Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Unified Pati-Salam from Noncommutative Geometry: Overview and Phenomenological Remarks (2511.07672v1)

Published 10 Nov 2025 in hep-ph and hep-th

Abstract: The lack of clear new-physics signals at the LHC searches motivates models that can guide current and future collider searches. The spectral action principle within the noncommutative geometry (NCG) framework yields such models with distinctive phenomenology. This formalism derives the actions of the Standard Model, General Relativity, and beyond from the underlying algebra, putting them on a common geometric footing. Certain versions of Pati-Salam (PS) models with gauge coupling unification and limited scalar content can be derived from an appropriate noncommutative algebra. In this paper, I review these gauge-coupling-unified Pati-Salam models and discuss their phenomenological aspects, focusing on the $S_1$ scalar leptoquark.

Summary

  • The paper introduces unified Pati-Salam models using noncommutative geometry and the spectral action principle to merge gravity with gauge interactions.
  • It demonstrates that geometric constraints yield a restricted scalar sector and precise gauge coupling unification while avoiding dangerous diquark couplings.
  • The study explores phenomenological implications, notably resolving B-meson decay anomalies through the incorporation of the S1 leptoquark with left-handed couplings.

Unified Pati-Salam from Noncommutative Geometry: Formalism and Phenomenological Implications

Noncommutative Geometry and the Spectral Action Principle

The paper presents a comprehensive overview of the construction of Pati-Salam models with gauge coupling unification from noncommutative geometry (NCG) via the spectral action principle. NCG formulations replace the classical notion of geometry with the spectral data (A,H,D)(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{H}, \mathcal{D}), where A\mathcal{A} denotes an involutive algebra acting on the Hilbert space H\mathcal{H}, and D\mathcal{D} is a generalized Dirac operator. This setup, enhanced by a Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 grading and an antiunitary operator J\mathcal{J}, encodes both the manifold and gauge content geometrically. The theory derives the Standard Model (SM), General Relativity (GR), and extended gauge models within the same geometric unification.

The spectral action,

S=(Jψ,DAψ)+Tr[χ(DAΛ)],\mathcal{S} = \left( J\psi, \mathcal{D}_A \psi \right) + \mathrm{Tr} \left[ \chi \left( \frac{\mathcal{D}_A}{\Lambda} \right) \right],

combines the fermionic and bosonic sectors. The operator DA\mathcal{D}_A incorporates inner fluctuations, with the Higgs field arising naturally as the connection in the discrete dimension. The cutoff function χ\chi restricts the spectrum to the scale Λ\Lambda.

Implementing the SM within this framework requires choosing the finite algebra AF=CHM3(C)\mathcal{A}_F = \mathbb{C} \oplus \mathbb{H} \oplus M_3(\mathbb{C}), directly reproducing the U(1)U(1), SU(2)SU(2), and SU(3)SU(3) gauge group factors. The bosonic part of the action exhibits necessary gauge coupling unification conditions, g32=g22=53g12g_3^2 = g_2^2 = \frac{5}{3}g_1^2, imposed at a unification scale MUM_U much lower than Λ\Lambda. This approach highlights constraints and limitations: e.g., the minimal construction yields the incorrect Higgs mass, which can be corrected by introducing an additional singlet field. Truncating the spectral action at order O(1/Λ2)O(1/\Lambda^2) implies the framework is viewed as an effective geometric theory, not UV complete. Notably, the formal QFT structure respecting NCG is not fully established, requiring pragmatic application of usual QFT methods at lower energies.

Construction of Pati-Salam Models From NCG

To extend beyond the minimal SM spectral geometry, the finite algebra is replaced by AF=HRHLM4(C)\mathcal{A}_F = \mathbb{H}_R \oplus \mathbb{H}_L \oplus M_4(\mathbb{C}), yielding the Pati-Salam gauge group SU(4)C×SU(2)L×SU(2)RSU(4)_C \times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R (denoted G422G_{422}) or explicitly left-right symmetric G422DG_{422D}, depending on the fulfillment of the order-one condition. The scalar sector becomes tightly restricted by the underlying algebra and geometry. Three versions of the model—A, B, and C—differ in scalar content and symmetry, summarized as follows:

Model Symmetry Scalar Content (main entries)
A G422G_{422} ϕ(1,2,2)\phi(1,2,2), Σ(15,1,1)\Sigma(15,1,1), Δ~R(4,1,2)\widetilde{\Delta}_R(4,1,2)
B G422G_{422} ϕ(1,2,2)\phi(1,2,2), Σ~(15,2,2)\widetilde{\Sigma}(15,2,2), ΔR(10,1,3)\Delta_R(10,1,3), HR(6,1,1)H_R(6,1,1)
C G422DG_{422D} BB plus ΔL(10,3,1)\Delta_L(10,3,1), HL(6,1,1)H_L(6,1,1)

The symmetry breaking proceeds through ΔR\langle \Delta_R \rangle, leading from the unified group G422DG_{422D} to the SM group G321G_{321} at hierarchy scales MUMCM_U \gg M_C.

Fermionic and Scalar Sector: Predictivity and Restrictions

The fermion representations are dictated by the group structure, filling (4,2,1)(4,2,1) and (4,1,2)(4,1,2), matching the SM fermion content with inclusion of right-handed neutrinos. In the scalar sector, crucial fields include Σa˙IbJ\Sigma^{bJ}_{\dot{a}I}, HaIbJH_{aIbJ}, and Ha˙Ib˙JH_{\dot{a}I \dot{b}J}, associated with bidoublets, triplets, and sextets. The NCG construction restricts possible interaction terms: several terms present in ordinary PS models due to larger scalar freedom are automatically eliminated by geometric constraints, yielding increased predictivity and profound implications for low-energy phenomenology.

Yukawa Lagrangian terms are generated via

LY=ψa˙Iγ5Σa˙IbJψbJ+ψCaIγ5HaIbJψbJ+ψCa˙Iγ5Ha˙Ib˙Jψb˙J+h.c.\mathcal{L}_Y = \overline{\psi}^{\dot{a}I} \gamma_5 \Sigma^{bJ}_{\dot{a}I} \psi_{bJ} + \overline{\psi^C}_{aI} \gamma_5 H^{aIbJ} \psi_{bJ} + \overline{\psi^C}_{\dot{a}I} \gamma_5 H^{\dot{a}I \dot{b}J} \psi_{\dot{b}J} + \text{h.c.}

The grading (γ5\gamma_5) arises from the product geometry M×FM\times F. Symmetry breaking yields SM-like Yukawa terms with additional interactions of new scalars, with absence of certain couplings (e.g., diquark couplings) enforced by the NCG structure.

Phenomenology: Addressing BB-Meson Decay Anomalies and Leptoquarks

A salient application is in the context of flavor anomalies in BB-decays, such as RD()R_{D^{(*)}} measurements, which currently deviate from SM predictions by over 3σ3\sigma. Scalar leptoquarks—especially the S1=(3,1,1/3)321S_1 = (\overline{3},1,1/3)_{321}—are able to resolve these anomalies at tree level. In the NCG-PS models, the specific leptoquark content and allowed couplings differ from the generic PS scenario, which often suffers from proton decay issues due to diquark couplings. Figure 1

Figure 1: SM and S1S_1 leptoquark contributions to B0D()+τντL\overline{B}_0 \to D^{(*)+}\tau^-\overline{\nu_{\tau L}}: the S1S_1 mechanism yields tree-level new physics relevant to RD()R_{D^{(*)}}.

The geometric constraints only allow the S1S_1 in HL(6,1,1)422H_L(6,1,1)_{422} (Model C) to couple to left-handed fermions without diquark couplings, thus avoiding proton decay. The resulting interaction terms are:

dLCνLH3LuLCeLH3L+εijkuLiCdLjH3Lk\overline{d_L^C} \nu_L H_{3L}^* - \overline{u_L^C} e_L H_{3L}^* + \varepsilon^{ijk}\overline{u_{Li}^C} d_{Lj} H_{\overline{3}Lk}^*

where H3LH_{3L}^* is phenomenologically viable, whereas H3LH_{\overline{3}L}^* should be heavy to suppress dangerous modes. If needed, H3RH_{3R}^{*} from HR(6,1,1)422H_R(6,1,1)_{422} can provide right-handed couplings.

Additionally, the absence of right-handed couplings reduces parameter space for RD()R_{D^{(*)}} fits compared to regular models, but the proton is automatically stable. In the context of aμa_\mu, contributions from S1S_1 with only left-handed couplings are suppressed and negative; given recent convergence between experimental and theoretical predictions, this feature is not problematic. Figure 2

Figure 2: Leading-order S1S_1 leptoquark contribution to aμa_\mu is suppressed and carries negative sign with left-handed couplings only.

The framework supports global phenomenological analyses for observables including RK()R_{K^{(*)}}, RKνR_K^\nu, rare tau decays, and BcτνB_c \to \tau \nu, as well as correlations among flavor anomalies and g2g-2, leveraging the highly predictive scalar and Yukawa sector. This restrictiveness sharpens constraints and enables model discrimination against broader new physics scenarios.

Implications and Outlook

The construction of Pati-Salam models within noncommutative geometry via the spectral action principle unifies gravity and particle physics on geometric grounds, enforces gauge coupling unification, and constrains the allowed scalar and Yukawa content. The removal of dangerous couplings (notably mediating proton decay) and the minimal scalar sector emerge naturally from the geometric formalism, enhancing theoretical consistency and phenomenological viability.

For future developments, establishing a QFT structure compatible with NCG, investigating the RG flow and possible UV completions, and exploring precision flavor physics in light of new data could further probe the framework’s predictions. The approach’s attention to flavor anomalies, restricted parameter space, and geometric control over couplings will continue to be relevant for collider and flavor experiments.

Conclusion

The reviewed work demonstrates that noncommutative geometry, implemented through the spectral action principle, provides a robust method of constructing Pati-Salam models with gauge coupling unification. Characteristic features—including constrained scalar sectors, absence of problematic couplings, and compatibility with flavor anomaly resolution—set these models apart from standard PS and GUT scenarios. The geometric foundation not only places gravity and particle physics on equal footing but also endows the low-energy phenomenology with distinctive, testable signatures, making the NCG-based Pati-Salam unification a prominent candidate for guiding future experimental and theoretical explorations.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Explain it Like I'm 14

Overview

This paper looks at a special way to build physics theories using a math idea called Noncommutative Geometry (NCG). The goal is to put the Standard Model (the theory of particles and forces we know) and General Relativity (the theory of gravity) on the same geometric footing, and then go beyond them to explore new particles. The author focuses on a family of models called Pati–Salam, which naturally come out of this geometry, and discusses how a particular particle called a scalar leptoquark (named S1) could help explain puzzling results seen in certain particle decays.

What questions is the paper asking?

To make things easy, think of the paper as asking:

  • Can NCG give us a neat, unified picture of known physics (particles and gravity) and point to sensible new physics to look for?
  • What does the Pati–Salam version of this NCG story look like, and how is it different from traditional models?
  • Could a specific new particle (the S1 leptoquark) exist at energies the LHC can reach, be safe for the proton (not causing it to decay), and explain some “anomalies” in B-meson decays (like the famous RD and RD* measurements)?
  • What predictions or limits follow from this setup (for example, how it affects other measurements like the muon’s magnetic moment)?

How did the researchers approach the problem?

The approach uses a mix of geometry and particle physics ideas. Here’s the core idea, with everyday analogies:

  • Noncommutative Geometry (NCG): In normal geometry, we think of space as points. In NCG, we describe space using algebra (rules for how objects multiply). Sometimes, “ab” is not the same as “ba”—that’s the “noncommutative” part. It’s a bit like describing a city not by dots on a map but by the list of bus routes and schedules that tell you how you move from place to place.
  • Spectral action: Imagine a musical instrument—its sound is set by the frequencies it can make. In NCG, the “shape” of space is captured by a special operator (like a giant piano) whose “notes” (eigenvalues) tell you the geometry. The spectral action is like only listening to notes below a certain volume or pitch (using a cutoff), and from that, you can derive the rules of physics.
  • Choosing the algebra: Different choices for the underlying algebra generate different physical models. The Standard Model comes from one choice; the Pati–Salam model comes from a larger choice that includes SU(4) × SU(2)L × SU(2)R (think of these as symmetry groups—like different rules for mixing colors and shapes).
  • Symmetry breaking: At very high energy, the model has the full Pati–Salam symmetry. As the universe “cools,” some fields pick special values (like a magnet choosing a direction), and the big symmetry breaks down to the Standard Model. This uses particular scalar fields (fields that can get “vacuum expectation values,” or VEVs, which are just “settled” values).
  • Checking particle content and couplings: The paper lists which scalar fields are part of the model and how they couple to quarks and leptons (the Yukawa couplings—these are the rules that give particles mass and let them interact). It pays special attention to the S1 leptoquark, which connects leptons and quarks, and checks whether its interactions are safe (no proton decay) and useful (can explain RD/RD* anomalies).
  • Versions A, B, and C: Depending on a technical condition (the “order-one condition”), NCG produces three versions of Pati–Salam models with different sets of scalar fields. Model C is the most symmetric (left-right symmetry) and has the right ingredients for a “good” S1 leptoquark.

What did they find, and why is it important?

Here are the main takeaways:

  • Unified starting point: Using NCG and the spectral action, you can naturally derive particle physics plus gravity in one geometric framework. This is conceptually elegant and potentially a step toward a deeper theory.
  • Pati–Salam from NCG: The Pati–Salam models that come from NCG are more constrained than usual versions. This is good—fewer arbitrary choices means stronger predictions. One strong prediction is “gauge coupling unification,” where the three forces of the Standard Model line up in strength at high energy.
  • Restricted scalar sector: NCG limits which scalar fields and interaction terms can exist. This reduces guesswork and can automatically forbid dangerous interactions (like those that would make the proton decay too quickly).
  • A “good” S1 leptoquark in Model C: In the left-right symmetric version (Model C), an S1 leptoquark appears with the right kind of couplings to left-handed particles and, crucially, without “diquark” couplings (the ones that could make protons fall apart). This means it could be light enough (around the TeV scale) to be found at the LHC and still be safe for proton stability.
  • Explaining RD/RD* anomalies: The S1 leptoquark can contribute to B-meson decays in a way that may help explain the RD and RD* anomalies—measurements where decays to tau leptons happen more often than expected compared to decays to electrons or muons.
  • Limits and side effects: In this setup, the S1’s effect on the muon’s magnetic moment (g−2) is small and tends to go in the wrong direction (negative). That could be okay if the g−2 anomaly is smaller than it used to seem, as recent updates suggest. The model also encourages looking at other measurements (like RK/RK*, tau decays, and rare B decays) to test its predictions.

What does it mean for the future?

The implications are encouraging:

  • Guided searches at colliders: Because the NCG–Pati–Salam models are tighter and more predictive, they can help experimentalists focus on specific signals—like looking for a particular S1 leptoquark with left-handed couplings and no dangerous diquark interactions.
  • A unified picture: Putting particle physics and gravity on the same geometric foundation is a big conceptual win. Even if this exact setup isn’t the final theory, it shows a promising way to think about unification.
  • Testable differences: The restricted scalar content and specific coupling patterns make these models testable. Combined analyses of flavor observables (RD/RD*, RK/RK*, rare decays) plus collider searches can either support or rule out this framework.
  • Open challenges: The spectral action is an effective description (it uses a cutoff and truncation), and a fully developed quantum field theory that perfectly matches NCG is still a work in progress. But even as an effective guide, it offers clear, distinctive targets for experiments.

In short, this paper shows how a mathematically elegant idea—describing space and physics through spectra and algebra—can lead to concrete, testable models. Among them, the NCG-based Pati–Salam models give a realistic candidate leptoquark that could explain puzzling data while keeping the proton safe, and they point toward a unified understanding of forces and matter.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Knowledge Gaps

Knowledge gaps, limitations, and open questions

Below is a concise list of unresolved issues the paper leaves open. Each point is phrased to be concrete and actionable for future research.

  • Formal QFT framework: A complete quantum field theory consistent with noncommutative geometry (NCG) is missing. Derive renormalization group equations (RGEs), matching conditions, and loop corrections directly from the spectral action while enforcing NCG constraints, and test whether operators absent at tree level remain absent under renormalization.
  • UV truncation and scale separation: The spectral action is truncated at low orders in 1/Λ, with an assumed unification scale M_U ≪ Λ. Quantify the allowed Λ/M_U window, compute higher-order corrections, and assess their impact on gauge coupling unification and low‑energy phenomenology.
  • Explicit gauge unification in NCG‑PS: The paper assumes gauge coupling unification in Pati–Salam (PS) models but presents no full 2‑loop RG analysis with threshold matching for Models A/B/C. Perform explicit unification studies including all PS fields, intermediate scales, and constrained scalar content.
  • Scalar potential and vacuum structure: The full PS scalar potential (Models A/B/C), vacuum alignment, symmetry‑breaking sequence(s), and stability are not analyzed. Derive the potential from the spectral action, find viable minima, and demonstrate natural doublet–sextet mass splittings that keep the “good” S1 light while rendering diquark‑coupled partners heavy.
  • Higgs mass fix compatibility: The spectral SM’s Higgs mass issue is addressed via an extra singlet, but its integration with PS extensions is not developed. Embed the singlet consistently in NCG‑PS, compute its effects on electroweak symmetry breaking, scalar spectra, and cosmology.
  • Fermion masses and mixings: The constrained Yukawa sector is only sketched. Construct explicit Yukawa textures dictated by NCG to reproduce SM mass hierarchies, CKM and PMNS mixings, and assess whether the geometric constraints are compatible with observed flavor data.
  • Neutrino sector: The mechanism for neutrino masses (Dirac/Majorana; seesaw via ⟨Δ_R⟩) and leptonic CP violation is not analyzed. Determine whether NCG‑PS permits realistic neutrino masses and phases and identify correlations with scalar and gauge sectors.
  • Radiative stability of proton safety: The absence of diquark couplings for the “good” S1 is claimed at tree level. Prove that loop effects within NCG‑PS do not regenerate dangerous diquark operators and quantify the required mass and coupling hierarchies for diquark‑coupled states.
  • Global phenomenology of S1: A comprehensive fit across RD(), RK(), B_c→τν, τ→μγ, τ→3μ, B→Kνν, Bs mixing, and LHC limits (pair/single production) under NCG‑imposed coupling structures is missing. Perform updated global analyses with realistic flavor textures and collider constraints.
  • Collider projections: Predict discovery/exclusion reach for the “good” S1 at HL‑LHC/HE‑LHC (and future colliders), including cross sections, dominant channels, kinematic handles, and optimized search strategies tailored to NCG‑PS coupling patterns.
  • Muon g−2: The statement that left‑handed S1 contributions are suppressed and negative is qualitative. Compute the full NCG‑PS contributions (including potential right‑handed couplings from H_{3R} and other fields) and test consistency with the evolving theory/experiment status.
  • Model discrimination: The paper focuses on Model C; the phenomenological viability of Models A and B is not assessed. Identify observables (e.g., left‑right symmetry signatures, extra scalar/gauge states) that can distinguish A/B/C and propose targeted tests.
  • Order‑one condition: Physical consequences of satisfying vs relaxing the order‑one condition are not mapped. Systematically enumerate which operators and couplings appear/disappear and quantify their phenomenological impact and unification viability.
  • Matching at PS→SM breaking: Explicit matching for gauge, Yukawa, and scalar couplings across the PS breaking scale(s) is absent. Compute threshold corrections from heavy PS multiplets consistent with NCG constraints and assess their effects on precision observables.
  • Cosmological implications: The roles of Weyl2, Gauss–Bonnet, and non‑minimal Higgs–curvature terms, as well as extra PS fields, in inflation, reheating, leptogenesis (via Δ_R), and dark matter are unexplored. Develop cosmology consistent with NCG‑PS and current data.
  • Regulator dependence: Predictions rely on the cutoff function χ and truncation. Study how different regulator choices and higher‑order terms affect gauge kinetic normalization, unification conditions, and low‑energy predictions.
  • Origin of TeV‑scale S1: The mechanism that naturally yields a TeV‑scale leptoquark while other PS multiplet components are heavy is unspecified. Provide an NCG‑derived explanation for the S1 mass hierarchy and assess naturalness.
  • CP violation and EDMs: New CP phases from the constrained Yukawa/scalar sectors are not investigated. Compute EDMs (electron, neutron) and related CP‑violating observables, delineating allowed parameter regions within NCG‑PS.
  • Flavor structure and MFV: It is unclear whether NCG imposes minimal‑flavor‑violation‑like suppression. Determine the effective flavor symmetries induced by the geometry and whether they suffice to evade stringent flavor bounds.
  • Unique, falsifiable predictions: Beyond gauge coupling unification, the paper does not enumerate distinctive quantitative predictions (e.g., sum rules among couplings or masses). Identify such signatures to make the framework experimentally testable.
  • Loop‑corrected spectral action: Only a one‑loop direction is cited. Derive and validate loop‑corrected effective actions for NCG‑PS, ensuring consistency with renormalization and the geometric constraints.
  • Data‑robustness of anomaly explanations: The RD(*) anomaly and muon g−2 status are evolving. Assess the robustness of NCG‑PS explanations under updated global datasets and define clear criteria for survival/exclusion.
  • B−L and higher‑dimensional operators: Beyond diquark couplings, the catalog of NCG‑permitted dimension‑5/6 B/L‑violating operators is not provided. Enumerate them and set bounds from proton decay, rare processes, and neutron–antineutron oscillations.
  • Benchmarks: No explicit parameter benchmarks are given. Provide concrete points (masses, couplings, scales) that satisfy unification, EWSB, flavor and collider constraints to enable reproducible simulations and searches.
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Glossary

  • antilinear unitary operator: An operator that is antilinear (complex conjugates scalars) and norm-preserving, used to implement charge conjugation in NCG. "an antilinear unitary operator J\mathcal{J} (generalized charged conjugation) on H\mathcal{H}"
  • antiunitary operator: An antilinear isometry preserving inner products up to complex conjugation. "it is an antiunitary operator acting on the Hilbert space H\mathcal{H}"
  • bidoublet: A scalar transforming as (1,2,2) under SU(2)L×SU(2)RSU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R, often used to generate fermion masses in PS models. "and the bidoublet ϕ(1,2,2)422\phi(1,2,2)_{422}"
  • branching ratio: The fraction of particle decays proceeding via a specific channel. "and BR\mathrm{BR} denotes branching ratio"
  • chirality operator: The grading operator (generalized γ5\gamma_5) distinguishing left- and right-handed components. "through the chirality operator Γ\Gamma (generalized γ5\gamma_5)"
  • conformal gravity: A gravitational theory based on Weyl invariance; in the action it appears as the Weyl-squared term. "the Weyl (or the conformal gravity) term"
  • covariant Dirac operator: The Dirac operator including gauge (and scalar) connections that couple to fermions. "the eigenvalues of the covariant Dirac operator, DA\mathcal{D}_A, smaller than the cutoff Λ\Lambda"
  • cutoff function: A regulator function in the spectral action that filters eigenvalues of the Dirac operator below a scale. "The cutoff function χ\chi acts as a regulator"
  • diffeomorphisms: Smooth coordinate transformations of the spacetime manifold; in NCG they arise as outer automorphisms. "while diffeomorphisms arise from the outer automorphisms"
  • diquark couplings: Interactions of a field with two quarks, often dangerous due to proton decay. "the diquark couplings of some of these leptoquarks are missing"
  • Dirac operator: A (generalized) first-order differential operator acting on spinors; central to encoding geometry in NCG. "the (generalized) Dirac operator D\mathcal{D}, a (possibly) unbounded self-adjoint operator"
  • double-triplet splitting problem: The difficulty in GUTs of keeping the Higgs doublet light while making its color-triplet partners heavy. "double-triplet splitting problem"
  • Einstein-Hilbert term: The standard gravitational action proportional to the Ricci scalar. "consists of the Einstein-Hilbert and the cosmological constant terms"
  • first-order condition: An NCG constraint requiring vanishing double commutators with the real structure, restricting allowed fluctuations. "the so-called first-order condition"
  • Gauss-Bonnet term: A topological curvature term that does not affect local dynamics in four dimensions. "the Gauss-Bonnet term"
  • gauge coupling unification: The meeting of the SM gauge couplings at a high scale predicted by the spectral setup and NCG-PS models. "require gauge coupling unification"
  • grand unified theories (GUTs): Models that unify the SM gauge groups into a single simple group at high energies. "grand unified theories, and Pati-Salam-type partially unified models"
  • Hermitian one-form: The self-adjoint gauge potential built from the algebra and Dirac operator in NCG. "a Hermitian one-form potential AA"
  • Hilbert space: A complete inner-product vector space on which the algebra acts in NCG. "H\mathcal{H} is a Hilbert space on which the algebra acts as bounded operators"
  • inner automorphisms: Automorphisms implemented by unitary conjugation in the algebra; they generate gauge transformations. "gauge transformations emerge from the unitary inner automorphisms of the algebra A\mathcal{A}"
  • inner fluctuations: Deformations of the Dirac operator by algebra one-forms corresponding to gauge and scalar fields. "The first equation accounts for the inner fluctuations of the line element"
  • involutive algebra: An algebra equipped with an involution (star operation) mimicking complex conjugation. "A\mathcal{A} is an involutive algebra"
  • left-right symmetry: A discrete Z2Z_2 (D-parity) exchanging left and right sectors in PS models. "the DD symbol refers to the left-right symmetry, a Z2Z_2 symmetry which keeps the left and the right sectors equivalent"
  • leptoquark: A bosonic particle mediating interactions between leptons and quarks. "focusing on the S1S_1 scalar leptoquark"
  • Noncommutative Geometry (NCG): A framework replacing spaces by operator algebras to describe geometry and physics. "Noncommutative Geometry (NCG)~\cite{Connes:1994yd,Connes:2007book} comes in"
  • non-minimal coupling: Direct coupling between a scalar field and curvature in the action. "a non-minimal coupling term between the Higgs boson and the curvature"
  • order-one condition: A geometric constraint in the finite algebra part of NCG determining allowed scalar content. "Depending on whether the so-called order-one condition is satisfied"
  • outer automorphisms: Algebra automorphisms not given by inner conjugation; associated with spacetime diffeomorphisms. "while diffeomorphisms arise from the outer automorphisms"
  • Pati–Salam (PS) model: A unification framework with gauge group SU(4)×SU(2)L×SU(2)RSU(4)\times SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R. "Pati-Salam (PS) models with gauge coupling unification"
  • proton decay: Baryon-number–violating decay processes, often mediated by diquark couplings in unified models. "thus mediating proton decay"
  • QFT formalism: The quantum field theory framework used to compute dynamics once the geometric action is specified. "a QFT formalism that is faithful to the NCG structure has not been completely established"
  • quaternions: A noncommutative division algebra used in the finite algebra of the spectral construction. "HM2(C)\mathbb{H} \subset M_2(\mathbb{C}) is the algebra of quaternions"
  • real structure: The NCG element (implemented by JJ) encoding charge conjugation and reality properties. "manages the real structure on H\mathcal{H}"
  • RG running: Renormalization-group evolution of couplings with energy scale. "the usual perturbative RG running"
  • Ricci scalar: The scalar curvature appearing in the gravitational action. "RR is the usual Ricci scalar"
  • right-handed neutrinos: SM singlet neutrinos added to complete PS/GUT fermion multiplets. "plus the right-handed neutrinos of each generation"
  • sextet: A six-dimensional representation (here of SU(4)SU(4)) containing leptoquark states. "The sextet is decomposed into the SM components as"
  • Spectral action: The bosonic action given by a trace over a function of the Dirac operator. "the spectral action yields the SM action"
  • spectral action principle: The postulate that the action is a spectral function of the Dirac operator. "The spectral action principle within the noncommutative geometry (NCG) framework"
  • Spectral Standard Model: The SM (with gravity) derived from the spectral action construction. "Spectral Standard Model (with gravity)"
  • spectral triple: The data (A,H,D)(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{H},\mathcal{D}) encoding a noncommutative space. "the spectral triple (A,H,D)(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{H}, \mathcal{D})"
  • tree-level solution: An explanation arising from leading-order (no-loop) processes. "providing a tree-level solution"
  • two sheeted spacetime: A product geometry M×Z2M\times \mathbb{Z}_2 representing two copies (“sheets”) of spacetime. "This corresponds to two sheeted spacetime with M×Z2M\times \mathbb{Z}_2"
  • UV-complete: A theory that remains consistent up to arbitrarily high energies. "is clearly not UV-complete in the common sense"
  • vacuum expectation value (VEV): The nonzero value of a field in the vacuum that triggers symmetry breaking. "acquiring a VEV"
  • Weyl tensor: The traceless part of the Riemann curvature tensor appearing in conformal gravity terms. "CμνρσC_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma} is the Weyl tensor"
  • Yukawa couplings: Fermion-scalar interactions responsible for fermion masses. "yields the Yukawa terms due to the Higgs embedded in the Dirac operator"
  • Z2 grading: A binary grading structure splitting the Hilbert space into even/odd parts. "a Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 grading through the chirality operator"
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Practical Applications

Immediate Applications

Below is a set of specific, deployable applications that leverage the paper’s findings on Noncommutative Geometry–based Pati–Salam (NCG–PS) models with gauge coupling unification and the phenomenology of a TeV-scale scalar leptoquark of type S1.

  • Collider search benchmarks and analysis workflows (sector: software; research/academia; high-energy physics)
    • Action: Implement the NCG–PS Model C benchmark (“LH-only S1 without diquark couplings”) as a simplified model in Monte Carlo generators (e.g., MadGraph5_aMC@NLO with UFO cards, Pythia, Delphes). Define standard final states and triggers for:
    • Pair production (QCD-driven): pp → S1 S1* → (τ ν) + (jets), with variants such as τ_h + MET + b/c-jets and τ_ℓ + MET + D(*).
    • Single production (coupling-driven, where viable): g q → S1 ℓ channels consistent with LH-only couplings.
    • Deliverables: Public benchmark cards, cutflows, trigger menus (τ+MET, charm-tagging), and recast scripts for ATLAS/CMS/LHCb/Belle II.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: S1 is at the TeV scale; LH-only couplings dominate; diquark couplings are absent (model-specific geometric constraint); current detector capabilities for τ-ID and charm tagging.
  • Global flavor-fit with NCG–PS coupling structure (sector: academia; software)
    • Action: Integrate the LH-only S1 interaction pattern into global-fit toolkits (e.g., Flavio, HEPfit, smelli). Perform joint fits to R_{D(*)}, R_{K(*)}, R_K^ν, BR(τ→μγ), BR(τ→3μ), BR(B_c→τν) under NCG–PS constraints.
    • Deliverables: Public likelihoods and parameter scans; sensitivity projections for Belle II and LHCb Upgrade; model-discriminating plots contrasting ordinary PS vs NCG–PS.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Stability of current anomalies and their central values; acceptance of NCG-induced coupling restrictions; consistent treatment of hadronic uncertainties.
  • Immediate reinterpretation of muon g−2 and correlated observables (sector: academia)
    • Action: Use the NCG–PS prediction that LH-only S1 gives a suppressed, negative contribution to a_μ to constrain parameter space via combined fits with R_{D(*)} and LHC direct searches.
    • Deliverables: Rapid-turnaround notes/white papers refining allowed S1 masses and couplings; guidance for near-term experimental analyses.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Up-to-date theoretical SM prediction of a_μ; latest Fermilab/Belle II updates; reliable treatment of loop-level contributions in effective models.
  • RG-running and unification-aware model-building tool (sector: software; academia)
    • Action: Provide an open-source “NCG–PS Model Builder” library to automate renormalization-group running with NCG–PS field content, threshold matching at M_C, and unified boundary conditions at M_U.
    • Deliverables: Python package/notebooks that enforce g_3^2 = g_2^2 = (5/3) g_1^2 at M_U, handle scalar content for models A/B/C, and generate viable spectra consistent with flavor and collider constraints.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Choice of intermediate scales (M_U ≫ M_C ≫ v), truncation validity of the spectral action, and effective field-theory treatment below M_U.
  • Experimental strategy guidance for near-term runs (sector: policy; academia/industry — experiments)
    • Action: Advise ATLAS/CMS/LHCb/Belle II on prioritizing channels most sensitive to LH-only S1 (τ+MET with b/c-tagging, B→D()τν differential distributions, τ polarization in B→Dτν).
    • Deliverables: Strategy briefs aligning triggers, reconstruction algorithms, and luminosity allocation with NCG–PS targets.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Collaboration resource availability; trigger bandwidth; τ and charm tagging performance; timely integration into run plans.
  • Educational and training materials on spectral action and NCG–PS (sector: education)
    • Action: Develop graduate-level modules that connect spectral triples, spectral action, and PS phenomenology; include hands-on MC labs and global-fit exercises.
    • Deliverables: Course syllabi, problem sets, and code labs; workshop tutorials for phenomenologists and experimental analysts.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Instructor familiarity with NCG; availability of computational resources for students.

Long-Term Applications

These applications require further theoretical development, scaling, or multi-year experimental programs.

  • Noncommutative QFT development consistent with spectral action (sector: academia)
    • Vision: Construct a quantum field theory formalism faithful to NCG (beyond truncations), including loop corrections, renormalization, and quantization procedures tailored to spectral triples.
    • Potential outcomes: A robust calculational framework to test NCG–PS predictions at higher precision; new computational tools (“NCG Spectral Action Workbench”).
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Resolution of outstanding formal issues; consensus on how spectral action emerges at M_U and its domain of validity.
  • Future collider and detector design tuned to leptoquark discovery (sector: policy; academia/industry — experiments)
    • Vision: Optimize HL-LHC, FCC-hh, muon collider, and e–p facilities (LHeC/EIC-like) for S1 searches: high-efficiency τ-ID, advanced charm tagging, and dedicated triggers for τ+MET and B→D(*)τν final states.
    • Potential outcomes: Increased discovery reach and tighter bounds on TeV-scale S1; single-production sensitivity at lepton–hadron colliders.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Long-term funding and international coordination; sustained anomalies motivating targeted capabilities; feasibility studies validating cost–benefit.
  • Proton-decay program synergy (sector: academia; policy)
    • Vision: Exploit Hyper-K/DUNE proton-decay limits and baryon-number–violating searches to cross-check the NCG–PS geometric absence of diquark couplings; design null tests sensitive to any small symmetry-breaking effects.
    • Potential outcomes: Stronger global constraints on models with potential diquark couplings; confidence in light-S1 scenarios if null results persist.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Continued improvements in detector exposures and background modeling; theoretical control of possible UV completions that might reintroduce diquark terms.
  • Cosmology and gravity tests of spectral action (sector: academia)
    • Vision: Investigate cosmological implications of the gravity sector in spectral action (e.g., Higgs–curvature non-minimal coupling, Weyl/GB terms) for inflation, early-universe dynamics, and gravitational-wave signatures.
    • Potential outcomes: Cross-disciplinary predictions bridging NCG–PS particle content with cosmological observables; constraints from CMB, LSS, and GW data.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Precise mapping from spectral action coefficients to cosmological parameters; viability of the truncation at relevant energy scales.
  • Standardization of algebraic-origin BSM modeling (sector: software; academia)
    • Vision: Establish community standards for models derived from algebras (NCG-based and beyond), including minimal coupling sets, automatic enforcement of geometric constraints, and interoperable MC/fit interfaces.
    • Potential outcomes: Reproducible pipelines for “geometry-first” model building; easier comparison across PS, SO(10), and NCG–PS variants.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Broad adoption by phenomenology and experimental communities; sustained maintenance of open-source tooling.
  • Workforce and training networks in NCG and unified model phenomenology (sector: policy; education)
    • Vision: Create multi-institution networks supporting training at the interface of geometry, model building, and data analysis (LHC, Belle II, neutrino experiments).
    • Potential outcomes: A skilled cohort ready to implement and test NCG–PS predictions; cross-pollination between theory and experiment.
    • Dependencies/assumptions: Long-term funding; integration with existing graduate schools and CERN/KEK training programs.
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We're still in the process of identifying open problems mentioned in this paper. Please check back in a few minutes.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 6 tweets with 126 likes about this paper.