Diversity Preservation via Resource Competition

• Diversity Preservation via Resource Competition is a framework that explains how species coexist by exploiting spatial resource gradients and consumer-driven feedbacks.
• The approach uses mathematical models and graphical criteria to determine invasion thresholds and spatial partitioning, highlighting trade-offs between growth and mortality.
• This theory informs ecosystem management by showing that maintaining spatial heterogeneity and dynamic resource distributions is key to preventing competitive exclusion.

Diversity Preservation via Resource Competition refers to the mechanisms, principles, and mathematical conditions under which multiple species or types—each competing for shared, limiting resources—are able to coexist and maintain high diversity, especially in structured, heterogeneous, or dynamic environments. Rather than inevitably driving competitive exclusion, resource competition generates gradients, feedbacks, and spatial or trait-based partitioning that regulate the persistence of diverse species assemblages. This topic occupies a central role in theoretical ecology, mathematical biology, and evolutionary theory, and it provides a quantitative framework for understanding biodiversity across systems ranging from microbial communities to plant ecosystems.

1. Spatial Resource Gradients and the System State Curve

When resources are supplied non-uniformly in space, as in vertical light–nutrient gradients in aquatic columns, resource concentrations develop position-dependent profiles rather than uniform equilibria. These gradients can be approximated locally by exponential functions: $$N(z) \propto e^{c_n z}, \quad I(z) \propto e^{-c_i z}$$ where $N(z)$, $I(z)$ are nutrient and light concentrations at depth $z$, and $c_n$, $c_i$ are logarithmic gradients (e.g. $c_n = \frac{1}{N} \frac{dN}{dz}$).

The set of resource pairs $(N(z), I(z))$ traced along the spatial axis forms a “system state curve” (SSC) in resource space. The SSC replaces the notion of a single equilibrium resource point (the “R*” concept from uniform theory) and describes how spatial heterogeneity, via consumer activity, generates a continuous manifold of resource environments (Ryabov et al., 2011).

2. Invasion Thresholds and Graphical Criteria

Species coexistence or invasion is governed not merely by local resource minimums, but by the invader’s critical requirements projected onto the SSC produced by the resident. The invasion threshold $T$ is a linear boundary in logarithmic resource space. For two resources and two species differing only in half-saturation constants, the critical spatial shift $\Delta$ determines invasibility: $$\Delta = \frac{1}{c_n}\ln\left(\frac{H_{n,2}}{H_{n,1}}\right) - \frac{1}{c_i}\ln\left(\frac{H_{i,2}}{H_{i,1}}\right)$$ with invasion possible if $\Delta < 0$.

More generally, for species with different growth and mortality rates,

$$\frac{1}{c_n} \ln\left(\frac{N_2^*}{N_1^*}\right) + \frac{1}{c_i} \ln\left(\frac{I_2^*}{I_1^*}\right) < \Delta_{12}$$

where $\Delta_{12}$ summarizes trait-driven displacements in the threshold. This graphical/analytical construction ties species persistence not to absolute resource efficiencies but to their relationship with community-shaped resource gradients.

3. Trait Differences, Spatial Partitioning, and Coexistence Mechanisms

Trait differences beyond resource requirements (e.g., differing maximal growth rates μ_max, mortality m, or dispersal D) translate to shifts along the resource plane but do not alter the slope of the invasion threshold. Thus, a high-growth/high-mortality “opportunist” may coexist with a low-requirement “gleaner” by exploiting different spatial segments of the SSC—a manifestation of classical trade-offs in a spatial context.

This mechanism allows for alternative stable states or coexistence even when classical (well-mixed) models predict exclusion. In the specific context of phytoplankton vertical structure, such mechanisms explain observed community patterns that migrate with changes in ambient nutrient/light availability (Ryabov et al., 2011).

4. Generalization to Multi-Resource and Multi-Species Systems

The approach is generalized to diverse spatially structured ecosystems: terrestrial plant canopies (with water and nutrients supplied at different soil depths), stream communities (with up/downstream resource gradients), and engineered reactors. In each, spatial resource heterogeneity increases the dimensionality of the ecological manifold—diversity is preserved as species partition or shape the resource environments in a manner not explainable by well-mixed or purely competitive exclusion principles.

5. Emergence of Multiple Stable States and Bistability

In spatially extended systems, parameter regimes may arise where the SSCs and invasion thresholds permit bistability (alternative stable states). For instance, a species that shapes a steep gradient may exclude others, but small parameter shifts—such as changes in supply rates or niche traits—can tip the balance to coexistence or flips between exclusive states. This sensitivity is absent in uniform systems and reflects the essential role of spatial feedbacks in diversity preservation.

6. Key Equations and Mathematical Summary

Central to this theory are the following relationships:

• Resource gradients:

$$c_n = \frac{1}{N(z)}\frac{dN}{dz},\quad c_i = -\frac{1}{I(z)}\frac{dI}{dz}$$

• Growth rate (e.g., Monod or von Liebig minimum):

$$\mu(N,I) = \mu_{max} \cdot \min\left[\frac{N}{N+H_n},\,\frac{I}{I+H_i}\right]$$

• Spatial shift in invasion analysis:

$$\Delta z = \frac{1}{c} \ln\left(\frac{H_2}{H_1}\right)$$

• Generalized invasion threshold condition:

$$\frac{1}{c_n}\ln\left(\frac{N_2^*}{N_1^*}\right) + \frac{1}{c_i}\ln\left(\frac{I_2^*}{I_1^*}\right) < \Delta_{12}$$

where $H_n, H_i$ are half-saturation constants, and $N^*, I^*$ the critical resource requirements.

7. Implications and Significance

The spatial resource competition framework demonstrates that spatial structure, via resource gradients shaped by consumers, creates conditions under which species with divergent or even “dominated” traits (in a uniform context) can persist. Diversity is maintained by the feedback loop in which each species modifies not just the mean but the structure (gradients) of the environment, thus altering the ecological niche landscape for both conspecifics and competitors. This effect is robust, generalizable to a variety of real-world and model systems, and provides mechanistic resolution to classical paradoxes of biodiversity such as the “paradox of the plankton”.

A plausible implication is that management strategies seeking to maintain or restore diversity in production or natural ecosystems should focus not only on total resource supply but also on sustaining or engineering persistent spatial gradients and consumer-driven feedbacks.

---

In summary, Diversity Preservation via Resource Competition is governed by how consumers shape resource gradients and how trait differences project onto the manifold of spatially distributed resource states. The coexistence outcome emerges not as a simple function of static resource efficiency but as the result of dynamic, position-dependent feedbacks, leading to diverse, robust, and context-sensitive community assemblies (Ryabov et al., 2011).