AutoCDSR+ Enhancement: Optimized CDSR
- The paper demonstrates an effective method for optimizing cross-domain recommendations through Pareto-optimal multi-objective learning.
- It introduces structured information bottleneck tokens to control cross-domain attention and mitigate negative transfer.
- Empirical results show up to 42% improvement in ranking metrics, validating the approach’s efficiency and plug-and-play design.
AutoCDSR Enhancement is an advanced architectural and optimization technique for cross-domain sequential recommendation (CDSR) on transformer-based models. Developed as an augmentation to the foundational AutoCDSR framework, AutoCDSR introduces structured bottlenecking and Pareto-optimal multi-objective learning, enabling robust and automated knowledge transfer between user histories in distinct domains. This approach is realized as a lightweight, plug-and-play module that brings principled improvements in recommendation performance while mitigating the challenges of negative transfer and uncontrolled information leakage across domains.
1. Theoretical Foundations and Motivation
Cross-domain sequential recommendation requires modeling user interactions distributed across multiple domains (e.g., books, movies, games). Naive concatenation of sequences and application of standard transformer self-attention typically lead to negative transfer, as transformer heads may amplify noise rather than harness complementary domain information. Previous CDSR methods frequently employ domain-specific modules—reweighting mechanisms, domain-aware blocks, etc.—which introduce substantial modeling and computational overhead.
AutoCDSR reframes the role of self-attention in transformers as a potent, if adequately optimized, mechanism for automating knowledge transfer between domains. The paradigm shift is toward direct multi-objective optimization of self-attention, requiring neither auxiliary modules nor extensive manual tuning, and targeting automated, empirically validated mitigation of negative transfer.
2. Pareto-Optimal Multi-Objective Formulation
The core AutoCDSR methodology casts CDSR as a multi-objective problem, simultaneously:
- Minimizing standard recommendation loss, typically categorical cross-entropy (), for next-item prediction.
- Dynamically minimizing the cross-domain attention intensity (), thereby controlling the degree of cross-domain transfer:
where is the attention score matrix and is the indicator for domain mismatch.
The joint loss is:
Fixed loss weight settings prove inadequate due to user- and sequence-level variance in domain complementarity. Accordingly, the framework invokes Pareto-optimality: a parameter set is Pareto-optimal if no other configuration decreases either sub-objective without increasing the other.
Optimization leverages the Multiple Gradient Descent Algorithm (MGDA), constructing a preference-aware combination of gradients:
Preference vectors prioritize solutions that minimize the recommendation loss, providing application-relevant tradeoff control. The result is automated, sequence-specific modulation of cross-domain attention—promoting transfer only when beneficial, mitigating negative transfer otherwise.
3. AutoCDSR: Structured Knowledge Transfer via Bottleneck Tokens
While Pareto-optimized self-attention regulates information flow across domains, unstructured transfer remains susceptible to leakage and residual noise. AutoCDSR introduces Information Bottleneck (IB) tokens, inspired by advances in multimodal transformers:
- IB tokens are inserted in each domain-sequence as exclusive mediators for cross-domain information exchange.
- Attention masking enforces that domain sequence items attend only to local items and their corresponding IB token.
- Cross-domain communication is restricted such that IB tokens from distinct domains are the sole vectors for transfer. Items re-attend to IB tokens, enabling indirect, controlled domain knowledge acquisition.
The cross-domain attention metric for AutoCDSR becomes:
where the sum selectively quantifies attention from domain items to cross-domain IB tokens.
This structuring ensures that cross-domain knowledge flow is both explicit and confined, strongly mitigating unwanted interference and further reducing negative transfer, while maintaining the Pareto-optimal multi-objective regime.
4. Empirical Performance and Comparative Advantages
Extensive experiments on datasets such as Amazon Reviews, KuaiRand-1K, and industrial-scale benchmarks demonstrate that both AutoCDSR and AutoCDSR yield consistent and substantial improvements over base transformer models, including SASRec and BERT4Rec:
| Model | Recall@10 (+) | NDCG@10 (+) |
|---|---|---|
| SASRec | 9.8% | 12.0% |
| BERT4Rec | 16.0% | 16.7% |
Reported metrics (see Table 1 of main paper) confirm up to 42% increases on key ranking indices across cutoffs, and AutoCDSR equipped transformers match or outperform leading bespoke CDSR methods, despite minimal architectural modification.
5. Implementation, Computational Complexity, and Deployment
AutoCDSR and AutoCDSR are architected as wraparound modules for sequential recommenders:
- No new network blocks are required; IB tokens are additional input-level placeholders.
- Computational overheads are controlled: AutoCDSR is 9.3% slower than vanilla BERT4Rec; AutoCDSR is 19.9% slower (due to IB token masking and processing), but remains ~4x faster than more complex CDSR competitors.
- The bulk of overhead is attributed to Pareto-optimal gradient computation, which converges rapidly (100 iterations) and supports parallelization.
- Plug-and-play deployment is emphasized, with minimal hyperparameter tuning requirements due to adaptive multi-objective weighting.
- Robustness evaluations indicate AutoCDSR remains effective under noisy/missing domain labels, while AutoCDSR is more sensitive—defaulting to AutoCDSR is recommended for less reliable domain annotation.
6. Comparative Summary Table
| Aspect | AutoCDSR | AutoCDSR |
|---|---|---|
| Negative Transfer | Mitigated via Pareto loss | Further mitigated via bottlenecked attention |
| Knowledge Transfer | Pareto-optimized, automatic | + explicit IB token gating |
| Additional Modules | None | Adds IB tokens, no structural change |
| Overhead | +9% | +20% |
| Plug-and-play | Yes | Yes |
| Domain label noise | Robust | Less robust |
| Empirical gains | Large | Slightly larger |
7. Insights and Implications
Rigorous optimization of self-attention using a Pareto-front multi-objective framework enables both noise filtering and complementary knowledge harvesting between user behaviors in distinct domains. AutoCDSR leverages the strategic insertion of IB tokens to further channel cross-domain transfer, producing an architecture wherein transfer is data-driven, explicit, and minimally intrusive.
The adaptivity of the approach—allocating cross-domain transfer capacity per user and sequence based on benefit to main task loss—addresses prior practicality gaps in CDSR arising from static loss weights or fixed domain-dependent reweighting. AutoCDSR demonstrates that highly performant CDSR can be achieved with lightweight augmentations of backbone transformer architectures, reducing the barriers to practical deployment in large-scale recommendation settings.
References to Formulas and Algorithms
- Multi-objective Pareto-optimal gradient calculation:
- Preference-aware Pareto optimality for main task prioritization via preference vectors.
AutoCDSR constitutes a substantive enhancement of automatic knowledge transfer in cross-domain sequential recommendation, balancing performance, efficiency, and deployment practicality as verified on real-world datasets (Ju et al., 27 May 2025).
Sponsored by Paperpile, the PDF & BibTeX manager trusted by top AI labs.
Get 30 days free