Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 75 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 39 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 131 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 168 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 440 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Critical Limitations in Quantum-Selected Configuration Interaction Methods (2501.07231v5)

Published 13 Jan 2025 in physics.chem-ph and quant-ph

Abstract: Quantum Selected Configuration Interaction (QSCI) methods (also known as Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization, SQD) have emerged as promising near-term approaches to solving the electronic Schr{\"o}dinger equation with quantum computers. In this work, we perform numerical analysis to show that QSCI methods face critical limitations that severely hinder their practical applicability in chemistry. Using the nitrogen molecule and the iron-sulfur cluster [2Fe-2S] as examples, we demonstrate that while QSCI can, in principle, yield high-quality configuration interaction (CI) expansions similar to classical SCI heuristics in some cases, the method struggles with inefficiencies in finding new determinants as sampling repeatedly selects already seen configurations. This inefficiency becomes especially pronounced when targeting high-accuracy results or sampling from an approximate ansatz. In cases where the sampling problem is not present, the resulting CI expansions are less compact than those generated from classical heuristics, rendering QSCI an overall more expensive method. Our findings suggest a significant drawback in QSCI methods when sampling from the ground-state distribution as the inescapable trade-off between finding sufficiently many determinants and generating compact, accurate CI expansions. This ultimately hinders utility in quantum chemistry applications, as QSCI falls behind more efficient classical counterparts.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that quantum selected configuration interaction methods face inherent inefficiencies due to repetitive sampling that hinders discovery of significant determinants.
  • It quantitatively compares QSCI to classical techniques like heat-bath CI, revealing classical heuristics yield more compact CI expansions than quantum approaches.
  • The study highlights that reliance on high-quality quantum state preparation limits QSCI’s practical application in efficiently solving the electronic Schrödinger equation.

Exposing a Fatal Flaw in Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization Methods

The paper "Exposing a Fatal Flaw in Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization Methods" critically examines the limitations of Quantum Selected Configuration Interaction (QSCI) methods, also referred to as Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization (SQD). These methods have gained attention as potential near-term quantum computational strategies to address the electronic Schrödinger equation. However, the paper elucidates significant barriers that impede their effective application in quantum chemistry.

Key Findings

The authors demonstrate the inherent inefficiencies in QSCI through case studies involving the nitrogen molecule and the [2Fe-2S] iron-sulfur cluster. They identify that while QSCI can theoretically achieve compact Configuration Interaction (CI) expansions akin to classical Selected CI (SCI) techniques, it faces difficulties in discovering new, significant determinants due to repetitive sampling. This issue is exacerbated when targeting high-accuracy results or sampling from approximate quantum states.

The paper further compares the determinants' discovery rate and compactness of CI expansions generated by QSCI to those obtained through classical heuristics such as Heat-bath Configuration Interaction (HCI). The authors highlight that although HCI starts with a classical computational step, it consistently outperforms QSCI by generating more compact CI expansions. This suggests that, despite the intrinsic parallel structures in quantum computing, classical methods remain more cost-effective and practical.

Implications

The paper raises concerns about the scalable utility of QSCI in quantum chemistry applications. The authors argue that the QSCI method's inefficiency in determinant selection and the resultant necessity for extensive sampling undermine any speed-up it might offer over classical computing techniques. Furthermore, the authors emphasize that the method's reliance on preparing a high-quality quantum state is a substantial hindrance, reflecting current limitations in quantum hardware and algorithms.

Future Prospects

Despite the critical findings, the paper opens discussions on potential improvements and adaptations of quantum sampling strategies. Future advancements in quantum state preparation and hardware could mitigate the inefficiencies observed in the QSCI method. Additionally, integrating enhancements such as ext-SQD could leverage quantum benefits, although similar improvements could apply to classical algorithms, thereby maintaining the status quo.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the paper provides a thorough analysis of the fundamental challenges facing QSCI methods within quantum chemistry. It underscores the importance of continuing to refine classical and quantum approaches, urging a realistic assessment of quantum computing's capabilities in tackling intricate chemical systems. Such evaluations will be critical to defining the role quantum technologies can play in future scientific explorations.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 5 likes.