Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Difference Graph of a Finite Group

Updated 10 January 2026
  • The Difference Graph is a structure with vertices as nontrivial proper subgroups where an edge exists if their join equals the group but their product does not.
  • It uncovers links between subgroup generation and graph parameters, illustrating how properties like simplicity, nilpotency, and solvability are reflected in graph invariants.
  • The reduced graph D*(G) filters out isolated vertices from normal subgroups, offering practical insights into group characteristics such as supersolvability and cyclic behavior.

The difference graph of a finite group captures intricate relationships between group-theoretic structure and graph-theoretic properties by encoding certain 'difference phenomena' in subgroup generation, element orders, or quotient sets. This article focuses on the Difference Subgroup Graph D(G)D(G) of a finite group GG, as developed in (Das et al., 6 Nov 2025), and situates this graph within the broader landscape of difference graphs stemming from combinatorial group theory. The vertices of D(G)D(G) are the nontrivial proper subgroups of GG; distinct subgroups HH and KK are adjacent exactly when H,K=G\langle H, K \rangle = G but HKGHK \neq G. This construction isolates those pairs whose join covers GG without having the subgroup product fill the group, thereby distinguishing between generating and multiplying subgroups. The investigation of D(G)D(G) yields strong connections between fundamental graph invariants and core structural properties of GG, including simplicity, nilpotency, solvability, and supersolvability.

1. Definition and Foundational Aspects

Let GG be a finite group and S={H<G:H1, HG}S = \{ H < G : H \neq 1,\ H \neq G \} the set of all nontrivial proper subgroups of GG. The difference subgroup graph is the simple undirected graph

V(D(G))=S,V(D(G)) = S,

with edges E(D(G))E(D(G)) specified by

E(D(G))={{H,K}:H,K=G and HKG}.E(D(G)) = \left\{ \{H, K\} : \langle H, K \rangle = G\ \text{and}\ HK \neq G \right\}.

This definition sets D(G)D(G) as the setwise difference between the join graph Δ(G)\Delta(G) (edges for pairs generating GG) and the comaximal subgroup graph Γ(G)\Gamma(G) (edges for pairs multiplying to GG). Thus,

D(G)=Δ(G)Γ(G).D(G) = \Delta(G) \setminus \Gamma(G).

D(G)D(G) is sensitive to global generation: it filters subgroup pairs by stringent generation versus multiplication criteria.

Many vertices of D(G)D(G) are isolated. For group-theoretic focus, the reduced graph D(G)D^*(G) is defined by deleting all isolated vertices from D(G)D(G); in particular, every nontrivial normal subgroup is isolated in D(G)D(G).

2. Structural Properties and Symmetries

Basic properties

  • Nontrivial normal subgroups are isolated vertices.
  • Conjugation acts as a graph automorphism: for gGg \in G, HKH \sim K implies gHg1gKg1gHg^{-1} \sim gKg^{-1}.
  • All non-isolated vertices have degree at least $2$; there are no leaves.
  • Degrees among non-isolated vertices are variable.
  • If GHKG \cong H \rtimes K, then D(K)D(K) embeds as an induced subgraph of D(G)D(G).
  • If NGN \triangleleft G, then D(G/N)D(G/N) embeds as an induced subgraph.

Lower bounds

If HKH \sim K is an edge in D(G)D(G):

  • At least $3$ edges emanate from HH and KK if conjugate.
  • At least $4$ edges if not conjugate.

3. Connectivity, Forbidden Subgraphs, and Girth

Connectivity

  • Theorem: D(G)D(G) is connected if and only if GG is simple.
  • A nontrivial normal subgroup yields an isolated vertex, so only simple groups have fully connected difference subgroup graphs.

Triangle-freeness and Bipartiteness

  • Theorem: If D(G)D(G) is triangle-free (hence bipartite), then GG is nilpotent.
  • Corollary: If D(G)D(G) has any edge, then its girth is either $3$ or $4$.
    • Non-nilpotent GG yields triangles via non-normal maximal subgroups.
    • For nilpotent GG, edges induce $4$-cycles whenever present.

Universal vertices

  • D(G)D(G) never has a universal vertex and is never complete. This is a consequence of subgroup order constraints in finite simple groups.

4. Reduced Graph D(G)D^*(G): Classification Results

  • If D(G)D^*(G) has a universal vertex, then GZqβZpαG \cong \mathbb{Z}_q^\beta \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_{p^\alpha}, primes pqp \ne q.
  • D(G)D^*(G) is complete if and only if GZqZpαG \cong \mathbb{Z}_q \rtimes \mathbb{Z}_{p^\alpha}, with V(D(G))=np=1+pl=q|V(D^*(G))| = n_p = 1 + p l = q.
  • If D(G)D^*(G) forms a cycle, it is necessarily C3C_3 or C4C_4.

5. Graph Parameters and Their Group-Theoretic Consequences

Independence number α(D(G))\alpha(D(G)):

  • α(D(G))5    G\alpha(D(G)) \leq 5 \implies G non-nilpotent.
  • α(D(G))13    G\alpha(D(G)) \leq 13 \implies G is a pp-group or non-nilpotent.
  • α(D(G))3    G\alpha(D(G)) \leq 3 \implies G supersolvable.
  • α(D(G))14    G\alpha(D(G)) \leq 14 \implies G solvable.
  • These bounds are tight, demonstrated by appropriate group families.

Clique number ω(D(G))\omega(D(G)):

  • ω(D(G))4\omega(D(G)) \leq 4 forces supersolvability.
  • ω(D(G))7\omega(D(G)) \leq 7 forces solvability.

6. Forbidden Subgraph Characterizations

  • Claw-free: D(G)D(G) is claw-free iff GG is supersolvable.
  • Cograph (P4P_4-free): D(G)D(G) is a cograph iff GG is solvable.
  • Chordality combined with cograph structure also forces solvability.

7. Examples

  • Abelian (Dedekind, Iwasawa) groups: D(G)D(G) is edgeless; for cyclic GG, D(Cn)D(C_n) is empty.
  • Dihedral group D4D_4: D(D4)C4D(D_4) \cong C_4.
  • Symmetric group S3S_3: D(S3)C3D^*(S_3) \cong C_3.
  • Alternating group A4A_4: α(D(A4))=4\alpha(D(A_4))=4, ω(D(A4))=5\omega(D(A_4))=5.
  • Simple group A5A_5 ($57$ nontrivial subgroups): D(A5)D(A_5) is connected; α(D(A5))=15\alpha(D(A_5))=15.

8. Analytical Significance and Open Problems

The study of D(G)D(G) yields precise characterizations linking graph-theoretic invariants to deep group-theoretic properties. The systematic correspondence between forbidden graph substructures and algebraic properties (solvability, nilpotency, simplicity) enhances the toolkit available for both group theorists and combinatorialists.

Main open questions:

  • When is D(G)D^*(G) connected? The conjecture states that for non-nilpotent GG, D(G)D^*(G) is always connected.
  • For non-abelian pp-groups with pp odd and D(G)D(G) nonempty, must the girth equal $3$?
  • Does D(G)D(H)D(G) \cong D(H) (both connected) imply GHG \cong H? For nilpotent GG, does D(G)D(H)D(G) \cong D(H) force HH nilpotent?
  • If D(G)D(G) is perfect, is GG necessarily solvable?
  • It is known that ω(D(G))7\omega(D(G)) \leq 7 implies solvability; the optimal bound may be ω(D(G))15\omega(D(G)) \leq 15.

9. Connections and Future Directions

D(G)D(G) synthesizes aspects of the classical join and comaximal subgroup graphs. It detects subtle deviations between generation and product phenomena, reflecting the asymmetry in group structure. This graph also interfaces with combinatorial parameters (clique, independence numbers) that serve as proxies for algebraic properties not readily accessible via traditional group-theoretic invariants.

The investigation of D(G)D(G) is poised for further exploration in the field of computational group theory, classification problems, and the study of automorphism groups of combinatorial structures defined by subgroups. The robustness of the difference graph paradigm suggests possible extensions in infinite group settings, algebraic semigroups, and the analysis of spectral graph properties with algebraic significance (Das et al., 6 Nov 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Difference Graph of a Finite Group.