Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 111 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 161 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 412 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Density Hypothesis for Congruence Subgroups

Updated 29 September 2025
  • Density Hypothesis for Congruence Subgroups is a framework that quantitatively estimates automorphic representation multiplicities by extending prior spherical analyses.
  • It employs specialized test functions in the Selberg trace formula to control non-tempered and non-spherical spectral contributions with uniform bounds.
  • The method connects spectral gap control, arithmetic volume growth, and lattice properties, impacting automorphic forms and expander graph constructions.

The density hypothesis for congruence subgroups addresses the quantitative distribution of automorphic representations—specifically non-tempered and non-spherical types—across congruence covers of irreducible uniform lattices in PSL2(R)d\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbb{R})^d. The central aim is to establish uniform upper bounds on the multiplicities of such representations, thereby extending the scope of the earlier spherical density hypothesis to a broader set of spectral types. This is achieved by precise control with respect to both the level (i.e., the volume of the congruence cover) and key spectral parameters.

1. Formulation of the Density Hypothesis

Given an irreducible uniform arithmetic lattice ΓPSL2(R)d\Gamma \subset \mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbb{R})^d and its congruence subgroups Γ(a)\Gamma(\mathfrak{a}), the density hypothesis predicts that for any family of non-tempered representations B\mathcal{B} (or for a single π\pi), the sum of multiplicities in L2(Γ(a)G)L^2(\Gamma(\mathfrak{a})\setminus G) satisfies: (B,Γ(a))Cvol(Γ(a)\G)2/p(B)+ε(\mathcal{B}, \Gamma(\mathfrak{a})) \leq C\cdot\mathrm{vol}(\Gamma(\mathfrak{a}) \backslash G)^{2/p(\mathcal{B})+\varepsilon} where p(B)p(\mathcal{B}) is the matrix coefficient integrability parameter (p(π)=2p(\pi) = 2 for tempered, p(π)>2p(\pi) > 2 for non-tempered), and CC depends only on Γ\Gamma and ε\varepsilon. This framework generalizes prior multiplicity bounds, relating spectral geometry to arithmetic volume growth. The key improvement is uniformity not only in level but also in spectral parameters.

2. Spectral Parameters and Representation Types

To precisely track representation contributions, the paper introduces a product parameter: T(π)=j=1dT(πj)T(\pi) = \prod_{j=1}^d T(\pi_j) with

T(πj)={1if πjπs,s(0,12) 1+rif πjπ1/2+ir mif πjDmT(\pi_j) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } \pi_j \simeq \pi_s,\, s\in(0,\tfrac{1}{2}) \ 1 + |r| & \text{if } \pi_j \simeq \pi_{1/2+ir} \ |m| & \text{if } \pi_j \simeq D_m \end{cases}

where DmD_m is a discrete series of weight mm, and π1/2+ir\pi_{1/2+ir} is a spherical principal series. The parameter T(π)T(\pi) approximates the square root of the shifted Casimir eigenvalue and is crucial for bounding multiplicities when spectral parameters become large.

3. Extension to Non-Spherical Non-Tempered Representations

Previous density hypothesis results often focused on representations with trivial KK-type (the spherical case). The present work develops test functions for the Selberg trace formula tailored to non-spherical cases, accommodating discrete series of arbitrary (possibly large) weight. These test functions are used to localize on exceptional complementary series and discrete series representations and to control non-tempered contributions uniformly.

The main result states: (π,Γ(a))C(T(π)vol(Γ(a)\G))2/p(π)+ε(\pi, \Gamma(\mathfrak{a})) \leq C \cdot (T(\pi) \cdot \mathrm{vol}(\Gamma(\mathfrak{a}) \backslash G))^{2/p(\pi)+\varepsilon} This is achieved for all irreducible lattices and for congruence subgroups Γ(a)\Gamma(\mathfrak{a}) arising from arithmetic constructions (e.g., quaternion-algebraic models), confirming the hypothesis uniformly in both level and spectral parameter.

4. Methodological Innovations

  • Test Function Design: Specialized test functions in the Selberg trace formula are constructed to concentrate on prescribed spectral types, not limited to the spherical situation.
  • Spectral Localization: The approach estimates the density of representations with high weight or large spectral parameter, using polynomial bounds in T(π)T(\pi).
  • Orbital Integral Analysis: The non-spherical trace formula requires refined control of orbital integrals associated with non-trivial KK-types, achieved via explicit uniform estimates.
  • Uniformity and Level Growth: The bounds remain valid as the level increases, which is encoded by the volume term vol(Γ(a)\G)\mathrm{vol}(\Gamma(\mathfrak{a}) \backslash G).

5. Applications and Consequences

The established bounds have several immediate implications:

  • Spectral Gap Control: Uniform control of non-tempered and non-spherical multiplicities implies strong spectral gap results in sequences of congruence covers.
  • Exceptional Eigenvalue Density: The proportion of non-tempered or exceptional eigenvalues does not grow faster than the indicated power of the volume, supporting conjectures regarding sparse exceptional spectra in arithmetic manifolds.
  • Automorphic Forms and Expander Graphs: The density bounds directly impact equidistribution theorems, diophantine problems, and constructions of expander graphs; strong bounds enable optimal rates of convergence and mixing in associated dynamical systems.
  • Generalization Beyond Spherical Case: The methods open the possibility for further extensions to other groups, including higher-rank and co-compact models, as well as for refined analysis of representation-theoretic and geometric quantities.

6. Mathematical Formulations

Key formulas from the paper include:

Representation Type T(πj)T(\pi_j) Definition Multiplicity Bound Formula
Spherical principal series $1$ or $1 + |r|$ (π,Γ(a))C(T(π)vol)2/p(π)+ε(\pi, \Gamma(\mathfrak{a})) \leq C(T(\pi) \cdot \mathrm{vol})^{2/p(\pi)+\varepsilon}
Discrete series m|m| Same as above
Family of representations B\mathcal{B} T(B)=maxT(π)T(\mathcal{B}) = \max T(\pi) (B,Γ(a))C(T(B)2vol)2/p(B)+ε(\mathcal{B}, \Gamma(\mathfrak{a})) \leq C (T(\mathcal{B})^2 \cdot \mathrm{vol})^{2 / p(\mathcal{B}) + \varepsilon}

These explicitly quantify how the spectral and arithmetic inputs interact.

7. Significance within Automorphic Representation Theory

This work verifies the strong form of the Sarnak–Xue density hypothesis for congruence covers in PSL2(R)d\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbb{R})^d beyond the spherical setting—all exceptional spectral types are controlled uniformly. The result unifies spectral, arithmetic, and geometric analysis of lattices and their congruence subgroups, and augments the foundation for future studies on multiplicity one, explicit spectral gap bounds, and the fine structure of automorphic spectra in higher dimensional locally symmetric spaces (Kelmer, 26 Sep 2025).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Density Hypothesis for Congruence Subgroups.