Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 22 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 53 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Complexity of Unambiguous Problems in $Σ^P_2$ (2510.19084v1)

Published 21 Oct 2025 in cs.CC

Abstract: The complexity class $\bf{\SigmaP_2}$ comprises problems based on polynomial-time checkable binary relations $\phi(x,y)$ in which we ask whether there exists $x$ such that for all $y$, $\phi(x,y)$ holds. We let $\bf{U\SigmaP_2}$ denote the subclass of unambiguous problems in $\bf{\SigmaP_2}$, namely those whose yes-instances correspond with a unique choice of $x$. $\bf{U\SigmaP_2}$ is unlikely to have complete problems, but we identify various syntactic subclasses associated with general properties of $\phi$ that guarantee uniqueness. We use these to classify the complexity of problems arising in social choice and game theory, such as existence of (1) a dominating strategy in a game, (2) a Condorcet winner, (3) a strongly popular partition in hedonic games, and (4) a winner (source) in a tournament. We classify these problems, showing the first is $\bf{\DeltaP_2}$-complete, the second and third are complete for a class we term $\bf{PCW}$ (Polynomial Condorcet Winner), and the fourth for a class we term $\bf{PTW}$ (Polynomial Tournament Winner). We define another unambiguous class, $\bf{PMA}$ (Polynomial Majority Argument), seemingly incomparable to $\bf{PTW}$ and $\bf{PCW}$. We show that with randomization, $\bf{PCW}$ and $\bf{PTW}$ coincide with $\bf{\DeltaP_2}$, and $\bf{PMA}$ is contained in $\bf{\DeltaP_2}$. Specifically, we prove: $\bf{\DeltaP_2} \subseteq \bf{PCW} \subseteq \bf{PTW} \subseteq \bf{SP_2}$, and $\bf{coNP} \subseteq \bf{PMA} \subseteq \bf{SP_2}$ (and it is known that $\bf{SP_2}\subseteq \bf{ZPP{NP}} \subseteq \bf{\SigmaP_2} \cap \bf{\PiP_2}$). We demonstrate that unambiguity can substantially reduce computational complexity by considering ambiguous variants of our problems, and showing they are $\bf{\SigmaP_2}$-complete. Finally, we study the unambiguous problem of finding a weakly dominant strategy in a game, which seems not to lie in $\bf{\SigmaP_2}$.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 4 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper:

alphaXiv