Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

A Holographic Constraint on Scale Separation (2512.11031v1)

Published 11 Dec 2025 in hep-th

Abstract: We propose a new consistency condition for the compatibility of a gravitational effective field theory in AdS with a dual holographic description in terms of a family of large-$N$ CFTs. Using large-$N$ factorization of correlation functions combined with a properly defined notion of single- and multi-particle operators, we argue that the cubic scalar bulk couplings for fields dual to operators with extremal arrangements of the conformal dimensions, i.e. $Δ_i=Δ_j+Δ_k$, should vanish. We apply this criterion to the 4d $\mathcal{N}=1$ effective supergravity theory describing the simplest DGKT AdS$_4$ vacua in type IIA string theory and show that it is non-trivially satisfied. In addition, we calculate explicitly all non-vanishing three-point correlation functions of low-lying scalar operators in the putative 3d CFTs dual to these AdS$_4$ string theory backgrounds.

Summary

  • The paper shows that vanishing extremal cubic scalar couplings in gravitational EFTs preserve large-N factorization in AdS/CFT.
  • Detailed computations in DGKT AdS4 vacua confirm that cancellations in extremal configurations are necessary for a consistent holographic dual.
  • This holographic constraint offers a rigorous guideline for constructing EFTs in string theory that admit dual large-N CFTs, influencing swampland and UV completeness research.

Summary of "A Holographic Constraint on Scale Separation" (2512.11031)

Introduction and Background

The manuscript presents a rigorous investigation into the compatibility of gravitational effective field theories (EFTs) in AdS with the existence of large-NN holographic dual conformal field theories (CFTs). The authors propose a novel, robust holographic constraint: cubic bulk scalar couplings that are extremal with respect to conformal dimensions—i.e., cijkc'_{ijk} where Δi=Δj+Δk\Delta_i = \Delta_j + \Delta_k—must vanish for a gravitational EFT in AdS to be consistent with a dual large-NN CFT. This assertion is motivated by the observation that extremal configurations induce divergences in the holographic three-point Witten diagrams and thus fail to yield well-defined CFT three-point functions unless the relevant bulk coupling constants vanish.

The argument leverages large-NN factorization and the precise identification of single- and multi-particle operators in holographic duality. The analysis generalizes previously understood constraints from the prototypical AdS5_5/CFT4_4 case (e.g., type IIB on AdS5×S5_5 \times S^5/ N=4\mathcal{N}=4 SYM) and extends them to generic EFTs in AdS, including those arising in string/M-theory constructions exhibiting scale separation.

Holographic Consistency Condition

The formal derivation begins by examining scalar cubic interactions in an EFT expanded around an AdS vacuum. Employing the holographic dictionary, operators dual to bulk scalars are identified as single-particle operators (SPOs) with well-defined conformal dimensions related to bulk masses. The authors show that, in the context of large-NN holographic CFTs, two-point and three-point function scaling imposes strong constraints on the allowed cubic couplings. Specifically, when a configuration allows for mixing between single- and double-trace CFT operators due to coincident dimensions (the extremal case), the only way to preserve large-NN factorization and the SPO structure is to ensure the relevant cubic bulk couplings vanish.

Failure to observe this constraint results in anomalous scaling of CFT correlators ($1/c$ rather than 1/c21/c^2 for three-point functions), signaling a breakdown of the holographic correspondence in the regime of large cc. The formalism encompasses both extremal and super-extremal cases (i.e., when Δi=Δj+Δk+n\Delta_i = \Delta_j + \Delta_k + n for nZ>0n \in \mathbb{Z}_{>0}), establishing a stringent requirement for the EFT's coupling structure.

Application to DGKT AdS4_4 Vacua

The second half of the paper tests the holographic criterion within the concrete context of DGKT-type scale-separated AdS4_4 vacua in massive type IIA string theory, built from orientifolded orbifold compactifications such as T6/Z32T^6/\mathbb{Z}_3^2. In these models, flux choices can produce parametric scale separation and large central charge, yielding a controlled regime for EFT and holography.

Detailed calculations of the scalar and pseudoscalar operator dimensions in the effective N=1\mathcal{N}=1 supergravity theory exhibit abundant extremal arrangements. The authors perform a precise expansion of the action to cubic order, compute the relevant couplings, and demonstrate explicit non-trivial cancellations: all extremal and super-extremal cubic couplings vanish after taking into account derivative and potential terms. This confirms that the EFT underlying these AdS4_4 vacua is compatible with the proposed holographic constraint.

In addition, explicit non-extremal three-point function coefficients for low-lying scalar operators are derived. The spectrum of conformal dimensions and the detailed matching of holographic correlator scaling support the validity of the criterion in both supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric DGKT vacua.

Implications and Future Directions

The holographic constraint outlined in this work establishes a necessary consistency condition for any gravitational EFT in AdS to admit a dual large-NN CFT description, especially for scenarios with scale separation. The constraint is non-trivial in string compactifications, where the occurrence of extremal operator arrangements cannot be a priori excluded, as demonstrated by the DGKT flux models.

Practical implications include:

  • Constraints on Model Building: Proposed scale-separated AdS vacua in string or M-theory must be scrutinized for vanishing extremal cubic couplings in their low-energy EFTs to admit consistent holographic duals.
  • Guiding UV Completeness: The vanishing of the extremal couplings acts as a filter for EFTs that may be realized as consistent quantum gravity backgrounds with CFT duals.
  • Impact on Swampland Program: This criterion intersects with ongoing efforts to delineate the swampland of EFTs incompatible with holography or UV completion.

Theoretically, the constraint sharpens the understanding of operator mixing and correlation function scaling in holographic dualities. It suggests extensions to other dimensions, compactification schemes, and setups with integer operator dimensions (e.g., AdS3_3/CFT2_2). The absence of extremal arrangements in certain constructions (e.g., KKLT/LVS) and the role of central charge tunability highlight further areas for exploration.

Several directions for future research are suggested:

  • Generalization to Other Scale-Separated Vacua: The applicability of the holographic criterion to more intricate CY orientifold compactifications should be investigated, particularly given the ubiquity of extremal arrangements in these spectra.
  • Study of Higher-Point Functions and Corrections: Further computation of holographic four-point functions and $1/c$ corrections to operator dimensions may reveal additional non-trivial structure and symmetry constraints.
  • Explicit Construction of Dual CFTs: The search for families of 3d CFTs dual to DGKT-type vacua—potentially with large spectral gaps and exotic fusion rules—remains open.

Conclusion

This work formulates and tests a new holographic consistency condition: extremal cubic scalar couplings must vanish in gravitational EFTs in AdS to preserve large-NN factorization and the existence of SPOs in the dual CFT. Detailed application to DGKT AdS4_4 flux vacua in type IIA string theory confirms this constraint via explicit calculation. The criterion strategically refines the landscape of admissible EFTs in string/M-theory compactifications and strengthens the analytic bridge between AdS gravity and CFT data, with consequences for future studies in holographic duality, scale separation, and quantum gravity model building.

Whiteboard

Generating whiteboard...

This may take a few minutes.

Explain it Like I'm 14

What is this paper about?

This paper studies a rule that any “good” theory of gravity in Anti-de Sitter space (AdS) should follow if it really has a holographic dual (a matching description) as a conformal field theory (CFT) with many degrees of freedom. The rule is simple to state: certain three-way interactions between scalar fields in AdS must be zero when the sizes of the matching CFT operators line up in a special “extremal” way. The authors then check this rule in a famous family of string theory models (called DGKT AdS₄ vacua) and show it holds. They also compute all the allowed non-extremal three-point functions of the lightest scalar operators in those models.

The big questions the paper asks

  • If an AdS gravity theory really has a holographic CFT dual with a very large number of degrees of freedom (large N), what must be true about its basic scalar interactions?
  • Specifically, when three operators in the CFT have dimensions that satisfy Δᵢ = Δⱼ + Δₖ (an “extremal” arrangement), what should happen to the matching three-field interaction in the AdS gravity side?
  • Do popular string theory AdS₄ models (DGKT vacua) obey this rule, and what are their non-extremal three-point functions?

How the authors approach the problem (with simple analogies)

Think of AdS/CFT as translating between two languages:

  • AdS gravity side: fields moving and interacting in a curved space.
  • CFT side: operators (like building blocks) with sizes (called “dimensions”) and rules for how they connect (correlation functions).

Key ideas and tools they use:

  • Large-N factorization: In CFTs with many degrees of freedom, complicated correlations split into simpler parts in a predictable way. Think of it like very big Lego sets where most builds can be taken apart cleanly into standard pieces.
  • Single vs multi-particle (or single-trace vs double-trace) operators: A “single-particle” operator is a basic block; a “double-trace” operator is two basic blocks glued together. To define a truly “basic block,” you need it to be orthogonal (distinct) from any glued-together combinations.
  • Three-point functions: These measure how three operators “meet” or interact. On the AdS side, you compute them by drawing “Witten diagrams” (like flowcharts of interactions); on the CFT side, they’re fixed by symmetry up to some constants.
  • Extremal arrangement Δᵢ = Δⱼ + Δₖ: This is a special case where the math that normally gives you a finite three-point function blows up (like dividing by zero). That means something has to cancel to keep the theory sensible.

What they show step-by-step:

  1. If the gravity theory has a finite set of fields and weak interactions, its dual CFT must obey large-N factorization.
  2. In extremal cases (Δᵢ = Δⱼ + Δₖ), the standard AdS calculation of a three-point function develops a divergence unless a special combination of cubic couplings (called c′ᵢⱼₖ) is exactly zero.
  3. Could mixing between “basic blocks” and “two-blocks” in the CFT fix this? Only if the mixing is very strong. But strong mixing would break large-N factorization (the “clean” Lego-building rule), which a good holographic CFT must keep.
  4. Conclusion: To stay consistent, all extremal cubic couplings must vanish in any well-behaved AdS effective field theory (EFT) with a large-N CFT dual. The same logic also applies to “super-extremal” cases (even more special arrangements), so those cubic couplings must vanish too.

Main results and why they matter

Here are the key findings and their significance:

  • New holographic consistency rule: In AdS EFTs with finitely many fields and a large-N CFT dual, all cubic scalar couplings that would create extremal (and super-extremal) three-point functions must be zero. This avoids dangerous divergences and keeps large-N factorization intact.
  • Tested in DGKT AdS₄ models: The authors analyze a simple but important set of AdS₄ vacua from type IIA string theory (DGKT). These have “scale separation,” meaning the extra-dimensional vibrations (KK modes) are much heavier than the AdS curvature scale, so the 4D gravity EFT makes sense on its own. They find:
    • The extremal cubic couplings are not zero individually, but a special combination cancels exactly, making c′ᵢⱼₖ = 0. This is a non-trivial check of the rule.
    • This cancellation holds both for the supersymmetric vacuum and for certain non-supersymmetric vacua (and also for super-extremal setups).
  • Explicit non-extremal data: For these DGKT models, the authors compute all the non-extremal three-point functions of the light scalar operators. This is valuable input for anyone trying to reconstruct or understand the mysterious dual 3D CFT.

Why this is important:

  • It’s a clean, general test for whether an AdS EFT could have a consistent holographic dual. If extremal cubic couplings don’t vanish, the dual CFT would break a core large-N property.
  • It gives a concrete pass/fail criterion for “scale-separated” AdS vacua in string theory, which are actively studied because they might model realistic physics while keeping quantum gravity effects under control.

A closer look at the DGKT example

What are DGKT AdS₄ vacua?

They come from compactifying type IIA string theory on a special 6D space (an orbifold of tori, T⁶/ℤ₃²), turning on certain background fluxes. The result is:

  • A 4D AdS space with a small set of light scalar fields.
  • Tunable flux parameters (the eᵢ’s) that make the AdS EFT valid and weakly coupled, with heavy KK modes (this is “scale separation”).
  • A dual 3D CFT (if it exists) with a large central charge c (roughly the “size” of the CFT), scaling like c ∼ ē⁹ᐟ² when all eᵢ ∼ ē are large.

What the authors computed

  • They expanded the 4D supergravity action to quadratic and cubic order around the AdS₄ vacuum.
  • They diagonalized the mass matrix (to read off operator dimensions Δ from m²L² = Δ(Δ − d), with d = 3).
  • They calculated the derivative-type and potential-type cubic couplings.
  • They combined them into the special c′ᵢⱼₖ combination that controls the CFT three-point function. In extremal and super-extremal cases, c′ᵢⱼₖ cancels to zero.
  • They listed all the non-extremal c′ᵢⱼₖ and, using known AdS/CFT formulae, gave the corresponding CFT three-point coefficients.

What does this mean going forward?

  • This “extremal-coupling must vanish” rule can be used to check other AdS models (especially scale-separated ones) for holographic consistency.
  • It offers a new constraint that any candidate AdS EFT should meet if it truly has a large-N CFT dual with a finite set of low-spin fields.
  • For DGKT-type models, it strengthens the case that a dual 3D CFT might exist, and provides detailed three-point data that future work can build on (like computing four-point functions or 1/c corrections).
  • It also highlights how unusual the putative dual CFTs are: they seem to have big gaps in their spectra and no relevant or marginal operators, making them hard to pin down explicitly. The new rule is a step toward understanding their structure.

In short, the paper gives a clear, testable holographic constraint on AdS gravity theories and shows it holds in an important string theory example, while supplying precise new data for the dual CFT side.

Knowledge Gaps

Below is a focused list of the paper’s unresolved knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions that future work could address:

  • Test the holographic constraint across the broader DGKT landscape: compute cubic scalar couplings (including derivative terms) and 3pt-functions for AdS4 vacua on more general CY orientifolds and flux choices beyond the T6/ℤ3² example, including thorough scans over moduli and sign assignments.
  • Provide a CFT-side derivation of the mixing data: explicitly construct the single-particle operator via the orthogonality prescription, and compute the double-trace admixture coefficient B and exponent β in the putative 3d large-N SCFT to verify the bound β ≥ 1/2 and the scaling arguments.
  • Identify or construct the dual CFT(s): the dual 3d CFT remains putative; concretely exhibit candidate theories (or universal constraints on them) with the required large higher-spin gap, large central charge, and absence of relevant/marginal operators.
  • Assess robustness under UV corrections: quantify α′ and g_s corrections and KK threshold effects to the bulk cubic couplings c_{ijk}, d_{ijk} and to the cancellation in c′_{ijk}; determine whether the vanishing of extremal/super-extremal couplings is symmetry-protected or easily spoiled.
  • Extend the constraint beyond scalars: analyze whether analogous extremal/super-extremal vanishing conditions are required for cubic couplings involving vectors, fermions, or mixed scalar–spin interactions in the EFT, and test these in DGKT vacua.
  • Compute 4pt functions and loop corrections: evaluate scalar 4pt Witten diagrams (exchange and 1-loop) to extract OPE data and 1/c anomalous dimensions, checking large-N factorization, potential new divergences, and consistency of the EFT with the holographic dictionary.
  • Systematically check super-extremal cases: beyond the examples treated, perform a comprehensive computation confirming c′_{ijk}=0 for all super-extremal arrangements in DGKT vacua and clarify the mechanism enforcing these cancellations.
  • Delineate the scope of applicability: precisely characterize when the argument (finite-field EFT in AdS) fails—e.g., consistent truncations with infinite towers or higher-spin modes—and formulate criteria for when non-vanishing extremal couplings can still be compatible with holography.
  • Derive and prove suspected Ward identities: the observed vanishing of certain non-extremal couplings hints at supersymmetric Ward identities; establish these identities in 4d N=1 supergravity and determine which couplings they constrain.
  • Fix operator normalization unambiguously: provide a complete, scheme-independent map from bulk couplings to CFT OPE coefficients, including the A_{Δ_iΔ_jΔ_k} factors and flux dependence, and cross-check via bootstrap or Mellin-space methods.
  • Quantify central charge precisely: go beyond scaling c ∼ ē{9/2} to compute exact prefactors and flux dependence for c, enabling sharper tests of large-N scaling and of the β bound.
  • Analyze alternate quantization effects: for non-supersymmetric vacua with Δ=1 or 2 choices, determine how quantization affects operator mixing, extremal/super-extremal conditions, and the holographic constraint’s validity.
  • Integrate with other swampland constraints: DGKT vacua reportedly fail other consistency tests; investigate correlations between the new extremal-coupling constraint and swampland/positivity/weak gravity constraints to assess overall viability.
  • Include higher-trace mixing systematically: quantify the suppression and impact of triple-trace and higher-trace admixtures (∼ c{−(n−1)/2}) on 3pt and 4pt data and verify that they do not upset large-N factorization or the SPO definition.
  • Generalize to other scale-separated AdS backgrounds: apply the constraint to AdS3 proposals with integer dimensions and extremal spectra (e.g., recent IIA/IIB constructions), and provide a practical algorithm to check c′_{ijk}=0 in new models.
  • Clarify scheme dependence and contact terms: determine whether boundary counterterms/field redefinitions can remove extremal divergences without requiring c′_{ijk}=0, and establish the uniqueness of the vanishing-coupling criterion.
  • Deliver complete numerical OPE data: the paper lists bulk c′ couplings; compute and publish the full set of normalized CFT 3pt coefficients C_{ijk} (including A_{Δ} factors and η dependence) for all non-extremal cases to enable bootstrap and phenomenological checks.
  • Check vacuum stability with full spectrum: include the heavy blow-up modes and KK towers in stability analyses (even if integrated out in the EFT) to confirm no tachyonic directions emerge once corrections are considered.
  • Explore constraints on stress-tensor couplings: investigate whether the extremal-coupling constraint implies restrictions on graviton–scalar interactions and stress-tensor OPE coefficients in the dual CFT.

Glossary

  • AdS/CFT correspondence: A duality relating gravity in anti-de Sitter (AdS) space to a conformal field theory (CFT) on its boundary. "The AdS/CFT correspondence provides a powerful quantitative framework to address open questions in the physics of strongly coupled QFTs and quantum gravity."
  • AdS vacuum: A solution of a gravitational theory with negative cosmological constant, corresponding to AdS spacetime. "We will assume that the potential V(φ) has at least one critical point corresponding to an AdSd+1_{d+1} solution."
  • Alternate quantization: A choice of boundary conditions in AdS/CFT for fields near the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound, changing operator dimensions. "there is a choice of regular or alternate quantization for the scalar field a0a_0."
  • Anomalous dimension: The quantum correction to a conformal operator’s scaling dimension. "the anomalous dimension of SPOs is $1/c$ suppressed"
  • Axio-dilaton: A complex scalar combining an axion and the dilaton in string theory. "the axio-dilaton SS"
  • Calabi–Yau (CY) orientifold: A Calabi–Yau manifold modded by an orientifold action, used in string compactifications. "constructed from CY orientifolds"
  • Central charge: A normalization of the stress-tensor two-point function that measures degrees of freedom in a CFT. "The central charge of these CFTs, defined in terms of the 2pt-function of the stress-tensor, is proportional to the gravitational coupling cηc\sim \eta"
  • Chiral multiplet: In supersymmetry, a multiplet containing a complex scalar and a fermion. "contains four chiral multiplets"
  • Conformal dimension: The scaling exponent of a local operator in a CFT. "operators with extremal arrangements of the conformal dimensions"
  • Consistent truncation: A reduction of a higher-dimensional theory to a lower-dimensional one that preserves solutions. "consistent truncations of supergravity"
  • Cubic couplings: Interaction terms involving three fields in the bulk effective action. "the cubic couplings of scalar fields dual to operators with extremal arrangements"
  • DGKT AdS4_4 vacua: Scale-separated AdS4_4 solutions from DeWolfe–Giryavets–Kachru–Taylor in massive IIA with fluxes. "the simplest DGKT AdS4_4 vacua in type IIA string theory"
  • Double-trace operators: Composite operators formed from products of single-trace operators. "double-trace operators, which we denote by $<sup>{\text{DT}_{i,j}&quot;</sup></li> <li><strong>Effective field theory (EFT)</strong>: A low-energy approximation capturing relevant degrees of freedom below a cutoff. &quot;a gravitational effective field theory in AdS&quot;</li> <li><strong>Euclidean signature</strong>: A metric signature with all positive signs, often used for path integrals. &quot;written in Euclidean signature.&quot;</li> <li><strong>Extremal arrangement</strong>: A relation among operator dimensions like $\Delta_i=\Delta_j+\Delta_k$ that can lead to divergences. &quot;operators with extremal arrangements of the conformal dimensions&quot;</li> <li><strong>GFF contraction</strong>: A generalized free field factorization contributing to correlator scaling. &quot;an allowed ‘GFF contraction’&quot;</li> <li><strong>Gravity multiplet</strong>: The supergravity multiplet containing the graviton and its superpartners. &quot;and the gravity multiplet.&quot;</li> <li><strong>Higher-spin gap</strong>: Absence of low-dimension operators with spin greater than two in a holographic CFT. &quot;This means that there is a higher-spin gap in the CFT spectrum.&quot;</li> <li><strong>Holographic dictionary</strong>: The precise mapping between bulk fields and boundary operators. &quot;The holographic dictionary.&quot;</li> <li><strong>Kähler moduli</strong>: Scalars parametrizing sizes of 2-cycles in a Calabi–Yau. &quot;the K\&quot;ahler moduli scalars $t_i$&quot;</li> <li><strong>Kähler potential</strong>: A function determining kinetic terms in $\mathcal{N}=1$ supergravity. &quot;The 4d $\mathcal{N}=1$ supergravity theory is specified by a Kähler potential and a superpotential&quot;</li> <li><strong>Kaluza–Klein (KK) scale</strong>: The energy scale associated with excitations from compact extra dimensions. &quot;the KK scale of the internal manifold&quot;</li> <li><strong>Large-$Nfactorization</strong>:Thepropertythatcorrelatorsfactorizeinthelarge factorization</strong>: The property that correlators factorize in the large-N(orlarge (or large-c$) limit. &quot;large-$N$ factorization&quot;</li> <li><strong>Mass matrix</strong>: The matrix of second derivatives of the potential determining mass eigenstates. &quot;their mass matrix is diagonal.&quot;</li> <li><strong>Massive type IIA string theory</strong>: Type IIA string theory with nonzero Romans mass. &quot;massive type IIA string theory&quot;</li> <li><strong>Multi-trace operators</strong>: Operators made from products of single-trace operators, e.g., double-trace. &quot;multi-trace operators&quot;</li> <li><strong>Newton constant</strong>: The gravitational coupling constant in the bulk theory. &quot;the $(d+1)dimensionalNewtonconstant-dimensional Newton constant G$&quot;</li> <li><strong>O6-planes</strong>: Orientifold 6-planes that modify the topology and charges in string compactifications. &quot;in the presence of background fluxes and O6-planes&quot;</li> <li><strong>Orientifold involution</strong>: The discrete symmetry used in defining an orientifold projection. &quot;all complex structure moduli are frozen by the orientifold involution&quot;</li> <li><strong>Pseudoscalar</strong>: A scalar field that changes sign under parity (odd under spatial inversion). &quot;the pseudoscalars&quot;</li> <li><strong>Romans mass</strong>: A mass parameter $m_0$ in massive type IIA supergravity. &quot;the Romans mass, $m_0,$&quot;</li> <li><strong>Scale separation</strong>: A regime where KK modes are parametrically heavier than the AdS scale. &quot;scale separated AdS vacua&quot;</li> <li><strong>Single-particle operator (SPO)</strong>: The boundary operator dual to a single bulk field excitation. &quot;a `single-particle operator&#39; (SPO)&quot;</li> <li><strong>Single-trace operators</strong>: Fundamental gauge-invariant operators (e.g., traces of fields) in a large-$N$ CFT. &quot;‘single-trace’ operators $^{\text{ST}_i$&quot;</li> <li><strong>Stress-tensor</strong>: The conserved energy–momentum operator in a CFT. &quot;the 2pt-function of the stress-tensor&quot;</li> <li><strong>Super-extremal</strong>: Arrangements where $\Theta_i=-nwith with n>0$, generalizing extremal dimension relations. &quot;the cases with $n>0$ are called super-extremal&quot;</li> <li><strong>Supergravity</strong>: The field theory combining supersymmetry with gravity. &quot;effective supergravity&quot;</li> <li><strong>Superpotential</strong>: A holomorphic function that determines F-term contributions to the potential in $\mathcal{N}=1$ theories. &quot;a superpotential that depend on the K\&quot;ahler moduli scalars $t_iandtheaxiodilaton and the axio-dilaton S$&quot;</li> <li><strong>Tadpole cancellation</strong>: A consistency condition requiring net charge cancellation in flux compactifications. &quot;In the absence of D6-branes, $C_7tadpolecancellationimplies tadpole cancellation implies m_0 p <0$&quot;</li> <li><strong>UV completion</strong>: An underlying high-energy theory that makes an EFT consistent at all scales. &quot;this gravitational EFT can be UV completed in a consistent theory of quantum gravity&quot;</li> <li><strong>UV cutoff scale</strong>: The energy limit beyond which an EFT is no longer valid. &quot;the UV cutoff scale in the EFT is given by the $(d+1)dimensionalNewtonconstant-dimensional Newton constant G$"
  • Witten diagram: A bulk AdS Feynman-like diagram used to compute boundary CFT correlators. "a divergence in the 3pt Witten diagram"

Practical Applications

Immediate Applications

The following items outline actionable uses of the paper’s findings and methods that can be deployed now. Each item includes sector links and any key assumptions or dependencies that affect feasibility.

  • Holographic consistency checker for AdS EFTs
    • Sector: academia, software (scientific computing)
    • Use: Implement the extremal/super-extremal cubic coupling constraint as a standard validation step for gravitational EFTs in AdS. Given a spectrum of scalar masses and cubic couplings, compute c′ using c′ = c + (m_i2 − m_j2 − m_k2)/2 * d and assert c′ = 0 for all extremal/super-extremal arrangements.
    • Tools/workflows: A “HoloEFT-Check” module for Mathematica/Maple/Sage/Julia; small CLI tool to scan Lagrangian expansions and report violations; integration with existing Witten diagram libraries.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Large-N factorization; EFT has finitely many fields (spin ≤ 3/2); weakly coupled bulk; higher-spin gap in the dual CFT; accessible c and d couplings from a well-defined EFT.
  • Cataloging and immediate use of DGKT 3-point functions
    • Sector: academia (high-energy theory and conformal bootstrap)
    • Use: Incorporate the paper’s explicit non-extremal 3-point coefficients for low-lying scalar operators in DGKT-based AdS4 vacua into bootstrap analyses of candidate 3d N=1 SCFTs; use extremal cancellations as a prior in CFT spectrum fits.
    • Tools/workflows: Curated dataset “DGKT-3pt” with operator dimensions and CFT coefficients C_{ijk} (normalized per the paper’s prescription); cross-link with numerical bootstrap solvers.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Existence of putative dual CFTs; reliable mapping from bulk normalization to CFT conventions; acceptance of large flux regime (e_i ∼ large) for scale separation.
  • Landscape scanning filter for scale-separated vacua
    • Sector: academia (string phenomenology), software (HPC workflow)
    • Use: Embed the extremal/super-extremal coupling check in flux compactification scans (e.g., DGKT-like setups) to filter out EFTs that would violate large-N holographic consistency.
    • Tools/workflows: Automated pipeline that (i) extracts scalar spectra and cubic couplings from supergravity data, (ii) detects extremal/super-extremal triples, and (iii) enforces c′ = 0; report candidates passing the filter to deeper analysis.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Accurate KK truncation below the KK scale; trust in semiclassical expansion; availability of symbolic expressions for Kähler potential, superpotential, and coupling tensors.
  • Peer review and community standards
    • Sector: academia, policy (research assessment)
    • Use: Adopt the extremal/super-extremal coupling vanishing constraint as a checklist item in evaluation of claims about scale-separated AdS vacua; require disclosure of c′ values for all extremal configurations in submitted work.
    • Tools/workflows: Journal policies or informal community practices; reproducible scripts shared with submissions.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Consensus on the applicability of the constraint to EFTs with finite field content; acknowledgment of known exceptions (e.g., setups outside finite-field EFTs, as noted in the paper).
  • Graduate-level teaching modules on holography
    • Sector: education (physics curricula)
    • Use: Use the paper’s derivations (large-N scaling, SPO mixing, β-bound, and Witten diagram divergences) to build lecture notes and problem sets introducing practical holographic consistency conditions.
    • Tools/workflows: Course notebooks (e.g., Jupyter) illustrating computation of A_{Δ_iΔ_jΔ_k}, extremal limit expansions, and the role of operator mixing.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Students have background in AdS/CFT, EFT, and basic special functions.
  • Early-warning diagnostics for EFT breakdown
    • Sector: academia
    • Use: In projects modeling new AdS EFTs, run the extremal coupling test early; non-zero c′ at extremality signals breakdown of the SPO notion and large-N factorization—saving time before deeper analyses.
    • Tools/workflows: Lightweight diagnostic script tied into model-building notebooks.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Reliable computation of operator dimensions/masses; accurate identification of extremal triples.
  • Symbolic/numeric tool enhancements for extremal limits
    • Sector: software (scientific computing)
    • Use: Extend packages that evaluate Witten diagrams to robustly handle extremal/super-extremal limits (Γ-function poles) and offer safe expansion routines; provide guardrails matching the paper’s consistency criterion.
    • Tools/workflows: Contributions to open-source AdS/CFT libraries; improved special-function regularization modules.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Community adoption; verification against benchmark models like N=4 SYM and DGKT.
  • ML datasets for holographic prediction and classification
    • Sector: academia, software (ML in physics)
    • Use: Label EFT examples as consistent/inconsistent based on the extremal constraint; train ML models to predict c′-vanishing patterns from Kähler/superpotential data or flux choices and to flag likely violations.
    • Tools/workflows: Dataset assembly; feature extraction (mass spectra, coupling tensors); baseline classifiers and regressors.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Enough labeled examples; careful normalization across models; avoidance of spurious correlations.

Long-Term Applications

The following items are promising but require further research, scaling, or development before they can be realized.

  • Automated end-to-end pipeline for holographic EFT validation across compactifications
    • Sector: academia, software (HPC)
    • Use: Generalize the paper’s methodology into a turnkey system that ingests candidate AdS vacua (AdS4, AdS3, etc.), computes spectra/couplings, enforces extremal/super-extremal constraints, and exports CFT data for bootstrap.
    • Tools/products: “HoloEFT-Validator” platform integrating symbolic algebra, diagram evaluators, and database backends.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Scalable access to exact/approximate flux compactification data; reliable diagonalization and normalization; consistent conventions across models.
  • Guided construction of consistent scale-separated vacua
    • Sector: academia (string/M-theory model building)
    • Use: Use the extremal coupling cancellation criterion to design Kähler/superpotential structures and derivative couplings that enforce c′=0 at extremal configurations (as in DGKT), reducing false starts in model building.
    • Tools/workflows: Constraint-aware optimization of flux choices; symbolic constraint solvers to enforce cancellations.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Existence of compactifications admitting required cancellations; flexibility in flux parameters and orientifold choices.
  • Identification and engineering of the dual CFT families
    • Sector: academia (conformal bootstrap, holography)
    • Use: Combine the paper’s 3-point data with bootstrap bounds to pin down candidate large-c 3d N=1 CFTs; iteratively refine OPE coefficients and anomalous dimensions (1/c corrections) to test dual proposals.
    • Tools/workflows: Bootstrap engines tuned to large spectral gaps and absence of relevant/marginal operators; integration with the DGKT-3pt dataset.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Strong numerical bootstrap advances; reliable inputs beyond 3-point data (e.g., 4-point functions and loop corrections).
  • Quantum simulation/quantum information tests of large-N factorization
    • Sector: quantum technologies (industry/academia), condensed matter
    • Use: Explore analog or digital quantum simulators that emulate correlator factorization and operator-mixing suppression consistent with large-N holography; benchmark against the β ≥ 1/2 bound and extremal coupling cancellations.
    • Tools/workflows: Cold-atom or photonic platforms engineered for effective CFT-like dynamics at tunable “N”; measurement protocols for 2pt/3pt scaling.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Feasibility of realizing approximate large-N dynamics; mapping of simulator observables to CFT correlators.
  • Extension to AdS3 vacua with integer dimensions and extremal arrangements
    • Sector: academia
    • Use: Apply the constraint to proposed AdS3 scale-separated vacua where operator spectra have many integer dimensions (as cited in the paper), testing the robustness of extremal cancellations and consistency.
    • Tools/workflows: New compactification analyses; 3-point and 4-point computations in 3d bulk with careful extremal handling.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Availability of explicit AdS3 models with tractable EFTs; control over boundary conditions and quantization choices.
  • Loop-level pipelines for 4-point functions and 1/c corrections
    • Sector: academia, software (scientific computing)
    • Use: Develop automated Witten diagram evaluators for exchange/loop contributions to 4-point functions; extract anomalous dimensions γ_i and higher-order mixing effects; test consistency beyond tree level.
    • Tools/workflows: Dedicated libraries for AdS loop integrals; HPC acceleration; cross-checks with Mellin-space techniques.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Numerical stability; control of divergences and scheme choices; validated benchmarks.
  • Productization: comprehensive HoloEFT Validator
    • Sector: software industry (scientific tools)
    • Use: Commercial or community-supported toolchain that bundles spectrum extraction, coupling calculation, extremal constraint enforcement, bootstrap-ready data export, and reports for reproducibility.
    • Tools/products: Desktop and cloud offerings; APIs for integration with existing CAS and bootstrap codes.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Sufficient user base (research groups in high-energy theory); sustained maintenance; funding.
  • Cross-field analytics (condensed matter analogs of extremal constraints)
    • Sector: academia (theory), education
    • Use: Investigate whether extremal-like operator arrangements and their “forbidden” cubic couplings have analogs in effective descriptions of critical systems; develop teaching materials connecting holography to many-body physics.
    • Tools/workflows: Comparative studies of operator algebra structures; pedagogical modules.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Existence of meaningful analogs; careful translation of holographic constraints to non-relativistic systems.
  • Policy: prioritization of testable, consistency-driven research
    • Sector: policy (science funding and strategy)
    • Use: Encourage funding programs that emphasize verifiable consistency checks (like the extremal coupling criterion) in proposals on scale-separated AdS vacua; standardize reporting requirements to reduce speculative claims.
    • Tools/workflows: Program guidelines; review rubrics referencing holographic consistency conditions.
    • Assumptions/Dependencies: Community buy-in; balance with support for exploratory work; acknowledgment of known exceptions.

Notes on overarching assumptions and dependencies across applications:

  • The core constraint applies to AdS EFTs with finitely many fields and large-N duals exhibiting factorization and a higher-spin gap; models outside this framework may admit non-vanishing extremal couplings.
  • Numerical/OPE data translation requires careful normalization, especially when moving between bulk couplings and CFT coefficients C_{ijk}.
  • Scale separation depends on large flux parameters (e_i) and a trustworthy semiclassical regime (small α′ and g_s corrections), as emphasized in the DGKT context.
  • Known exceptions and special cases (referenced in the paper) should be recognized when generalizing the constraint beyond the finite-field EFT setting.

Open Problems

We found no open problems mentioned in this paper.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 3 tweets with 113 likes about this paper.