Black hole thermodynamics is gauge independent (2512.11196v1)
Abstract: Black hole thermodynamics provides a rare window into the elusive quantum nature of gravity. In the first-order formalism for gravitational theories, where torsion and gauge freedom are present, it has been suggested that the first law of black hole thermodynamics requires a specific gauge choice, which would undermine its fundamental character. By using principal fiber bundles, it has been shown that the first law is independent of this gauge choice. The present work introduces an alternative method that establishes this independence in a more direct manner, thereby reinforcing the status of the first law as a guide toward quantum gravity. This method also facilitates explicit computations of the first law and helps resolve several ambiguities that commonly appear in such analyses.
Sponsor
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Top Community Prompts
Explain it Like I'm 14
Black hole thermodynamics is gauge independent — explained simply
Overview: What is this paper about?
This paper looks at a big idea in physics called black hole thermodynamics. That idea says black holes follow rules similar to those of heat and energy, like normal objects do. One of the most important of these rules is the “first law,” which connects how a black hole’s mass, area, spin, and other properties change. The paper asks: does this law depend on how we choose to describe the math of gravity, or is it truly universal? The authors show that the first law is universal — it does not depend on a “gauge choice,” which is a kind of mathematical setup. They also provide a clear, practical way to compute it.
Goals: What questions are they trying to answer?
- In certain versions of gravity (called “first-order formalism”), you can describe spacetime using two separate tools: a “vielbein” (think of it like local rulers) and a “spin connection” (think of it like local rotation guides). This setup comes with extra freedoms called “gauge transformations.”
- Past work suggested the first law of black hole thermodynamics might depend on which gauge you use, which would be bad because physics shouldn’t depend on arbitrary choices.
- The main questions here are:
- Is the first law truly independent of gauge choices in the first-order formalism?
- Can we prove this in a simple, direct way without using extra mathematical machinery?
- Can we define clean, practical formulas that avoid common mathematical ambiguities?
Methods: How do they approach the problem?
The authors use ideas from symmetry and conservation (Noether’s theorem) in a way that’s careful about how different “descriptions” of the same physics might look.
Here are the key steps in everyday language:
Symmetries and conserved quantities: When a physical system has a symmetry (like time not affecting the rules), there’s a conserved quantity (like energy). For black holes, combinations of spacetime symmetries give us special “charges” that help state the first law.
Diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations:
- A “diffeomorphism” is like smoothly reshaping or relabeling spacetime points, similar to changing coordinates on a map.
- A “gauge transformation” is like choosing a different orientation for your local rulers and protractors — it changes how you describe things, not the things themselves.
- First-order formalism: Instead of describing spacetime only by its metric (distances), they describe it using two parts: vielbeins (local rulers) and spin connections (local rotations). This allows “torsion,” which is like a twist in spacetime in addition to bending.
- Pre-symplectic current: Think of this as a precise bookkeeping tool that measures how small changes in your system relate to conserved quantities. The authors modify this tool to create a “gauge-independent” version so the results don’t depend on arbitrary choices.
- The key trick:
- They build new, “hat” versions of the important quantities: a boundary term and a charge, written as
hat{θ}andhat{Q}. These are designed to cancel out any dependence on gauge choice. - Then they define a new pre-symplectic current,
hat{Ω}, which is also gauge independent. - With these, they show the first law holds regardless of the chosen combination of diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations.
- They build new, “hat” versions of the important quantities: a boundary term and a charge, written as
You can think of their method like this: if different ways of drawing a map (gauge choices) give you slightly different pictures, they find a way to add and subtract the right pieces so the final answers match — no matter which map you used.
Findings: What did they discover?
- The first law of black hole thermodynamics does not depend on gauge choice. That means the law is truly fundamental and not an artifact of how we choose to write the equations.
- They provide simple, spacetime-based formulas (no need to go to more abstract “fiber bundles”) to compute the first law reliably:
- A corrected boundary term
hat{θ}and a corrected chargehat{Q}that make gauge effects drop out. - A corrected pre-symplectic current
hat{Ω}that is: - Zero for pure gauge transformations (so gauge changes don’t affect the physics).
- Independent of how you mix diffeomorphisms and gauge transformations.
- A corrected boundary term
- They show that a popular specific transformation (the “Lorentz–Lie” transformation) is not specially required to get the first law — the law works in a broader, more general way.
- They address common ambiguities (like adding certain harmless extra terms to the formulas) and show how their corrected quantities automatically handle these issues, leaving the first law clean and unambiguous.
Why this matters
- Black hole thermodynamics is one of our best clues to understanding quantum gravity — the deep theory that would combine quantum mechanics and general relativity.
- If the first law depended on arbitrary mathematical choices, it wouldn’t be trustworthy as a fundamental guide. Proving gauge independence strengthens its status.
- Their approach makes calculations easier and clearer, which helps researchers test and extend ideas in gravity, especially in theories that include torsion or other modifications.
Implications: What could this lead to?
- A more solid foundation for using black hole thermodynamics to explore quantum gravity.
- Practical tools for computing black hole properties in many gravity theories, not just Einstein’s original one.
- Easier handling of tricky technical issues (“ambiguities”) that often slow progress.
- Future directions include adding matter fields (like light, particles, and fluids) to see how they change the charges and whether the first law still holds neatly. This could help connect black hole thermodynamics to more realistic astrophysical situations.
In short, this paper shows that the first law of black hole thermodynamics stands strong no matter how you choose to write the math, and it gives a simple, usable way to prove it — a helpful step toward understanding the quantum nature of spacetime.
Knowledge Gaps
Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions
Below is a focused list of what remains missing, uncertain, or unexplored in the paper, formulated to be concrete and actionable for future research.
- Explicit computation of the corrected boundary term and charge: Provide algorithmic constructions and closed-form expressions for , , , and for concrete Lagrangians (e.g., Palatini, Holst, Nieh–Yan, Lovelock, in first-order form), including torsionful solutions.
- Scope beyond vacuum: Extend the gauge-independent derivation to include matter fields (scalars, spinors, gauge fields), making explicit how matter couplings, spin densities, and internal gauge symmetries modify , , , and the first law.
- Torsion symmetry assumption: The derivation assumes that the Lie derivative of torsion vanishes for the relevant Killing vector. Analyze whether the result persists for stationary spacetimes where torsion is only invariant up to a gauge transformation, for non-Killing symmetries, or for solutions with nontrivial torsion flow.
- Nontrivial topology: The use of Poincaré’s lemma and contractibility assumptions excludes nontrivial topology. Investigate gauge independence and the existence of , when spacetime or the exterior region of the black hole is not contractible (e.g., wormholes, black rings, topologically nontrivial horizons).
- Asymptotics beyond flat space: Generalize the framework to asymptotically AdS/dS spacetimes, including precise fall-off conditions for torsion and spin connection, boundary counterterms, and the impact on and the first law.
- Extremal horizons: The derivation relies on a bifurcate Killing horizon. Extend the method to extremal black holes (no bifurcation surface) and assess whether , still yield a well-defined first law and entropy.
- Integrability of charges: Analyze integrability conditions for the charges constructed from and across the solution space, and identify necessary/sufficient conditions for integrability in the presence of torsion and field-dependent gauge parameters.
- Edge modes and boundary degrees of freedom: Clarify whether edge modes or boundary symplectic structures are needed for full gauge invariance at finite boundaries, and how they interact with the proposed -shift in .
- Ambiguities with topological terms: Test the claimed robustness of the first law under Lagrangian shifts for actions with topological or parity-odd terms (Holst, Nieh–Yan, gravitational Chern–Simons), where gauge invariance may hold only up to boundary terms.
- Condition to fix : The prescription using to fix the Noether charge ambiguity is asserted but not derived broadly. Provide a general proof or alternative criteria and demonstrate its consistency across diverse theories and boundary conditions.
- Comparison to fiber bundle formalism: Give explicit case studies showing equivalence or differences between the spacetime-only construction of and the principal bundle construction (e.g., compute both for the same torsionful solution and compare).
- Lorentz–Lie transformation: While the paper argues the Lorentz–Lie transformation is not required, it does not present explicit counterexamples where relying on it alone fails. Construct and analyze such examples to clarify the limitation of the Lorentz–Lie approach.
- Field-dependent gauge parameters: The commutator relation is used crucially. Examine possible anomalies, central extensions, or boundary contributions to the symmetry algebra that could modify this relation and affect .
- Identification of entropy: Beyond the abstract derivation, provide explicit entropy formulas derived from for torsionful black holes and verify agreement with known results (e.g., Wald entropy) in benchmark solutions.
- Fall-off conditions with torsion: Specify and justify asymptotic fall-off conditions for and in torsionful asymptotically flat spacetimes to ensure finiteness of charges and the vanishing of boundary ambiguities at infinity.
- Application to supergravity: Extend the method to first-order formulations of supergravity, addressing local supersymmetry transformations, the enlarged gauge group, and their impact on the symplectic structure and first law.
- Dynamical/isolated horizons: Investigate whether the gauge-independent pre-symplectic current yields a consistent first law for nonstationary horizons (isolated/dynamical horizons) where is not strictly Killing.
- Nonmetricity: The analysis excludes nonmetricity due to “pathologies,” but metric–affine theories with controlled nonmetricity exist. Determine the precise conditions under which the method extends to nonmetricity and identify necessary modifications to , , and .
- Regular tetrads at the horizon: The construction of uses the tetrad. Provide criteria for choosing regular frames near the bifurcation surface to avoid singular behavior, and assess sensitivity of to frame choices.
- Numerical/explicit solutions: Present worked examples with known torsionful black hole solutions (or construct new ones), computing , , and verifying the first law numerically or analytically.
- Quantum corrections: Explore whether gauge independence of the first law persists under semiclassical or quantum corrections in first-order gravity (e.g., loop effects that could introduce anomalies in local Lorentz symmetry).
- Global charges and comparisons: Relate -based mass and angular momentum to ADM/Komar charges in first-order formalism, checking consistency and potential torsion-induced corrections.
- Boundary term cancellations at the bifurcation surface: Provide a detailed proof (beyond the qualitative argument) that the ambiguity in cancels exactly in on , including potential subtleties with corner terms.
- Algorithmic pipeline: Develop a step-by-step procedure (potentially computable in symbolic software) for deriving , , from a given first-order Lagrangian, including handling field-dependent gauge parameters and verifying commutators.
Glossary
- Antisymmetrization: Making a tensor antisymmetric in a set of indices. "where the brackets denote antisymmetrization of indices."
- Asymptotically flat: A spacetime that approaches flat (Minkowski) geometry at infinity. "a black hole is a spacetime that is asymptotically flat and its “exterior region” is globally hyperbolic"
- Bifurcate Killing horizon: A Killing horizon with two branches intersecting on a bifurcation surface. "there is a bifurcate Killing horizon, whose bifurcation surface is denoted by ."
- Bifurcation surface: The surface where the two branches of a bifurcate Killing horizon meet. "whose bifurcation surface is denoted by ."
- Boundary term: A term arising from integration by parts, often written as an exact differential. "A second ambiguity concerns the definition of the boundary term ."
- Cartan's magic formula: Identity relating the Lie derivative to interior and exterior derivatives, . "Using Cartan's magic formula \cite{Naka}, "
- Cauchy hypersurface: A spacelike surface on which initial data determines the entire evolution. "integration is on , a Cauchy hypersurface."
- Cauchy surface: A surface that every inextendible causal curve intersects exactly once. "Consequently, can be taken as a Cauchy surface of this region."
- Co-dimension 2 form: An -form in an -dimensional spacetime. "there exists a co-dimension $2$ form, with two antisymmetric group indices, "
- Conserved current: A current satisfying , typically linked to a symmetry. "there exists a conserved current"
- Contractible: Topologically trivial; can be continuously shrunk to a point. "spacetime is assumed to be topologically trivial (contractible)."
- Covariant derivative: A derivative compatible with the connection, preserving tensor character. "where is the torsion-free covariant derivative."
- Diffeomorphism: A smooth, invertible map of the manifold; symmetry transformation in GR. "an infinitesimal diffeomorphism along the vector field "
- Differential forms: Antisymmetric tensor fields that can be integrated over manifolds. "differential forms, first introduced into gravity by Cartan~\cite{cartan1923,cartan1924},"
- Einstein–Cartan theory: Extension of GR allowing torsion sourced by spin. "In fact, in Ref.~\cite{Simone}, Einstein--Cartan theory is analyzed,"
- Exact form: A form that is the exterior derivative of another form. "freedom to add an exact form to the Lagrangian"
- Exterior derivative: Operator mapping -forms to -forms. "where denotes the exterior derivative."
- Exterior region: The region outside the black hole, often considered for dynamics. "its “exterior region” is globally hyperbolic"
- Field-dependent (gauge parameter): A gauge parameter that depends on the dynamical fields. "as depends on the dynamical fields (i.e., it is “field-dependent” in the terminology of Ref.~\cite{Lee})."
- Globally hyperbolic: A spacetime with well-posed initial value formulation and no causal pathologies. "its “exterior region” is globally hyperbolic"
- Gauge independence: Physical results not depending on the choice of gauge. "a situation referred to as “gauge independence.”"
- Gauge transformation: Local symmetry transformation acting on fields (e.g., Lorentz). "for an infinitesimal gauge transformation with parameter , the transformations are"
- Group scalar: A quantity invariant under the action of the gauge group. "Since the Lagrangian is a group scalar,"
- Interior derivative: The contraction operator acting on differential forms. "where is the interior derivative (contraction)"
- Killing vector field: A vector field generating isometries; satisfies the Killing equations. "the existence of a Killing vector field ."
- Lagrangian -form: The action density written as an -form in -dimensional spacetime. "its Lagrangian , which is an -form"
- Lie derivative: Derivative along a vector field capturing the change under diffeomorphisms. "where is the corresponding Lie derivative."
- Lie group: A smooth group underlying continuous symmetries (e.g., Lorentz). "where the last equality follows from the properties of the Lie group."
- Lorentz–Lie transformation: A combined diffeomorphism and Lorentz gauge transformation tailored to . "the Lorentz--Lie transformation, which is defined by Eq.~\eqref{GT+Diff} with ."
- Metric formalism: Gravitational formulation using the metric rather than tetrads/spin connections. "as in the metric formalism"
- Noether charge: The conserved quantity associated with a symmetry, typically an -form integrated on a surface. "The corresponding Noether charge then takes the form"
- Noether current: The conserved current associated with a symmetry, typically an -form. "The associated Noether current is"
- Nonmetricity: Failure of the connection to preserve the metric (). "Nonmetricity is not considered as it leads to pathological behaviors"
- Poincaré's lemma: On contractible domains, closed forms are exact. "by virtue of Poincar e's lemma, there exists an -form, "
- Pre-symplectic current: The current defining the covariant phase-space symplectic structure. "It is useful to introduce the pre-symplectic current."
- Principal fiber bundle: Geometric structure with a base manifold and a fiber (group) supporting gauge fields. "the framework of a principal fiber bundle"
- Spin connection: The gauge connection for local Lorentz transformations in the tetrad formalism. "the spin connection 1-form "
- Stoke's theorem: Relates integrals of differential forms over a boundary to integrals of their exterior derivatives over the region. "and using Stoke's theorem yields"
- Torsion: The antisymmetric part of the connection; a geometric property allowing for twisting. "allowing for a nontrivial torsion tensor"
- Torsion-free: A connection with zero torsion. "the torsion-free part of "
- Vacuum gravity theory: A gravitational theory without matter fields. "an arbitrary vacuum gravity theory is assumed."
- Vielbein: Local orthonormal frame fields (tetrads) used in first-order gravity. "the vielbein 1-form "
Practical Applications
Below is a focused mapping from the paper’s key results—gauge-independent formulation of the first law in first-order gravity, the construction of the gauge-independent boundary term and charge (hat-theta, hat-Q), and the gauge-independent pre-symplectic current (hat-Omega)—to practical, real-world applications across sectors. For each item, we indicate sectors, tangible tools/workflows, and assumptions/dependencies that affect feasibility.
Immediate Applications
- Gauge-independent black hole thermodynamics calculations in first-order (tetrad/connection) gravity
- Sectors: Academia (theoretical physics, relativity), Software (scientific computing)
- What: Use the hat-theta, hat-Q, and hat-Omega constructions to compute entropy and the first law in Einstein–Cartan and related torsionful theories without relying on principal bundles.
- Tools/workflows: Implement the γ, Hμν, hat-theta, hat-Q pipeline in symbolic platforms (e.g., Mathematica/xAct, Cadabra, SageManifolds); publish notebooks/templates to reproduce derivations; add unit tests that verify gauge independence.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Vacuum theories; asymptotically flat, stationary black holes with a bifurcate Killing horizon; topologically trivial spacetimes; smooth fields; nonmetricity excluded.
- Reproducibility and consistency checks for published first-law derivations
- Sectors: Academia (peer review, journals), Research integrity
- What: Use the gauge-independent formalism to audit earlier results that depended on specific gauge prescriptions (e.g., Lorentz–Lie choice), detecting errors or resolving ambiguities.
- Tools/workflows: “Derivation checklists” and CI-style test suites for preprints; repositories with reference calculations using hat-Omega to benchmark equivalence across gauges.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Availability of original Lagrangians and boundary conditions; community willingness to adopt standardized checks.
- Rapid prototyping of modified gravity models (with torsion) for black hole thermodynamics
- Sectors: Academia (modified gravity), Software (model-building libraries)
- What: Faster derivation of thermodynamic quantities when exploring alternative actions; sensitivity studies of torsion contributions to entropy and charges.
- Tools/workflows: Plug-in modules for model exploration that auto-generate θ, γ, hat-theta, hat-Q from a Lagrangian written in differential forms.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Accurate specification of the action in first-order formalism; validated symbolic rules for variations.
- Education and training materials for advanced GR/QG courses
- Sectors: Education (graduate programs), Open education
- What: Lecture notes and problem sets demonstrating the gauge-independent first law and comparison of metric vs first-order approaches; “from Wald to hat-Omega” learning path.
- Tools/workflows: Interactive notebooks, short coding tasks that implement Cartan’s magic formula, Noether charges, and the modified pre-symplectic current.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Students’ familiarity with differential forms, Lie derivatives, and basic gauge theory.
- Formal-methods mechanization of first-law proofs
- Sectors: Software (formal verification), Academia (mathematical physics)
- What: Encode the gauge-independent derivation (avoiding principal bundles) in proof assistants (Coq, Isabelle/HOL, Lean) for machine-checked theorems about charges and symplectic structures.
- Tools/workflows: Libraries for differential forms and variational bicomplex; reusable lemmas for d, iξ, and Lie derivatives; test theorems on specific actions.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Availability of mature differential-geometry libraries; expert effort to encode form calculus and on-shell reasoning.
- Post-processing modules for numerical-relativity pipelines using tetrads
- Sectors: Academia (numerical relativity), Software/HPC
- What: Add gauge-robust extraction of horizon thermodynamics from simulation snapshots when tetrad/connection variables are used (or can be reconstructed).
- Tools/workflows: Post-processing scripts that evaluate hat-Q at boundaries and verify first-law balances across time slices.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Access to tetrad/connection data or reliable reconstruction; simulations close to stationary end-states; computational performance for large datasets.
- Community standards for first-law data products and reporting
- Sectors: Academia (collaborations, journals), Research infrastructure
- What: Minimum reporting standards for black hole thermodynamics derivations (e.g., explicit θ, γ, hat-θ, hat-Q choices; boundary terms; gauge choices), improving comparability across papers.
- Tools/workflows: “First-law computation protocol” templates; checklist appendices; machine-readable artifacts (JSON/YAML) of charges and boundary terms.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Editorial and community buy-in; simple reference implementations to lower adoption cost.
- Methodological guidance for peer reviewers and grant panels
- Sectors: Policy (funding agencies), Academia (peer review)
- What: Clear criteria to assess whether claims about entropy/first-law results in first-order theories are genuinely gauge independent.
- Tools/workflows: Reviewer guidelines emphasizing the hat-Omega test (0 = hat-Ω(δ, Lξ)) and the handling of ambiguities (L → L + dX, θ → θ + dZ, Q → Q + dY).
- Assumptions/dependencies: Awareness of the method among reviewers; concise checklists.
Long-Term Applications
- Constraints and cross-comparisons for quantum gravity candidates
- Sectors: Academia (quantum gravity: LQG, string theory, asymptotic safety)
- What: Use a gauge-independent first law as a theory-agnostic benchmark to compare microstate counting and entropy corrections in torsionful or first-order formulations.
- Tools/workflows: Databases of predicted entropy/charge corrections across theories; pipeline integrating hat-Q evaluations for candidate actions.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Extension to matter fields; consensus on relevant black-hole solutions within each theory.
- Observational pipelines linking thermodynamic charges to astrophysical signatures
- Sectors: Astrophysics (EHT, mm-VLBI), Gravitational waves (LIGO/Virgo/KAGRA/ET/CE)
- What: In torsionful or modified-gravity scenarios, relate thermodynamic charges to quasi-normal mode spectra, ringdown consistency tests, or horizon-scale observables; assess deviations from GR.
- Tools/workflows: Forward models that couple hat-Q-based thermodynamics with perturbation theory and radiative signatures; Bayesian inference frameworks to constrain torsion parameters.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Realistic solutions with matter; robust mapping from thermodynamic to dynamical observables; sufficient data quality.
- General-purpose software suite for conserved charges in generalized gravity
- Sectors: Software (scientific platforms), Academia
- What: Matured open-source toolkit implementing gauge-independent charges/symplectic structures for broad classes of Lagrangians (including higher-curvature and torsion terms).
- Tools/workflows: API for defining actions in differential forms; automated derivation of θ, γ, hat-θ, hat-Q; boundary extraction on numerical grids.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Community maintenance; interoperability with NR codes and symbolic platforms.
- Standardization and best practices in modified-gravity thermodynamics
- Sectors: Academia (standards), Policy (roadmaps, community reports)
- What: Consensus documents that codify gauge-independent procedures for first-law derivations, ambiguity handling, and boundary conditions across theories.
- Tools/workflows: Working groups, benchmark problems, and living documents curated by collaborations.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Broad community participation; alignment with journal and funding-agency guidelines.
- Extension to matter couplings and phenomenology
- Sectors: Academia (high-energy phenomenology, cosmology)
- What: Incorporate matter fields into the gauge-independent framework to study entropy/first-law in more realistic settings (e.g., charged/rotating BHs, cosmological horizons), enabling new phenomenological constraints.
- Tools/workflows: Symbolic and numerical modules for matter-inclusive θ and hat-θ; case studies (Einstein–Cartan–Dirac, scalar–tensor in first order).
- Assumptions/dependencies: Completed theoretical development for matter couplings; availability of exact or numerical solutions.
- Guidance for experimental searches of torsion and non-Riemannian effects
- Sectors: Precision experiments (spin-torsion couplings), Space/astroparticle physics
- What: Translate thermodynamic consistency conditions into constraints or targets for experiments (e.g., bounds on torsion from combined astrophysical and lab data).
- Tools/workflows: Global-fit frameworks combining astrophysical thermodynamics-based bounds with lab experiments (torsion pendula, spin-precession).
- Assumptions/dependencies: Calibrated mapping from theory parameters to observables; credible priors from astrophysical modeling.
- Unified HPC frameworks blending metric and first-order formulations
- Sectors: HPC, Numerical relativity
- What: Next-generation simulation infrastructures that can switch between or mix metric and tetrad/connection variables while preserving a common, gauge-robust thermodynamic post-processor.
- Tools/workflows: Modular codebases with adapters for hat-Q extraction; benchmark suites ensuring cross-formulation consistency.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Software engineering investment; community adoption.
- Advanced training programs and cross-disciplinary curricula
- Sectors: Education, Workforce development
- What: Long-form training that integrates geometric methods, gauge theory, and computational tools for modern gravitational theory, preparing students for QG/NR/HPC careers.
- Tools/workflows: Certificate or graduate tracks; capstone projects implementing the gauge-independent first law in new models.
- Assumptions/dependencies: Institutional support; sustained teaching materials and tooling.
Notes on overarching assumptions and dependencies common to many applications:
- The current results are for vacuum theories in first-order formalism with torsion allowed and nonmetricity excluded; extension to matter is identified by the authors as future work.
- Black holes are assumed stationary with a bifurcate Killing horizon and asymptotically flat boundary conditions; departures (e.g., dynamical horizons, AdS) require dedicated analysis.
- Spacetimes are taken as topologically trivial; nontrivial topology may introduce additional subtleties in charges.
- Adoption depends on accessible software implementations, clear documentation, and community standards for reporting and verification.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.