Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Accessible Nonverbal Cues to Support Conversations in VR for Blind and Low Vision People (2410.21652v1)

Published 29 Oct 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Social VR has increased in popularity due to its affordances for rich, embodied, and nonverbal communication. However, nonverbal communication remains inaccessible for blind and low vision people in social VR. We designed accessible cues with audio and haptics to represent three nonverbal behaviors: eye contact, head shaking, and head nodding. We evaluated these cues in real-time conversation tasks where 16 blind and low vision participants conversed with two other users in VR. We found that the cues were effective in supporting conversations in VR. Participants had statistically significantly higher scores for accuracy and confidence in detecting attention during conversations with the cues than without. We also found that participants had a range of preferences and uses for the cues, such as learning social norms. We present design implications for handling additional cues in the future, such as the challenges of incorporating AI. Through this work, we take a step towards making interpersonal embodied interactions in VR fully accessible for blind and low vision people.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (55)
  1. Nonverbal communication in virtual reality: Nodding as a social signal in virtual interactions. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 164 (2022), 102819. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1071581922000489#ecom0001
  2. Echo-house: Exploring a virtual environment by using echolocation. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian conference on computer-human interaction. 278–289. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3292147.3292163
  3. LinkedIn Community Articles. n.d.. How do you evaluate the emotional impact of your UX design? https://www.linkedin.com/advice/0/how-do-you-evaluate-emotional-impact-your-ux-design
  4. Transformed social interaction: Decoupling representation from behavior and form in collaborative virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 13, 4 (2004), 428–441. https://direct.mit.edu/pvar/article-abstract/13/4/428/18516/Transformed-Social-Interaction-Decoupling
  5. Lessons learned in designing ai for autistic adults. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–6. https://andrewbegel.com/papers/lessons-learned-autism.pdf
  6. Viverse Blog. n.d.. Exploring the VR Music Revolution: Top 5 VRChat Music Concerts, Videos, and Performances. https://www.news.viverse.com/post/exploring-the-vr-music-revolution-top-5-vrchat-music-concerts-and-performances
  7. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  8. Global Listening Centre. n.d.. Body Language of Listeners. https://www.globallisteningcentre.org/body-language-of-listeners
  9. Pietro Cipresso and Giuseppe Riva. 2015. Virtual Reality for Artificial Intelligence: human-centered simulation for social science. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine 2015: Virtual Reality in Healthcare: Medical Simulation and Experiential Interface (2015). https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_MbXCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA177&dq=artificial+intelligence+and+virtual+reality&ots=d49mPiIo1v&sig=BXFBrnLmz1yIQLQ1erc1PKX3vBY#v=onepage&q=artificial%20intelligence%20and%20virtual%20reality&f=false
  10. Making Avatar Gaze Accessible for Blind and Low Vision People in Virtual Reality: Preliminary Insights. In 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 701–705. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10322247
  11. “The Guide Has Your Back”: Exploring How Sighted Guides Can Enhance Accessibility in Social Virtual Reality for Blind and Low Vision People. In Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–14. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3597638.3608386
  12. Loredana Crisan. 2021. Emojis finally have a voice: Introducing Soundmojis on Messenger. https://messengernews.fb.com/2021/07/15/emojis-finally-have-a-voice-introducing-soundmojis-on-messenger/
  13. Racing in the dark: Exploring accessible virtual reality by developing a racing game for people who are blind. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 65. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1114–1118. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1071181321651224
  14. Aaron Gluck and Julian Brinkley. 2020. Implementing ‘The Enclosing Dark’: A VR Auditory Adventure. Journal on Technology and Persons with Disabilities 8, 2020 (2020), 149–159. https://scholarworks.csun.edu/bitstream/handle/10211.3/215985/2197%20Implementing%20The%20Enclosing%20Dark%20A%20VR%20Auditory%20Adventure.pdf
  15. Inclusive Social Virtual Environments: Exploring the Acceptability of Different Navigation and Awareness Techniques. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–7.
  16. Hands-On: Using Gestures to Control Descriptions of a Virtual Environment for People with Visual Impairments. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 1–4. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3526114.3558669
  17. “Invisible Illness Is No Longer Invisible”: Making Social VR Avatars More Inclusive for Invisible Disability Representation. In Proceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–4. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3597638.3614480
  18. The design space of the auditory representation of objects and their behaviours in virtual reality for blind people. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 5 (2023), 2763–2773. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10049631
  19. Detect and approach: Close-range navigation support for people with blindness and low vision. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 607–622. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-25075-0_41
  20. Modeling Six Universal Emotions. https://people.ece.cornell.edu/land/OldStudentProjects/cs490-95to96/HJKIM/emotions.html
  21. Effects of avatar’s symbolic gesture in virtual reality brainstorming. In Proceedings of the 32nd Australian conference on human-computer interaction. 170–177. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3441000.3441081
  22. William James. 2007. The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. Cosimo, Inc. http://infomotions.com/sandbox/great-books-redux/corpus/html/principles.html
  23. Vrbubble: Enhancing peripheral awareness of avatars for people with visual impairments in social virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. 1–17. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3517428.3544821
  24. Virtual gaze: exploring use of gaze as rich interaction method with virtual agent in interactive virtual reality content. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 1–2. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3281505.3281587
  25. Roughness perception in haptic virtual reality for sighted and blind people. Perception & psychophysics 69 (2007), 502–512. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/bf03193907
  26. Using body language of avatars in vr meetings as communication status cue. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2021. 366–377. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3473856.3473865
  27. Rebecca Lawson. 2015. I just love the attention: implicit preference for direct eye contact. Visual Cognition 23, 4 (2015), 450–488. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506285.2015.1039101
  28. Proxemics with multiple dynamic characters in an immersive virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) 8, 1 (2010), 1–12. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1857893.1857896
  29. Michael Luck and Ruth Aylett. 2000. Applying artificial intelligence to virtual reality: Intelligent virtual environments. Applied artificial intelligence 14, 1 (2000), 3–32. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/088395100117142
  30. Maruricio Lumbreras and Jaime Sánchez. 1999. Interactive 3D sound hyperstories for blind children. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 318–325. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/302979.303101
  31. ” Talking without a Voice” Understanding Non-verbal Communication in Social Virtual Reality. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW2 (2020), 1–25. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3415246
  32. Changing Minds. n.d.. Attentive Body Language. https://changingminds.org/techniques/body/attentive_body.htm
  33. VI-Tennis: a vibrotactile/audio exergame for players who are visually impaired. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. 147–154. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1822348.1822368
  34. Navstick: Making video games blind-accessible via the ability to look around. In The 34th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 538–551. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3472749.3474768
  35. Uncovering Visually Impaired Gamers’ Preferences for Spatial Awareness Tools Within Video Games (ASSETS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3517428.3544802
  36. Cybergrasp and phantom integration: Enhanced haptic access for visually impaired users. In 9th Conference Speech and Computer. https://www.isca-archive.org/specom_2004/nikolakis04_specom.pdf
  37. Crusoe Okwong. 2023. Usability and usefulness as user experience best practices. https://bootcamp.uxdesign.cc/usability-and-usefulness-as-user-experience-best-practices-93a43f34f9ac
  38. The “Musical Emotional Bursts”: a validated set of musical affect bursts to investigate auditory affective processing. Frontiers in psychology 4 (2013), 52505. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00509/full
  39. Introducing the Oxford Vocal (OxVoc) Sounds database: a validated set of non-acted affective sounds from human infants, adults, and domestic animals. Frontiers in psychology 5 (2014), 562. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00562/full
  40. Virtual reality solutions employing artificial intelligence methods: A systematic literature review. Comput. Surveys 55, 10 (2023), 1–29. https://dl.acm.org/doi/full/10.1145/3565020
  41. SocialCueSwitch: Towards Customizable Accessibility by Representing Social Cues in Multiple Senses. In To appear in Proceedings of the 26th International ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
  42. Capstancrunch: A haptic vr controller with user-supplied force feedback. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. 815–829. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3332165.3347891
  43. Virtual reality without vision: A haptic and auditory white cane to navigate complex virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3313831.3376353
  44. Autumn Sprabary. 2022. How eye contact can help or hurt communication. https://www.allaboutvision.com/resources/human-interest/importance-of-eye-contact/
  45. ” How do I make this thing smile?” An Inventory of Expressive Nonverbal Communication in Commercial Social Virtual Reality Platforms. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3313831.3376606
  46. Charles Tidwell. n.d.. Non-Verbal Communication Modes. https://www.andrews.edu/~tidwell/bsad560/NonVerbal.html
  47. Virtual showdown: An accessible virtual reality game with scaffolds for youth with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–15. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3290605.3300371
  48. Markus Wieland and Tonja Machulla. 2022. Towards Inclusive Conversations in Virtual Reality for People with Visual Impairments. (2022). https://dl.gi.de/server/api/core/bitstreams/54742add-e79b-458b-8cd2-6cdbf40c4132/content
  49. Vr, gaze, and visual impairment: An exploratory study of the perception of eye contact across different sensory modalities for people with visual impairments in virtual reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–6. https://visvar.github.io/pdf/wieland2023vr.pdf
  50. Non-verbal communication and joint attention between people with and without visual impairments: Deriving guidelines for inclusive conversations in virtual realities. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Springer, 295–304. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-08648-9_34
  51. The unbearable likeness of being digital: The persistence of nonverbal social norms in online virtual environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 1 (2007), 115–121. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/cpb.2006.9984
  52. “it’s just part of me:” understanding avatar diversity and self-presentation of people with disabilities in social virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 24th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility. 1–16. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3517428.3544829
  53. Exploring virtual environments by visually impaired using a mixed reality cane without visual feedback. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 51–56. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9288373
  54. Enabling people with visual impairments to navigate virtual reality with a haptic and auditory cane simulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3173574.3173690
  55. SeeingVR: A set of tools to make virtual reality more accessible to people with low vision. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–14. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3290605.3300341
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 tweet and received 2 likes.

Upgrade to Pro to view all of the tweets about this paper: