Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

ECLIPSE Framework: Modular Systems in Computing

Updated 6 December 2025
  • ECLIPSE Framework is a diverse suite of modular and extensible scientific systems integrating advanced modeling, constraint solving, simulation, and workflow management.
  • It features multi-layered architectures and configurable language extensions that enable seamless integration of native and external solver backends.
  • Real-world applications span quantum programming, edge/cloud simulation, workflow orchestration, and exoplanet spectral reduction, demonstrating its robust performance.

The ECLIPSE Framework encompasses a diverse set of software systems, pipeline architectures, and domain-specific platforms unified by their foundational focus on modeling, constraint solving, simulation, workflow management, and data-driven reduction across scientific and computational disciplines. While implementations and scope vary—spanning Prolog-based constraint logic programming (ECLiPSe), integrated modeling environments (Eclipse ICE), advanced quantum programming (Eclipse Qrisp), cloud-edge emulation (ECLYPSE), domain-specific modeling tools (EMF/GMF), secure protocol verification (AnBx IDE), and exoplanet spectral reduction (exoTEDRF, Eigenspectra)—common principles include modularity, extensibility, rigorous algorithmic pipelines, and technical depth appropriate for research and industrial deployment.

1. Foundational Architectures

ECLIPSE systems are typically distinguished by their multi-layered and modular architectures, optimized for extensibility, domain abstraction, and integration with both internal and external solver or computation engines.

  • ECLiPSe Constraint Logic Programming is structured around a layered architecture comprising an extended Warren Abstract Machine (WAM), low-level C/C++ VM bindings, Prolog kernel (suspensions, attributed variables), generic solver libraries, domain-specific solver APIs, high-level modeling constructs, and interfaces to external MP/IP solvers (eplex, Gecode) (Schimpf et al., 2010).
  • Eclipse ICE employs a tiered design: the Equinox/OSGi-based core provides stateless registry, workflow orchestration, and persistence, while the rich client platform ("Workbench") delivers the interactive and visualization UIs; Items implement finite-state workflow types and Actions encapsulate atomic tasks (Billings et al., 2017).
  • Eclipse Qrisp uses a Python-based DSL with IR-level optimizations, circuit synthesis, and interchangeable backends (native simulator, OpenQASM for IBM's QPU stack) (Osaba et al., 30 May 2024).
  • ECLYPSE features a Cython core for graph and parallel actor handling (Ray), Python-level environmental abstractions, and dynamic event/callback architectures enabling seamless simulation-emulation transitions (Massa et al., 28 Jan 2025).
  • Domain-specific Modeling (EMF/GMF) segments the meta-model (Ecore), diagram interface (GMF Graphical Mapping, Tooling, Generation), and runtime editor bundles, allowing generation of graphical DSLs for complex scenario modeling (Banerjee, 8 Sep 2025).

2. Algorithmic and Language Extensions

Modularity is reinforced by configurable language extensions and transformation processes tailored for specific use cases:

  • ECLiPSe introduces expanded Prolog syntax: array subscriptors, high-level loop constructs (do/2 with combinator specifiers), structures with named fields, exact rationals and interval types, and preprocessor macros for clause/goal/term expansion. All transformations remove syntactic sugar at parse-time for runtime efficiency (Schimpf et al., 2010).
  • Qrisp abstracts quantum logical variables, cost/mixer Hamiltonians, high-level problem classes, and auto-optimized circuit generators; all pure Python (Osaba et al., 30 May 2024).
  • EMF/GMF Modelers use Ecore meta-modeling with object constraint language (OCL) invariants and automated diagram code-generation via GMF, driven by mapping between domain entities and graphical/connection tools (Banerjee, 8 Sep 2025).
  • AnBx IDE for security protocols supports high-level Alice&Bob notation, context-aware syntax validation, code and verification artifact generation, and transparent integration with model checkers (OFMC/ProVerif) (Garcia et al., 26 Nov 2024).
  • exoTEDRF provides stage-separated, tunable analysis pipelines adaptable from notebooks to CLI—complete with YAML/INI-based configuration, performance diagnostics, and batch processing (Radica, 24 Jul 2024).

3. Native and External Solver Integrations

A salient feature is unified APIs and dataflows connecting modeling layers with highly optimized solver backends, encompassing both native and third-party systems.

  • ECLiPSe features solver libraries (interval constraints, generalised propagation, repair/local search). Third-party solvers are integrated via attribute hooks and external data handles: eplex for MP solvers (CPLEX, Xpress-MP, COIN-OR), Gecode, SAT solvers with correct backtracking through timestamped trails. MiniZinc/FlatZinc readers enable interchange (Schimpf et al., 2010).
  • Eclipse ICE leverages OSGi plugin registry for rapid extension with new workflow types, scripting engines (EASE), and remote HPC dispatch via SSH/SLURM actions, without a global scheduler (Billings et al., 2017).
  • Qrisp directly compiles to OpenQASM for external quantum hardware, supporting gate commutation and optimization for arbitrary graph topologies (Osaba et al., 30 May 2024).
  • exoTEDRF can wrap the official JWST pipeline for calibration, export results in standardized formats (cf. Eureka!, ExoTiC), and admits alternative decorrelation/systematics packages (Radica, 24 Jul 2024).

4. Event-Driven Simulation, Workflow, and Emulation

Dynamic, event-driven architectures are featured for simulation, workflow feedback, and in situ emulation:

  • ECLYPSE models environments using AssetGraphs, supports deployment and stateful transitions via triggers/events/callbacks, and provides a unified interface for both simulation (Python, Cython) and emulation (Ray actors, remote service instantiation), including message-passing mechanisms suitable for REST or MPI (Massa et al., 28 Jan 2025).
  • Eclipse ICE frames workflow as imperative Item orchestration (not DAGs), with finite-state models: "Form Ready", "Ready to Process", "Processing", "Processed", and "Error". Multiple workflows run in parallel by manual or script invocation (Billings et al., 2017).
  • Domain-specific EMF/GMF tools record action history via GMF Command Stack, support undo/redo, and serialize all resource files (model, diagram, notation) for persistence and versioned refactoring (Banerjee, 8 Sep 2025).

5. Benchmarking, Diagnostics and Use Cases

Every ECLIPSE framework highlights concrete benchmarking, diagnostics, and applied case studies:

  • ECLiPSe uses profiler libraries (sampling, port transition, source-instrumentation), structured documentation, unit testing, and coverage tools for propagation-heavy loop analysis; deployment supports eco/eci files for platform portability and binary distribution (Schimpf et al., 2010).
  • Qrisp delivers comparative benchmarking versus Qiskit for Max-Cut QAOA: 15 instances, layer counts, optimization runs, circuit depth and gate count aggregation. Demonstrates reduced depth and gate count by >10% and top approximation ratio in 58% of experiments (Osaba et al., 30 May 2024).
  • exoTEDRF provides diagnostic plots for every sub-step, batch-enables systematic error quantification (parameter sweeps, tornado plots), and operates at high throughput for JWST datasets (Radica, 24 Jul 2024).
  • ECLYPSE reports experimental metrics: placement success rate, response latency, accuracy/time behavior in emulation—with detailed breakdown per use case (infrastructure grid, user mobility, AI inference across distributed nodes) (Massa et al., 28 Jan 2025).
  • AnBx IDE is evaluated through educational user cohorts, feedback surveys, task effectiveness ratings, and case paper syntheses; parallel single-goal verification markedly reduces debug time (Garcia et al., 26 Nov 2024).

6. Extensibility, Limitations, and Future Directions

While extensibility is core to every ECLIPSE system, limitations and articulated future plans reflect the evolving demands of research and industry applications.

  • ECLiPSe is open-source under LGPL, embeds into C/C++/Java hosts via low-level APIs, yet completeness, performance, and backtracking semantics require careful module design and locking (Schimpf et al., 2010).
  • ICE's imperative workflow model can limit visual composition; future goals include tighter integration with grid-based workflow systems (AiiDA, Pegasus), cloud/web deployment, and GUI-based workflow wiring (Billings et al., 2017).
  • EMF/GMF modeling exhibits a learning curve for mapping and diagram configuration, but offers robust refactoring and validation. Sirius is recommended for larger, less verbose DSLs. Performance scales to 20k model elements with low UI lag (Banerjee, 8 Sep 2025).
  • Qrisp has yet to target real QPUs and broader graph classes but aims to extend with advanced mixers and backend compilers (Osaba et al., 30 May 2024).
  • exoTEDRF is tailored to JWST TSO; generalization to other observatories would require added flexibility (Radica, 24 Jul 2024).
  • AnBx IDE plans integration of diff-equivalence verifiers (Tamarin), deeper ProVerif support, theory template wizards, and full theorem-prover integration (Garcia et al., 26 Nov 2024).
  • ECLYPSE invites further scale-up of experiments, security-conscious resource handling, and integration with ML-based adaptive strategies (Massa et al., 28 Jan 2025).

7. Comparative Analysis and Interoperability

Comparisons of ECLIPSE-based solutions with other state-of-the-art tools reveal their unique strengths in modularity, interoperability, and algorithmic transparency:

Framework Domain Extensibility Performance (per exp.) Diagnostics/Batch
ECLiPSe Constraint LP High (C/Java APIs) Hotspot ID, coverage Multi-layer tracing
ICE Workflow Mgmt High (OSGi, EASE) Parallel items Plugin registry
Qrisp Quantum Alg High (Python/QASM) 10–20% lower gate cnt Bench. table/plots
exoTEDRF Astro Reduction High (CLI, Jupyter) 1.5hr/run (16-core) Batch mode, RMS
EMF/GMF Model DSL High (Ecore, GMF) 1.2s load (1000 nodes) Command stack
AnBx IDE Formal Methods High (plugins) 50–85% ProVerif up User-paper surveys
ECLYPSE Edge/Cloud Sim High (Ray actors) 2.5ticks/s (grid sim) Callback metrics

All ECLIPSE frameworks prioritize maintainable code generation, standardized output formats, and reliable state management, supporting robust academic and industrial research workflows. Interoperability and openness are advanced through plugin infrastructures, export to canonical formats (FlatZinc, OpenQASM, XMI), and APIs tailored for evolving solver and computational backends.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to ECLIPSE Framework.