Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Bipartite Diophantine Tuples: Bounds & Techniques

Updated 4 December 2025
  • Bipartite Diophantine tuples are defined by two natural number subsets A and B where every product ab shifted by n yields a perfect k-th power, generalizing classical Diophantine m-tuples.
  • Sharp quantitative bounds are established using methods like the gap principle and sieve techniques, revealing logarithmic limits on minimal set sizes and power-saving estimates on product sizes.
  • The framework extends to multipartite settings, offering insights into conditional results under the ABC conjecture and posing open problems in arithmetic geometry.

A bipartite Diophantine tuple with property BDk(n)BD_k(n) consists of two finite subsets A,BNA, B \subseteq \mathbb{N} (with A,B2|A|, |B| \geq 2), such that for all aAa \in A and bBb \in B, the shifted product ab+nab + n is a perfect kk-th power in N\mathbb{N}. This bipartite notion generalizes classical Diophantine mm-tuples and, in recent work, provides a unifying framework for bounding the size and structure of various Diophantine-type sets and their shifted higher-power analogues (Tsang et al., 3 Dec 2025, Yip, 2023).

1. Definition and Notation

Let k2k \geq 2 and n0n \neq 0 be fixed integers. Denote N\mathbb{N} as the set of positive integers. A pair (A,B)(A, B) of finite subsets of N\mathbb{N}, each with cardinality at least 2, is a bipartite Diophantine tuple with property BDk(n)BD_k(n) if

ab+n=(xa,b)kfor allaA, bB, xa,bN.ab + n = (x_{a,b})^k \quad \text{for all} \quad a \in A,~b \in B,~x_{a,b} \in \mathbb{N}.

In symbols: (A,B) has property BDk(n)    aA,bB: ab+n{xk:xN}.(A,B) \text{ has property } BD_k(n) \iff \forall\,a \in A,\,b \in B:~ab + n \in \{ x^k: x \in \mathbb{N} \}. This structure interpolates between classical Diophantine tuples (n=1,A=B=Cn = 1, A = B = C) and various generalized settings, including shifted and higher-power cases.

2. Quantitative Bounds and Structural Results

Yip establishes sharp unconditional upper bounds on both the cardinalities and product sizes of bipartite Diophantine tuples.

Let BMk(n)=sup{min{A,B}:(A,B) satisfies BDk(n)}BM_k(n) = \sup\{ \min\{|A|,|B|\} : (A,B) \text{ satisfies } BD_k(n) \}. As n|n| \to \infty,

BMk(n)lognand specificallyBMk(n)(4ϕ(k)k2+o(1))logn,BM_k(n) \ll \log|n| \quad\text{and specifically}\quad BM_k(n) \leq \left( \frac{4\phi(k)}{k-2} + o(1) \right)\log|n|,

where ϕ\phi is Euler’s totient function with an absolute implied constant (Yip, 2023).

For larger minimal block sizes, define PMk(n,R)=sup{AB:(A,B) satisfies BDk(n), min{A,B}R}PM_k(n, R) = \sup \{ |A|\cdot|B| : (A,B) \text{ satisfies } BD_k(n),~\min\{|A|,|B|\} \geq R \}. For explicit thresholds R=rkR = r_k (r3=9,r4=6,r5=5,rk=4r_3 = 9, r_4 = 6, r_5 = 5, r_k = 4 for k6k \geq 6): PMk(n,rk)k,εntk/k+ε,PM_k(n,r_k) \ll_{k, \varepsilon} |n|^{t_k/k+\varepsilon}, with t6=29/4t_6 = 29/4 and, for k7k \geq 7,

tk=k2+k4k26k+6.t_k = \frac{k^2 + k - 4}{k^2 - 6k + 6}.

When k6k \geq 6 and min{A,B}4\min\{|A|,|B|\} \geq 4, one obtains the power-saving bound ABn1+ε|A|\cdot|B| \ll |n|^{1+\varepsilon}.

3. Generalizations and Conditional Results

A significant generalization of the Bugeaud–Dujella theorem extends from the classical n=1n = 1 case to arbitrary nonzero shifts. If k4k \geq 4 and for a1<a2b1<<bma_1 < a_2 \leq b_1 < \cdots < b_m, all aibj+na_i b_j + n (i=1,2i = 1,2) are perfect kk-th powers, then for any ϵ>0\epsilon > 0,

mk,ϵnϕ(k)k(k3)+ϵ.m \ll_{k, \epsilon} |n|^{\frac{\phi(k)}{k(k-3)}+\epsilon}.

For k=3k = 3, the bound is mn34/27+ϵm \ll |n|^{34/27 + \epsilon} (Tsang et al., 3 Dec 2025).

On a conditional basis (assuming the ABC conjecture), minimal sizes =(k,n)\ell = \ell(k, n) can be determined such that any bipartite BDk(n)BD_k(n) tuple with A=|A| = \ell has B|B| bounded as a function of kk and nn:

(k,n)={2k6, 3k=4,5, 5k=3.\ell(k, n) = \begin{cases} 2 & k \geq 6, \ 3 & k = 4,5, \ 5 & k = 3. \end{cases}

Explicit power-saving bounds under ABC are established for these regimes, using simultaneous Pell-type equations and inductive bootstrapping with the gap principle.

4. Connections to Other Diophantine Structures

Bipartite Diophantine tuples serve as a central notion linking numerous variants and extensions:

  • Strongly AA-Diophantine Sets (Banks–Luca–Szalay): For a fixed ANA \subset \mathbb{N}, a set SNS \subset \mathbb{N} is strongly AA-Diophantine if all shifted subset-products 1+sRsA1 + \prod_{s \in R} s \in A. The construction reduces questions about large strongly Diophantine sets to bipartite BDk(n)BD_k(n) tuples using partitions of subset products.
  • Kihel–Kihel Pn(k)P_n^{(k)}-sets: A set A={a1,,am}A = \{a_1, \ldots, a_m\} is a Pn(k)P_n^{(k)}-set if, for every kk-element subset JJ, jJaj+n\prod_{j \in J} a_j + n is a perfect kk-th power. Tsang–Yip make bounds explicit by partitioning the (mk)\binom{m}{k} products into two blocks to produce a bipartite BDk(n)BD_k(n)-tuple. The resulting bound: Akk+log(n+1)k,|A| \ll_k k + \frac{\log(|n|+1)}{k}, giving explicit finiteness results for Pn(k)P_n^{(k)}-sets.

5. Auxiliary Techniques

The proof strategies employ a range of Diophantine, combinatorial, and sieve-theoretic tools:

  • Gap Principle: If a1<a2a_1 < a_2 and b1<b2b_1 < b_2 with all aibj+na_i b_j + n perfect kk-th powers, then b2b1k1/nkb_2 \gg b_1^{k-1}/|n|^k; repeated application yields super-exponential growth unless set sizes are small.
  • Thue–Siegel/Evertse Bounds: Used to control large solutions to a2xika1yik=n(a2a1)a_2 x_i^k - a_1 y_i^k = n(a_2 - a_1).
  • Stepanov’s Method over Fp\mathbb{F}_p: Bounding the cardinalities of product sets in shifted multiplicative subgroups modulo primes.
  • Gallagher’s Larger Sieve: Ensures that min{A,B}=O(logN)\min\{|A|,|B|\} = O(\log N) for AB+n{xk}AB + n \subseteq \{ x^k \} within [1,N][1,N].

These methods interact to establish both unconditional and conditional bounds on the size and product of the tuples.

6. Examples and Applications

  • Classical Diophantine Quadruples: E.g., {1,3,8,120}\{1, 3, 8, 120\} split as A={1,120},B={3,8}A = \{1, 120\}, B = \{3, 8\}, as a BD2(1)BD_2(1) pair.
  • Hilbert Cubes in Shifted Powers: A multiplicative Hilbert cube H×(a0;a1,,ad)H^\times(a_0; a_1, \dots, a_d) contained in {xkn:xN}\{x^k - n: x \in \mathbb{N} \} yields, after partitioning, a bipartite tuple; the bounds imply dklog(n+1)d \ll_k \sqrt{\log(|n|+1)} for k3k \geq 3.

An explicit unconditional bound for k=2k = 2 (squares) gives d132d \leq 132 when a0=1a_0 = 1 and d9d \leq 9 for k3k \geq 3.

7. Open Problems and Directions for Further Research

  • The general case for k=2k = 2 (shifted squares) remains unresolved: it is conjectured that for each n0n \neq 0, there exists an absolute constant C(n)C(n) such that any BD2(n)BD_2(n)-tuple has min{A,B}C(n)\min\{|A|,|B|\} \leq C(n). Confirmed only for small shifts n=±1n = \pm 1.
  • Eliminate dependence on the ABC conjecture, potentially via sharper Thue bounds or uniformity results from arithmetic geometry.
  • Refine the exponents in all power-saving bounds.
  • Investigate “multipartite” Diophantine tuples involving more than two subsets.
  • Analyze analogues over number fields, function fields, and finite fields, where different sum–product behaviors arise.
  • Study effective and algorithmic enumeration of large BDk(n)BD_k(n)-tuples for fixed small nn and kk.

Bipartite Diophantine tuples thus unify and control multiple classical and recent extensions in the theory of Diophantine tuples, serving as a versatile device in modern research on multiplicative and shifted Diophantine problems (Tsang et al., 3 Dec 2025, Yip, 2023).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (2)

Whiteboard

Follow Topic

Get notified by email when new papers are published related to Bipartite Diophantine Tuples.