Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 175 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 218 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 442 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Charged Non-Rotating Black Hole

Updated 12 November 2025
  • Charged non-rotating black hole is a solution of the Einstein–Maxwell equations featuring mass, electric charge, and zero angular momentum, described by the Reissner–Nordström metric.
  • It reveals complex interactions between gravitational and electromagnetic forces that affect particle dynamics, ISCO stability, and the formation of accretion structures.
  • Research on these black holes probes alternative gravity theories and quantum corrections, offering insights into high-energy astrophysical phenomena and particle acceleration.

A charged non-rotating black hole is a solution of the Einstein–Maxwell equations characterized by nonzero electric charge and vanishing angular momentum. Such solutions, most notably the Reissner–Nordström (RN) metric, serve as fundamental models in the paper of classical and quantum gravity, relativistic astrophysics, horizon and singularity structure, as well as the dynamics of fields and matter in strong gravitational and electromagnetic backgrounds. Charged non-rotating black holes are central to analyzing the interplay of gravitational and electromagnetic forces, particle acceleration, stability of accretion flows, and a variety of phenomena in both standard and modified gravity theories.

1. Spacetime Geometry and Electromagnetic Structure

The prototypical charged, non-rotating black hole in four dimensions is described by the RN metric: ds2=f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2(dθ2+sin2θdϕ2),ds^2 = -f(r)\,dt^2 + \frac{dr^2}{f(r)} + r^2(d\theta^2 + \sin^2\theta\, d\phi^2), with

f(r)=12Mr+Q2r2,f(r) = 1 - \frac{2M}{r} + \frac{Q^2}{r^2},

where MM and QQ are the mass and electric charge, respectively. Horizons are located at r±=M±M2Q2r_{\pm} = M \pm \sqrt{M^2 - Q^2}. The electromagnetic field comprises only a radial component: At=Q/rA_t = -Q/r, with field tensor Ftr=Q/r2F_{tr} = Q/r^2. The singularity at r=0r=0 is spacelike and stronger than for Schwarzschild.

In extensions involving external fields or new physics, the local structure is altered:

  • Immersion in an external, asymptotically uniform magnetic field leads to an axially symmetric “magnetized Reissner–Nordström” metric, featuring an additional field parameter BB and metric functions H(r,θ)H(r, \theta), ω(r,θ)\omega(r, \theta) that encode the interplay between QQ, BB, and geometry (Shaymatov et al., 2021).
  • In Lorentz-violating bumblebee gravity, the charged spherically symmetric solution admits a modified metric function,

f(r)=12Mr+(2+)Q22(1+)r2,f(r) = 1 - \frac{2M}{r} + \frac{(2+\ell) Q^2}{2(1+\ell) r^2},

with =ξb2\ell = \xi b^2, providing an effective modification to both the asymptotic geometry and 1/r² charge-tail, while preserving the principal horizon structure (Liu et al., 11 Jul 2024).

  • The Bertotti–Robinson (AdS₂ × S²) solution demonstrates how a RN hole can be globally matched to a universe with a homogeneous electric field, modifying asymptotics to AdS (Alekseev, 8 Nov 2025).

2. Test Particle Dynamics and Effective Potentials

The joint gravitational and EM field decisively alters geodesics, especially for charged test particles. The Hamiltonian formalism yields the equations of motion: pμ=gμν(πνqAν),H=12gμν(πμqAμ)(πνqAν),p^\mu = g^{\mu\nu}(\pi_\nu - q A_\nu), \quad H = \frac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}(\pi_\mu - qA_\mu)(\pi_\nu - qA_\nu), where πμ\pi_\mu is the canonical momentum, and qq is the test particle charge. Stationarity and axial symmetry ensure conservation of energy EE and angular momentum LL.

The resulting radial equation can be expressed as: 12r˙2+R(r)=0\frac{1}{2}\dot{r}^2 + R(r) = 0 or, equivalently,

r˙2=[EVeff(r)][EV(r)],\dot{r}^2 = [E - V_{\rm eff}(r)][E - V_{-}(r)],

where the physically relevant effective potential for charged particles—especially in the magnetized case—reads

Veff(r)=ω(LqAϕ)qAt+Hr2[H(LqAϕ)2+r2]r2(ω1)ω+fH2V_{\rm eff}(r) = \omega(L - q A_\phi) - qA_t + \sqrt{\frac{H\,r^2[H(L - q A_\phi)^2 + r^2]}{r^2 (\omega-1)\omega + f H^2}}

(Shaymatov et al., 2021).

Circular orbits at r=rcr = r_c are characterized by

Veff(rc)=E,dVeffdrrc=0,V_{\rm eff}(r_c) = E, \quad \left. \frac{dV_{\rm eff}}{dr}\right|_{r_c} = 0,

while the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) is at the inflection point: d2Veffdr2rc=0.\left. \frac{d^2V_{\rm eff}}{dr^2}\right|_{r_c} = 0. The ISCO structure is highly sensitive to the interplay of QQ, qq, and BB: positive (negative) test charge leads to an outward (inward) shift, and a nonzero magnetic field further compresses the ISCO (Shaymatov et al., 2021).

3. Accretion Structures and Matter Configurations

In the presence of external magnetic fields and/or test charge, charged-fluid configurations—such as tori and polar clouds—can stably exist around non-rotating charged black holes.

  • The construction of these structures utilizes analytic solutions for the Euler equations in the test-field approximation, allowing for both toroidal (equatorial) and cloud (axial) geometries stabilized by the balance of gravitational, electromagnetic, and centrifugal forces (Kovář et al., 2014).
  • The pressure and density distribution are encoded in a scalar field h(r,θ)h(r,\theta), with level sets determining equipotential surfaces. Rigid rotation (ω=const\omega = \text{const}), polytropic equations of state, and integrability conditions yield explicit parameter constraints for the existence and local stability of these fluid structures.
  • Parameter ranges enabling stability are highly model dependent. Pure magnetic or pure charge cases require small rotation rates and suitable values for QQ, BB, and the rotation parameter. Mixed cases (both QQ and BB nonzero) are necessary to support polar clouds.

Such analytic equilibrium regions may have astrophysical implications for the trapping of charged plasma or dust in black hole magnetospheres.

4. High-Energy Processes and Particle Acceleration

A key dynamical consequence of nonzero black hole charge is the possibility of efficient energy extraction and particle acceleration in the black hole vicinity.

  • The "electric Penrose process" enables neutral infalling particles, upon ionization near the horizon, to acquire substantial energy via the black hole's electric field. The energy gain is determined by the jump in Coulomb potential:

Emaxm+qQr0,E_{\max} \simeq m + \frac{qQ}{r_0},

with Lorentz factors as high as γmax106\gamma_{\max} \simeq 10^6 for maximal astrophysical charges (Tursunov et al., 2021).

  • This process can accelerate protons to PeV ("PeVatron") energies, relevant for cosmic ray astrophysics, even when QMQ \ll M. The mechanism is isotropic and does not rely on spin-driven processes.
  • External homogeneous EM fields (Bertotti–Robinson classes) provide a means of black hole acceleration by balancing conical singularities, connecting the black hole's global acceleration to its charge-to-mass ratio (Alekseev, 8 Nov 2025).
  • Near-horizon particle collisions in the magnetized RN geometry can achieve arbitrarily large center-of-mass energies, with both black hole charge and external field amplifying ECME_{\rm CM}:

ECM2=gμν(p1μ+p2μ)(p1ν+p2ν)=2m2[1gμνu1μu2ν],E_{\rm CM}^2 = -g_{\mu\nu}(p_1^\mu + p_2^\mu)(p_1^\nu + p_2^\nu) = 2m^2[1 - g_{\mu\nu}u_1^\mu u_2^\nu],

with ratios ECM/2m>10E_{\rm CM}/2m > 10 for moderate parameter choices (Shaymatov et al., 2021).

These mechanisms have significant implications for UHECR generation, radiative phenomena, and the energetic budget of accreting plasmas.

5. Modifications from Alternate Gravity and Quantum Effects

Charged non-rotating black holes are sensitive probes of deviations from general relativity and semiclassical effects.

  • In Einstein–bumblebee gravity, the Lorentz-violating parameter \ell alters the metric function, renormalizing the effective charge and affecting the horizon structure, asymptotics, and curvature invariants (Liu et al., 11 Jul 2024).
  • The presence of a cosmological constant introduces an additional cubic term, modifying the global horizon structure and yielding up to three real roots.
  • Quantum tunneling calculations incorporating a Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) lead to robust corrections to both temperature and entropy for lower-dimensional (BTZ) charged black holes:

TGUP=TH[1+λlp2r+λ2lp22r+2],T_{\text{GUP}} = T_H \Big[1 + \frac{\lambda l_p}{2 r_+} - \frac{\lambda^2 l_p^2}{2 r_+^2}\Big],

SGUP=S02πλlpln(r+)2πλ2lp2r++const,S_{\text{GUP}} = S_0 - 2\pi \lambda l_p \ln(r_+) - \frac{2\pi \lambda^2 l_p^2}{r_+} + \text{const},

mirroring the expected "log + inverse area" corrections from string and loop quantum gravity, and implying a Planck-scale remnant for the evaporation endpoint (Sadeghi et al., 2016).

This suggests that charged non-rotating black holes are informative laboratories for testing both infrared (cosmological, Lorentz-violating) and ultraviolet (quantum gravity) modifications of black hole thermodynamics and causal structure.

6. Observational and Astrophysical Consequences

The macroscopic electric charge of astrophysical black holes is expected to be extremely small due to efficient neutralization, but even tiny values Q/M1Q/M \ll 1 may produce observable effects:

Phenomenon Effect of Q and B Reference
ISCO radius rISCOr_{\rm ISCO} Inward shift, strong Q/B (Shaymatov et al., 2021)
Black hole shadow radius (bumblebee) Decreases with Q and ℓ (Liu et al., 11 Jul 2024)
Center-of-mass energy ECME_{\rm CM} Grows rapidly with Q, B (Shaymatov et al., 2021)
High-energy cosmic rays from Sgr A* PeVatron activity possible (Tursunov et al., 2021)
Polarization and Faraday rotation Upper limits on Q (Tursunov et al., 2021)
Trapping of charged matter Existence of tori, clouds (Kovář et al., 2014)

The degeneracy of ISCO radii between magnetized RN and rotating Kerr geometries—capable of mimicking spins up to a/M0.8a/M \sim 0.8—demonstrates challenges in disentangling charge/magnetic effects from spin-based observational inferences based on orbital dynamics. Furthermore, the presence of equipotential surfaces supporting tori or clouds may influence spectral signatures, polarization, and variability in accreting compact objects (Kovář et al., 2014).

7. Horizon and Causal Structures

Charged, non-rotating black holes generically exhibit an inner (Cauchy) and an outer (event) horizon for Q2<M2Q^2 < M^2. As QMQ \rightarrow M, the horizons coalesce in the extremal limit, with distinct modifications under alternative gravity or cosmological constant. The spacetime may asymptote to flatness (GR), AdS (Bertotti–Robinson), or non-Minkowskian behaviors (bumblebee gravity).

The global causal structure is adjusted by the asymptotic properties—AdS asymptotia lead to "box-like" Penrose diagrams, while external fields or Lorentz violation rescale the radial distance or introduce singularities on antipodal axes at cosmological distances (Alekseev, 8 Nov 2025, Liu et al., 11 Jul 2024). In all cases, the curvature singularity at r=0r = 0 persists, except for lower-dimensional models where topology may play a role.

In summary, charged non-rotating black holes serve as a central theoretical construct elucidating the interplay between gravity and electromagnetism, revealing complex effects in particle dynamics, energy extraction, equilibrium matter configurations, and sensitivity to both high- and low-energy modifications of GR. Their paper remains critical for advancing both fundamental theory and the interpretation of astrophysical data.

Forward Email Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Charged Non-Rotating Black Hole.