Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Guiding Empowerment Model: Liberating Neurodiversity in Online Higher Education (2410.18876v1)

Published 24 Oct 2024 in cs.AI and cs.HC

Abstract: In this innovative practice full paper, we address the equity gap for neurodivergent and situationally limited learners by identifying the spectrum of dynamic factors that impact learning and function. Educators have shown a growing interest in identifying learners' cognitive abilities and learning preferences to measure their impact on academic achievement. Often institutions employ one-size-fits-all approaches leaving the burden on disabled students to self-advocate or tolerate inadequate support. Emerging frameworks guide neurodivergent learners through instructional approaches, such as online education. However, these frameworks fail to address holistic environmental needs or recommend technology interventions, particularly for those with undisclosed learning or developmental disabilities and situational limitations. In this article, we integrate a neurodivergent perspective through secondary research of around 100 articles to introduce a Guiding Empowerment Model involving key cognitive and situational factors that contextualize day-to-day experiences affecting learner ability. We synthesize three sample student profiles that highlight user problems in functioning. We use this model to evaluate sample learning platform features and other supportive technology solutions. The proposed approach augments frameworks such as Universal Design for Learning to consider factors including various sensory processing differences, social connection challenges, and environmental limitations. We suggest that by applying the mode through technology-enabled features such as customizable task management, guided varied content access, and guided multi-modal collaboration, major learning barriers of neurodivergent and situationally limited learners will be removed to activate the successful pursuit of their academic goals.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (98)
  1. Universal design for learning (udl): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3):39–56, 2016.
  2. T. P. Alloway. A comparison of working memory profiles in children with adhd and dcd. Child Neuropsychology, 17(5):483–494, 2011.
  3. M. Anghel. The influence of sensory systems in motor development to the preschool child. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brașov. Series IX: Sciences of Human Kinetics, 12(61)(1):189–194, Jun. 2019.
  4. The role of working memory in achievement goal pursuit. Acta Psychologica, 144(2):361–372, Oct. 2013.
  5. A. Bandura. Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2(2):128–163, 1990.
  6. Sensory modulation disorder: A risk factor for participation in daily life activities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 50(12):932–937, 2008.
  7. Capturing the effects of context on human performance in mobile computing systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11:81–96, 2007.
  8. J. Bay. Fostering diversity, equity, and inclusion in the technical and professional communication service course. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 65(1):213–225, Mar. 2022.
  9. S. Braem and T. Egner. Getting a grip on cognitive flexibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6):470–476, 2018.
  10. Causes, effects, and practicalities of everyday multitasking. Developmental Review, 35:64–78, 2015.
  11. CAST. Universal design for learning guidelines website, 2018. Accessed: Dec. 10, 2023.
  12. A literature review: Efficacy of online learning courses for higher education institutions using meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2):1367–1385, Nov. 2019.
  13. Sensory processing evaluation and intervention in mental health. OT Practice, 15(5):CE1–CE7, 2010.
  14. Reframing neurodiversity in engineering education. Frontiers in Education, 7, Nov. 2022.
  15. Comparing and exploring the sensory processing patterns of higher education students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(2):7002250010p1–7002250010p9, 2016.
  16. N. Cowan. What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress in Brain Research, 169:323–338, 2008.
  17. Navigating challenges to facilitate success for college students with autism. Journal of Higher Education, 92(2):252–278, Aug. 2020.
  18. Neurodiversity-affirming practices are a moral imperative for occupational therapy. Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 10(2):1–9, Apr. 2022.
  19. Sensory processing in the general population: Adaptability, resiliency, and challenging behavior. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(1):7201195060p1–7201195060p8, 2018.
  20. H. Deng. Emerging patterns and trends in utilizing electronic resources in a higher education environment: An empirical analysis. New Library World, 111(3/4):87–103, 2010.
  21. Development and validation of the systems thinking scale. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(8):2314–2320, 2020.
  22. Self-discipline outdoes iq in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12):939–944, 2005.
  23. Corrigendum: Construct validity of the sensory profile interoception scale: Measuring sensory processing in everyday life. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 2022.
  24. The ecology of human performance: A framework for considering the effect of context. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(7):595–607, 1994.
  25. P. Dwyer. The neurodiversity approach(es): What are they and what do they mean for researchers? Human Development, 66(2):73–92, Jan. 2022.
  26. M. O. Ernst. The ’puzzle’ of sensory perception: putting together multisensory information. In Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Multimodal interfaces, pages 1–1, 2005.
  27. J. L. Rivera Munoz et al. Systematic review of adaptive learning technology for learning in higher education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 98:221–233, 2022.
  28. M. E. King-Sears et al. Achievement of learners receiving udl instruction: A meta-analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122:103956, 2023.
  29. S. Palvia et al. Online education: Worldwide status, challenges, trends, and implications. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 21(4):233–241, Oct. 2018.
  30. Enhancing literacy and communicative skills of students with disabilities in special schools through dialogic literary gatherings. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 2021.
  31. Emotion information processing as a new component of emotional intelligence: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence. European Journal of Personality, 36(2):245–264, 2022.
  32. Academic success for students in postsecondary education: The role of student characteristics and integration. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 23(3):659–685, 2021.
  33. Destructive criticism in software code review impacts inclusion. In Proc. ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, volume 6, pages 1–29, 2022.
  34. L. G. Hamilton and S. Petty. Compassionate pedagogy for neurodiversity in higher education: A conceptual analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 2023.
  35. The role of accessibility in a universal web. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference, pages 1–4, 2014.
  36. Decision-guided chatbots and cognitive styles in interdisciplinary learning. Computers and Education, 201, 2023.
  37. Transformative social and emotional learning (sel): Toward sel in service of educational equity and excellence. Educational Psychologist, 54(3):162–184, 2019.
  38. Teaching higher education staff to understand and support autistic students: evaluation of a novel training program. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 2023.
  39. N. Kenny and A. Doyle. I have always lived desperate and vulnerable on the edge of helplessness and collapse…: A phenomenological exploration of the lived experience of adults experiencing pathological demand avoidance, 2023.
  40. N. Kholifah and B. Astuti. The correlation between peer social interaction with resilience in student. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, pages 1–5, 2021.
  41. Relationships between sensory modulation and social supports and health-related quality of life. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3):320–327, 2011.
  42. Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60(2):265–299, Jun. 1990.
  43. Reactive risk-taking: anxiety regulation via approach motivation increases risk-taking behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 49(1):81–96, 2023.
  44. M. P. Lillis. Faculty emotional intelligence and student-faculty interactions: Implications for student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(2):155–178, 2011.
  45. The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19(2):119–137, 2003.
  46. Strategies for success in education: Time management is more important for part-time than full-time community college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(5):618–623, 2012.
  47. An exploration of sensory processing patterns and their association with demographic factors in healthy adults. Irish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(1):3–16, 2020.
  48. A synthesis of systematic review research on emerging learning environments and technologies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68:1613–1633, 2020.
  49. S. McWeeny and E. S. Norton. Auditory processing and reading disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 28(2):167–189, 2024.
  50. The social contagion of student engagement in school. School Psychology International, 41(5):454–474, 2020.
  51. Identification of sensory processing and integration symptom clusters: A preliminary study. Occupational Therapy International, 2017.
  52. S. Mishra. Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students. Educational Research Review, 29, 2020.
  53. A. Moore. Pathological demand avoidance: What and who are being pathologised and in whose interests? Global Studies of Childhood, 10(1):39–52, 2020.
  54. J. W. Moore. What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2016.
  55. A. Moriña. When what is unseen does not exist: disclosure, barriers and supports for students with invisible disabilities in higher education. Disability and Society, pages 1–19, 2022.
  56. The human spectrum: A phenomenological enquiry within neurodiversity. Psychopathology, 56(3):220–230, 2023.
  57. Support receipt: Effect on postsecondary success of students with learning disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 42(1):6–16, 2019.
  58. T. R. Nodine. How did we get here? a brief history of competency-based higher education in the united states. Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1(1):5–11, Apr. 2016.
  59. Disabled students’ perception of the sensory aspects of the learning and social environments within one higher education institution. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(5):367–375, 2023.
  60. M. Nwabuoku. Surviving distance learning as an adult learner in higher education. Adult Learning, 31(4):185–187, 2020.
  61. Pathological demand avoidance: exploring the behavioural profile. Autism, 18(5):538–544, 2014.
  62. Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6):7893–7925, Feb. 2022.
  63. The learning styles neuromyth: when the same term means different things to different teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36:511–531, 2021.
  64. Indecisiveness and response to risk in deciding when to decide. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4):405–424, 2007.
  65. Examining the effect of interruptions at different breakpoints and frequencies within a task. Human Factors, 65(1):22–36, 2023.
  66. V. L. Reese and R. Dunn. Learning-style preferences of a diverse freshmen population in a large, private, metropolitan university by gender and gpa. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 9(1):95–112, 2007.
  67. K. A. Robert. The Vigor of Creative Materialism: Making the Hidden Stories of Underrepresented Engineering Students Visible. PhD thesis, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA, 2023.
  68. J. Roksa and P. Kinsley. The role of family support in facilitating academic success of low-income students. Research in Higher Education, 60:415–436, 2019.
  69. S. R. Ross. Supporting your neurodiverse student population with the universal design for learning (udl) framework. In 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2019.
  70. Verbal working memory as emergent from language comprehension and production. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 2020.
  71. A systematic review of empirically based universal design for learning: Implementation and effectiveness of universal design in education for students with and without disabilities at the postsecondary level. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(05):171, 2018.
  72. Inspiring academic confidence in university students: perceived digital experience as a source of self-efficacy. On the Horizon: The International Journal of Learning Futures, 31(2):110–122, 2023.
  73. S. Shimojo and L. Shams. Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(7):505–513, Jul. 2001.
  74. S. Shipman and V. C. Shipman. Chapter 7: Cognitive styles: Some conceptual, methodological, and applied issues. Review of Research in Education, 12(1):229–291, 1985.
  75. Riskalyzer: Inferring individual risk-taking propensity using phone metadata. In Proc. of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, volume 2, pages 1–21, 2018.
  76. A. Strantz. Using web standards to design accessible data visualizations in professional communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 64(3):288–301, Sept. 2021.
  77. Development and initial validation of the coping with academic demands scale: How students in accelerated high school curricula cope with school-related stressors. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(4):357–374, 2015.
  78. N. Sun and M. B. Rosson. Connection enablers in online learning community: From informative online personae to meaningful social space. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pages 315–318, 2017.
  79. How do distance learners connect? In Proc. of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–12, 2019.
  80. Experiences of neurodivergent students in graduate stem programs. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Jun. 2023.
  81. An exploratory study of university teachers’ conceptions and articulation of care amidst online teaching. Pastoral Care in Education, pages 1–21, 2022.
  82. Incremental intelligence mindset, fear of failure, and academic coping. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 16, 2022.
  83. Broad and narrow personality traits of women’s college students in relation to early departure from college. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 11(4):483–497, 2010.
  84. Behavioral assessment of emotion discrimination, emotion regulation, and cognitive control in childhood, adolescence, and adulthood. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 2011.
  85. Dealing with task interruptions in complex dynamic environments: Are two heads better than one? Human Factors, 54(1):70–83, 2012.
  86. J. Treviranus. Authoring tools. In Web Accessibility: A Foundation for Research, pages 127–138. Springer, 2008.
  87. Examination of ableist educational systems and structures that limit access to engineering education through narratives. In Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference, Feb. 2024.
  88. Y. Turjeman-Levi and A. N. Kluger. Sensory-processing sensitivity versus the sensory-processing theory: Convergence and divergence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Dec. 2022.
  89. Y. Turjeman-Levi and A. N. Kluger. Sensory-processing sensitivity versus the sensory-processing theory: Convergence and divergence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 2022.
  90. A. S. Venet. Equity-Centered Trauma-Informed Education. Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2023.
  91. Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3):302–323, 2013.
  92. Assessing multisensory sensitivity across scales: Using the resulting core factors to create the multisensory amplification scale. The Journal of Pain, 23(2):276–288, 2022.
  93. Exploring the learning experiences of neurodivergent college students in stem courses. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 00:1–14, 2024.
  94. Measuring the impact of a marketing simulation game: Experience on perceived indecisiveness. Simulation & Gaming, 48(1):56–80, 2017.
  95. M. Winget and A. M. Persky. A practical review of mastery learning. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 86(10):ajpe8906, Dec. 2022.
  96. Exploring links between polychronicity and job performance from the person–environment fit perspective—the mediating role of well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 2020.
  97. J. Zhou and S. Bhat. Modeling consistency using engagement patterns in online courses. In LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, pages 226–236, 2021.
  98. A. Zolyomi and J. Snyder. Social-emotional-sensory design map for affective computing informed by neurodivergent experiences. In Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., volume 5, April 2021.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 1 tweet with 0 likes about this paper.