Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The Communication Complexity of Approximating Matrix Rank (2410.20094v1)

Published 26 Oct 2024 in cs.CC and quant-ph

Abstract: We fully determine the communication complexity of approximating matrix rank, over any finite field $\mathbb{F}$. We study the most general version of this problem, where $0\leq r<R\leq n$ are given integers, Alice and Bob's inputs are matrices $A,B\in\mathbb{F}^{n\times n}$, respectively, and they need to distinguish between the cases $\mathrm{rk}(A+B)=r$ and $\mathrm{rk}(A+B)=R$. We show that this problem has randomized communication complexity $\Omega(1+r^{2}\log|\mathbb{F}|)$. This is optimal in a strong sense because $O(1+r^{2}\log|\mathbb{F}|)$ communication is sufficient to determine, for arbitrary $A,B$, whether $\mathrm{rk}(A+B)\leq r$. Prior to our work, lower bounds were known only for consecutive integers $r$ and $R$, with no implication for the approximation of matrix rank. Our lower bound holds even for quantum protocols and even for error probability $\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{4}|\mathbb{F}|^{-r/3}$, which too is virtually optimal because the problem has a two-bit classical protocol with error $\frac{1}{2}-\Theta(|\mathbb{F}|^{-r})$. As an application, we obtain an $\Omega(\frac{1}{k}\cdot n^{2}\log|\mathbb{F}|)$ space lower bound for any streaming algorithm with $k$ passes that approximates the rank of an input matrix $M\in\mathbb{F}^{n\times n}$ within a factor of $\sqrt{2}-\delta$, for any $\delta\>0$. Our result is an exponential improvement in $k$ over previous work. We also settle the randomized and quantum communication complexity of several other linear-algebraic problems, for all settings of parameters. This includes the determinant problem (given matrices $A$ and $B$, distinguish between the cases $\mathrm{det}(A+B)=a$ and $\mathrm{det}(A+B)=b$, for fixed field elements $a\ne b)$ and the subspace sum and subspace intersection problem (given subspaces $S$ and $T$ of known dimensions $m$ and $\ell$, respectively, approximate the dimensions of $S+T$ and $S\cap T$).

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.