Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 189 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 160 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 443 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Discriminant-Preserving Equivalence

Updated 11 November 2025
  • The paper establishes that all discriminant algebra functors in a fixed rank are canonically isomorphic, ensuring consistent discriminant preservation.
  • Methodologies based on norm polynomial laws, Clifford algebras, and Pfaffian formulas are compared to reveal structured, functorial relationships.
  • For ranks up to three, the unique isomorphism is proven, while the case for rank four and higher remains open, highlighting avenues for further research.

Discriminant-preserving equivalence of categories concerns the systematic relationship between constructions that assign to each rank-nn algebra a quadratic algebra with canonically matching discriminant data. In this framework, all established “discriminant algebra” functors for a fixed rank nn are shown to be canonically isomorphic in a suitable category Cn\mathcal{C}_n; moreover, for ranks n3n\leq 3, this functor is unique up to unique isomorphism. The formalism captures and compares various discriminant algebra constructions appearing in the literature, establishing categorical equivalence and, in small ranks, uniqueness up to contractibility.

1. Categories and Functorial Structure

Let Aff\mathsf{Aff} denote the opposite of the category of commutative rings, and Disc\mathsf{Disc} the category whose objects are triples (R,L,d)(R,L,d) with RR a ring, LL a locally free rank-$1$ RR-module, and d:L2Rd: L^{\otimes 2}\to R an RR-linear discriminant pairing, with morphisms given by base change preserving dd. Algn\mathsf{Alg}_n is the category of rank-nn algebras: objects are pairs (R,A)(R,A) with AA an RR-algebra locally free of rank nn, and morphisms are base change plus RR-algebra isomorphism.

There is a tautological functor $\,^n: \mathsf{Alg}_n \rightarrow \mathsf{Disc}$ which to (R,A)(R,A) associates its top exterior power nA{}^nA equipped with the discriminant bilinear form

nAnAdet(Tr(aibj))R.{}^nA \otimes {}^nA \xrightarrow{\det(\operatorname{Tr}(a_ib_j))} R.

A discriminant algebra in rank nn is a functor D:AlgnAlg2D:\mathsf{Alg}_n\to\mathsf{Alg}_2 equipped with an isomorphism 2D(R,A)nA{}^2 D(R,A) \cong {}^n A over RR, supplying a quadratic algebra functorial in (R,A)(R,A) along with a discriminant-identifying isomorphism. The category Cn\mathcal{C}_n has objects the such functors, with morphisms given by natural isomorphisms that respect the discriminant identifications.

A summary of the structural framework appears below:

Category Objects Morphisms
Algn\mathsf{Alg}_n Rank-nn locally free RR-algebras (R,A)(R,A) Base change + algebra isomorphism
Disc\mathsf{Disc} Triples (R,L,d)(R,L,d) as above Base change preserving dd
Cn\mathcal{C}_n Discriminant-algebra functors AlgnAlg2\mathsf{Alg}_n\to\mathsf{Alg}_2 + data Natural isomorphisms respecting discriminants

2. Constructions of Discriminant Algebras

Three main constructions of discriminant algebras for rank-nn algebras are systematically compared:

(a) Biesel–Gioia (“Ferrand”) Construction

Given (R,A)Algn(R,A)\in\mathsf{Alg}_n, the norm polynomial law NmA/R:AR\operatorname{Nm}_{A/R}:A\to R is represented by an RR-algebra homomorphism ΦA/R:(An)SnR\Phi_{A/R}: (A^{\otimes n})^{S_n} \to R. Considering the inclusion (An)Sn(An)An(A^{\otimes n})^{S_n}\subset (A^{\otimes n})^{A_n} of invariants for the alternating subgroup, set

Δ(R,A):=(An)An(An)SnR,\Delta(R,A):= (A^{\otimes n})^{A_n} \otimes_{(A^{\otimes n})^{S_n}} R,

where the map (An)SnR(A^{\otimes n})^{S_n} \to R is given by ΦA/R\Phi_{A/R}. Δ(R,A)\Delta(R,A) is locally free of rank 2 and its induced discriminant form agrees with that of AA. Assigning D1(R,A):=Δ(R,A)D_1(R,A):=\Delta(R,A) defines an object in Cn\mathcal{C}_n.

(b) Rost’s Construction (Rank 3)

For n=3n=3, let AA be a rank-3 RR-algebra. Set A˙=A/R\dot{A}=A/R and define the quadratic form qA(a˙)=s1(a2)s2(a)q_A(\dot a)=s_1(a^2)-s_2(a), with s1s_1, s2s_2 the characteristic polynomial coefficients. The even Clifford algebra K(A)=C0(qA)K(A)=C_0(q_A) fits in a short exact sequence

0RK(A)2A˙3A0,0\to R\to K(A)\to {}^2\dot{A}\cong{}^3A\to 0,

making K(A)K(A) a quadratic RR-algebra. Adjusting the multiplication in K(A)K(A) by the discriminant bilinear form on 3A{}^3A yields a quadratic algebra D3(A)=K(A)3AD_3(A) = K(A) - {}^3A whose discriminant matches that of AA. Rost’s functor D3D_3 defines an object in C3\mathcal{C}_3.

(c) Loos’s Construction (Even Rank)

For even nn, let AA be a rank-nn algebra, and write s2:ARs_2:A\to R for the quadratic trace. For any representable quadratic form QQ on a rank-nn bundle MM, construct an algebra

Q=RnM,Q^* = R\oplus {}^nM,

with multiplication determined via Pfaffian and “quarter-determinant” formulas. Different choices of representing bilinear form produce canonically isomorphic algebras, so QQ^* is well-defined. For AA as above with Q=s2Q = s_2, shift the algebra by (1)n2+1n4nA(-1)^{\frac{n}{2}+1} \frac{n}{4} \cdot {}^n A to align the discriminant form. This yields the functor D2:AlgnAlg2D_2:\mathsf{Alg}_n\to\mathsf{Alg}_2 belonging to Cn\mathcal{C}_n for even nn.

3. Canonical Equivalences and Natural Isomorphisms

Within Cn\mathcal{C}_n, the core phenomenon is the canonical isomorphism between any two discriminant-algebra constructions. For any two objects D,DCnD, D'\in \mathcal{C}_n, there is a bijection of natural transformations HomCn(D,D)\operatorname{Hom}_{\mathcal{C}_n}(D,D')\cong (identifications of discriminant forms). Explicit comparison maps are constructed:

  • φ13:D1D3\varphi_{13}: D_1 \to D_3 (rank 3): The generator a˙b˙K(A)\dot a\otimes \dot b\in K(A) is sent to s1(ab)γ(1,b,a)Δ(A)s_1(ab)-\gamma(1,b,a)\in \Delta(A), and this map preserves traces and norms after the algebra shift.
  • φ12:D1D2\varphi_{12}: D_1\to D_2 (even rank): The “wedge-generator” sf(a1an)s_f(a_1\wedge\cdots\wedge a_n) corresponds to σf(a1,,an)Δ(A)\sigma_f(a_1,\ldots,a_n)\in\Delta(A) built from a universal Pfaffian.
  • In mixed or odd ranks, comparison isomorphisms are obtained by composing these via inverses as appropriate.

All three constructions (D1D_1, D2D_2, D3D_3) are thus canonically isomorphic in Cn\mathcal{C}_n. This establishes discriminant-preserving equivalence between all known reasonable constructions.

4. Uniqueness in Small Ranks

For n3n\le3, uniqueness up to unique isomorphism is established in Cn\mathcal{C}_n, making it a contractible groupoid. The key lemma: for ring RR with $2$ invertible or a prime nonzero-divisor, and quadratic RR-algebras A,BA,B with matching discriminant forms, there is a unique RR-algebra isomorphism ABA\cong B inducing that identification.

Trivial (rank $0, 1$) and quadratic (n=2n=2) algebras are handled by demonstrating uniqueness via universal quadratic algebras. For rank $3$, universal associativity relations provide the necessary identifications, with suitable use of base change and Čech-like descent arguments. Thus, for n3n\leq 3, the discriminant functor is unique up to unique isomorphism across all constructions.

5. Existence, Scope, and Open Problems

Biesel–Gioia’s construction confirms that Cn\mathcal{C}_n is always nonempty for n2n\geq 2. For all nn, canonical isomorphisms between known constructions guarantee discriminant-preserving equivalence in Cn\mathcal{C}_n. For ranks up to $3$, categorical uniqueness holds, but for n4n\geq 4, uniqueness remains open.

The possibility of extending uniqueness to n>3n>3 appears to require a global “universal” parameter space for rank-nn algebras, such as those provided by Bhargava or Wood for quartic and quintic algebras. In the absence of such parametrizations, the classification and uniqueness of discriminant algebra functors for higher ranks remains unresolved. This suggests scope for further research in both the construction of discriminant algebras for higher rank and in the development of suitable moduli spaces.

6. Mathematical Significance and Connections

Discriminant-preserving equivalence of categories systematically relates and generalizes classical invariants associated with commutative ring extensions and their quadratic forms. By formalizing discriminant algebra constructions in a categorical context, it provides a rigorous method for comparing functorial constructions and establishes conditions for their uniqueness. The equivalences established ensure that within suitable settings, the discriminant encoding is functorially canonical.

A plausible implication is that advances in parametrizing higher algebraic structures may permit a complete understanding of discriminant algebra uniqueness in all finite ranks. The framework also interfaces naturally with the paper of polynomial invariants, Clifford algebras, and the behavior of quadratic forms under various base changes.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Discriminant-Preserving Equivalence of Categories.