Dynamic Interaction Discovery Module

• Dynamic Interaction Discovery Modules are algorithmic frameworks that identify and model evolving interactions in real time across complex systems.
• They integrate modular subsystems to abstract discovery from static configurations, enabling runtime adaptivity in blockchain, robotics, IoT, and beyond.
• They employ advanced methods such as probabilistic filtering, graph inference, and causal feature selection to ensure accurate, interpretable discovery.

A Dynamic Interaction Discovery Module (DIDM) is a structured system component or algorithmic framework designed to infer, enumerate, or adapt to the set of interactions within a complex, dynamic environment. These modules provide machine reasoning or engineered automation for the identification, modeling, and utilization of time-evolving interactions—whether between agents, objects, protocols, or computational processes. Across diverse domains, DIDMs underpin tasks in blockchain configuration, robotics, sensor networks, group activity analysis, and scientific discovery, using data-driven, probabilistic, or protocol-based mechanisms as appropriate to the application context.

1. Architectural Principles and Scope

Dynamic Interaction Discovery Modules are instantiated in multiple technical settings but share overarching principles:

• Runtime Adaptivity: DIDMs operate online, discovering and updating interaction patterns in response to evolving system states or observations. They eschew static configuration, allowing software (e.g., blockchain clients), collaborative robots, or networked sensors to adapt their behavior, communication, and control strategies in real time (Manevich et al., 2018, Duan et al., 2018, Perera et al., 2013).
• Decoupling of System Tiers/Components: By abstracting the discovery process from static logic, DIDMs provide a formal bridge between specification (such as code or topological layout) and runtime context, reducing manual intervention and synchronization burdens.
• Integration of Modular Subsystems: The design of DIDMs often includes clearly delimited submodules (e.g., service discovery, composition, interaction analysis, context reasoning) that interact via defined queries or message-passing interfaces.

For example, the Service Discovery module in Hyperledger Fabric (Manevich et al., 2018) operates as a peer-resident gRPC service leveraging local ledgers and gossip protocols; in IoT settings, CADDOT's SmartLink module orchestrates a broadcast, plugin-based discovery protocol (Perera et al., 2013); in robotics, interaction primitives and transfer entropy-guided filtering provide online causal feature selection (Duan et al., 2018, Castri et al., 2023).

2. Core Algorithms and Computational Strategies

Dynamic interaction discovery generally builds on one or more of the following algorithmic paradigms:

• Protocol/API-based Discovery: Utilized in permissioned blockchains such as Hyperledger Fabric, which exposes gRPC APIs for runtime discovery of system configuration, membership, and policies, mapping static blockchain tier data (e.g., chaincode, endorsement policies) to client-tier execution (Manevich et al., 2018).
• Probabilistic Filtering and State Estimation: In collaborative robotics, DIDMs such as those in D-IProMPs recursively update the estimated distribution over robot motion primitives via dynamic human motion observations, using Kalman filter analogues conditioned on partial and evolving data streams (Duan et al., 2018).
• Graph Inference and Temporal Reasoning: For multi-agent or multi-object domains, advanced DIDMs infer evolving interaction graphs—e.g., DIDER disentangles sub-interaction prediction and duration estimation for latent edge segments, enforcing interpretability and segment-wise consistency (Sachdeva et al., 2022). The DiM module in DynamicFormer constructs adaptive, temporally smoothed human-object interaction graphs for activity recognition (Zhang et al., 2023).
• Information-Theoretic and Causal Feature Selection: Causal discovery pipelines such as F-PCMCI prepend transfer-entropy-based feature selection to prune irrelevant variables, reducing both spurious link recovery and computational footprint in time series causal graph inference (Castri et al., 2023).
• Combinatorial Exploration and Infection Tracing: In dynamic network analysis, algorithms like DiscoveryFollow exploit the propagation rules of an infection model to optimally uncover dynamic graph structure, using seeded interventions and round-based label acquisition (Bals et al., 14 Dec 2024).
• Shape and Feature Extraction for Event Detection: In violence recognition, the DIFEM module explicitly computes temporal and spatial interaction features from keypoints—joint velocities and overlaps—eschewing deep learning in favor of lightweight, interpretable statistics (Mittal et al., 6 Dec 2024).

3. Interface and Data Flow Specifications

DIDMs typically entail specialized input-output flows and API contracts, which can be formalized as follows:

• Discovery Query Interfaces: For service-oriented or protocol-based modules, APIs are exposed for configuration queries, peer membership queries, and endorsement policy retrieval. In Hyperledger Fabric, all four major queries (configuration, peer membership, endorsement, local peer membership) are specified as gRPC interfaces (Manevich et al., 2018).
• Feature-Extraction Pipelines: In skeleton-based recognition, DIFEM's pipeline proceeds via pose extraction → feature selection → velocity/proximity computation → fixed-dimensional vector for downstream ML classification (Mittal et al., 6 Dec 2024).
• Graphical or Tokenized Embeddings: For group activity recognition, DiM outputs per-frame interaction token sequences integrated with composition tokens at multiple semantic levels via multi-head self-attention (Zhang et al., 2023). In interpretable dynamic relation models, DIDER outputs segmentation tuples {(sub-interaction class, start, duration)} per edge (Sachdeva et al., 2022).
• Temporal Log/Trace Accumulation: In infection tracing, logs contain infection events or label transitions, enabling iterative updating of the inferred dynamic interaction structure (Bals et al., 14 Dec 2024).

4. Handling of Dynamic Changes and Online Updates

A hallmark of DIDMs is explicit support for evolving system state:

• Always-On Discovery: In Fabric, clients may re-invoke the Service Discovery endpoint at any time; no long-lived SDK cache is assumed (Manevich et al., 2018).
• Online Recursive Updates: D-IProMPs condition robot motion distributions on the freshest human observations, updating prior/posterior beliefs and blending new plans via activation-based Gaussian products (Duan et al., 2018).
• Graph Pruning and Adaptation: F-PCMCI iteratively refines the set of considered variables and their candidate edges as new evidence is accumulated from transfer entropy tests (Castri et al., 2023).
• Error Handling and Failover: Service Discovery defines fallback strategies if selected peers or orderers become unavailable, including fresh re-discovery from alternative peer endpoints (Manevich et al., 2018).
• Cache Management and Invalidation: Where necessary, short TTL caches (e.g., on discovery responses in Fabric) are supported but with recommendations for frequent re-discovery to avoid stale configurations.

5. Interpretability, Consistency, and Intrinsic Constraints

A trend in recent DIDM design is to promote intrinsically interpretable and temporally consistent discovery outputs:

• Segmented Latent Interaction Prediction: DIDER enforces that discovered sub-interaction types remain consistent for an extended, dynamically inferred duration, thereby ruling out spurious or flickering frame-to-frame assignments (Sachdeva et al., 2022).
• Role Assignment and Attention: The Dynamic Markov Blanket Detection algorithm computes dynamic responsibilities (gamma marginals) for node assignment to environment, boundary, or internal object, building a macroscopic, dynamically consistent object-blanket-environment partition (Beck et al., 28 Feb 2025).
• Empirical and Ablation Insights: For group activity recognition, ablations demonstrate that dynamic interaction modules contribute substantial accuracy improvements over static or no-interaction baselines, and that explicit incorporation of object nodes and temporal transformers is essential for full discriminative power (Zhang et al., 2023).

6. Application Domains and Empirical Validation

DIDMs are validated and adopted across technical fields, with a variety of datasets and benchmarks:

Domain	Representative Module	Dataset/Metric
Permissioned Blockchain	Fabric Service Discovery	Deployment stability, recovery to policy/peer changes
Human–Robot Interaction	D-IProMP	Joint/endpoint error, phase error (weighted sum metric)
Group Activity Recognition	DiM (DynamicFormer)	Volleyball/Basketball accuracy (full DiM: 95.3%)
IoT Sensor Networks	CADDOT/SmartLink	Discovery/config time per sensor: <12 s, heterogeneity
Causal Time-Series Discovery	F-PCMCI	SHD, F1, error reduction, forecasting in LSTM
Violence Recognition	DIFEM	RWF-2000, Hockey Fight, Crowd Violence: 96-99% accuracy
Dynamic Network Discovery	DiscoveryFollow	Linear-in-edges scaling, component threshold phenomena
Physics, Cell, Attractor Discovery	DMBD	Partitioning accuracy, macroscopic law extraction

Empirical results underscore both the interpretability and computational efficiency of DIDM approaches: for instance, DIFEM achieves deep network-level accuracy with orders-of-magnitude fewer parameters via engineered features (Mittal et al., 6 Dec 2024); F-PCMCI outperforms standard PCMCI in both link quality (20-40% error reductions) and runtime (2–5× faster) (Castri et al., 2023); DIDER yields more consistent, semantically meaningful edge segmentation than DNRI (e.g., 92.5% segmentation accuracy in synthetic physics) (Sachdeva et al., 2022).

7. Limitations and Open Research Directions

While Dynamic Interaction Discovery Modules have demonstrated substantial utility, several limitations and open questions remain:

• Timeliness and Data Freshness: DIDMs depending on underlying state (gossip, ledger, environmental database) may exhibit a lag in rapidly changing networks (Manevich et al., 2018).
• Security Guarantees: As of DEBS’18, Fabric Service Discovery's authentication guarantees are implicitly reliant on the MSP/TLS infrastructure, and not analyzed in depth (Manevich et al., 2018).
• Feature Selection Autonomy: Present causal DIDMs still typically require manual feature engineering or observables; fully unsupervised observable discovery remains a research direction (Castri et al., 2023).
• Scalability and Complexity: Dynamic network discovery's worst-case complexity is linear in the number of nodes and edges, but lower bounds prevent sub-linear guarantees in general (Bals et al., 14 Dec 2024).
• Spurious and Weak Link Discovery: Information-theoretic scores (e.g., transfer entropy) may fail to detect very weak but physically meaningful causal connections (Castri et al., 2023).
• Ontology and Plugin Coverage: Successful dynamic discovery in heterogeneous IoT settings relies on full coverage of plugin drivers and accurate semantic ontologies (Perera et al., 2013).

Further research addresses model-based and data-driven integration, inference in the presence of latent confounders, and the expansion of intrinsic interpretability mechanisms for complex, multi-object environments.

---

References:

• "Service Discovery for Hyperledger Fabric" (Manevich et al., 2018)
• "Dynamic Interaction Probabilistic Movement Primitives" (Duan et al., 2018)
• "Context-aware Dynamic Discovery and Configuration of 'Things' in Smart Environments" (Perera et al., 2013)
• "Group Activity Recognition via Dynamic Composition and Interaction" (Zhang et al., 2023)
• "Dynamic Network Discovery via Infection Tracing" (Bals et al., 14 Dec 2024)
• "Enhancing Causal Discovery from Robot Sensor Data in Dynamic Scenarios" (Castri et al., 2023)
• "DIDER: Discovering Interpretable Dynamically Evolving Relations" (Sachdeva et al., 2022)
• "NeuroKoopman Dynamic Causal Discovery" (Adesunkanmi et al., 25 Apr 2024)
• "DIVI: Dynamically Interactive Visualization" (Snyder et al., 2023)
• "Causal Discovery in Physical Systems from Videos" (Li et al., 2020)
• "Dynamic Markov Blanket Detection for Macroscopic Physics Discovery" (Beck et al., 28 Feb 2025)
• "DIFEM: Key-points Interaction based Feature Extraction Module for Violence Recognition in Videos" (Mittal et al., 6 Dec 2024)