Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Charged Higgs Bosons (H±)

Updated 3 January 2026
  • Charged Higgs bosons (H±) are massive, electrically charged scalars in extended Higgs sectors that indicate new physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • They are produced via multiple collider channels with decay modes—both fermionic and bosonic—sensitive to tanβ and the specific model structure.
  • Experimental searches employ advanced strategies like kinematic cuts, b-tagging, and invariant mass reconstruction to isolate H± signals from backgrounds.

A charged Higgs boson (H±^\pm) is a massive, electrically charged scalar predicted in any extension of the Standard Model Higgs sector containing multiple complex doublets. The charged Higgs occurs universally in Two-Higgs-Doublet Models (2HDMs), supersymmetric frameworks (MSSM, NMSSM, BLSSM), Higgs triplet models (GMHTM), and dark-sector-motivated Z′ models. Observation of H±^\pm would constitute a direct indication of physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) and provide key information about the structure of electroweak symmetry breaking, the pattern of Yukawa couplings, and potentially even the nature of dark matter.

1. Theoretical Foundations: Scalar Sector and Couplings

In the canonical 2HDM, the scalar sector yields five physical states after electroweak symmetry breaking: two CP-even neutral scalars (hh, HH), one CP-odd (AA), and a charged pair (H±H^\pm) (Bao et al., 2011, Arhrib et al., 2022). The scalar potential is typically

V(Φ1,Φ2)=m112Φ12+m222Φ22(m122Φ1Φ2+h.c.)+quartic termsV(\Phi_1, \Phi_2) = m_{11}^2|\Phi_1|^2 + m_{22}^2|\Phi_2|^2 - (m_{12}^2 \Phi_1^\dagger \Phi_2 + \text{h.c.}) + \text{quartic terms}

with parameters traded for physical masses, mixing angles α\alpha and β\beta (tanβ=v2/v1\tan\beta = v_2/v_1), and a soft-breaking term m122m_{12}^2. Charged-Higgs mass relations are mH±2=mA2+mW2m_{H^\pm}^2 = m_A^2 + m_W^2 in Type-II and MSSM-like models (Arhrib et al., 2018).

The H±^\pm couplings to fermions are set by the Yukawa structure. In Type-II (including MSSM), the interaction Lagrangian is

LY2  Vud  [muvcotβuˉRH+dL+mdvtanβuˉLH+dR]\mathcal{L}_Y \supset -\sqrt{2}\; V_{ud}\; \left[\frac{m_u}{v}\cot\beta\, \bar{u}_R H^+ d_L + \frac{m_d}{v} \tan\beta\, \bar{u}_L H^+ d_R\right]

where VudV_{ud} is the CKM matrix element (Bao et al., 2011). In Type-I and X, both up- and down-type couplings scale as cotβ\cot\beta.

Charged-Higgs–gauge–Higgs couplings arise from doublet covariant derivatives:

  • gH±Wϕg(mW/Mϕ)cos(βα)g_{H^\pm W^\mp \phi} \propto g\, (m_W/M_\phi)\, \cos(\beta-\alpha) for ϕ=H\phi=H, or sin(βα)\sin(\beta-\alpha) for ϕ=A\phi=A (Bao et al., 2011).
  • Triplet models introduce gH±WZsHg_{H^\pm W^\mp Z} \propto s_H, a measure of custodial SU(2) breaking (Collaboration, 2015).

2. Production Mechanisms at Colliders

The dominant production channels depend on mH±m_{H^\pm} and the underlying model:

  • Sub-top mass: ppttˉpp\to t\bar{t} with tbH+t\to b H^+ (Arhrib et al., 2022, Benbrik et al., 2021, Arhrib et al., 2024). The decay width depends on the model-dependent coupling and phase-space factors.
  • Above top threshold: Associated production via gbtHgb\to t H^-, ggtbˉHgg\to t\bar{b} H^- (4FS), or ggH+Hgg\to H^+ H^- (pair production) (Arhrib et al., 2018, Arhrib et al., 2022). In Type-I and X, ppH±Wpp\to H^\pm W^\mp and ppH±bjpp\to H^\pm bj are significant for mH±<mtm_{H^\pm} < m_t (Arhrib et al., 2022, Benbrik et al., 2022).
  • Resonant heavy boson: Models with a heavy ZZ' predict ppZH+Hpp\to Z'\to H^+ H^-, yielding very energetic final states (Abdallah et al., 2018). BLSSM benchmarks achieve cross sections up to O(102)\mathcal{O}(10^{-2}) pb at MZ=2.5M_{Z'} = 2.5–$3.5$ TeV for MH±=100M_{H^\pm} = 100–$150$ GeV.

At lepton colliders (ILC, CLIC), both pair production e+eH+He^+e^- \to H^+ H^- and associated e+eH±WSe^+e^- \to H^\pm W^\mp S (S=H,AS=H,A) are accessible, with the latter often exceeding the former for moderate masses (Hashemi et al., 2023, Ouazghour et al., 2 Jun 2025).

3. Decay Channels and Branching Fractions

Charged Higgs decay patterns are controlled by mass, tanβ\beta, and model:

  • Fermionic modes: H±tbH^\pm \to t b, H±τνH^\pm \to \tau \nu, H±cs/cbH^\pm \to c s/c b (Arhrib et al., 2018, Benbrik et al., 2021, Arhrib et al., 2024). For mH±<mtm_{H^\pm}<m_t, H±τνH^\pm\to\tau\nu dominates at high tanβ\beta in II/X, while cs/cbcs/cb or μν\mu\nu can prevail in III or with flavor texture.
  • Bosonic modes: H±W±ϕH^\pm \to W^\pm \phi (ϕ=h,H,A,Z,hBSM\phi=h,H,A,Z',h_{\rm BSM}). These dominate whenever kinematically open and at low tanβ\beta in Type-I and in models with a light neutral scalar or dark ZZ' (Bao et al., 2011, Arhrib et al., 2022, Bae et al., 2024). For example, BR(H±W±A)>90%(H^\pm\to W^\pm A) > 90\% at tanβ2\beta\sim2, mH±100m_{H^\pm}\sim100 GeV (Arhrib et al., 2023).

In Z′-mediated DM models the key signatures are H±W±ZH^\pm\to W^\pm Z', H±W±hH^\pm\to W^\pm h with distinctive multi-lepton final states. Fermionic decays are typically suppressed below 1% unless mH±<mWm_{H^\pm}<m_W (Bae et al., 2024).

4. Signal Reconstruction and Background Suppression

Collider searches leverage a suite of kinematic cuts and resonance reconstruction techniques:

  • Semi-leptonic and fully hadronic topologies: ppW±Hνbbˉjjpp\to W^\pm H^\mp \to \ell\nu\, b\bar{b} jj, with stepwise cuts on pTp_T, η\eta, ΔR\Delta R, missing ETE_T, jet multiplicity, and invariant-mass windows for H±H^\pm, WW, and h/Ah/A (Bao et al., 2011, Arhrib et al., 2022, Benbrik et al., 2022).
  • b-tagging and mass windowing: Requiring multiple b-tagged jets and reconstructing mbbm_{bb} or mbjjjm_{bjjj} significantly suppresses ttˉt\bar{t} and W+W+jets backgrounds (Enberg et al., 2014, Enberg et al., 2015).
  • Angular distributions: Spin discrimination for H±^\pm vs. WW' leverages the flat angular distribution of scalar decays vs. 1+cos2θ1+\cos^2\theta for vectors (Bao et al., 2011).
  • Muon-specific final states: In 2HDM-III with large muon Yukawa, H±μνH^\pm\to\mu\nu dominates. Transverse mass mT(μ,ETmiss)m_T(\mu, E_T^{\text{miss}}) peaks sharply at mH±m_{H^\pm} (Benbrik et al., 2021).
  • Complex multi-lepton signatures: For H±W±ZH^\pm\to W^\pm Z', ZμμZ'\to\mu\mu, trilepton and five-lepton channels with tight isolation and invariant mass cuts are exploited (Bae et al., 2024).

Typical signal-to-background ratios S/B0.3S/B \sim 0.3, significances S/B5S/\sqrt{B} \gtrsim 5 for high-luminosity scenarios and mH±>400m_{H^\pm}>400 GeV (Bao et al., 2011, Enberg et al., 2014).

5. Experimental Constraints, Parameter Space, and Search Strategies

Present bounds derive from both direct and indirect data:

  • Direct LHC searches: H±τνH^\pm\to\tau\nu, tbtb, cscs, cbcb in top decays constrain low and high tanβ\beta regimes differently in 2HDM-II, III, and BLSSM (Arhrib et al., 2024, Abdallah et al., 2018, Arhrib et al., 2022).
  • Bosonic modes: Recent analyses place upper limits on σ×\sigma\timesBR(H±HW±H^\pm\to HW^\pm) down to \sim0.02 pb at mH±=700m_{H^\pm}=700 GeV for HH mass =200=200 GeV (Collaboration, 2022).
  • Flavor observables: BXsγB\to X_s\gamma excludes mH±650m_{H^\pm}\lesssim 650–800 GeV in II/Y, but not in I/X for tanβ2\beta\gtrsim2 (Arhrib et al., 2022).
  • EW precision: T-parameter restrictions typically require near-degenerate H±^\pm, A, H masses (Bahl et al., 2021).
  • Dedicated searches: Many studies emphasize the need for targeted searches in bbWWbbWW, Wbj+bb/ττ/γγWbj+bb/\tau\tau/\gamma\gamma, and multi-lepton channels (Arhrib et al., 2022, Benbrik et al., 2022, Arhrib et al., 2023).

Search strategies routinely exploit the dominance of bosonic channels in Type-I/X and the unique final-state kinematics available due to mass relations and mixing angles.

Channel σ(pp)\sigma(pp) [fb] BR β\beta" title="" rel="nofollow" data-turbo="false" class="assistant-link">\%
ppH±Wpp \to H^\pm W^\mp $100$–$300$ H±W±AH^\pm \to W^\pm A: 80–98
ppH±bjpp \to H^\pm bj $1000$–$3000$ AbbA \to bb: 80, AττA \to \tau\tau: 7
pptH±bpp \to tH^\pm b (subdominant) $50$–$100$ H±W±hH^\pm \to W^\pm h: 90

6. Beyond Standard 2HDM: Triplet, Dark Sector, and High-Energy Extensions

  • Triplet Models (GMHTM): Vector-boson fusion production ppH±jjpp\to H^\pm jj with H±W±ZH^\pm\to W^\pm Z is correlated with custodial sHs_H, with current limits excluding sH=1s_H=1 for 240GeV<mH±<700GeV240\,\text{GeV}<m_{H^\pm}<700\,\text{GeV} (Collaboration, 2015).
  • Dark Z-mediated DM: Charged Higgs signatures intimately connected with dark matter relic density and direct detection limits; bosonic decays H±W±h^\pm\to W^\pm h, W±ZW^\pm Z' dominate (Bae et al., 2024).
  • BLSSM: Heavy ZZ' can provide essentially background-free H±H^\pm discovery in both jjjj and τν\tau\nu channels at HL-LHC for mH±<200m_{H^\pm}<200 GeV (Abdallah et al., 2018).
  • Lepton Colliders: CLIC and ILC studies demonstrate the utility of high-energy, high-luminosity searches in H±WSH^\pm W^\mp S modes, with reach exceeding that of hadron colliders for certain regions of tanβ\beta and mH±m_{H^\pm} (Hashemi et al., 2023, Ouazghour et al., 2 Jun 2025).

7. Phenomenological Implications and Future Prospects

Robust evidence for a charged Higgs would elucidate the structure of EWSB, validate BSM scalar sectors, and inform the flavor and CP properties of fundamental interactions. The observed 3σ\sigma excess in H±cbH^\pm\to cb at mH±=130m_{H^\pm}=130 GeV provides a compelling possibility for near-term experimental resolution (Arhrib et al., 2024). Bosonic decays—long overlooked in favor of fermionic—are now highlighted as leading discovery channels, particularly in Type-I/X and DM-related scenarios.

Designing future searches requires comprehensive analyses targeting mixed bosonic and fermionic decay cascades, leveraging precision jet/lepton identification, optimized mass windowing, and advanced multivariate reconstruction (e.g., BDTs, neutrino weighting) (Hanson et al., 2018, Arhrib et al., 2023). Exploration of extended Higgs sectors remains central to Run 3 and the high-luminosity era, with lepton collider programs offering complementary and sometimes unique sensitivity.


Key References:

(Bao et al., 2011): H±^\pm identification in W±HW^\pm H^\mp associated LHC production (Arhrib et al., 2022, Arhrib et al., 2023, Benbrik et al., 2022): Single charged Higgs production/decay signatures in various 2HDMs (Enberg et al., 2015): W±hW^\pm h channel phenomenology (Arhrib et al., 2024): LHC charged Higgs excess and 2HDM-III fit (Bae et al., 2024): Charged Higgs in dark Z-mediated models (Abdallah et al., 2018): BLSSM and ZZ'-driven signatures (Hanson et al., 2018): MS-2HDM and advanced collider reconstruction (Collaboration, 2015): ATLAS triplet (GMHTM) W±ZW^\pm Z search (Hashemi et al., 2023, Ouazghour et al., 2 Jun 2025): Lepton collider discoveries

Charged Higgs bosons, as predicted by extended Higgs sectors, remain one of the most theoretically robust and experimentally approachable portals to BSM physics, with a broad range of discovery and exclusion prospects set to advance rapidly in the coming years.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (17)

Whiteboard

Topic to Video (Beta)

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Charged Higgs Bosons (H$^\pm$).

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube