Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 134 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 79 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 188 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 434 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

On idealized models of turbulent condensation in clouds (2501.08968v1)

Published 15 Jan 2025 in physics.flu-dyn and physics.ao-ph

Abstract: Various microphysical models attempt to explain the occurrence of broad droplet size distributions (DSD) in clouds through approximate representations of the stochastic droplet growth by condensation in a turbulent environment. This work analyzes specific idealized models, where the variability of droplet growth conditions arises primarily from variability in the turbulent vertical velocity of the air carrying these droplets. Examples are the stochastic eddy hopping model operating in adiabatic parcels and certain types of DNS-like models. We show that such models produce droplet size statistics that are spatially inhomogeneous along the vertical direction, causing the predicted DSD to depend on the DSD spatial sampling scale $\Delta$. In these models, $\Delta$ is implicitly related to the spatial extent of the droplets turbulent diffusion (approximated by Brownian-like excursions) and thus grows like $t{1/2}$. This leads to spurious continuous DSD broadening, as the growth in time (also like $t{1/2}$) of the standard deviation of droplet squared radius arises essentially from the growth of the sampling scale $\Delta$. Also, the DSDs predicted by the models discussed here are not necessarily locally broad (in the sense that large and small droplets might not be well-mixed in sufficiently small volumes) and thus do not necessarily indicate enhanced probabilities of gravity-induced droplet coagulation. In the effort to build a firm physical basis for subgrid parametrizations, this study presents a framework to explain the merits and limitations of idealized models, indicating how to assess and use them wisely as a subgrid representation of turbulent condensation in large-eddy simulations of clouds.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube