Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 190 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 130 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 439 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

PhasePoly: An Optimization Framework forPhase Polynomials in Quantum Circuits (2506.20624v1)

Published 25 Jun 2025 in cs.PL and quant-ph

Abstract: Quantum computing has transformative computational power to make classically intractable computing feasible. As the algorithms that achieve practical quantum advantage are beyond manual tuning, quantum circuit optimization has become extremely important and integrated into today's quantum software stack. This paper focuses on a critical type of quantum circuit optimization -- phase-polynomial optimization. Phase polynomials represents a class of building-block circuits that appear frequently in quantum modular exponentials (the most time-consuming component in Shor's factoring algorithm), in quantum approximation optimization algorithms (QAOA), and in Hamiltonian simulations. Compared to prior work on phase polynomials, we focus more on the impact of phase polynomial synthesis in the context of whole-circuit optimization, from single-block phase polynomials to multiple block phase polynomials, from greedy equivalent sub-circuit replacement strategies to a systematic parity matrix optimization approach, and from hardware-oblivious logical circuit optimization to hardware-friendly logical circuit optimization. We also provide a utility of our phase polynomial optimization framework to generate hardware-friendly building blocks. Our experiments demonstrate improvements of up to 50%-with an average total gate reduction of 34.92%-and reductions in the CNOT gate count of up to 48.57%, averaging 28.53%, for logical circuits. Additionally, for physical circuits, we achieve up to 47.65% CNOT gate reduction with an average reduction of 25.47% across a representative set of important benchmarks.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.