Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 158 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 117 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 182 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 439 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Predictive Process Monitoring: a comparison survey between different type of event logs (2504.16933v1)

Published 7 Jan 2025 in cs.SE

Abstract: The application of Predictive Process Monitoring (PPM) techniques is becoming increasingly widespread due to their capacity to provide organizations with accurate predictions regarding the future behavior of business processes, thereby facilitating more informed decision-making. A plethora of solutions have been proposed in the literature employing these techniques, yet they differ from one another due to a number of factors. However, in light of the growing recognition of the value of object-centric event logs, including in the context of PPM, this survey focuses on the differences among PPM techniques employed with different event logs, namely traditional event logs and object-centric event logs. In addition, the reviewed methods are classified according to the prediction task they address and the specific methodologies they employ.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 0 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: