Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 124 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 79 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 206 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 435 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Pseudorapidity density, transverse momentum spectra, and elliptic flow studies in Xe-Xe collision systems at $\rm{\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44 TeV}$ using the HYDJET++ model (2505.03968v1)

Published 6 May 2025 in hep-ph

Abstract: In this paper, we present a systematic study of Xe--Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.44$~TeV center-of-mass energy. We employ the Monte Carlo (hydrodynamics plus jets) HYDJET++ model to calculate the pseudorapidity distribution, transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) spectra, and the elliptic flow ($v_2$) of charged hadrons with different parameters in two geometrical configurations: body-body and tip-tip types of Xe--Xe collisions. The kinematic ranges $0 < p_{\mathrm{T}} < 50~\mathrm{GeV}/c$ and $|\eta| < 0.8$ are considered in our study. Results are obtained for seven classes of centrality. For comparison, we have shown results from the AMPT model with the string-melting version. The results obtained for Xe--Xe collision systems for minimum bias at midrapidity match well with the experimental data from the ALICE and CMS Collaborations. We observe that the pseudorapidity density depends on the size and geometry of the colliding system. The centrality dependence of average transverse momentum ($\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle$) and average elliptic flow ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) is also observed. The charged hadron properties also show clear dependence on the geometrical configuration of the collisions. Our model results have been compared to results obtained from the AMPT model. The HYDJET++ model matches the experimental data more closely than the AMPT model, which tends to overpredict the data.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: