Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Constructible Commutative Semigroup Rings

Updated 27 December 2025
  • Constructible commutative semigroup rings are semigroup rings k[S] over a field, where the affine semigroup S is constructed via algebraic operations like gluing and join.
  • They facilitate the explicit construction of projective closures and one-dimensional local rings with controlled Hilbert functions and strongly indispensable minimal free resolutions.
  • Utilizing techniques such as Gröbner bases and tensor products, these rings reveal deep combinatorial and homological insights, addressing open problems in commutative algebra.

A constructible commutative semigroup ring is a semigroup ring k[S]k[S] over a field kk, where the affine semigroup SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d is obtained via algebraic constructions such as gluing and join. These operations furnish large, explicit families of semigroup rings with prescribed homological and algebraic properties—most notably, projective closures exhibiting the Cohen–Macaulay (CM) or Gorenstein property, infinite families of one-dimensional Gorenstein local rings with controlled Hilbert functions, and classes of semigroup rings with strongly indispensable minimal free resolutions. The study of such rings is tightly interwoven with the structure of the underlying semigroups and their defining lattice ideals, presenting a rich interplay between combinatorial and homological algebraic features (Singh et al., 2023).

1. Affine Semigroups and Their Semigroup Rings

An affine semigroup SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d is a finitely generated submonoid of Nd\mathbb{N}^d. The associated semigroup ring is defined as k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d] for generators a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n of SS, where tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}. Equivalently, k[S]R/I(S)k[S] \cong R / I(S) with kk0 and the prime lattice ideal kk1, kk2, generated by all binomials kk3 such that kk4 (Singh et al., 2023).

2. Gluing of Numerical Semigroups and Its Ring-Theoretic Consequences

Given numerical semigroups kk5 and kk6 (submonoids of kk7 with kk8 of generators kk9), gluing constructs a new numerical semigroup SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d0 for suitable integers SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d1 and SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d2 satisfying SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d3 and natural exclusion conditions on SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d4 and SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d5. The defining ideal SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d6 of the glued semigroup can be explicitly computed as

SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d7

for generators SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d8 of SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d9 and SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d0 of SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d1 (Singh et al., 2023).

Table: Key Conditions in Numerical-Semigroup Gluing

Parameter Description Constraints
SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d2 Linear combination in SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d3 SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d4, SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d5
SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d6 Linear combination in SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d7 SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d8, set-intersection empty
SNdS \subset \mathbb{N}^d9 Glued semigroup Nd\mathbb{N}^d0 as above

These glued semigroups serve as the basis for constructing projective closures and local rings with desired homological properties.

3. Homological Properties: Cohen–Macaulayness and the Gorenstein Condition

For "nice gluing" Nd\mathbb{N}^d1, defined by Nd\mathbb{N}^d2, Nd\mathbb{N}^d3 with Nd\mathbb{N}^d4, the projective closure Nd\mathbb{N}^d5, with homogeneous coordinate ring Nd\mathbb{N}^d6, exhibits the following property ([(Singh et al., 2023), Theorem 2.10]):

  • If the largest generator of Nd\mathbb{N}^d7 is Nd\mathbb{N}^d8 (from Nd\mathbb{N}^d9), k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]0 is arithmetically Cohen–Macaulay (aCM) or Gorenstein if k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]1 are so.
  • If the largest generator is k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]2 (from k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]3), k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]4 fails to be aCM.

The proof utilizes a Gröbner basis construction, showing that the union of homogenized Gröbner bases for k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]5 and k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]6, together with the binomial corresponding to the gluing, remains a Gröbner basis for k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]7. The Gorenstein property for one-dimensional local rings follows from the symmetry of the glued semigroup under nice gluing.

Under "star gluing" (with k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]8, k[S]:=k[ta1,,tan]k[t1,,td]k[S] := k[t^{a_1}, \ldots, t^{a_n}] \subset k[t_1, \ldots, t_d]9), if the tangent cones of a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n0, a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n1 are Cohen–Macaulay, then so is a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n2. These constructions yield infinite families of symmetric semigroups whose corresponding local Gorenstein rings have Cohen–Macaulay tangent cones and thus non-decreasing Hilbert functions (positive answers to Rossi's question) (Singh et al., 2023).

4. Joins of Affine Semigroups and Strongly Indispensable Resolutions

For affine semigroups a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n3 with disjoint and a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n4-linearly independent sets of extremal rays a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n5, the join a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n6 produces a new simplicial semigroup. The semigroup ring a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n7 possesses a minimal graded free resolution that is strongly indispensable (SIFR) if, at each homological position, the difference of two distinct a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n8-degrees does not lie in a1,,ana_1, \ldots, a_n9 (Singh et al., 2023).

Theorem (3.4): SS0 has a strongly indispensable minimal free resolution if and only if both SS1 and SS2 do. The tensor product of minimal free resolutions SS3 yields a minimal free resolution of SS4, and the Cauchy-product formula for the Betti numbers holds:

SS5

The differentials act as in the tensor product of complexes.

5. Explicit Constructions and Illustrative Examples

Several concrete families and explicit computations underscore the power of the gluing and join processes:

  • Cohen–Macaulay Gluing: SS6, SS7; with SS8, SS9, the glued semigroup tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}0 yields projective closure tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}1 that is arithmetically Cohen–Macaulay.
  • Gorenstein Monomial Curves and Hilbert Functions: For tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}2, tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}3, star gluing with tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}4, tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}5 gives tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}6. The Hilbert function tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}7 computed as tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}8 is non-decreasing: tai:=t1ai1tdaidt^{a_i} := t_1^{a_{i1}} \cdots t_d^{a_{id}}9.
  • Join Example and SIFR: For k[S]R/I(S)k[S] \cong R / I(S)0 and k[S]R/I(S)k[S] \cong R / I(S)1, the join k[S]R/I(S)k[S] \cong R / I(S)2 with generators k[S]R/I(S)k[S] \cong R / I(S)3 has k[S]R/I(S)k[S] \cong R / I(S)4 in k[S]R/I(S)k[S] \cong R / I(S)5. The tensor product of the two Koszul-type resolutions yields a 4-step minimal resolution, and since both factors are strongly indispensable, so is the join (Singh et al., 2023).

6. Broader Algebraic and Combinatorial Relevance

The gluing and join constructions address open questions in the theory of semigroup rings and local algebra. Infinitely many new examples of Gorenstein local rings with non-decreasing Hilbert functions (affirming Rossi's question) are produced via star gluing. The join operation provides a systematic way to construct semigroup rings with strongly indispensable minimal free resolutions, contributing examples relevant to the question posed by Charalambous and Thoma on lattice ideals. The explicit description of generators and relations also aids computational approaches in commutative algebra and leads to effective criteria for key algebraic properties (Singh et al., 2023).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (1)

Topic to Video (Beta)

No one has generated a video about this topic yet.

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this topic yet.

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Constructible Commutative Semigroup Rings.