Custom-Designed IMU Sensors

• Custom-designed IMU sensors are specialized sensor modules engineered for precise multi-axis motion and orientation measurements tailored to specific industrial, ergonomic, or robotic applications.
• They integrate low-power microcontrollers, 9-DoF MEMS units, and synchronized wireless protocols to deliver real-time, frame-accurate kinematic data.
• These systems enable scalable, cost-effective deployments by offering full software transparency, customizable sensor fusion, and interoperability with popular digital frameworks.

Custom-designed inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors are application-specific, embedded sensor modules engineered to measure multi-axis motion and orientation, tailored for domain constraints such as ergonomics, robotics, or human–machine interaction. Unlike off-the-shelf commercial IMUs, custom solutions allow optimization of sensing electronics, power, form factor, communication interfaces, and system-level integration to meet the strict environmental, cost, and interoperability demands of industrial deployment and research-grade kinematic pipelines.

1. Hardware Composition and Architectural Principles

A custom-designed IMU sensor typically integrates:

• A microcontroller/SoC, e.g., Nordic nRF52 Series (ARM Cortex-M4 + 2.4 GHz wireless transceiver) for low power and reliable wireless data streaming.
• A 9-DoF MEMS sensor, such as the BNO080, featuring 3D accelerometer, gyroscope, and magnetometer, and an on-chip sensor fusion engine delivering orientation as quaternions at rates up to 100 Hz.
• Power subsystem with a compact (120 mAh typical) Li-Po cell and charge controller (e.g. MCP73831), supporting several hours of continuous operation.
• Form factors engineered for unobtrusive mounting; e.g., 45×28×10 mm, hardened for industrial electromagnetic interference, allowing >10 parallel nodes.
• Application-specific mounting and body-segment registration protocol; e.g., elastic straps under PPE for ergonomic studies, precise anatomical colocation for kinematic accuracy.

The cost per node can be maintained in the €50–€70 range for component BOMs, enabling affordable large-scale deployment relative to proprietary IMU kits costing several orders of magnitude more (González-Alonso et al., 24 Jan 2026).

2. Multi-Node Data Acquisition, Time Synchronization, and Communication

Custom IMU systems provide tailored acquisition protocols:

• Multinode operation, e.g., up to 11 simultaneous nodes streaming wirelessly in a robust, interference-resistant protocol (BLE or proprietary channel-hopping).
• Per-sensor time synchronization using either a physical “heading reset” (realignment of device axes to the global reference frame) or reference pose calibration (e.g., N-pose).
• Embedded device fusion delivers orientation as quaternions $q_i(t) = [w,x,y,z]$ at specified output rates (commonly 100 Hz), minimizing host-side processing.
• Direct broadcasting into open software frameworks (Unity3D, Python viewers) for both live visualization and CSV-based logging.

This architecture enables scalable frame-accurate streaming across devices positioned on all major body regions of interest (e.g., trunk, upper limbs, wrists) under industrial conditions (González-Alonso et al., 24 Jan 2026).

3. Software Pipeline: Acquisition, Inverse Kinematics, and Report Generation

A key differentiator of custom-IMU pipelines is complete transparency and extensibility of the software stack. The canonical pipeline implements:

1. Sensors: Real-time acquisition clients (C# Unity3D, Python) capture quaternion timeseries from each IMU.
2. Alignment and Avatar Mapping: Sensor-to-body alignment matrices are applied live for avatar animation, supporting error checking on placement.
3. Selective Frame Extraction: Ergonomist-interactive tools enable active interval segmentation (e.g., via button presses during relevant task cycles).
4. Movement Analysis: OpenSim’s OpenSense module applies inverse kinematics (IK) to map each sensor quaternion to anatomical joint angles $\theta_j(t)$ per limb and timepoint. N-pose-anchored calibration is leveraged, and a rational musculoskeletal model (e.g., Rajagopal2015) defines kinematic constraints.
5. Ergonomics Assessment: Python scripts compute instantaneous joint metrics, extract percent-time-in-range, and score with RULA (Rapid Upper Limb Assessment) diagrams for objective risk reporting. Outputs include traffic-light visualization and CSV batch reports, interoperable with industrial prevention workflows.

The open architecture allows direct researcher access and customization of all analysis steps, contrasting sharply with the “black box” nature of many commercial setups (González-Alonso et al., 24 Jan 2026).

4. Signal Processing, Calibration, and Metric Extraction

Signal processing is dominated by minimal in-node fusion (BNO080’s embedded algorithms) and precise quaternion handling:

• Quaternion relabeling for each sampled time $t$: $Q_\text{child}(t)$ and $Q_\text{parent}(t)$ are combined to yield the relative orientation $$Q_\text{rel}(t) = Q_\text{parent}(t)^{-1} \otimes Q_\text{child}(t)$$.
• These are converted, with user-defined Euler angle conventions (e.g., XYZ), to physiological axes of rotation for subsequent kinematic or ergonomic scoring.
• No further host-side low-pass filtering (all fusion is on-device); users have the ability to substitute or upgrade fusion routines (e.g., Mahony, Madgwick, EKF) to meet higher specificity or robustness needs.
• Output metrics include multi-degree-of-freedom joint angles, directly input to domain-specific assessment frameworks (e.g., RULA for WMSD risk scoring).

Calibration accuracy is ensured via standardized initial poses, and the system easily accommodates variable sensor placements and user-chosen body models (González-Alonso et al., 24 Jan 2026).

5. Quantitative Validation against Commercial Systems

Rigorous experimental validation against certified commercial IMU platforms is a mandatory step for custom-IMU pipelines. The González-Alonso et al. pipeline:

• Compared a 5-node custom system (BNO080, nRF52) against a 7-node Movella (formerly Xsens) Awinda system as reference on an automotive ergonomic task.
• Achieved time-series cross-correlation coefficients $\rho = 0.952$–$0.973$ and root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 7.4–9.6$^\circ$ for elbows and 8.7–11.5$^\circ$ for shoulders (major flexion/extension axes).
• Instantaneous RULA discrepancies were $\leq$1 point for 99% of measurements, with aggregate risk band agreement differing by less than 5% cycle time.
• The assessment matched the granularity and risk quantification fidelity of the gold-standard—even under factory-floor electromagnetic and lighting interference conditions (González-Alonso et al., 24 Jan 2026).

This level of agreement is critical for regulatory compliance and industrial deployment in risk-sensitive environments.

6. System Impact, Extensibility, and Research Opportunities

Custom-IMU pipelines offer:

• Significant reduction in acquisition cost; component-level pricing ($<$€70 per node) enables deployment at scale across workforces, in contrast to proprietary platforms ($>$€2000).
• Full transparency and researcher-level modifiability: raw data, sensor fusion, IK model choice, and analytic post-processing can be customized, peer-reviewed, and open-sourced.
• Interoperability: modular design lets users integrate new sensors (e.g., head, trunk, lower limbs), alter radio protocols (BLE, Wi-Fi), and interface with external digital twin or analytics backends.
• Feasibility for preventive ergonomics, continuous monitoring, large-cohort research studies, and domain extension (e.g., gait analysis, sports performance).

The adoption of such open, custom-designed IMU systems enables widespread ergonomics risk quantification, accelerates research reproducibility, and supports the evolution of next-generation workplace health technologies (González-Alonso et al., 24 Jan 2026).

---

Key reference:

González-Alonso et al., "Development of an end-to-end hardware and software pipeline for affordable and feasible ergonomics assessment in the automotive industry" (González-Alonso et al., 24 Jan 2026).