Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 79 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Taxonomic Networks: A Representation for Neuro-Symbolic Pairing (2505.24601v1)

Published 30 May 2025 in cs.AI

Abstract: We introduce the concept of a \textbf{neuro-symbolic pair} -- neural and symbolic approaches that are linked through a common knowledge representation. Next, we present \textbf{taxonomic networks}, a type of discrimination network in which nodes represent hierarchically organized taxonomic concepts. Using this representation, we construct a novel neuro-symbolic pair and evaluate its performance. We show that our symbolic method learns taxonomic nets more efficiently with less data and compute, while the neural method finds higher-accuracy taxonomic nets when provided with greater resources. As a neuro-symbolic pair, these approaches can be used interchangeably based on situational needs, with seamless translation between them when necessary. This work lays the foundation for future systems that more fundamentally integrate neural and symbolic computation.

Summary

Taxonomic Networks: A Framework for Neuro-Symbolic Pairing

The paper "Taxonomic Networks: A Representation for Neuro-Symbolic Pairing" explores an innovative integration of neural and symbolic approaches in AI through the development of taxonomic networks. These networks act as a bridge, enabling seamless translation between neural and symbolic methods, thereby combining the strengths of both paradigms while mitigating their individual limitations.

Concept and Motivation

Neuro-symbolic AI aims to unify neural and symbolic techniques to leverage their complementary advantages. Symbolic AI is known for utilizing high-level, human-readable representations, facilitating interpretability and reliable inference, albeit with the drawback of requiring intensive knowledge engineering. Conversely, neural AI is robust, data-driven, and capable of learning complex patterns from large datasets, but often suffers from a lack of interpretability and explicit manipulation of cognitive symbols.

The authors propose a novel framework termed "neuro-symbolic pairs," which involves linked neural and symbolic approaches governed by a shared representation. This representation, the taxonomic network, is a tree-like structure where nodes represent taxonomically organized categories, supporting both efficient categorization and concept generalization.

Methodology

The paper introduces taxonomic networks as a discrimination network, where nodes symbolize hierarchically organized taxonomic concepts. It describes two main instantiations: a symbolic approach through the Cobweb algorithm and a neural approach through a specialized neural architecture.

  • Symbolic Instantiation: Cobweb is an incremental clustering algorithm that adapts to new data by building and refining a conceptual hierarchy. It maintains probabilistic prototypes for each category, leveraging these to make and refine predictions as new data is observed.
  • Neural Instantiation: The neural approach models the hierarchical structure as a tree, with neural nodes representing taxonomic concepts. This model includes path probabilities and regularization techniques to ensure the formation of distinct and meaningful category nodes.

The paper emphasizes the ability to translate between these instantiations, allowing a model learned through one approach to be expressed equivalently in the other. This translation involves mapping the probabilistic prototypes of the symbolic model onto the gating functions and decision-making processes of the neural model, effectively creating a unified framework.

Experiments and Results

The authors tested their framework on multiple datasets of varying complexity: MNIST, FashionMNIST, and CIFAR-10. They found that while the symbolic approach exhibited greater data efficiency, the neural approach achieved higher accuracy with more data. This result reflects the traditional trade-off between generative models, such as the symbolic variant, which require less data for convergence, and discriminative models, like the neural variant, which can outperform under data-rich conditions.

In terms of computational efficiency, the symbolic model was more computationally economical, particularly beneficial when deployment scenarios limit computational resources. Conversely, the neural approach benefited from modern hardware acceleration, such as GPUs, thus supporting scalability to larger datasets.

Implications and Future Directions

This framework's dual abilities of interpretability and scalability have significant implications for AI applications requiring adaptive learning and transparent decision processes. Bridging the neural-symbolic divide offers vast potential, such as enhancing machine learning systems with explicit declarative knowledge and improving the robustness and interpretability of neural methods.

The concept of neuro-symbolic pairs and taxonomic networks sets a foundational platform for future research, suggesting a path forward for developing more complex integrations between these approaches. Future work would focus on extending this framework to enable enhanced compositionality and learning of representations across broader AI domains.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.