Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Confidential Computing Technology

Updated 21 November 2025
  • Confidential Computing Technology is a hardware-rooted approach using trusted execution environments that isolate and encrypt code and data during execution.
  • It ensures confidentiality, integrity, and freshness by applying memory encryption, runtime measurement, and attestation protocols to resist sophisticated attacks.
  • It supports diverse architectures including CPUs, GPUs, and decentralized platforms, enabling secure multi-tenant cloud, edge, and AI applications.

Confidential computing technology is a hardware-rooted paradigm for protecting the confidentiality and integrity of code and data during execution, even in the presence of adversaries with complete control over software stacks, including the operating system, hypervisor, and platform administrators. It relies fundamentally on Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs), which enforce fine-grained hardware isolation at the memory, execution, and attestation levels, thereby enabling secure processing of sensitive assets across public clouds, multi-tenant datacenters, edge–cloud hierarchies, and decentralized platforms (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Zhou et al., 2023, Agarwal et al., 6 Nov 2025, Dhar et al., 16 Jul 2024, Gu et al., 3 Jul 2025, Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024).

1. Architectural Foundations and Security Properties

Confidential computing is built upon the hardware-enforced capability to create enclaves—regions of memory in which the CPU ensures that only authorized code can access data, and whose contents are transparently encrypted and integrity-protected as they leave the processor package. For example, Intel SGX defines “enclaves” with encrypted Enclave Page Cache (EPC) pages and a memory encryption engine, whereas AMD SEV(-SNP) applies memory encryption and integrity to entire virtual machine memory spaces using per-VM keys (Agarwal et al., 6 Nov 2025, Zhou et al., 2023, Chen, 2022).

Core security properties:

Expanding on the trust base, recent confidential computing systems, such as CCxTrust, compose multiple roots of trust—including CPU-TEE, GPU-TEE, and TPM—in collaborative architectures to enable stronger, cross-platform and cross-cloud attestation semantics (Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024).

2. Threat Model and Adversary Scope

The standard adversary model assumes that all system software is potentially malicious: the attacker can control the host OS, hypervisor, boot environment, firmware, and can inject, replay, or snoop on memory and I/O (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Gu et al., 3 Jul 2025, Zobaed et al., 2023, Agarwal et al., 6 Nov 2025). Confidential computing restricts the trust base to a minimal hardware root (the silicon implementation of the TEE, platform-specific microcode/firmware, and, where applicable, the TPM or security processor):

  • Memory Confidentiality: Encryption within the TEE or at the memory controller (e.g., AMD SP, NVIDIA FSP), so attackers cannot read data via DRAM or DMA.
  • Execution Integrity: Only attested and approved code images execute within the enclave, with sealed entry/exit points and runtime measurement enforcement (Galanou et al., 23 Feb 2024, Sahita et al., 2023).
  • Side Channel and Physical Attacks: Most TEEs do not protect against side-channel analysis (cache timing, page-fault), physical probing of on-die wires, or DoS; these are active areas of ongoing research (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Zhou et al., 2023, Gu et al., 3 Jul 2025).

Emerging attacks include side-channels via resource contention, microarchitectural state (e.g., Spectre/Meltdown/Foreshadow), and timing/dma-level leakage; mitigations range from data-oblivious algorithms to hardware partitioning and continuous attestation (Chen, 2022, Agarwal et al., 6 Nov 2025).

3. Protocols: Attestation, Provisioning, and Secure Workflow

Remote Attestation and Key Exchange

Remote attestation sequences construct a cryptographic proof of enclave state that can be verified off-platform (e.g., by data owners or cloud customers):

  1. The enclave generates a measurement hash (of code/data and environment).
  2. The TEE uses its private key to sign a quote (e.g., Intel’s quoting enclave, AMD’s SP, NVIDIA’s GSP/SEC2, ARM’s RMM) (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Gu et al., 3 Jul 2025, Abdollahi et al., 11 Apr 2025).
  3. A remote party verifies the quote and measurement, establishing trust and bootstrapping a secure channel.
  4. Key exchange (e.g., via aTLS or on-chain public keys) secures input provisioning; session keys may be generated inside the TEE and sealed to hardware (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Agarwal et al., 6 Nov 2025, Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024).

Composite attestation, as instantiated by CCxTrust, embeds TEE and TPM reports into a single, joint signature, eliminating TOCTOU and report-mixing attacks and offering efficient, scalable proofs for multi-component workloads (Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024).

Secure Provisioning and Workflow

  • In decentralized and cloud architectures (e.g., Atoma, OpenStack+SEV, Ascend-CC), components negotiate encrypted input/output channels using attested key establishment, placing encrypted user and model data directly into enclaves (or into in-use cryptoprocessors on NPUs/GPUs) (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Zhou et al., 2023, Dhar et al., 16 Jul 2024).
  • Task execution is atomicized to avoid observable leakage: e.g., in Ascend-CC, all host-side direct memory mappings are unmapped before decrypting or running AI jobs inside the NPU TEE; only once post-processing is complete are results remapped and exposed (Dhar et al., 16 Jul 2024).
  • Multistep decentralized flows (Atoma, blockchain-based edge–cloud) use consensus layers and smart contract–mediated task scheduling, with attestation proofs written on-chain for auditability and verifiability (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Alaverdyan et al., 2023).

4. Hardware Platforms, Software Stacks, and Heterogeneity

Confidential computing support encompasses a growing ecosystem:

5. Performance and Practical Impact

Benchmarks show that well-provisioned workloads incur low-to-moderate overheads:

Environment TEE Overhead Notes
Atoma/TEE AI inference ≤10% Δ_attest ≈ 100–300 ms, exec ≈2–5% (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024)
Cloud AI/HPC (SEV, SGX) 1.15–1.5× VM/memory encryption; with ORAM ≥4.8× (Chen, 2022)
Containerized (TCX/SEV) ~5.8% (SPEC2017) vs. baseline; lower for network IO (Brasser et al., 2022)
GPU-CC/Ascend-CC (AI) <0.1–22% <0.1% for large LLMs, ≤22% for on-device ML (Gu et al., 3 Jul 2025, Dhar et al., 16 Jul 2024, Abdollahi et al., 11 Apr 2025)
PIM-Enclave (in-memory) 3.7% vs. baseline PIM for k-means; <2× versus CPU TEE (Duy et al., 2021)

Most overhead comes during attestation/setup, memory encryption for large data/VMs, and enclave context switches. Modern implementations, especially at the NPU/GPU level, parallelize encryption/decryption and leverage batched key management to further minimize practical latency.

6. Limitations, Challenges, and Research Frontiers

Confidential computing systems, despite recent advances, are limited by:

  • Side Channels: Persistent vulnerability to microarchitectural side-channels (timing, cache, speculative execution, page-fault) (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Gu et al., 3 Jul 2025, Zobaed et al., 2023). Algorithmic countermeasures, hardware partitioning, and data-oblivious kernel design are ongoing research areas.
  • Hardware Vulnerability Surface: Attacks like Foreshadow or WeSee expose limitations in microcode/hardware; probabilistic analysis suggests that compositional layering of diverse TEEs reduces aggregate risk:

Pcompromise(λ)≈∏i=1nθiP_{\mathrm{compromise}(\lambda)} \approx \prod_{i=1}^n\theta_i

where θi\theta_i is the compromise probability per layer (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024).

  • Scalability: Attestation at scale incurs cost (e.g., on-chain gas in decentralized settings, startup latency in HPC). Proposals include committee-based verification, batching, and delegated attestation (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024).
  • Usability: Partitioning legacy software into trusted/untrusted parts (SGX/EPC limits), container orchestration, and key-management integration present significant engineering challenges (Chen, 2022, Agarwal et al., 6 Nov 2025, Zhou et al., 2023).
  • Interoperability and Cross-Platform Trust: Lack of unified trust models limits multi-cloud and heterogenous device deployments; composite approaches like CCxTrust address this (Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024).
  • Formal Assurance: Formally verified monitors (e.g., Rust/Coq implementation of security monitors for RISC-V, ACE embedded TEE) are being adopted but remain rare in mainstream hardware (Ozga et al., 2023, Ozga et al., 19 May 2025, Sahita et al., 2023).
  • Accelerator Integration: GPU-CC, Ascend-CC, and analogous technologies are extending the TEE trust boundary into AI/ML accelerators, but remain proprietary or documented only partially, and raise concerns around transparency and open security validation (Gu et al., 3 Jul 2025, Dhar et al., 16 Jul 2024).

Open problems also include: automating side-channel detection, reducing attestation overhead, hybrid TEE–cryptographic computation frameworks, anonymous attestation with strong privacy, and optimizing for high-throughput AI and multi-party collaboration (Lee et al., 17 Oct 2024, Zobaed et al., 2023, Chen, 2022, Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024).

7. Applications and Future Directions

Confidential computing is deployed in a growing array of domains:

Future direction emphasizes end-to-end attestation and transparency, standardization of composite trust protocols, unified cross-device and cross-cloud policy enforcement, and integration with cryptographically secure computation paradigms (HE, MPC) for use cases where TEEs alone do not suffice (Shang et al., 5 Dec 2024, Agarwal et al., 6 Nov 2025, Chen, 2022).

References:

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (20)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Confidential Computing Technology.

Add Bell Notification Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Follow Topic by Email