AgentEvolver Architecture: Evolving Adaptive Agents

• AgentEvolver Architecture is an adaptive framework that iteratively refines agent designs using evolutionary search, learned mutations, and feedback-driven policy updates.
• It integrates neuroevolution and dynamic topology methods to enhance sample efficiency, preserve diversity, and improve real-world task adaptability.
• The architecture enables modular, automated multi-agent workflow evolution and end-to-end agent generation, supporting scalable, lifelong learning.

AgentEvolver Architecture is a paradigm for building intelligent agents whose structure and behavior can iteratively adapt and improve through evolutionary and learning-based mechanisms, either autonomously or under partial guidance. Rather than relying on static, human-engineered workflows or fixed topologies, such architectures leverage search over agent designs, policy reflection, modular composition, and self-improvement driven by measured feedback. The AgentEvolver concept synthesizes innovations in neuroevolution, neural architecture search, multi-agent workflow optimization, and policy-level prompt evolution, supporting the creation of agents or agentic systems that continually progress toward higher sample efficiency, adaptability, and domain robustness.

1. Hybrid Evolutionary-Neural Search and Mutation

AgentEvolver Architectures frequently exploit the strengths of both evolutionary algorithms and learning-based controllers for architecture search and adaptation. The Evo-NAS framework (Maziarz et al., 2018) exemplifies this by combining:

• Parent Selection/Exploitation: Selection of high-performing individuals (architectures) from a population using tournament sampling, amplifying exploitation of known good designs (classical evolutionary strategy).
• Learned Mutation via Neural Policy: Instead of random or fixed mutations, a recurrent neural network (RNN)–based policy conditions each architectural decision. The agent decides, for each architectural component, with probability $p$ to sample a new value from the learned distribution, and with $1-p$ to copy the parent's value. This is mathematically formalized as:

$$P(A'|A, \theta) = \prod_{i=1}^n [(1 - p) \cdot \mathbb{I}[a'_i = a_i] + p \cdot \pi_\theta(a'_i | A'_{<i})]$$

where $A'$ is the child architecture, $A$ the parent, and $\pi_\theta$ the RNN's conditional output.

• Priority Queue Training (PQT): Mutation policies are trained to maximize the log-likelihood of the best-performing architectures, increasing sample efficiency over REINFORCE.

This approach improves architecture search by focusing exploration within promising low-dimensional manifolds while preserving evolutionary sample efficiency, and is extensible beyond architecture search to decision-making and RL (Maziarz et al., 2018).

2. Neuroevolution and Adaptive Topology

The AgentEvolver paradigm incorporates mechanisms for evolving both network topology and node-level properties, as shown in AGENT (Behjat et al., 2019):

• Enhanced Node Encoding: Each node (neuron) encodes not only activation function type but also a memory capacity parameter $M \in \{0,1,2\}$, enabling neurons to compute derivatives of synaptic inputs and thus supporting integration of temporal features:

$$V_i(\tau) = \begin{cases} U_i(\tau), & M = 0 \ \frac{U_i(\tau) - U_i(\tau-1)}{\delta\tau}, & M = 1 \ \frac{U_i(\tau) - 2U_i(\tau-1) + U_i(\tau-2)}{(\delta\tau)^2}, & M = 2 \end{cases}$$

• Automated Diversity and Mutation Control: Genetic diversity is quantified using a distance metric over node and edge properties, preserved via minimum spanning tree (MST) length. Mutation rates are adapted according to the gap between best and average fitness, enforcing exploration when improvement stagnates and enabling convergence otherwise.
• Benchmark Performance: Demonstrated on OpenAI Gym tasks and UAV collision avoidance, AGENT achieves high success rates and maintains robustness, benefiting from network adaptability and parallelizable evolution.

These innovations extend neuroevolution techniques, reducing convergence pitfalls such as structural stagnation and improving performance on temporal, real-world control tasks (Behjat et al., 2019).

3. Emergent Modularity and Evolving Workflows

AgentEvolver approaches generalize to the dynamic composition and refinement of multi-agent systems and workflows, leveraging automated structure search and feedback loops:

• Multi-Agent Workflow Evolution: Frameworks such as EvoAgentX (Wang et al., 4 Jul 2025) and EvoFlow (Zhang et al., 11 Feb 2025) automate not just single-agent design, but the evolution of complex, modular agentic workflows via hierarchical graph-based representations. Nodes correspond to agents or functional primitives; edges encode data and control flow.
  • Optimization Methods: Integration of evolutionary algorithms, preference-guided refinement, and gradient-based prompt search (e.g., TextGrad, AFlow, MIPRO) to optimize both agent configurations and workflow topologies.
  • Multi-Objective and Niching Evolution: EvoFlow applies niching algorithms for query-driven, population-based Pareto optimization balancing cost and task utility, promoting solution diversity and cost-effectiveness by evolving workflows using different LLM backbones and operator templates.
• Iterative Feedback and Self-Improvement: Case studies (Yuksel et al., 22 Dec 2024) show iterative cycles where outputs are evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively, hypotheses for improvement are generated, modifications are synthesized and executed, and scores converging toward optimal performance are monitored—formally:

$S(C_0) = f(O_{C_0},\text{criteria})$

$$\forall i:\,\, C_{i+1} = M(\mathcal{H}_i, C_i),\,\, S_{i+1} = f(O_{C_{i+1}},\text{criteria})$$

Iterations stop once progress $|S_{i+1} - S_\text{best}| < \varepsilon$.

This generalizes architecture evolution to modular, distributed settings, enabling scalable, autonomously improving systems responsive to new requirements and environments (Zhang et al., 11 Feb 2025, Wang et al., 4 Jul 2025, Yuksel et al., 22 Dec 2024).

4. Memory, Reflection, and Continual Self-Improvement

Modern AgentEvolver instantiations emphasize persistent memory, self-reflection, and continual feedback integration:

• Experience-Centric Self-Evolution: Architectures like Mobile-Agent-E (Wang et al., 20 Jan 2025) and AppAgentX (Jiang et al., 4 Mar 2025) incorporate memory modules (storing execution history, Tips, Shortcuts, or chain-based state transitions) that enable the abstraction and encapsulation of subroutines as high-level “shortcut” actions. This supports continual improvement of both planning and low-level control, with empirical gains in sample efficiency and task success rates.
• Policy-Level Reflection: Agent-Pro (Zhang et al., 27 Feb 2024) demonstrates reflection at the policy level in LLM-based agents by reviewing entire trajectories, updating behavioral policies via aggregated instructions from successful/failed runs. Policy candidate trees are explored with depth-first search, retaining only those strategies that yield proven performance improvements, as assessed by payoff differences ($\Delta$).
• Meta Tool Learning and Modularization: MetaAgent (Qian et al., 1 Aug 2025) extends continual self-improvement to tool use. It starts from a minimal base, autonomously generates help requests, routes these to external tools via structured descriptions, then distills reflective “knowledge capsules” from every completed task, augmenting future input contexts. Tool-use history is organized in a persistent knowledge base, permitting self-driven, meta-level workflow adaptations.
• Closed-Loop World Model Integration: EvoAgent (Feng et al., 9 Feb 2025) and WebEvolver (Fang et al., 23 Apr 2025) embed continual world models that act as virtual simulators and synthetic trajectory generators. Planning, action, and self-reflection proceeds in a feedback loop where selected impactful experiences and imagined rollouts inform continual parameter updates, thus avoiding catastrophic forgetting and supporting fast accommodation of new, long-horizon tasks.

These mechanisms facilitate a self-reinforcing cycle in which agents abstract, distill, and retain gains from diverse interactions, forming the basis for robust, lifelong adaptation across domains (Wang et al., 20 Jan 2025, Jiang et al., 4 Mar 2025, Zhang et al., 27 Feb 2024, Qian et al., 1 Aug 2025, Feng et al., 9 Feb 2025, Fang et al., 23 Apr 2025).

5. Automated Agent Generation and End-to-End Design

Recent frameworks extend AgentEvolver concepts to the full automation of agent and workflow synthesis from high-level objectives or data:

• Dual-Agent and Generator Architectures: Agent² (Wei et al., 16 Sep 2025) exemplifies an agent-generates-agent paradigm, in which a Generator Agent analyzes natural language task descriptions and environment code to automatically construct an entire RL pipeline—formulating MDPs, selecting algorithms, designing network architectures, tuning hyperparameters—while a Target Agent is trained and evaluated. Feedback is used to refine both task modeling and learning policy, forming an end-to-end, closed-loop automation pipeline.
  • The modeling step involves synthesizing $$(\mathcal{S},\mathcal{A},\mathcal{P},\mathcal{R},\gamma)$$ for each task, with execution conforming to a Model Context Protocol that standardizes agent creation and ensures reproducibility across environments.
  • Adaptive training management and intelligent feedback analysis enables self-correction of suboptimal agents via LLM-driven prompt regeneration.
• Empirical Results: Agent² outperforms manually engineered baselines with up to 55% performance improvement on RL benchmarks including MuJoCo, MetaDrive, and SMAC, demonstrating the feasibility of scalable, self-evolving agent generation without human intervention (Wei et al., 16 Sep 2025).

Such frameworks establish a new paradigm in which intelligent agents autonomously evolve other agents, modularizing and standardizing their own design and deployment at scale.

6. Biological Inspiration and Life-Like Dynamics

AgentEvolver approaches also draw from biological development, embedding principles such as neural plasticity and developmental wiring:

• Neural net architectures constructed via sequential developmental stages—spatial node arrangement, chemotactic initial wiring, spontaneous activity, Hebbian plasticity, and reward-driven refinement—mimic cortical circuit formation (Wood et al., 2022). Parameters are evolved via mutation, and the resulting networks exhibit dynamic, real-time adaptability (continuous response to sensory input via recurrent feedback loops) suitable for embodied agents such as robots or drones.
• Evolutionary dynamics, including parameter mutation scheduling based on population statistics (e.g., variance scaling with observed standard deviation), confers adaptive fine-tuning analogous to population genetics (Wood et al., 2022).

This biologically motivated direction supports agents whose adaptability and emergent behavior reflect complex, life-like properties.

7. Scalability, Modularity, and Future Prospects

Architectures in the AgentEvolver family emphasize modularity in both agent design and system integration:

• Systems like AutoGenesisAgent (Harper, 25 Apr 2024) use specialized agents for the entire lifecycle: requirement parsing, system design, code generation, integration, deployment, and iterative feedback. Clear module delineation, asynchronous communication protocols, and real-time performance monitoring ensure that architectures can be autonomously composed and refined for complex tasks with minimal human oversight.
• Scalability is achieved via modular layering, support for diverse roles, and generalizable search/optimization operators (crossover, mutation, selection). Case studies across market research, medical imaging, and professional guidance confirm transferability and efficacy (Yuksel et al., 22 Dec 2024).

Challenges remain in controlling oscillatory dynamics in agent adaptation (e.g., conversational loops in multi-agent coordination), optimizing for open-ended, non-stationary environments, and formalizing skill abstraction and sharing across distributed agents. The bottom-up skill evolution paradigm (Du et al., 23 May 2025)—where experience-driven, decentralized agents build and refine a global skill library—offers a path toward large-scale, cooperative lifelong learning.

---

In summary, the AgentEvolver Architecture encompasses a set of principles and implementations that enable agents to evolve through a complex interplay of evolutionary search, learning-based mutation, persistent memory, reflection, and modular workflow optimization. Empirical results across architecture search, control, web navigation, multi-agent collaboration, and open-world exploration underscore the power and versatility of these approaches, with metrics and technical details substantiating the pathway toward scalable, adaptable, and autonomous AI systems.