Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Directional Spearman’s Footrule Coefficients

Updated 31 January 2026
  • Directional Spearman’s Footrule Coefficients are rank-based measures defined within a copula framework that capture directional dependence by quantifying concordance and discordance.
  • They extend the classical symmetric footrule by incorporating a direction indicator, thereby uncovering tail asymmetry, non-exchangeability, and subtle dependence structures.
  • Nonparametric estimation using normalized ranks yields robust, asymptotically normal estimators that allow detailed analysis of local multivariate dependence.

Directional Spearman’s footrule coefficients are a family of rank-based dependence measures defined for multivariate data within the copula framework. Extending the classical (symmetric) Spearman’s footrule, these coefficients quantify the degree of concordance or discordance in specific directions, thereby detecting patterns of directional or asymmetric dependence that are invisible to traditional symmetric measures. The coefficients are parameterized by a direction indicator vector and exhibit a range of theoretical properties including reflection symmetry, sensitivity to copula structure, and robust nonparametric estimation.

1. Definition and Mathematical Formulation

Let d2d \geq 2 denote the dimension of interest, and let CC be a dd-copula coupling continuous marginals U1,,UdU[0,1]U_1,\ldots,U_d \sim U[0,1]. For a direction vector α=(α1,,αd){1,1}d\alpha = (\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_d) \in \{-1, 1\}^d, the directional Spearman footrule coefficient is defined as

φdα(C)=2(d+1)d101{P[α1U1>α1u,,αdUd>αdu]i=1dP[αiUi>αiu]}du.\varphi_d^\alpha(C) = \frac{2(d+1)}{d-1} \int_0^1 \left\{ \mathbb{P}\left[ \alpha_1 U_1 > \alpha_1 u, \ldots, \alpha_d U_d > \alpha_d u \right] - \prod_{i=1}^d \mathbb{P}[\alpha_i U_i > \alpha_i u] \right\} du.

This quantity measures, for a specified direction α\alpha, the deviation of the copula joint upper tail (or lower, depending on the sign pattern in α\alpha) from the product of its univariate margins.

An alternative "min–max" form is given by

φdα(C)=2(d+1)d1{E[(miniJUimaxiIUi)+]I!J!(d+1)!},\varphi_d^\alpha(C) = \frac{2(d+1)}{d-1} \left\{ \mathbb{E}\left[ \left( \min_{i \in J} U_i - \max_{i \in I} U_i \right)_+ \right] - \frac{|I|! |J|!}{(d+1)!} \right\},

where J={i:αi=1}J = \{i: \alpha_i = 1\}, I={i:αi=1}I = \{i: \alpha_i = -1\}, and (x)+=max(x,0)(x)_+ = \max(x, 0).

The two extreme choices of α=1=(1,,1)\alpha = \mathbf{1} = (1, \ldots, 1) and α=1=(1,,1)\alpha = -\mathbf{1} = (-1, \ldots, -1) recover the classic upward and downward multivariate footrules, denoted φd+\varphi^+_d and φd\varphi^-_d, respectively (Amo et al., 24 Jan 2026).

2. Theoretical Properties

The family φdα(C)\varphi_d^\alpha(C) satisfies the following fundamental properties:

  • Consistency with Classical Footrule: The average of the upward and downward directional coefficients recovers the classical symmetric multivariate footrule:

φd+(C)+φd(C)2=φd(C).\frac{ \varphi_d^+(C) + \varphi_d^-(C) }{2 } = \varphi_d(C).

  • Null under Independence: For the product copula Πd\Pi_d, all directional coefficients vanish:

φdα(Πd)=0α.\varphi_d^\alpha(\Pi_d) = 0 \qquad \forall \alpha.

  • Maximal Dependence: For the comonotonic (Fréchet–Hoeffding upper bound) copula MdM_d,

φd1(Md)=φd1(Md)=1,\varphi_d^{\mathbf{1}}(M_d) = \varphi_d^{-\mathbf{1}}(M_d) = 1,

while for intermediate directions ($0 < |J| < d$),

φdα(Md)=2(d1)(dJ).\varphi_d^\alpha(M_d) = -\frac{2}{(d-1)\binom{d}{|J|}}.

  • Summation to Zero:

α{1,1}dφdα(C)=0.\sum_{\alpha \in \{-1,1\}^d} \varphi_d^\alpha(C) = 0.

  • Reflection/Survival Duality:

φdα(C)=φdα(C^),\varphi_d^\alpha(C) = \varphi_d^{-\alpha}(\widehat{C}),

where C^\widehat C denotes the survival copula.

Proofs of these properties are based on the symmetry of the copula construction, combinatorial arguments, and algebraic manipulations inherent to the definition (Amo et al., 24 Jan 2026).

3. Estimation: Nonparametric Rank-Based Procedures

Given an i.i.d. sample {Xij:i=1,,d;j=1,,n}\{X_{ij}: i=1,\ldots,d; j=1,\ldots,n\} from a distribution with underlying copula CC, the nonparametric estimator of φdα(C)\varphi_d^\alpha(C) is constructed by replacing uniform marginals with normalized ranks: φ~n,dα=2(d+1)(d1)(n+1){1nj=1n(miniJRijmaxiIRij)+(n+1)I!J!(d+1)!}.\widetilde\varphi_{n,d}^\alpha = \frac{2(d+1)}{(d-1)(n+1)} \left\{ \frac{1}{n} \sum_{j=1}^n \left( \min_{i \in J} R_{ij} - \max_{i \in I} R_{ij} \right)_+ - \frac{(n+1) |I|! |J|!}{(d+1)!} \right\}. Here, RijR_{ij} is the rank of XijX_{ij} among {Xi1,,Xin}\{X_{i1},\ldots,X_{in}\}. This estimator is bounded in [1,1][-1,1].

These estimators can be expressed as linear combinations of lower-dimensional estimators, allowing decomposition and interpretation of dependence in subspaces. Under standard regularity conditions on CC, the estimator is asymptotically normal and consistent: n(φ~n,dαφdα(C))wN(0,σα2),\sqrt{n}\left( \widetilde\varphi_{n,d}^\alpha - \varphi_d^\alpha(C) \right) \xrightarrow[]{w} N(0, \sigma_\alpha^2), with the variance σα2\sigma_\alpha^2 determined by the limiting Gaussian field of the empirical copula process (Amo et al., 24 Jan 2026).

4. Explicit Expressions for Standard Copula Families

Closed-form expressions for φdα(C)\varphi_d^\alpha(C) are available for several important copula families. Sign and magnitude depend explicitly on J|J|, the number of positive entries in α\alpha.

Copula Family Formula for φdα(C)\varphi_d^\alpha(C)
Farlie–Gumbel–Morgenstern (FGM) 2(d+1)(d!)2(d1)(2d+1)!λ(1)J\displaystyle \frac{2(d+1)(d!)^2}{(d-1)(2d+1)!} \lambda\, (-1)^{|J|}
Clayton 2(d+1)d1k=0J(1)k(Jk)01[(I+k)uθ+(1Ik)]1/θdu2(d1)(dJ)\displaystyle \frac{2(d+1)}{d-1} \sum_{k=0}^{|J|} (-1)^k \binom{|J|}{k} \int_0^1 \left[(|I|+k)u^{-\theta}+(1-|I|-k)\right]^{-1/\theta} du - \frac{2}{(d-1)\binom{d}{|J|}}
Cuadras–Augé mixture 2(d+1)d1k=0J(1)k(Jk)θ(I+k1)(I+k+1)2θ[(I+k)21]\displaystyle \frac{2(d+1)}{d-1} \sum_{k=0}^{|J|} (-1)^k \binom{|J|}{k} \frac{\theta(|I|+k-1)}{(|I|+k+1)^2 - \theta[ (|I|+k)^2 -1 ]}

For more complex copulas such as Gumbel or Gaussian, numerical evaluation is required. The explicit directionality of φdα(C)\varphi_d^\alpha(C) enables detection of asymmetry and tail behavior inaccessible to classical symmetric concordance measures.

5. Detection of Asymmetry and Illustrative Comparisons

Classical (symmetric) footrule coefficients, such as φd(C)\varphi_d(C), are insensitive to non-exchangeability and tail asymmetry. Directional footrule coefficients provide fine-grained resolution. For instance, in a 4-variate Clayton copula with θ=5\theta=5,

φ4(C)0.82(classical),φ4(+1,+1,+1,+1)(C)0.91,φ4(1,1,1,1)(C)0.77,\varphi_4(C) \approx 0.82 \qquad \text{(classical)}, \qquad \varphi_4^{(+1,+1,+1,+1)}(C) \approx 0.91, \quad \varphi_4^{(-1,-1,-1,-1)}(C) \approx 0.77,

with mixed-sign directions yielding small negative values. This reveals clustering of mass in particular quadrants, a signature of tail asymmetry.

Similarly, in a Cuadras–Augé mixture with d=4d=4 and θ=0.4\theta=0.4,

φ4(+1,+1,+1,+1)0.38,φ4(1,1,1,1)0.38,φ4(±1,±1,±1,1)0,\varphi_4^{(+1,+1,+1,+1)} \approx 0.38, \quad \varphi_4^{(-1,-1,-1,-1)} \approx 0.38, \quad \varphi_4^{(\pm1,\pm1,\pm1,\mp1)} \approx 0,

while classical φ40.10\varphi_4 \approx 0.10 obliterates the distinction. This suggests that directional coefficients are able to localize dependence structure and singular mass (Amo et al., 24 Jan 2026).

Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate empirical estimators closely follow the population values for moderate sample sizes (n50n \gtrsim 50), with asymptotic normality observed at n100n \geq 100.

6. Relation to Symmetric Footrule and Literature Context

Prior studies of Spearman footrule coefficients, such as in "Relation between non-exchangeability and measures of concordance of copulas" (Bukovšek et al., 2019), treated only the symmetric version, ϕ(C)\phi(C), which aggregates over all directions and ignores asymmetry. That work demonstrated theoretical bounds for ϕ(C)\phi(C) under LL_\infty asymmetry and compared various measures of concordance but did not introduce directional decomposition, sign conventions, or formulas for directional analysis.

The framework introduced by de Amo et al. (Amo et al., 24 Jan 2026) addresses this limitation by constructing, for the first time, direction-indexed measures, thereby enabling direct study of non-exchangeability, reflection, and tail-dependence asymmetry in high-dimensional dependence modeling.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Directional Spearman's Footrule Coefficients.