3D Rasterization: Techniques and Innovations

• 3D rasterization is the process of converting continuous 3D geometry into discrete 2D representations using scan-conversion and coverage tests, fundamental to real-time rendering.
• Recent advances introduce differentiable and probabilistic models that enable gradient-based optimization and extend input primitives beyond traditional meshes.
• Innovative hardware co-design and support for varied primitives such as Gaussians and voxels expand applications in inverse graphics, VR/AR, robotics, and simulation.

3D rasterization is the process of converting continuous 3D geometric structures into discrete 2D image representations via a scan-conversion or coverage test, forming the backbone of real-time rendering algorithms in computer graphics, computer vision, and differentiable learning systems. Historically, rasterization has centered on transforming and projecting 3D polygons (typically triangles) or volumetric primitives onto pixel grids, determining for each pixel which geometry contributes to color, depth, and associated shading attributes. Recent advances have expanded the domain of rasterization to probabilistic, soft, or neural paradigms, supporting full differentiability for gradient-based optimization and broadening the range of input primitives to include not only classical meshes but also Gaussians, voxels, and neural textures.

1. Formal Definition and Classical Framework

Rasterization fundamentally executes a discrete test: for every screen-space pixel $p$, it determines whether %%%%1%%%% is covered by the projected primitive (triangle, quad, or higher-level geometric entity) and assigns an output value (color, label, or feature) accordingly. In the canonical mesh pipeline, this entails the following steps:

• Object transformation from model to world, then to camera (view) space.
• Projection (pinhole or lens-based) from 3D to 2D coordinates.
• Scan conversion tests for pixel inclusion within geometry, typically via half-space functions or barycentric interpolation.
• Attribute interpolation (e.g., color, normals, UV) typically using barycentric weights, followed by shading and z-buffered compositing to resolve visibility.

In classical hardware rasterization (fixed-function GPU pipeline), this process is highly optimized for triangle primitives using depth-sorted z-buffers and supports massive pixel-level parallelism. (Kato et al., 2017)

2. Differentiable and Probabilistic Rasterization

A core challenge in integrating rasterization into learning systems is its inherent non-differentiability, stemming from binary, discontinuous pixel coverage decisions. Several research innovations have addressed this:

• Neural 3D Mesh Renderer: Implements gradient approximation by linearly interpolating color jumps as mesh vertices move across pixel boundaries. The derivative is approximated as $$\frac{\partial I_j}{\partial x_i} \approx \begin{cases} \frac{I(x_1) - I(x_0)}{x_1 - x_0} & \text{if } \delta^P_j \cdot (I(x_1) - I(x_0)) < 0 \ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$ ensuring gradients propagate only in directions that reduce image loss. (Kato et al., 2017)
• Soft Rasterizer: "Softens" the pixel coverage function by replacing the binary mask with a sigmoid of signed distance to triangle edges:

$D_j^i = \sigma(s_{ij} \cdot d^2(i, j)/\sigma)$

where $d(i, j)$ is the distance from pixel $p_i$ to triangle $f_j$, $s_{ij}$ the in/out sign, and $\sigma$ a temperature parameter. Silhouette images are then fused as

$S^i = 1 - \prod_j (1 - D_j^i)$

providing a truly differentiable surrogate for rasterization, critical in unsupervised mesh reconstruction. (Liu et al., 2019)

• Interpolation-based Differentiable Rasterizer (DIB-R): Models pixel values as barycentric-weighted interpolations of vertex attributes, even for background pixels using a distance-based exponential kernel, making all pixel outputs analytically differentiable with respect to attributes and vertex locations. This framework generalizes to optimizing geometry, appearance, and even lighting parameters under various lighting models (Phong, Lambertian, Spherical Harmonics). (Chen et al., 2019)

These advances enable end-to-end trainable pipelines for tasks such as single-image 3D reconstruction, 2D-to-3D style transfer, and generative textured object synthesis, using only 2D supervision.

3. Extensions Beyond Polygonal Primitives

While early work focused on triangle meshes, contemporary methods generalize rasterization to other 3D primitives:

• 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS): Represents a scene as a set of 3D anisotropic Gaussians, each "splatted" into a 2D distribution in image space. Rendering aggregates each Gaussian's projected influence using weighted exponentials and blends them via order-dependent (depth-sorted) alpha compositing. The pixel color is given by

$C_p = \sum_{i} T_{p,i} \alpha_{p,i} c_i$

with $T_{p,i} = \prod_{j=1}^{i-1}(1-\alpha_{p,j})$, enabling fast, high-quality rendering (Li et al., 20 Mar 2025).

• Probabilistic and Stochastic Rasterization: StochasticSplats replaces expensive sorting and deterministic alpha blending with a Monte Carlo process sampling Gaussians per fragment, yielding a controllable trade-off between visual fidelity and run-time via the number of samples per pixel (SPP), and removing order dependence (Kheradmand et al., 31 Mar 2025).
• Voxel Rasterization: The SVRaster framework discretizes the scene into an adaptively allocated sparse voxel grid, using Morton ordering per ray direction to ensure near-to-far blending and avoid the popping artifacts of Gaussian splatting, supporting extremely high grid resolutions (up to $65536^3$) while maintaining high performance (Sun et al., 5 Dec 2024).
• Radiance Textures: Encodes view-dependent radiance per surface patch as a matrix of "buckets" (azimuthal/equisolid projections), allowing for the real-time synthesis of complex effects such as multi-bounce reflections, subsurface scattering, and iridescence via simple fragment shader texture lookups (Fober, 2023).

4. Hardware, Efficiency, and Scalability

State-of-the-art rasterization benefits from both algorithmic and hardware co-design:

• Enhancing GPU Rasterizers for 3DGS: GauRast repurposes existing triangle rasterizer hardware with minor modifications to accelerate Gaussian splatting by adding dedicated units for exponentiation and accumulation, achieving a $23\times$ speedup and $24\times$ energy reduction compared to CUDA implementations, with only $0.2\%$ area overhead (Li et al., 20 Mar 2025).
• Axis-Oriented Rasterization and Neural Sorting: By reorganizing arithmetic to share axis-dependent computation and replacing sorting hardware with a monotonic decay function predicted by a lightweight MLP, MAC operations are reduced by $63\%$, and area/power footprint are significantly lowered. Cache utilization is further improved via a $\pi$-trajectory tile schedule, enhancing Gaussian reuse (Wang et al., 8 Jun 2025).
• Tile Grouping for Redundant Sorting Reduction (GS-TG): Amortizes Gaussian sorting across grouped tile regions, using per-Gaussian bitmasks to dynamically determine per-tile inclusion at rasterization, leading to a $1.54\times$ overall speedup without retraining (Jo et al., 31 Aug 2025).
• Differentiable Hardware Rasterization: Introduces programmable blending and quad+subgroup hybrid gradient reductions in the backward pass, allowing efficient per-pixel gradient computation for 3DGS, achieving $3.07\times$ acceleration and reducing memory overhead by orders of magnitude, with float16 rendering yielding optimal accuracy/performance (Yuan et al., 24 May 2025).

5. Novel Rasterization Models: Omnidirectional and Vision-Language

Rasterization methods have been generalized to new image formation models and modalities:

• Omnidirectional Rasterization: ODGS addresses severe distortions introduced when conventional perspective rasterizers are applied to 360° images. Each Gaussian is projected first to a tangent plane on the sphere (normal to the ray to the Gaussian center), then mapped to equirectangular pixel space via a composition of analytic Jacobians (including azimuth, elevation, and scaling terms). This geometric interpretation enables $100\times$ faster optimization and rendering versus NeRF-based approaches, with superior perceptual and reconstruction fidelity (Lee et al., 28 Oct 2024).
• Cross-Modal (Vision-Language) Rasterization: In vision-language 3DGS, language and visual features are fused for each Gaussian via self-attention before rasterization, and a distinct learnable "semantic indicator" replaces standard alpha-blending for the language channel. Camera-view blending regularizes semantic features across views, achieving state-of-the-art open-vocabulary semantic segmentation and mitigating semantic overfitting (Peng et al., 10 Oct 2024).

6. Applications in Inverse Graphics, Perception, and Planning

3D rasterization is foundational for a wide spectrum of applications:

• Inverse Graphics and Self-supervised 3D Reconstruction: Differentiable rasterizers (via soft, interpolation-based, or neural approaches) support unsupervised shape and appearance inference from 2D images, circumventing the need for 3D ground truth (Liu et al., 2019, Chen et al., 2019).
• Efficient Neural Field Rendering on Edge Devices: Hardware-efficient frameworks, such as MobileNeRF (polygon-based NeRF rendering) and custom accelerators for 3DGS, enable interactive frame rates on mobile hardware without sacrificing visual quality (Chen et al., 2022, Wang et al., 8 Jun 2025).
• 3D Vision-Language and Robotics: Enhanced semantic rasterization facilitates robust open-vocabulary segmentation, object localization, and scene understanding in robotics and AR/VR (Peng et al., 10 Oct 2024).
• Real-Time Simulation and Data Augmentation for Planning: Lightweight 3D rasterization schemes that forgo photorealism in favor of semantic and geometric fidelity (as in RAP) allow for scalable data augmentation in end-to-end driving policy training, delivering state-of-the-art closed-loop robustness in real-world and simulated autonomous driving benchmarks (Feng et al., 5 Oct 2025).

7. Theoretical and Philosophical Perspectives

Alternative rasterization approaches question the necessity of planar projections:

• Visual-Sphere and Perspective-Map Models: By rasterizing directly in curved spaces (spherical or perspective-mapped domains), one obtains aliasing-free, single-pass images covering full $360^\circ$ fields of view, accommodates lens distortions natively, and supports merging incompatible sources (e.g., fish-eye, wide angle) (Fober, 2020). This approach also underlines the symbolic, non-universal nature of perspective, enriching both artistic and practical 3D visualization paradigms.

---

The evolution of 3D rasterization, from discrete polygon tests to general, highly-differentiable, and hardware-optimized systems, has made it central in real-time rendering, inverse graphics, differentiable learning, and embodied perception. Ongoing research continues to expand its expressiveness, efficiency, and domain applicability, adapting to emerging needs in vision, machine learning, perception, and interactive simulation.