Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Contravariant Hochschild Cohomology

Updated 27 March 2026
  • Contravariant Hochschild cohomology is a generalized cohomological theory that encodes Ext-groups and duality for associative algebras and schemes.
  • It features a rich algebraic structure with cup products, Gerstenhaber brackets, and BV operators that are key to analyzing deformation and Poisson structures.
  • The theory underpins practical applications in deformation theory, noncommutative geometry, and string topology through explicit constructions from DG algebras and polyvector fields.

Contravariant Hochschild cohomology is a generalized cohomological theory arising in both algebra and algebraic geometry, with a defining feature that the functoriality is contravariant with respect to morphisms. It plays a foundational role in deformation theory, noncommutative geometry, and derived algebraic geometry. Contravariant Hochschild cohomology may be constructed for associative algebras or for schemes, typically encoding Ext-groups of derived invariants that naturally admit rich algebraic structures—most notably, Gerstenhaber and Batalin–Vilkovisky (BV) algebra structures. Modern developments place contravariant Hochschild (co)homology in a bivariant framework with deep connections to duality, deformation quantization, and string topology.

1. Definitions and Foundational Constructions

For a unital differential graded (DG) kk-algebra AA, the contravariant Hochschild cochain complex is given by

C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)

where A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k) is the kk-dual bimodule. The total differential splits into internal and external components, and the cohomology

HH∗(A,A∨)=ker⁡δ/imδHH^*(A, A^\vee) = \ker \delta / \mathrm{im} \delta

is the contravariant Hochschild cohomology. The construction generalizes to the setting of schemes: given a separated, essentially finite type morphism x:X→Sx: X \to S of noetherian schemes, the derived Hochschild complex is

Hx:=LΔx∗ RΔx∗ OX∈Dqc(X)H_x := L\Delta_x^*\,R\Delta_{x*}\,\mathcal{O}_X \in D_{qc}(X)

and the contravariant Hochschild groups are

HHi(X/S)=ExtOXi(Hx,Hx)HH^i(X/S) = \mathrm{Ext}^i_{\mathcal{O}_X}(H_x, H_x)

which are modules over the ring ⨁jHj(S,OS)\bigoplus_{j} H^j(S, \mathcal{O}_S) (Tarrío et al., 2010, Abbaspour, 2013).

2. Algebraic Structures: Cup Product, Gerstenhaber Bracket, and BV Operator

The cup product in AA0 is defined by

AA1

which is associative and graded-commutative on cohomology:

AA2

A Gerstenhaber bracket is given by explicit insertion operations, making AA3 a Gerstenhaber algebra. When AA4 is Calabi–Yau or satisfies Poincaré duality (e.g., AA5 in the derived category), a BV-operator AA6 of degree AA7 may be constructed via duality from the Connes operator, giving

AA8

Thus AA9 is a BV algebra (Abbaspour, 2013). In the geometric (scheme-theoretic) picture, cup product and graded-commutativity are similarly realized, and the unit is the identity map C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)0 (Tarrío et al., 2010).

3. The Contravariant Viewpoint and Polyvector Fields

For the exterior algebra C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)1 on a finite-dimensional vector space C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)2, the Hochschild cohomology is controlled by contravariant data:

C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)3

where C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)4 denotes even-weight polyvector fields on C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)5. This is underpinned by Koszul duality and the Hochschild–Kostant–Rosenberg theorem, with the key property that each cohomology class is represented by a polyvector field acting contravariantly by differentiation on C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)6 (Wong, 2016).

The Gerstenhaber algebra structure on C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)7 corresponds to the Schouten–Nijenhuis bracket on these polyvector fields, and the cup product matches the wedge product. If C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)8 is even, the divergence operator becomes a BV-operator, resulting in a BV structure (Wong, 2016).

4. Functoriality, Duality, and the Bivariant Framework

Contravariant Hochschild cohomology fits in a three-functor formalism based on Grothendieck duality:

  • C∗(A,A∨):=HomAe(B(A,A,A),A∨)≅Homk((s A‾)⊗∗,A∨)C^*(A, A^\vee) := \mathrm{Hom}_{A^e}(B(A,A,A), A^\vee) \cong \mathrm{Hom}_k((s\,\overline{A})^{\otimes *}, A^\vee)9: (derived) inverse image
  • A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)0: derived direct image
  • A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)1: extraordinary inverse image

In schemes, the cup product and all structure maps are compatible with functorial pullbacks, base change, projection formulas, and canonical orientations/fundamental classes

A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)2

These orientations are central in realizing Gysin maps and in defining a general Fulton–MacPherson–type bivariant theory (Tarrío et al., 2010).

5. Formality, Deformation Theory, and Poisson Structures

For the exterior algebra in even dimension, the differential graded Lie algebra (DGLA) of Hochschild cochains is A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)3-formal, i.e., it is quasi-isomorphic as an A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)4-algebra to its cohomology, and all higher Massey brackets vanish. Thus the formal deformation space is governed by Maurer–Cartan elements of the polyvector field algebra, i.e., by even-weight formal Poisson bivector fields:

A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)5

giving a geometric classification of deformations in terms of Poisson structures on the dual space (Wong, 2016). In contrast, when A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)6 is odd, formality may fail, as evidenced by nontrivial Massey products (Wong, 2016).

6. Geometric and Topological Applications

When A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)7 for a closed oriented manifold A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)8, A∨=Homk(A,k)A^\vee = \mathrm{Hom}_k(A, k)9 is a homologically smooth DG Hopf algebra (up to homotopy) with Poincaré duality, and kk0 acquires a BV structure. This recovers, via Burghelea–Fiedorowicz–Goodwillie, the Chas–Sullivan BV structure on the homology of the free loop space. Further, Sullivan chord diagrams act naturally on the Hochschild chain and cochain complexes, encoding cup product, Connes operator, BV operator, and relevant homotopies in a combinatorial, geometric model for string topology operations (Abbaspour, 2013).

7. Summary Table: Contravariant Hochschild Cohomology in Key Settings

Setting Complex/Group Structure
DG algebra kk1 kk2 Gerstenhaber/BV algebra
Scheme kk3 kk4 Graded-commutative kk5-algebra, orientation classes
kk6, kk7 even kk8 kk9-formal, BV structure
HH∗(A,A∨)=ker⁡δ/imδHH^*(A, A^\vee) = \ker \delta / \mathrm{im} \delta0, HH∗(A,A∨)=ker⁡δ/imδHH^*(A, A^\vee) = \ker \delta / \mathrm{im} \delta1 odd HH∗(A,A∨)=ker⁡δ/imδHH^*(A, A^\vee) = \ker \delta / \mathrm{im} \delta2 BV structure, may not be formal

Contravariant Hochschild cohomology unifies and generalizes cohomological, geometric, and topological invariants, encoding deformation, duality, and string-topological phenomena through a robust algebraic framework (Wong, 2016, Abbaspour, 2013, Tarrío et al., 2010).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (3)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Contravariant Hochschild Cohomology.