Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Towards alleviating the $H_0$ and $S_8$ tensions with Early Dark Energy - Dark Matter drag

Published 28 Oct 2024 in astro-ph.CO and hep-ph | (2410.21459v1)

Abstract: Early dark energy, an additional component of dark energy active in the decade of redshift before recombination, has emerged as one of the most effective models at reducing the $H_0$ tension between direct measurement of the Hubble parameter $H_0$ in the late-universe and the $\Lambda$CDM prediction when calibrated on Planck. However, it requires a slight increase in the dark matter density $\omega_{\rm cdm}$ and primordial tilt $n_s$ that worsens the $S_8$ tension between measurements of weak gravitational lensing at low redshifts and the Planck/$\Lambda$CDM prediction. Using a phenomenological fluid model, we investigate whether the inclusion of a drag term between dark matter and early dark energy can compensate for the effect of the increase in power at small-scales, such that both $H_0$ and $S_8$ tensions are simultaneously alleviated. We find that this works if the drag term is dynamically relevant in the post-recombination universe. However, a drag term active before or just around the time at which the early dark energy contribution to the energy density is maximum is significantly constrained due to its impact on the matter perturbations before recombination, and the subsequent modifications to the cosmic microwave background power spectra.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (91)
  1. Elcio Abdalla et al., “Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies,” JHEAp 34, 49–211 (2022), arXiv:2203.06142 [astro-ph.CO] .
  2. Wendy L. Freedman, “Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective,”   (2021), arXiv:2106.15656 [astro-ph.CO] .
  3. Adam G. Riess et al., “A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team,”   (2021), arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO] .
  4. A. Amon et al., “Consistent lensing and clustering in a low-S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Universe with BOSS, DES Year 3, HSC Year 1 and KiDS-1000,”   (2022), arXiv:2202.07440 [astro-ph.CO] .
  5. Giovanni Aricò, Raul E. Angulo, Matteo Zennaro, Sergio Contreras, Angela Chen,  and Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo, “DES Y3 cosmic shear down to small scales: constraints on cosmology and baryons,”   (2023), arXiv:2303.05537 [astro-ph.CO] .
  6. Tanvi Karwal and Marc Kamionkowski, “Dark energy at early times, the Hubble parameter, and the string axiverse,” Phys. Rev. D94, 103523 (2016), arXiv:1608.01309 [astro-ph.CO] .
  7. Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Tanvi Karwal,  and Marc Kamionkowski, “Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 221301 (2019), arXiv:1811.04083 [astro-ph.CO] .
  8. Tristan L. Smith, Vivian Poulin,  and Mustafa A. Amin, “Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 063523 (2020), arXiv:1908.06995 [astro-ph.CO] .
  9. Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith,  and Tanvi Karwal, “The Ups and Downs of Early Dark Energy solutions to the Hubble tension: a review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023,”   (2023), arXiv:2302.09032 [astro-ph.CO] .
  10. Eleonora Di Valentino, Olga Mena, Supriya Pan, Luca Visinelli, Weiqiang Yang, Alessandro Melchiorri, David F. Mota, Adam G. Riess,  and Joseph Silk, “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,” Class. Quant. Grav. 38, 153001 (2021a), arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO] .
  11. Nils Schöneberg, Guillermo Franco Abellán, Andrea Pérez Sánchez, Samuel J. Witte, Vivian Poulin,  and Julien Lesgourgues, “The H0subscript𝐻0H_{0}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,”   (2021), arXiv:2107.10291 [astro-ph.CO] .
  12. Karsten Jedamzik and Levon Pogosian, “Relieving the Hubble tension with primordial magnetic fields,”  (2020), arXiv:2004.09487 [astro-ph.CO] .
  13. Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Rodrigo Calderón,  and Théo Simon, “On the implications of the ‘cosmic calibration tension’ beyond H0subscript𝐻0H_{0}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and the synergy between early- and late-time new physics,”   (2024), arXiv:2407.18292 [astro-ph.CO] .
  14. J. Colin Hill, Evan McDonough, Michael W. Toomey,  and Stephon Alexander, “Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 043507 (2020), arXiv:2003.07355 [astro-ph.CO] .
  15. Riccardo Murgia, Guillermo F. Abellán,  and Vivian Poulin, “Early dark energy resolution to the Hubble tension in light of weak lensing surveys and lensing anomalies,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 063502 (2021), arXiv:2009.10733 [astro-ph.CO] .
  16. Julien Lesgourgues, Gustavo Marques-Tavares,  and Martin Schmaltz, “Evidence for dark matter interactions in cosmological precision data?” JCAP 02, 037 (2016), arXiv:1507.04351 [astro-ph.CO] .
  17. Manuel A. Buen-Abad, Gustavo Marques-Tavares,  and Martin Schmaltz, “Non-Abelian dark matter and dark radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 023531 (2015), arXiv:1505.03542 [hep-ph] .
  18. Zackaria Chacko, Yanou Cui, Sungwoo Hong, Takemichi Okui,  and Yuhsin Tsai, “Partially Acoustic Dark Matter, Interacting Dark Radiation, and Large Scale Structure,” JHEP 12, 108 (2016), arXiv:1609.03569 [astro-ph.CO] .
  19. Manuel A. Buen-Abad, Martin Schmaltz, Julien Lesgourgues,  and Thejs Brinckmann, “Interacting Dark Sector and Precision Cosmology,” JCAP 01, 008 (2018), arXiv:1708.09406 [astro-ph.CO] .
  20. Stefan Heimersheim, Nils Schöneberg, Deanna C. Hooper,  and Julien Lesgourgues, “Cannibalism hinders growth: Cannibal Dark Matter and the S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tension,” JCAP 12, 016 (2020), arXiv:2008.08486 [astro-ph.CO] .
  21. Eleonora Di Valentino, Alessandro Melchiorri, Olga Mena,  and Sunny Vagnozzi, “Interacting dark energy in the early 2020s: A promising solution to the H0subscript𝐻0H_{0}italic_H start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 0 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and cosmic shear tensions,” Phys. Dark Univ. 30, 100666 (2020), arXiv:1908.04281 [astro-ph.CO] .
  22. Matteo Lucca, “Dark energy-dark matter interactions as a solution to the S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tension,”  (2021), arXiv:2105.09249 [astro-ph.CO] .
  23. Guillermo F. Abellan, Riccardo Murgia, Vivian Poulin,  and Julien Lavalle, “Hints for decaying dark matter from S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT measurements,”   (2020), arXiv:2008.09615 [astro-ph.CO] .
  24. Eleonora Di Valentino et al., “Cosmology Intertwined III: f⁢σ8𝑓subscript𝜎8f\sigma_{8}italic_f italic_σ start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT and S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT,” Astropart. Phys. 131, 102604 (2021b), arXiv:2008.11285 [astro-ph.CO] .
  25. Saurabh Bansal, Jeong Han Kim, Christopher Kolda, Matthew Low,  and Yuhsin Tsai, “Mirror twin Higgs cosmology: constraints and a possible resolution to the H0 and S8 tensions,” JHEP 05, 050 (2022), arXiv:2110.04317 [hep-ph] .
  26. Marco Baldi and Fergus Simpson, “Structure formation simulations with momentum exchange: alleviating tensions between high-redshift and low-redshift cosmological probes,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465, 653–666 (2017), arXiv:1605.05623 [astro-ph.CO] .
  27. Suresh Kumar and Rafael C. Nunes, “Observational constraints on dark matter–dark energy scattering cross section,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 734 (2017), arXiv:1709.02384 [astro-ph.CO] .
  28. Mahnaz Asghari, Jose Beltrán Jiménez, Shahram Khosravi,  and David F. Mota, “On structure formation from a small-scales-interacting dark sector,” JCAP 04, 042 (2019), arXiv:1902.05532 [astro-ph.CO] .
  29. Jose Beltrán Jiménez, Dario Bettoni, David Figueruelo, Florencia A. Teppa Pannia,  and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Velocity-dependent interacting dark energy and dark matter with a Lagrangian description of perfect fluids,” JCAP 03, 085 (2021a), arXiv:2012.12204 [astro-ph.CO] .
  30. David Figueruelo et al., “J-PAS: Forecasts for dark matter - dark energy elastic couplings,” JCAP 07, 022 (2021), arXiv:2103.01571 [astro-ph.CO] .
  31. Jose Beltrán Jiménez, Dario Bettoni, David Figueruelo, Florencia Anabella Teppa Pannia,  and Shinji Tsujikawa, “Probing elastic interactions in the dark sector and the role of S8,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 103503 (2021b), arXiv:2106.11222 [astro-ph.CO] .
  32. Vivian Poulin, José Luis Bernal, Ely Kovetz,  and Marc Kamionkowski, “The Sigma-8 Tension is a Drag,”   (2022), arXiv:2209.06217 [astro-ph.CO] .
  33. Alexandra Amon and George Efstathiou, “A non-linear solution to the S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tension?”  (2022), arXiv:2206.11794 [astro-ph.CO] .
  34. Clément Stahl, Benoit Famaey, Rodrigo Ibata, Oliver Hahn, Nicolas Martinet,  and Thomas Montandon, “Scale-dependent local primordial non-Gaussianity as a solution to the S8subscript𝑆8S_{8}italic_S start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 8 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT tension,”   (2024), arXiv:2404.03244 [astro-ph.CO] .
  35. Alkistis Pourtsidou and Thomas Tram, “Reconciling CMB and structure growth measurements with dark energy interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 94, 043518 (2016), arXiv:1604.04222 [astro-ph.CO] .
  36. Evan McDonough, Meng-Xiang Lin, J. Colin Hill, Wayne Hu,  and Shengjia Zhou, “Early dark sector, the Hubble tension, and the swampland,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 043525 (2022), arXiv:2112.09128 [astro-ph.CO] .
  37. Tanvi Karwal, Marco Raveri, Bhuvnesh Jain, Justin Khoury,  and Mark Trodden, “Chameleon Early Dark Energy and the Hubble Tension,”   (2021), arXiv:2106.13290 [astro-ph.CO] .
  38. Gang Liu, Jiaze Gao, Yufen Han, Yuhao Mu,  and Lixin Xu, “Mitigating Cosmological Tensions via Momentum-Coupled Dark Sector Model,”   (2023a), arXiv:2310.09798 [astro-ph.CO] .
  39. Gang Liu, Yuhao Mu, Jiaze Gao, Yufen Han,  and Lixin Xu, “The Yukawa-Coupled Dark Sector Model and Cosmological Tensions,”   (2023b), arXiv:2312.01410 [astro-ph.CO] .
  40. Gang Liu, Zhihuan Zhou, Yuhao Mu,  and Lixin Xu, “Kinetically coupled scalar fields model and cosmological tensions,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 529, 1852–1861 (2024), arXiv:2308.07069 [astro-ph.CO] .
  41. Gabriela Garcia-Arroyo, L. Arturo Ureña López,  and J. Alberto Vázquez, “Interacting Scalar fields: Dark Matter–Early Dark Energy,”   (2024), arXiv:2402.08815 [astro-ph.CO] .
  42. A. Pourtsidou, C. Skordis,  and E. J. Copeland, “Models of dark matter coupled to dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 083505 (2013), arXiv:1307.0458 [astro-ph.CO] .
  43. Rachel Bean, Eanna E. Flanagan, Istvan Laszlo,  and Mark Trodden, “Constraining Interactions in Cosmology’s Dark Sector,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 123514 (2008), arXiv:0808.1105 [astro-ph] .
  44. Stéphane Ilić, Michael Kopp, Constantinos Skordis,  and Daniel B. Thomas, “Dark matter properties through cosmic history,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 043520 (2021), arXiv:2004.09572 [astro-ph.CO] .
  45. Chung-Pei Ma and Edmund Bertschinger, “Cosmological perturbation theory in the synchronous and conformal Newtonian gauges,” Astrophys. J. 455, 7–25 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9506072 .
  46. Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith, Daniel Grin, Tanvi Karwal,  and Marc Kamionkowski, “Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields,” Phys. Rev. D98, 083525 (2018), arXiv:1806.10608 [astro-ph.CO] .
  47. J. Colin Hill et al., “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Constraints on Pre-Recombination Early Dark Energy,”   (2021), arXiv:2109.04451 [astro-ph.CO] .
  48. Vivian Poulin, Tristan L. Smith,  and Alexa Bartlett, “Dark Energy at early times and ACT: a larger Hubble constant without late-time priors,”   (2021), arXiv:2109.06229 [astro-ph.CO] .
  49. George Efstathiou, Erik Rosenberg,  and Vivian Poulin, “Improved Planck constraints on axion-like early dark energy as a resolution of the Hubble tension,”   (2023), arXiv:2311.00524 [astro-ph.CO] .
  50. Meng-Xiang Lin, Giampaolo Benevento, Wayne Hu,  and Marco Raveri, “Acoustic Dark Energy: Potential Conversion of the Hubble Tension,” Phys. Rev. D100, 063542 (2019), arXiv:1905.12618 [astro-ph.CO] .
  51. Florian Niedermann and Martin S. Sloth, “New Early Dark Energy,”   (2019), arXiv:1910.10739 [astro-ph.CO] .
  52. Fergus Simpson, “Scattering of dark matter and dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 083505 (2010), arXiv:1007.1034 [astro-ph.CO] .
  53. Melissa Joseph, Daniel Aloni, Martin Schmaltz, Eashwar N. Sivarajan,  and Neal Weiner, “A Step in understanding the S8 tension,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 023520 (2023), arXiv:2207.03500 [astro-ph.CO] .
  54. Thejs Brinckmann and Julien Lesgourgues, “MontePython 3: boosted MCMC sampler and other features,”   (2018), arXiv:1804.07261 [astro-ph.CO] .
  55. Benjamin Audren, Julien Lesgourgues, Karim Benabed,  and Simon Prunet, “Conservative Constraints on Early Cosmology: an illustration of the Monte Python cosmological parameter inference code,” JCAP 1302, 001 (2013), arXiv:1210.7183 [astro-ph.CO] .
  56. Julien Lesgourgues, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview,”  (2011), arXiv:1104.2932 [astro-ph.IM] .
  57. Diego Blas, Julien Lesgourgues,  and Thomas Tram, “The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes,” JCAP 1107, 034 (2011), arXiv:1104.2933 [astro-ph.CO] .
  58. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A5 (2020a), arXiv:1907.12875 [astro-ph.CO] .
  59. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VIII. Gravitational lensing,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A8 (2020b), arXiv:1807.06210 [astro-ph.CO] .
  60. Florian Beutler, Chris Blake, Matthew Colless, D. Heath Jones, Lister Staveley-Smith, Lachlan Campbell, Quentin Parker, Will Saunders,  and Fred Watson, “The 6dF Galaxy Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Local Hubble Constant,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 416, 3017–3032 (2011), arXiv:1106.3366 [astro-ph.CO] .
  61. Ashley J. Ross, Lado Samushia, Cullan Howlett, Will J. Percival, Angela Burden,  and Marc Manera, “The clustering of the SDSS DR7 main Galaxy sample – I. A 4 per cent distance measure at z=0.15𝑧0.15z=0.15italic_z = 0.15,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 449, 835–847 (2015), arXiv:1409.3242 [astro-ph.CO] .
  62. Héctor Gil-Marín et al., “The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO measurement from the LOS-dependent power spectrum of DR12 BOSS galaxies,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460, 4210–4219 (2016), arXiv:1509.06373 [astro-ph.CO] .
  63. Shadab Alam et al. (BOSS), “The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 470, 2617–2652 (2017), arXiv:1607.03155 [astro-ph.CO] .
  64. Francisco-Shu Kitaura et al., “The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: mock galaxy catalogues for the BOSS Final Data Release,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 456, 4156–4173 (2016), arXiv:1509.06400 [astro-ph.CO] .
  65. Pierre Zhang, Guido D’Amico, Leonardo Senatore, Cheng Zhao,  and Yifu Cai, “BOSS Correlation Function analysis from the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure,” JCAP 02, 036 (2022), arXiv:2110.07539 [astro-ph.CO] .
  66. Beth Reid et al., “SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey Data Release 12: galaxy target selection and large scale structure catalogues,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 455, 1553–1573 (2016), arXiv:1509.06529 [astro-ph.CO] .
  67. Guido D’Amico, Leonardo Senatore,  and Pierre Zhang, “Limits on w𝑤witalic_wCDM from the EFTofLSS with the PyBird code,”   (2020a), arXiv:2003.07956 [astro-ph.CO] .
  68. José Luis Bernal, Tristan L. Smith, Kimberly K. Boddy,  and Marc Kamionkowski, “Robustness of baryon acoustic oscillations constraints to beyond-ΛΛ\Lambdaroman_ΛCDM cosmologies,”   (2020), arXiv:2004.07263 [astro-ph.CO] .
  69. Guido D’Amico, Leonardo Senatore, Pierre Zhang,  and Henry Zheng, “The Hubble Tension in Light of the Full-Shape Analysis of Large-Scale Structure Data,”   (2020b), arXiv:2006.12420 [astro-ph.CO] .
  70. Tristan L. Smith, Vivian Poulin, José Luis Bernal, Kimberly K. Boddy, Marc Kamionkowski,  and Riccardo Murgia, “Early dark energy is not excluded by current large-scale structure data,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 123542 (2021), arXiv:2009.10740 [astro-ph.CO] .
  71. Mikhail M. Ivanov, Evan McDonough, J. Colin Hill, Marko Simonović, Michael W. Toomey, Stephon Alexander,  and Matias Zaldarriaga, “Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 103502 (2020), arXiv:2006.11235 [astro-ph.CO] .
  72. Théo Simon, Pierre Zhang, Vivian Poulin,  and Tristan L. Smith, “Updated constraints from the effective field theory analysis of the BOSS power spectrum on early dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 063505 (2023), arXiv:2208.05930 [astro-ph.CO] .
  73. Théo Simon, “Can acoustic and axionlike early dark energy still resolve the Hubble tension?” Phys. Rev. D 110, 023528 (2024), arXiv:2310.16800 [astro-ph.CO] .
  74. Rafaela Gsponer, Ruiyang Zhao, Jamie Donald-McCann, David Bacon, Kazuya Koyama, Robert Crittenden, Theo Simon,  and Eva-Maria Mueller, “Cosmological constraints on early dark energy from the full shape analysis of eBOSS DR16,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 530, 3075–3099 (2024), arXiv:2312.01977 [astro-ph.CO] .
  75. Théo Simon, Pierre Zhang, Vivian Poulin,  and Tristan L. Smith, “On the consistency of effective field theory analyses of BOSS power spectrum,”  (2022a), arXiv:2208.05929 [astro-ph.CO] .
  76. Emil Brinch Holm, Laura Herold, Théo Simon, Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Steen Hannestad, Vivian Poulin,  and Thomas Tram, “Bayesian and frequentist investigation of prior effects in EFT of LSS analyses of full-shape BOSS and eBOSS data,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 123514 (2023), arXiv:2309.04468 [astro-ph.CO] .
  77. Théo Simon, Pierre Zhang,  and Vivian Poulin, “Cosmological inference from the EFTofLSS: the eBOSS QSO full-shape analysis,”  (2022b), arXiv:2210.14931 [astro-ph.CO] .
  78. Shadab Alam et al. (eBOSS), “Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 083533 (2021), arXiv:2007.08991 [astro-ph.CO] .
  79. Ashley J. Ross et al., “The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Large-scale structure catalogues for cosmological analysis,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 498, 2354–2371 (2020), arXiv:2007.09000 [astro-ph.CO] .
  80. Chia-Hsun Chuang, Francisco-Shu Kitaura, Francisco Prada, Cheng Zhao,  and Gustavo Yepes, “EZmocks: extending the Zel’dovich approximation to generate mock galaxy catalogues with accurate clustering statistics,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 446, 2621–2628 (2015), arXiv:1409.1124 [astro-ph.CO] .
  81. Florian Beutler and Patrick McDonald, “Unified galaxy power spectrum measurements from 6dFGS, BOSS, and eBOSS,” JCAP 11, 031 (2021), arXiv:2106.06324 [astro-ph.CO] .
  82. Jiamin Hou et al., “The Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: BAO and RSD measurements from anisotropic clustering analysis of the Quasar Sample in configuration space between redshift 0.8 and 2.2,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 500, 1201–1221 (2020), arXiv:2007.08998 [astro-ph.CO] .
  83. Dillon Brout et al., “The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints,”  (2022), arXiv:2202.04077 [astro-ph.CO] .
  84. Catherine Heymans et al., “KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints,” Astron. Astrophys. 646, A140 (2021), arXiv:2007.15632 [astro-ph.CO] .
  85. T. M. C. Abbott et al. (DES), “Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing,”   (2021), arXiv:2105.13549 [astro-ph.CO] .
  86. N. Aghanim et al. (Planck), “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020c), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] .
  87. Antony Lewis, “GetDist: a Python package for analysing Monte Carlo samples,”  (2019), arXiv:1910.13970 [astro-ph.IM] .
  88. Itamar J. Allali, Fabrizio Rompineve,  and Mark P. Hertzberg, “Dark sectors with mass thresholds face cosmological datasets,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 023527 (2023), arXiv:2305.14166 [astro-ph.CO] .
  89. Manuel A. Buen-Abad, Zackaria Chacko, Can Kilic, Gustavo Marques-Tavares,  and Taewook Youn, “Stepped partially acoustic dark matter: likelihood analysis and cosmological tensions,” JCAP 11, 005 (2023), arXiv:2306.01844 [astro-ph.CO] .
  90. Nils Schöneberg, Guillermo Franco Abellán, Théo Simon, Alexa Bartlett, Yashvi Patel,  and Tristan L. Smith, “Comparative analysis of interacting stepped dark radiation,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 123513 (2023), arXiv:2306.12469 [astro-ph.CO] .
  91. Matthew C. Johnson and Marc Kamionkowski, “Dynamical and Gravitational Instability of Oscillating-Field Dark Energy and Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 063010 (2008), arXiv:0805.1748 [astro-ph] .

Summary

No one has generated a summary of this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Summarize

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up to Generate

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up for Free