0.7 Conductance Anomaly in QPCs

• The 0.7 conductance anomaly is a non-integer plateau in QPC conductance arising from many-body electron interactions and sensitive confinement effects.
• Experimental studies show that the anomaly evolves with temperature, magnetic field, and barrier curvature, illustrating its variability across devices.
• Competing theoretical models such as spontaneous spin polarization and Kondo-like resonances offer diverse explanations for the observed conductance features.

The 0.7 conductance anomaly designates a non-integer, plateau-like feature in the conductance of ballistic quantum point contacts (QPCs), typically manifesting near $G \approx 0.7 \times (2e^2/h)$ as the first one-dimensional subband opens. Universally observed in clean QPCs at low temperatures and various material systems (notably GaAs/AlGaAs, but also Si, InAs, and bilayer graphene/WSe$_2$), the anomaly is widely attributed to electron–electron interaction effects rather than single-particle scattering. Its microscopic origin, however, remains a central and sometimes controversial issue in mesoscopic physics, with multiple competing theories including spontaneous spin polarization, Kondo-like resonances, van Hove density-of-states effects, spin-incoherent Luttinger liquid behavior, and models incorporating channel-specific decoherence.

1. Experimental Phenomenology and Key Features

Quantized conductance in QPCs is observed as a staircase of $G = N G_0$ steps, where $G_0 = 2e^2/h$. The 0.7 anomaly appears as a shoulder or plateau below the first full step, typically in the range $0.6$–$0.8\,G_0$, though values from $0.25$ up to $0.95\,G_0$ have been reported across device types and conditions (Das et al., 2018, Micolich, 2011). Its defining signatures are:

• Temperature Dependence: The anomaly strengthens with increasing $T$ up to $\sim$1–2 K, then diminishes at higher $T$, and is often weakest at base temperature ($T < 100$ mK) (Micolich, 2011).
• Magnetic Field Response: Application of an in-plane field typically drives the shoulder smoothly toward $0.5G_0$, coinciding with full spin polarization of the lowest mode (Micolich, 2011, Schimmel et al., 2017).
• Finite-Bias and Spectral Features: Zero-bias peaks (ZBAs) in $dI/dV$ and finite-bias shoulders are often observed at or below $G_0$, with distinct scaling behaviors (Burke et al., 2012, Heyder et al., 2014).
• Device-to-Device Variation: Even for arrays of lithographically identical QPCs, the 0.7 anomaly's strength and position vary, reflecting extreme sensitivity to details of local confinement, background disorder, and barrier curvature (Smith et al., 2014, Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024).

The anomaly persists in clean devices and is robust to changes in channel geometry, although, as detailed below, the shape and precise conductance value are highly non-universal.

2. Sensitivity to Confinement and Electrostatics

Numerous studies establish the centrality of the confinement landscape, specifically the barrier's longitudinal curvature and transverse confinement energy, in controlling the 0.7 anomaly:

• Barrier Curvature: The conductance value of the anomaly is strongly and negatively correlated with the curvature $\hbar\omega_x$ of the potential barrier in the transport direction. Shallower (lower $\omega_x$) barriers show more pronounced and lower-valued 0.7 structures (Smith et al., 2015, Smith et al., 2015). Quantitatively, as $\hbar\omega_{x,1}$ drops from $\sim$3 meV to $\sim$1.3 meV, the anomaly moves from $0.82$ to $0.65 \, G_0$ (Smith et al., 2015).
• Transverse Confinement: The opening rate of spin gaps and associated anomaly strength often correlates with the transverse subband spacing $\Delta E_{1,2}$. A softer transverse potential (smaller $\Delta E_{1,2}$) weakens and shifts the 0.7 plateau (Burke et al., 2012).
• Electrostatic Landscape: Variations arising from random background disorder or charge inhomogeneity dominate over lithographic dimensions in determining effective channel length and potential shape (Smith et al., 2015, Smith et al., 2014). Device-to-device spread in these parameters explains both variability in the anomaly and limits universal statements based on geometry alone.

A table summarizing core empirical dependencies:

Parameter	Trend for 0.7 Anomaly	Supporting Study
$\hbar\omega_x$	Lower $\to$ more pronounced/lower $G$	(Smith et al., 2015)
$\Delta E_{1,2}$	Lower $\to$ weaker/higher anomaly	(Burke et al., 2012)
Background disorder	Increased spread/variability	(Smith et al., 2014)
Gate architecture	Non-universal $g_1^*(n)$, plateau shape	(Burke et al., 2012)

3. Theoretical Models and Mechanisms

Extensive theoretical efforts have produced multiple scenarios (many with direct, testable predictions), but no consensus exists on a unique microscopic mechanism to date (Das et al., 2018, Micolich, 2011, Heyder et al., 2014, Schimmel et al., 2017). Major frameworks include:

• Spontaneous Spin Polarization: Mean-field models predict exchange-driven splitting of the first subband, generating partial plateaus at 0.5 or 0.75 $G_0$, with the opening rate of the spin gap set by confinement curvature (Burke et al., 2012, Smith et al., 2015). However, absence of robust 0.5 $G_0$ plateaus and failure to fit temperature/magnetic scaling in large device arrays empirically challenge this model as the exclusive explanation (Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024).
• Kondo-like Many-Body Resonances: A localized quasi-bound state near the QPC's saddle-point can host a spin, which is Kondo-screened by the leads. QPCs can undergo a quantum phase transition between symmetric and asymmetric Kondo regimes as the conductance tunes through 0.7 $G_0$, with two Kondo temperatures (scales) in the asymmetric case—naturally explaining anomalous broadening and ill-defined ZBA widths for $G \leq 0.7 G_0$ (Hong, 26 Feb 2025, Komijani et al., 2013, Heyder et al., 2014).
• van Hove Ridge/Density-of-States Effect: Smooth saddle-point barriers create a smeared van Hove singularity—a local ridge in LDOS—which, when pinned to the chemical potential due to interactions, enhances spin fluctuations and leads to asymmetric backscattering, lowering conductance and creating the 0.7 shoulder (Schimmel et al., 2017, Schubert et al., 2014, Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024). This scenario is empirically favored by large-array statistics, observed correlations of suppression depth with curvature ratios, and scaling of temperature response.
• Spin-Incoherent Luttinger Liquid: Transmission-phase shift measurements show a deviation ("kink") in the phase behavior as the QPC is tuned into the 0.7 regime, signifying crossover to a spin-incoherent regime where exchange energy $J \ll k_B T$. The phase anomaly tracks with conductance suppression and field, supporting this model in certain device regimes (Kobayashi et al., 2013).
• Single-Electron Decoherence: Alternative quantum-mechanical models argue the act of "observation" (i.e., decoherence of spin superpositions in the channel) reduces the effective transmission by a universal factor $K \approx 0.74$, directly reproducing the key value of the 0.7 plateau, potentially enhanced on resonance (Figielski, 2016).
• Dirac Constraints in the Hubbard Limit: Imposing $U \to \infty$ (no double occupancy) via Dirac's method and bosonization produces a modification of the anomalous commutator and yields a 0.7-like conductance plateau at finite temperature, interpreted as an effective spinless transport through the wire (Schmeltzer, 2010).

4. Extensions: Material Systems and Emergent Analogs

Although first identified in GaAs/AlGaAs QPCs, the basic phenomenology and many-body signatures of the 0.7 anomaly extend to other platforms:

• Bilayer Graphene/WSe$_2$: A sharp 0.7 anomaly appears in BLG/WSe$_2$ QPCs, where spin–orbit coupling and valley physics give rise to spin-valley locked Kramers doublets. The anomaly emerges between opposite spin-valley states, with its temperature and bias scaling closely paralleling GaAs, but with distinctly different magnetic-field response (robust up to high in-plane fields and governed by valley, not spin) (Gerber et al., 9 Nov 2025).
• p-Type QPCs and Hole Systems: 0.7-like (and additional, gate-sensitive) anomalies are observed in p-GaAs devices with strong spin–orbit coupling. Coexistence and interplay between generic 0.7 anomalies (unaffected by gate asymmetry) and extrinsic, impurity-driven features support the decoupling of background disorder from the intrinsic phenomenon (Komijani et al., 2013).
• High Magnetic Field (0.7-Analogs): At subband crossings in high field, "0.7 analogs" arise between split branches, interpreted and quantitatively modeled using two-band functional RG code incorporating band-dependent interactions and Hartree shifts (Weidinger et al., 2018).

5. Distinguishing Intrinsic from Extrinsic Origins

Direct scanning gate microscopy experiments prove that the 0.7 anomaly persists in QPCs both with and without detectable local impurities. The spatial location and lateral position of the channel (moved by up to 1 μm) do not alter the presence or value of the 0.7 anomaly, decisively excluding quantum interference from defect scattering or tip-induced dot states as its universal cause (Iagallo et al., 2013). While defect-induced Kondo effects can lead to ZBAs and other side phenomena, the intrinsic nature of the 0.7 plateau is now well established.

6. Empirical and Statistical Trends

Multiplexed measurements on arrays of hundreds of QPC devices reveal:

• Non-Uniformity: The anomaly's value and visibility are highly device-specific, even among "identical" QPCs; distributions of the plateau position in $G$ have variances $\sigma_{0.7} \sim 0.04$–0.1 $G_0$ and ranges from 0.63 to 0.84 $G_0$ (Smith et al., 2014, Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024).
• Dependence on Barrier Curvature Ratios: Quantitative scaling of the anomaly suppression (e.g., minimum in normalized transconductance) with the ratio $E_y/E_x$ (transverse to longitudinal curvature) is observed. The latter emerges as a key geometric control parameter (Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024).
• Channel Length and Gate Geometry: Lithographic length of the QPC does not set effective electrostatic length or curvature; rather, local background disorder dominates, further emphasizing environmental sensitivity (Smith et al., 2015).

Table: Correlations from Large-Array Studies

Metric	Correlation with G$_{0.7}$	Study
$\hbar\omega_x$ (longitudinal)	Strong negative	(Smith et al., 2015)
$E_y/E_x$ (curvature ratio)	Positive (suppression depth)	(Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024)
Gate length (lithographic)	None (within ensembles)	(Smith et al., 2015)
Background disorder	Strong (device spread)	(Smith et al., 2014)

7. Controversies, Open Problems, and Outlook

Despite the wealth of experimental and theoretical progress, several significant issues remain:

• Universality: The non-universality (broad value range, device specificity, dependence on disorder/curvature) challenges any single-parameter or universal explanation for the 0.7 anomaly (Das et al., 2018). The label "anomaly" encompasses a family of sub-$G_0$ conductance features, sensitive to microscopic environment.
• Competing Theories: Spin polarization and Kondo scenarios both have empirical support but are mutually exclusive in limiting cases. The van Hove ridge/dynamical spin fluctuation model—though now favored by large-scale statistics and functional RG—has not entirely eliminated alternative interpretations (Schimmel et al., 2017, Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024).
• Distinguishing Kondo vs. Generic Effects: The presence or absence of ZBAs and their scaling (single vs. multiple Kondo temperatures, as in the asymmetric phase transition (Hong, 26 Feb 2025)) continues to spur interpretation.
• Spin vs. Valley Physics: Observations in BLG/WSe$_2$ QPCs suggest a broader "pseudospin" framework for many-body-induced anomalies, with valley-exchange taking a role analogous to spin in traditional semiconductor QPCs (Gerber et al., 9 Nov 2025).

Future work is directed toward high-fidelity mapping of the local spin susceptibility, combined optical–transport probes (Faraday rotation), and systematic studies across spin–orbit and valley-active materials (Schubert et al., 2014, Gerber et al., 9 Nov 2025). Experiment–theory convergence on a fully quantitative, microscopic understanding remains an open challenge, demanding careful control (and measurement) of the local potential landscape, disorder, and interaction parameters in one-dimensional nanoelectronic devices.

---

Table: Key Observations and Theoretical Mechanisms

Feature/Trend	Consistent Model(s)	Notable References
$G \approx 0.7 G_0$ plateau, $T$-peak	van Hove LDOS, Kondo-like, SSP	(Burke et al., 2012, Schimmel et al., 2017)
Anomaly position shifts with $\omega_x$	van Hove, spin-gap	(Smith et al., 2015, Smith et al., 2015)
Kondo-like ZBA, gate-tunable splitting	Kondo model, quantum phase transition	(Hong, 26 Feb 2025, Heyder et al., 2014)
Robustness to lateral channel shift	Intrinsic/interactions, not defects	(Iagallo et al., 2013)
Suppression depth ∝ $E_y/E_x$	van Hove LDOS + short-range interaction	(Ma et al., 10 Apr 2024)
Valley-anomaly in BLG/WSe$_2$	Valley-exchange correlations	(Gerber et al., 9 Nov 2025)

A plausible implication is that the 0.7 anomaly is a robust emergent phenomenon in low-dimensional, tunnel-coupled electron liquids, intricately determined by local potential geometry, interaction-enhanced spin (or valley) fluctuations, and subtle balance between disorder and intrinsic many-body processes. Its realization in a broad range of materials and under diverse experimental conditions suggests a generic, though non-universal, route to strong correlation physics in nanoscale electronic systems.