Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Using Parametric PINNs for Predicting Internal and External Turbulent Flows

Published 24 Oct 2024 in cs.LG, cs.NA, and math.NA | (2410.18917v1)

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers employing two-equation eddy viscosity models are the industry standard for simulating turbulent flows using the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) formulation. While these methods are computationally less expensive than direct numerical simulations, they can still incur significant computational costs to achieve the desired accuracy. In this context, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) offer a promising approach for developing parametric surrogate models that leverage both existing, but limited CFD solutions and the governing differential equations to predict simulation outcomes in a computationally efficient, differentiable, and near real-time manner. In this work, we build upon the previously proposed RANS-PINN framework, which only focused on predicting flow over a cylinder. To investigate the efficacy of RANS-PINN as a viable approach to building parametric surrogate models, we investigate its accuracy in predicting relevant turbulent flow variables for both internal and external flows. To ensure training convergence with a more complex loss function, we adopt a novel sampling approach that exploits the domain geometry to ensure a proper balance among the contributions from various regions within the solution domain. The effectiveness of this framework is then demonstrated for two scenarios that represent a broad class of internal and external flow problems.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Distributed physics informed neural network for data-efficient solution to partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.08967, 2019.
  2. Physics-informed neural networks for solving reynolds-averaged navier–stokes equations. Physics of Fluids, 34(7):075117, 2022.
  3. RANS-PINN based Simulation Surrogates for Predicting Turbulent Flows. ICML Workshop on Synergy of Scientific and Machine Learning Modeling Workshop (SynS & ML), 2023.
  4. Studying turbulent flows with physics-informed neural networks and sparse data. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 104:109232, 2023. ISSN 0142-727X.
  5. O. Hennigh. Lat-net: Compressing lattice Boltzmann flow simulations using deep neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.09036, 2017.
  6. Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Convergence Guarantees, 2019.
  7. MeshfreeFlowNet: A Physics-Constrained Deep Continuous Space-Time Super-Resolution Framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01463, 2020.
  8. Machine learning–accelerated computational fluid dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(21):e2101784118, 2021.
  9. Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equations. arXiv Preprint, 2010.08895, 2021.
  10. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04502, 2019.
  11. A survey on the application of machine learning in turbulent flow simulations. Energies, 16(4), 2023.
  12. M. A. Nabian and H. Meidani. A deep learning solution approach for high-dimensional random differential equations. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, 57:14–25, 2019.
  13. Turbulence model augmented physics-informed neural networks for mean-flow reconstruction. Phys. Rev. Fluids, 9:034605, Mar 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.034605.
  14. Turbulence Modeling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Comparison of Different RANS Models for the Backward-Facing Step Flow. Fluids, 8(2), 2023. ISSN 2311-5521. doi: 10.3390/fluids8020043.
  15. Combustion in a turbulent mixing layer formed at a rearward-facing step. AIAA Journal, 21(11):1565–1570, 1983. doi: 10.2514/3.8290.
  16. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational physics, 378:686–707, 2019.
  17. A comprehensive and fair comparison between MLP and KAN representations for differential equations and operator networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02917, 2024.
  18. R. Vinuesa and S. L. Brunton. Enhancing computational fluid dynamics with machine learning. Nature Computational Science, 2(6):358–366, 2022.
  19. Towards physics-informed deep learning for turbulent flow prediction. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 1457–1466, 2020.
  20. Data-driven prediction of vehicle cabin thermal comfort: using machine learning and high-fidelity simulation results. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 148:119083, 2020.
  21. Frequency-compensated PINNs for Fluid-dynamic Design Problems. NeurIPS Workshop on Machine Learning for Engineering Modeling, Simulation, and Design, arXiv:2011.01456, 2020.
  22. Demystifying the Data Need of ML-surrogates for CFD Simulations. AAAI Workshop on AI to Accelerate Science and Engineering, arXiv:2205.08355, 2022.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.