(z,w)=1(1zw)n+1,T_u f(z) = \int_{\mathbb{B}_n} K(z, w) u(w) f(w)\, dV(w), \qquad K(z, w) = \frac{1}{(1 - z \cdot \overline{w})^{n+1}},

where uL(Bn)u\in L^\infty(\mathbb{B}_n) is the symbol and dVdV denotes normalized Lebesgue measure on the ball. Weighted theory situates this operator as acting naturally on spaces Lσ1=L1(Bn,dμ)L^1_\sigma = L^1(\mathbb{B}_n, d\mu) with dμ=σdVd\mu = \sigma\,dV, and one seeks the boundedness from Lσ1L^1_\sigma to weak-Lσ1L^1_\sigma (the endpoint Lσ1,L^{1,\infty}_\sigma) (Stockdale et al., 2021).

2. Endpoint Weak-Type (1,1)(1,1) Theorem

Let uL(Bn)u\in L^\infty(\mathbb{B}_n) and σ\sigma be a nonnegative locally integrable weight. The endpoint theorem states: Tu:Lσ1Lσ1, is boundedT_u : L^1_\sigma \to L^{1, \infty}_\sigma \text{ is bounded} if and only if σ\sigma belongs to the uu-adapted Bekollè–Bonami class uB1uB_1 and, in practice, satisfies a reverse Hölder property RHrRH_r for some r>1r>1.

More precisely, there exists C=C(n)C=C(n) such that

TuLσ1Lσ1,C[σ]uB1[σ]RHr(1+logr),r=rr1,\|T_u\|_{L^1_\sigma \to L^{1, \infty}_\sigma} \leq C\,[\sigma]_{uB_1}\,[\sigma]_{RH_r}\,(1+\log r'), \qquad r' = \frac{r}{r-1},

and if σ\sigma further satisfies a dyadic doubling condition, one obtains

TuLσ1Lσ1,([σ]uB1+1)log(e+[σ]B1).\|T_u\|_{L^1_\sigma \to L^{1, \infty}_\sigma} \lesssim ([\sigma]_{uB_1} + 1) \log (e + [\sigma]_{B_1}).

This result is sharp in all known cases; the logarithmic term is generally unavoidable when tracking dyadic decompositions (Stockdale et al., 2021).

Bekollè–Bonami classes BpB_p encode the compatibility of a weight ω\omega with the Bergman kernel on dyadic cube systems. Explicitly,

ωBp    [ω]Bp:=supe,KDeωKω1pKp1<\omega \in B_p \; \Longleftrightarrow \; [\omega]_{B_p} := \sup_{e, K\in\mathcal{D}^e} \langle \omega \rangle_K \, \langle \omega^{1-p'}\rangle_K^{p-1} < \infty

with p=pp1p' = \frac{p}{p-1} and ωK=1KKωdV\langle \omega \rangle_K = \frac{1}{|K|} \int_K \omega\, dV. For the endpoint p=1p=1,

$[\omega]_{B_1} := \sup_{e, K} \langle \omega \rangle_K \, \esssup_K(\omega^{-1}) < \infty.$

The class uB1uB_1 is defined by incorporating the supremum norm of uu over dyadic tents, and similar expressions hold for uBpuB_p.

Reverse Hölder classes RHrRH_r are given by

[σ]RHr:=supe,KσrK1/rσK1<,[\sigma]_{RH_r} := \sup_{e,\,K} \left\langle \sigma^r \right\rangle_K^{1/r} \left\langle \sigma \right\rangle_K^{-1} < \infty,

with weights in B1B_1 (under mild doubling) automatically in RHrRH_r for some r>1r>1 (Stockdale et al., 2021).

4. Sparse Domination and Calderón–Zygmund Methods

The proof utilizes sparse domination: for any ff,

Tuf(z)e=1MKDeuL(R)1RRfdV1K(z).|T_u f(z)| \lesssim \sum_{e=1}^M \sum_{K\in\mathcal{D}^e} \|u\|_{L^\infty(R)}\, \frac{1}{|R|}\int_R |f|\, dV \, \mathbf{1}_K(z).

A Calderón–Zygmund decomposition on the dyadic systems, together with weak-type (1,1)(1,1) control of the Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator, enables

μ{Tuf>2λ}[σ]uB1μ{M(uf)>λ}+k0Ck[σ]uB1μ{Tuf>2kλ}\mu\left\{ |T_u f| > 2\lambda \right\} \lesssim [\sigma]_{uB_1}\,\mu\left\{ M(uf)>\lambda \right\} + \sum_{k\ge 0} C_k [\sigma]_{uB_1}\, \mu\left\{ |T_u f| > 2^{-k} \lambda \right\}

with CkC_k decaying as a negative power of kk up to logarithms. Iteration and the choice of a Young function Φ(t)=tr\Phi(t)=t^r systematically produce the stated reverse Hölder dependence and weak–(1,1)(1,1) bound (Stockdale et al., 2021).

5. Illustrative Examples and Boundary Cases

  • Radial weights: For σb(z)=(1z2)b\sigma_b(z)=(1 - |z|^2)^b with b(1,0]b\in(-1, 0], σb\sigma_b satisfies B1B_1 with [σb]B111+b[\sigma_b]_{B_1} \sim \frac{1}{1+b} and doubling, giving

P:Lσb1Lσb1,,P11+blog(e+11+b).P:L^1_{\sigma_b} \to L^{1,\infty}_{\sigma_b},\quad \|P\| \lesssim \frac{1}{1+b} \log\left( e + \frac{1}{1+b} \right).

  • Conformal Jacobian weights: For gg univalent in D\mathbb{D} and σ=gα\sigma = |g'|^\alpha, σB1RHr\sigma \in B_1 \cap RH_r via Koebe distortion.
  • Limitations: Outside uB1uB_1 (even if σB1\sigma\in B_1), no general weak–(1,1)(1,1) bound is known and necessity remains open (Stockdale et al., 2021).

6. Summary and Significance

The endpoint boundedness theory for Toeplitz operators on weighted Bergman spaces characterizes the admissible weights for which the operator extends as weak-type (1,1)(1,1) from Lσ1L^1_\sigma to Lσ1,L^{1,\infty}_\sigma. This is achieved via the quantitative uB1uB_1 condition, reverse Hölder regularity, and compatibility with dyadic decomposition structures. All criteria are quantitative and checkable through Carleson-tent or dyadic-cube averages. The theory extends, with analogous structure, to related spaces and further general symbols, and sharp quantitative dependence in operator norms is obtained. This advances a rigorous framework for endpoint analysis in Bergman and related function spaces, elucidating the boundary between boundedness and failure in weighted singular integral settings (Stockdale et al., 2021).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Endpoint Boundedness Criterion for Toeplitz Operators.