Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 93 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 211 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 442 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 35 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Polyp detection in colonoscopy images using YOLOv11 (2501.09051v1)

Published 15 Jan 2025 in cs.CV and cs.AI

Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers all over the world. It starts as a polyp in the inner lining of the colon. To prevent CRC, early polyp detection is required. Colonosopy is used for the inspection of the colon. Generally, the images taken by the camera placed at the tip of the endoscope are analyzed by the experts manually. Various traditional machine learning models have been used with the rise of machine learning. Recently, deep learning models have shown more effectiveness in polyp detection due to their superiority in generalizing and learning small features. These deep learning models for object detection can be segregated into two different types: single-stage and two-stage. Generally, two stage models have higher accuracy than single stage ones but the single stage models have low inference time. Hence, single stage models are easy to use for quick object detection. YOLO is one of the singlestage models used successfully for polyp detection. It has drawn the attention of researchers because of its lower inference time. The researchers have used Different versions of YOLO so far, and with each newer version, the accuracy of the model is increasing. This paper aims to see the effectiveness of the recently released YOLOv11 to detect polyp. We analyzed the performance for all five models of YOLOv11 (YOLO11n, YOLO11s, YOLO11m, YOLO11l, YOLO11x) with Kvasir dataset for the training and testing. Two different versions of the dataset were used. The first consisted of the original dataset, and the other was created using augmentation techniques. The performance of all the models with these two versions of the dataset have been analysed.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube