Beam-Splitter States in Quantum Optics

• Beam-splitter states are quantum states engineered through passive, linear optical devices that mix photon modes to create entangled and coherent superpositions.
• They arise from SU(2) and multiport unitary transformations that distribute photon-number states, leading to distinctive interference effects and measurable quantum statistics.
• These states underpin practical applications in quantum information science, metrology, and resource theories, with advances in multipartite entanglement and cat state generation.

A beam-splitter state is any quantum state formed by applying the unitary transformation associated with one or more passive, linear optical beam splitters to an initial multimode input. As fundamental elements in quantum optics, beam splitters convert local input states into complex superpositions across spatial or polarization modes. Such mixing generates modal entanglement, coherence, and interference effects that encode nonclassical features. Beam-splitter states thus underpin modern photonic information processing, continuous-variable quantum optics, and general multi-mode interference phenomena.

1. Unitary Beam Splitter Transformation and State Structure

A lossless beam splitter mixes two bosonic modes (with annihilation operators $a$, $b$) via the SU(2) unitary

$$U(\theta, \varphi) = \exp \left[ -\frac{\theta}{2}\left(e^{i\varphi} a^\dagger b - e^{-i\varphi} a b^\dagger \right) \right]$$

which implements the transformation

$$a' = a \cos\frac{\theta}{2} + b e^{i\varphi} \sin\frac{\theta}{2}, \qquad b' = -a e^{-i\varphi} \sin\frac{\theta}{2} + b \cos\frac{\theta}{2}$$

For a balanced (50:50) beam splitter, $\theta = \pi/2$.

Given an $n$-photon Fock state in mode $a$ and vacuum in $b$, the output is

$$|\Psi_{\text{out}}\rangle = \sum_{k=0}^{n} c_{n,k} |k, n-k\rangle$$

with

$$c_{n,k} = (\cos{\frac{\theta}{2}})^k (e^{i\varphi}\sin{\frac{\theta}{2}})^{n-k} \sqrt{\binom{n}{k}}$$

The generalization to multiport beam splitters involves an $m\times m$ unitary scattering matrix $S\in \mathrm{U}(m)$ acting on a vector of mode operators via $\mathbf{a}^{\rm out} = S\, \mathbf{a}^{\rm in}$ (Steinhoff, 5 Jan 2024).

2. Entanglement Generation and Classification

Single beam splitters acting on nonclassical input states can generate entanglement between output modes. For pure Fock input $|k\rangle \otimes |0\rangle$, the entanglement (e.g., quantified by the entropy of the reduced density matrix or logarithmic negativity) monotonically increases with photon number $k$ and, for small $\theta$, scales as $\sim \theta^2(k - |\langle a \rangle|^2)$ (Goldberg et al., 2017, Gagatsos et al., 2013, Bose et al., 2016).

With multiport devices, multipartite entangled states naturally emerge. The SLOCC entanglement class of the output is determined by the input state's maximal photon number (total-number hierarchy), its nonclassicality degree (GHZ-type hierarchy), or their hybrid (combined hierarchy). Dicke and W-class states are specific cases (Steinhoff, 5 Jan 2024).

Table: Key Classes of Multiport Beam-Splitter States (Steinhoff, 5 Jan 2024)

Input State Type	Output State Type	SLOCC Class
Fock superposition $\sum_{n=0}^N c_n |n\rangle$	$|\Phi_N\rangle$ (uniform)	$\mathcal{C}_N$
$r$-component cat $\sum_{k=0}^{r-1} c_k |\alpha_k\rangle$	$|GHZ_{(r)}\rangle$	$\mathcal{R}_r$
Hybrid (both above)	$\mathcal{H}_{N,r}$	$(N,r)$

3. Coherence Properties and Resource Theory

Beam splitters are not “free” with respect to basis-dependent quantum coherence; they generate off-diagonal elements in the photon-number basis, acting as quantum coherence-makers (Ares et al., 2022, Díez et al., 2023). The $l_1$-norm and relative entropy quantifiers grow with the number of cascading stages and with input symmetry.

For a two-mode squeezed vacuum input, the output $l_1$-coherence reads

$$C_{l_1} = \frac{2\lambda S^2 - \lambda^2(S^4 + 1)}{(1 - \lambda S^2)^2}$$

with $S = \cos{\theta} + \sin{\theta}$, and exhibits non-monotonic dependence on the beam-splitter angle and input squeezing parameter (Ares et al., 2022). Maximal coherence is obtained for nearly equal photon-number distributions (twin-Fock, TMSV), often at or near the balanced point.

4. Nonclassicality and Zero-Entanglement States

Nonclassicality is necessary but not sufficient for modal entanglement generation via beam splitters. Highly nonclassical, even non-Gaussian states (e.g., squeezed, displaced, or SU(2)-unpolarized mixtures) can, if structured precisely, remain separable at the output for all beam-splitter configurations (Goldberg et al., 2017). The full set of such invariants comprises local unitaries acting on convex mixtures of SU(2)-unpolarized states

$$\hat{\rho}_{\text{in}} = \sum_k p_k \Bigl[ D_a(\alpha_k) S_a(\zeta) \otimes D_b(\beta_k) S_b(\zeta\, e^{-2i\varphi}) \Bigr]\, \hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{unpol}} \Bigl[ \cdots \Bigr]^\dagger$$

where $\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{unpol}}$ is block-diagonal in total photon number. These inputs are inert under all beam-splitter rotations in SU(2).

5. Multipartite and Hybrid Entanglement Engineering

By preparing input states in suitable superpositions, multiport beam splitters can deterministically generate W, GHZ, and G/G' states by local pre-rotation and postselection, without adjustment of the interferometric device (Kumar et al., 2023). The transformation is governed by the multiport unitary (e.g. tritter: $U_{kj} = \exp[2\pi i (k-1)(j-1)/3]/\sqrt{3}$).

Experimental fidelities for W, G', and GHZ-like three-photon polarization states have reached $F = 0.873, 0.834, 0.788$ respectively (Kumar et al., 2023).

6. Advanced Operational Regimes and Applications

Beam-splitter states are central to critical quantum optical protocols:

• Generation of Schrödinger-cat states: A single photon-number input on a balanced beam splitter leads to a continuous-phase-entangled “cat” state with phase-correlation and measurable Bell inequality violation (Shringarpure et al., 2019).
• Quantum resource tests: Output states have been used to probe coherence, quantum Fisher information, and discord properties, e.g., in Bell-cat superpositions serving as high-sensitivity phase-estimation probes (Slaoui et al., 2023).
• Controlled mode-selectivity: Advanced beam-splitter architectures, such as cross-cavity $\Lambda$-atom systems, enable bright/dark mode filtering and switchable strong/weak-coupling regimes; the atom’s ground state acts as an optical “gate” (Solak et al., 27 Aug 2024).
• Collaborative dense coding and entanglement distribution: Beam splitters acting on subsystems of correlated, but unentangled, multipartite Gaussian states generate multipartite entanglement exploitable for communication and resource distribution (Croal et al., 2015).

7. Interference Effects and Quantum Statistics

Generalized beam-splitter states reveal many-body interference such as Hong–Ou–Mandel dips for multi-particle Fock inputs (Laloë et al., 2010). For two Fock inputs $(N_\alpha, N_\beta)$ and 50:50 splitting, only even output number counts are allowed if $N_\alpha = N_\beta$, with rapid population oscillations ("quantum angle" effects) for imbalanced inputs. These statistics are a distinctive mark of the quantum regime, beyond mean-field coherence.

---

The theoretical and experimental study of beam-splitter states thus provides a unified framework for engineering, classifying, and exploiting complex quantum superpositions, entanglement, and coherence among photonic and other bosonic modes, with rich applications in quantum information science, metrology, and foundational studies of many-body quantum interference (Ares et al., 2022, Bose et al., 2016, Steinhoff, 5 Jan 2024, Goldberg et al., 2017, Slaoui et al., 2023, Solak et al., 27 Aug 2024, Kumar et al., 2023).