Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries

Updated 14 January 2026
  • Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries are differences between electrons' and positrons' effective masses, probing violations of the Weak Equivalence Principle and CPT symmetry.
  • High-energy collider experiments and cosmological tests, including BBN, impose stringent bounds on these asymmetries via forbidden processes and modified dispersion relations.
  • Field-theoretic models with temperature-dependent CPT-violating effects show that mass asymmetries vanish at low temperatures while allowing keV-level gaps in the early universe.

Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries are experimentally constrained differences between the effective gravitational or inertial masses of the electron (e−e^-) and positron (e+e^+), as well as between their fundamental dispersion relations at finite temperature or in the presence of external backgrounds. These asymmetries directly probe foundational principles such as the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP), CPT symmetry, and extensions of General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory. Modern limits derive from both high-energy collider searches for forbidden processes and cosmological tests based on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN), spanning laboratory and early-universe regimes. Field-theoretic models that permit electron-positron mass splitting have been developed, including temperature-dependent CPT-violating backgrounds with distinctive T2T^2 scaling. The anomalous mass difference, denoted Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+} (or, in the gravitational sector, Δmg\Delta m_g), is subject to stringent experimental and observational bounds.

1. Theoretical Framework

The WEP postulates equivalence between inertial mass mm and gravitational mass mgm_g for all particle species; General Relativity assumes m=mgm = m_g universally, with extensive experimental confirmation at low energies for normal matter. For antimatter, and in particular for electrons/positrons at relativistic energies, direct experimental confirmation is lacking. Violations of WEP permit mg≠mm_g \neq m for e−e^- and e+e^+0, resulting in modified dispersion relations in external gravitational potentials.

Deviations are parametrized via e+e^+1 and expressed as a small expansion parameter e+e^+2, where e+e^+3 is the gravitational potential. The background metric in weak-field approximation takes the form: e+e^+4 For a test particle, the effective potential is e+e^+5, leading to the first-order dispersion relation

e+e^+6

This formalism underpins indirect experimental bounds via high-energy processes (Kalaydzhyan, 2015).

Temperature-dependent CPT-violating backgrounds introduce further asymmetries. A universal CPT-violating parameter e+e^+7 (with e+e^+8 of mass dimension e+e^+9) shifts the electron and positron masses: T2T^20 This allows for sizable early-universe mass gaps (T2T^21 keV at T2T^22 MeV) while automatically suppressing asymmetry at T2T^23 (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026).

2. Forbidden Processes and Experimental Constraints

High-energy collider experiments enable stringent indirect tests of mass asymmetry through kinematic investigations of forbidden processes:

  • Vacuum Cherenkov Radiation (T2T^24): If T2T^25, the electron (or positron) group velocity exceeds T2T^26, enabling spontaneous emission of real photons in vacuum above energy threshold T2T^27. Absence of this process for T2T^28 at T2T^29 GeV at LEP sets Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}0 GeV and thus Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}1.
  • Photon Decay (Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}2): For Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}3, photon decay to Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}4 becomes kinematically allowed above threshold Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}5. Non-observation for photons with Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}6 GeV at Tevatron implies Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}7.

Combining these with astrophysical potentials yields the key bounds (Kalaydzhyan, 2015):

Potential Choice Lower Bound Upper Bound Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}8 Bound
Sun's Potential (Δm≡me−−me+\Delta m \equiv m_{e^-} - m_{e^+}9) Δmg\Delta m_g0 Δmg\Delta m_g1 Δmg\Delta m_g2
Local Supercluster (Δmg\Delta m_g3) Δmg\Delta m_g4 Δmg\Delta m_g5 Δmg\Delta m_g6

A plausible implication is that antigravity-type scenarios (where antimatter is repelled by Earth) are excluded within these empirical limits.

3. Cosmological Tests: BBN Constraints

Early-universe electron-positron mass asymmetries are tightly constrained by their effects on Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN). The approach introduces: Δmg\Delta m_g7 Modified dispersion relations impact several key steps:

  • Friedmann Equation: The Hubble rate Δmg\Delta m_g8 depends on separate electron and positron contributions with shifted masses.
  • Chemical Potential Evolution: Charge neutrality is enforced via

Δmg\Delta m_g9

  • Weak Interactions: Neutron-proton conversion rates incorporate mm0 or mm1, modifying freeze-out conditions.
  • Nuclear Reaction Network: Observables mm2 (Helium-4 fraction), mm3 (deuterium-to-hydrogen ratio), and mm4 (effective relativistic degrees of freedom) are sensitive to mm5.

Numerical implementation is realized in the modified \texttt{PRyMordial} BBN code, with full finite-mass and chemical potential effects (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026). Linearized sensitivities are: mm6

mm7

mm8

Observational constraints (2mm9) lead to mgm_g0 GeVmgm_g1, mgm_g2 keV.

4. Field-Theoretic Models for Mass Asymmetry

Explicit field-theoretic mechanisms for temperature-dependent electron-positron mass asymmetry with mgm_g3 scaling have been constructed:

(a) Cubic Proca-Potential Model

A massive vector field mgm_g4 is introduced with the Lagrangian

mgm_g5

Analyzing the effective finite-mgm_g6 potential: mgm_g7 Minimization yields mgm_g8 and thus mass asymmetry mgm_g9.

(b) Scalar-Vector EFT with Phase Transition

A real scalar m=mgm = m_g0 couples to the vector via

m=mgm = m_g1

m=mgm = m_g2

For m=mgm = m_g3, the induced vacuum expectation value gives m=mgm = m_g4.

(c) PT-Symmetric Quantum-Mechanical Model

A non-Hermitian coordinate m=mgm = m_g5 with PT-symmetric Hamiltonian: m=mgm = m_g6 High-temperature thermal effective potential yields saddle-point m=mgm = m_g7.

In all models, m=mgm = m_g8 naturally vanishes as m=mgm = m_g9, ensuring restoration of CPT symmetry today.

5. Methodological Implementation and Computational Tools

Simulation of BBN with electron-positron mass asymmetries utilizes the public \texttt{PRyMordial} code, with key modifications:

  • Separate computation of electron/positron energy density and pressure for mg≠mm_g \neq m0.
  • Dynamical solution of charge neutrality condition for mg≠mm_g \neq m1.
  • Accurate weak mg≠mm_g \neq m2 rates including radiative and finite-mass effects, using mg≠mm_g \neq m3.
  • Incorporation of neutrino-electron collision terms with finite-mass corrections from the NUDEC_BSM_v2 tables, weighted by actual particle masses.
  • Rescaling of QED plasma corrections using mg≠mm_g \neq m4.
  • Enforcement of standard atomic mass-excess benchmarks to maintain nuclear binding energy normalization.

This approach permits extraction of constraints on mg≠mm_g \neq m5 and mg≠mm_g \neq m6 from observed mg≠mm_g \neq m7, mg≠mm_g \neq m8, and mg≠mm_g \neq m9 abundances (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026).

6. Implications, Limits, and Outlook

Current laboratory and cosmological data exclude large electron-positron mass asymmetries and antigravity scenarios at the levels probed. Collider bounds yield e−e^-0 (solar potential) and e−e^-1 (Local Supercluster potential) (Kalaydzhyan, 2015). In the early universe, BBN measurements constrain potential CPT-violating mass asymmetries to e−e^-2 1.6--2.6 keV, depending on observable (Barenboim et al., 9 Jan 2026).

A plausible implication is that any field-theoretic model aiming to explain observable effects via electron-positron mass splitting must satisfy stringent e−e^-3 bounds and vanish identically at laboratory temperatures. Complementary accelerator experiments at future facilities (ILC, CLIC) and precision cosmological surveys could further tighten constraints or uncover small violations. These tests probe both particle physics extensions and foundational principles in gravity and cosmology.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Electron-Positron Mass Asymmetries.