Demonet Quiver in Skew Group Algebras
- Demonet quiver is a combinatorial model that presents the Morita reduced skew group algebra as the path algebra of a modified quiver stemming from a finite group action.
- It defines vertices as pairs (i, U) and constructs arrow spaces via Hom-spaces, linking orbifold choices and local module structure in a clear representation-theoretic framework.
- Intertwiner formulas and nondegenerate pairings yield a unique expansion for algebra elements as linear combinations of paths, offering explicit computational methods.
Searching arXiv for the cited paper and closely related records. arXiv search query: (Meur, 2018) The Demonet quiver is the quiver that appears in the Morita reduction of a skew group algebra of a path algebra. For a finite group acting by automorphisms on the path algebra of a finite quiver , with algebraically closed and , one considers the skew group algebra
Reiten–Riedtmann and Demonet show that there exists an idempotent such that the basic algebra
is Morita equivalent to and canonically isomorphic to the path algebra 0 of a new quiver 1 (Meur, 2018). In this form, the Demonet quiver gives a concrete combinatorial model for the Morita reduced algebra, while explicit formulas identify arbitrary elements of 2 as 3-linear combinations of paths in 4.
1. Algebraic setting and idempotent reduction
Let 5 be a finite quiver, let 6 be the vertex-idempotent algebra, and let 7 be the 8-bimodule spanned by the arrows of 9, so that 0. The finite group 1 acts by automorphisms on 2, and the resulting skew group algebra is
3
(Meur, 2018).
For each vertex 4, the stabiliser is
5
and 6 denotes the corresponding primitive idempotent. One fixes a complete set of irreducible 7-modules 8, and for each 9 chooses a primitive idempotent 0 such that
1
With 2 a choice of representatives of the 3-orbits of vertices, the idempotent used in the reduction is
4
Reiten–Riedtmann and Demonet show that 5 and 6 are Morita equivalent, and that under the stated assumption on the chosen simples 7, there is a canonical algebra isomorphism
8
(Meur, 2018).
This establishes the Demonet quiver not merely as an auxiliary combinatorial gadget, but as the literal path-algebra presentation of the Morita reduced algebra.
2. Vertex set and arrow spaces
A vertex of 9 is a pair 0 where 1 and 2 (Meur, 2018). Thus each orbit representative 3 is refined by the choice of an irreducible representation of its stabiliser.
For two such vertices 4 and 5, one first forms the 6-module
7
where 8 denotes the conjugate 9-module 0. The vector space of arrows
1
has a natural 2-basis given by
3
Equivalently, the number of arrows is
4
Concretely, one chooses a 5-basis of 6 and declares each basis element to be an arrow of 7 (Meur, 2018).
The construction can be summarized as follows.
| Component | Definition |
|---|---|
| Vertices | Pairs 8 with 9 and 0 |
| Arrow source/target | From 1 to 2 |
| Arrow space | 3 |
This description makes the representation theory of the stabilisers intrinsic to the quiver itself. A plausible implication is that 4 encodes, at the level of vertices and arrow multiplicities, both the orbit structure of 5 on 6 and the local module-theoretic data of the stabiliser subgroups.
3. Canonical identification of 7 with the basic algebra
The isomorphism
8
is canonical in the sense described in the source: each arrow
9
of 0 is sent to
1
(Meur, 2018).
In this form, the basic algebra 2 is literally the path algebra of the Demonet quiver. The statement is stronger than a mere existence theorem for a Morita equivalent quiver algebra: it identifies the reduced algebra explicitly and functorially through the chosen idempotent and the decorated vertex set.
The data entering the quiver are not arbitrary. The choice of orbit representatives 3, the stabilisers 4, the sets 5, and the idempotents 6 together determine the vertex set and the canonical embedding of arrows into the reduced skew group algebra. This suggests that the Demonet quiver is best understood as the representation-theoretic refinement of the orbit quiver obtained from the group action.
4. Intertwiners and explicit path expansions
A central contribution of the cited work is an explicit procedure for decomposing arbitrary elements of 7 as linear combinations of paths in 8 (Meur, 2018). This is done via the algebra of intertwiners and a monoidal-category formalism.
For each path 9 in 0 of length 1, one associates an intertwiner
2
obtained by iterated 3-product of the individual-arrow maps 4. Dual to 5 is a second intertwiner 6 relative to the dual bimodule 7, chosen so that
8
Theorem 2.12 asserts that the map
9
is an algebra isomorphism, where 0 is the algebra of intertwiners. Moreover, every intertwiner 1 of degree 2 has the unique expansion
3
and the coefficients are computed by nondegenerate pairings in the monoidal category of 4-bimodules.
Composing with the inverse of Demonet’s identification yields an algebra isomorphism
5
and therefore any element 6 admits the explicit path expansion
7
Hence the coefficient of a basis path 8 is exactly the scalar
9
This gives a computational answer to the Morita reduction problem: not only is 00 identified with a path algebra, but arbitrary elements of the reduced algebra can be written explicitly in the path basis by a pairing formula.
5. Path structure, linear independence, and examples
Because 01 has no further relations beyond those of a free path algebra, all paths in 02 are linearly independent (Meur, 2018). There is no mesh relation or zero relation at the level of 03 itself.
The source emphasizes that the only relations arise indirectly from the 04-action in 05. These appear through coefficients 06 describing how 07 permutes paths of 08, and these coefficients influence the decomposition of a 09-skewed cycle in the 10 basis. Thus the combinatorial freedom of the path algebra is preserved in 11, while the group action re-enters through the expansion coefficients of elements coming from 12.
Two examples in the source illustrate the construction. In one example, 13 and 14 swaps 15 while fixing a new vertex 16. The resulting quiver has decorated vertices such as 17, 18, and 19, and the arrow multiplicities are determined by the four 20-modules 21 computed there (Meur, 2018).
In another example, 22 is the cyclic quiver on 23 vertices, 24 is the dihedral group, and one considers the 25-cycle
26
The formulas yield
27
summed over all length-28 oriented cycles 29 in 30. No further local relation is imposed (Meur, 2018).
6. Morita equivalence, hereditary structure, and graded form
The Morita reduction proceeds in two steps. First, the skew group algebra 31 is hereditary and Morita equivalent to its basic algebra
32
Second, one reduces further by the idempotent 33, so that
34
is again Morita equivalent to 35 (Meur, 2018). Demonet’s theorem then identifies this final basic algebra with the path algebra of 36.
The graded setting behaves compatibly with the ungraded one: all of the above remains valid with graded Morita equivalences, and the degree of an arrow in 37 agrees with the grading by tensor length in 38 (Meur, 2018). This compatibility is structurally important because it preserves the tensor-length filtration inherited from the presentation 39.
The principal references named in the source delineate the development of the subject. Reiten–Riedtmann provide the hereditary skew-group-algebra framework and the initial Morita reduction. Demonet gives the explicit quiver 40 and the isomorphism
41
Le Meur develops the explicit formulas, through intertwiners, monoidal-category operations, and nondegenerate pairings, that decompose arbitrary elements of 42 in the path basis of 43 (Meur, 2018).
Taken together, these results present the Demonet quiver as the exact path-algebra realization of the Morita reduced skew group algebra, with a fully explicit translation between algebra elements and quiver paths.