ALP-Mediated Dark Matter-Nucleon Scattering
- ALP-mediated dark matter-nucleon scattering is defined by dark matter interacting with nucleons via axion-like particles through both spin-dependent and loop-induced spin-independent channels.
- The methodology employs effective Lagrangians with derivative couplings and distinguishes between heavy and light mediator regimes to capture momentum transfer and coherence effects.
- Experimental strategies, ranging from tabletop optomechanical sensors to large-scale liquid xenon detectors and neutron star heating observations, enhance sensitivity to varied ALP mass and coupling landscapes.
Axion-like particle (ALP)-mediated dark matter–nucleon scattering encompasses a diverse range of theoretical, phenomenological, and experimental regimes. In such scenarios, dark matter (DM) interacts with Standard Model nucleons through the exchange of a pseudoscalar mediator—typically an ALP—resulting in both spin-dependent (SD) and loop-induced spin-independent (SI) scattering. The phenomenology is shaped by the ALP mass regime, tree-level versus loop-induced couplings, nuclear coherence, and the vastly distinct velocity landscapes of terrestrial and astrophysical environments.
1. Theoretical Foundations: ALP–Nucleon and ALP–DM Couplings
In canonical constructions, the relevant interactions are described by an effective Lagrangian with derivative couplings: where is the (isoscalar or isovector) ALP–nucleon coupling, denotes the nucleon field, and is the ALP (Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025, Jiang et al., 2021).
For DM composed of a Dirac fermion , the coupling to the ALP is similarly of the form: with parameterizing the DM–ALP interaction. The ALP–quark couplings propagate to the nucleon scale as , where encodes the nucleon’s quark spin fractions (Coffey et al., 2022).
The tree-level amplitude for via -exchange is then governed by the effective operator , resulting from the leading expansion of the bilinears in the non-relativistic regime (Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025, Coffey et al., 2022).
2. Scattering Amplitudes, Cross Sections, and Mediator Mass Regimes
The tree-level differential cross section for ALP-mediated DM–nucleon scattering is: where and is the ALP mass (Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025, Coffey et al., 2022).
Two regimes are distinguished:
- Heavy-mediator limit (): The cross section scales as , leading to severe velocity and momentum suppression, particularly relevant for terrestrial direct detection where .
- Light-mediator or "massless" regime (): The denominator scales as , but the in both numerator and denominator cancels, resulting in a cross section —thus enhancing the scattering rate relative to the naive scaling (Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025). This regime applies when the mediator mass is lower than the typical momentum transfer in the experiment.
At one-loop level, ALP exchange can induce SI operators, especially when the ALP couples flavor-off-diagonally (e.g., to the top quark). The resulting SI cross section features a significant enhancement (chirality-flip), leading to rates that can be directly probed by current and near-future xenon-based experiments (Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025).
3. Experimental Strategies and Sensitivity: Tabletop and Large-scale Detectors
Experimental efforts span diverse technologies and mass ranges. Optically levitated nanospheres present a table-top approach with unique sensitivity to low-momentum transfer recoils:
- Levitated SiO₂ nanospheres: Spheres of 200 nm diameter operate in the incoherent regime for keV, probing down to – at keV. Small (15 nm) spheres—coherent for keV—offer rate enhancement, with a single sphere reaching at eV and arrays probing down to (Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025).
| Configuration | Array Size | Run Time | keV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Present | 10 yr | ||
| Upgrade I | 10 yr | ||
| Upgrade II | 1 yr | ||
| Ultimate | 1 yr |
Similar scaling holds for , with the Standard Quantum Limit (SQL) for the impulse measurement determining the minimum accessible . The fully-coherent regime provides event rate enhancement (Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025).
Quantum spin-based amplifiers, such as those implemented with hyperpolarized Xe and Rb, have probed ALP masses in the 8 feV–744 feV range, setting limits at (at $67.5$ feV, CL), more than times stronger than previous laboratory constraints and approaching astrophysical bounds (Jiang et al., 2021).
Large-scale liquid xenon detectors can probe loop-induced SI cross sections in the – cm regime, with flavor-changing ALP couplings offering exceptional reach due to enhancements (Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025).
4. Distinctive Features and Scaling Laws
The momentum and mass regime of the ALP crucially determines the scaling laws:
- Tree-level SD scattering: For generic (flavor-diagonal) pseudoscalar exchange, cross sections are -suppressed in terrestrial direct detection, severely restricting experimental reach (Coffey et al., 2022, Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025).
- Light-mediator regime: The denominator in the cross section is reduced, partially alleviating momentum suppression and leading to a non-trivial scaling with for , allowing certain experimental configurations (notably tabletop optomechanical sensors) to access otherwise hidden parameter space (Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025, Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025).
- Coherence effects: In nanoparticle or nuclei, full target coherence () yields an event rate enhancement, while incoherent (nuclear) regimes revert to scaling with the number of nuclei (Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025).
- Loop-induced SI enhancement: In cases with ALP flavor-changing couplings, e.g., off-diagonal top-quark interactions, the one-loop SI cross section receives chirality-flip enhancement, potentially elevating rates to the sensitivity levels of ongoing XENONnT and PandaX-4T searches. Specifically, for TeV and , reaches cm (Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025).
5. Astrophysical Probes: Neutron Star Heating
Neutron star (NS) observations constitute a complementary avenue, uniquely insensitive to the velocity suppression that limits terrestrial searches. Infalling DM is accelerated by the deep NS potential (), so that the suppression in is lifted (Coffey et al., 2022).
Quantitatively, the capture rate and resultant heating luminosity scale as:
For GeV, and MeV, cm, resulting in GeV/s, corresponding to an observable NS temperature K. NS heating outperforms direct detection and beam-dump/meson-decay limits in large yet unconstrained regions, especially for –10 GeV and –1000 MeV (Coffey et al., 2022).
6. Current Bounds and Projected Sensitivities
ALP-mediated DM–nucleon scattering is constrained across multiple channels:
- Laboratory (quantum sensors, NMR, optically trapped spheres): For feV, at CL, with corresponding cm (Jiang et al., 2021).
- Direct detection (XENONnT, PandaX-4T): With flavor-changing (e.g., top) ALP couplings, SI cross sections up to cm are accessible, constraining for GeV and TeV (Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025).
- NS heating: Permits sensitivity to – for MeV–10 GeV and –1000 MeV—parameter space inaccessible to current terrestrial searches (Coffey et al., 2022).
- Tabletop optomechanics: Sensitivity to at – for sub-keV ALP or vector-mediation masses, benefitting from coherence enhancement (Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025).
7. Outlook and Unique Capabilities
ALP-mediated DM–nucleon scattering, while traditionally considered unobservable due to suppression by low velocities and momentum transfer, possesses experimentally and phenomenologically viable regions through:
- Light-mediator enhancement ()
- Loop-induced SI processes with chirality-flip amplification for flavor-changing couplings
- Full target coherence in precision optomechanics
- Velocity-boosted capture in compact astrophysical objects (NSs)
Optical levitation platforms uniquely cover the $10$ eV–$100$ keV momentum transfer window with negligible background at the Standard Quantum Limit, and are best suited for small and low-mass DM (Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025).
Astrophysical probes and next-generation large-mass DD experiments will continue to close the remaining parameter space, with coherent improvements in experimental sensitivity and theoretical modeling enabling stringent exclusion or potential discovery across a broad ALP mass-coupling landscape.
References:
(Dutta et al., 31 Jan 2025, Beenakker et al., 24 Nov 2025, Coffey et al., 2022, Jiang et al., 2021)