Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

A Causal Graph-Enhanced Gaussian Process Regression for Modeling Engine-out NOx (2410.18424v1)

Published 24 Oct 2024 in cs.LG

Abstract: The stringent regulatory requirements on nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions from diesel compression ignition engines require accurate and reliable models for real-time monitoring and diagnostics. Although traditional methods such as physical sensors and virtual engine control module (ECM) sensors provide essential data, they are only used for estimation. Ubiquitous literature primarily focuses on deterministic models with little emphasis on capturing the uncertainties due to sensors. The lack of probabilistic frameworks restricts the applicability of these models for robust diagnostics. The objective of this paper is to develop and validate a probabilistic model to predict engine-out NOx emissions using Gaussian process regression. Our approach is as follows. We employ three variants of Gaussian process models: the first with a standard radial basis function kernel with input window, the second incorporating a deep kernel using convolutional neural networks to capture temporal dependencies, and the third enriching the deep kernel with a causal graph derived via graph convolutional networks. The causal graph embeds physics knowledge into the learning process. All models are compared against a virtual ECM sensor using both quantitative and qualitative metrics. We conclude that our model provides an improvement in predictive performance when using an input window and a deep kernel structure. Even more compelling is the further enhancement achieved by the incorporation of a causal graph into the deep kernel. These findings are corroborated across different validation datasets.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Aithal S (2010) Modeling of nox formation in diesel engines using finite-rate chemical kinetics. Applied Energy 87(7): 2256–2265.
  2. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 88: 100967.
  3. Asprion J, Chinellato O and Guzzella L (2013) A fast and accurate physics-based model for the nox emissions of diesel engines. Applied energy 103: 221–233.
  4. Bowman CT (1975) Kinetics of pollutant formation and destruction in combustion. Progress in energy and combustion science 1(1): 33–45.
  5. In: 2016 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). IEEE, pp. 3338–3345.
  6. International Journal of Engine Research 19(4): 423–433.
  7. EPA (2021) Regulations for emissions from vehicles and engines. URL https://www.epa.gov/regulations-emissions-vehicles-and-engines/cleaner-%****␣main.bbl␣Line␣50␣****trucks-initiative.
  8. International Journal of Engine Research 23(7): 1201–1212.
  9. Fey M and Lenssen JE (2019) Fast graph representation learning with pytorch geometric. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02428 .
  10. Advances in neural information processing systems 31.
  11. International Journal of Engine Research 24(2): 536–551.
  12. In: International conference on machine learning. PMLR, pp. 1321–1330.
  13. Heywood JB (2018) Internal combustion engine fundamentals. McGraw-Hill Education.
  14. Kingma DP (2014) Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 .
  15. Kipf TN and Welling M (2016a) Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 .
  16. Kipf TN and Welling M (2016b) Variational graph auto-encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.07308 .
  17. Lavoie GA, Heywood JB and Keck JC (1970) Experimental and theoretical study of nitric oxide formation in internal combustion engines. Combustion science and technology 1(4): 313–326.
  18. LeCun Y, Bengio Y and Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. nature 521(7553): 436–444.
  19. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05493 .
  20. IEEE transactions on neural networks 20(1): 61–80.
  21. IFAC-PapersOnLine 54(20): 826–833.
  22. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 94: 103761.
  23. Thost V and Chen J (2021) Directed acyclic graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.07965 .
  24. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.10903 .
  25. Williams CK and Rasmussen CE (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning, volume 2. MIT press Cambridge, MA.
  26. In: Artificial intelligence and statistics. PMLR, pp. 370–378.
  27. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00826 .
  28. Yousefian S, Bourque G and Monaghan RF (2021) Bayesian inference and uncertainty quantification for hydrogen-enriched and lean-premixed combustion systems. international journal of hydrogen energy 46(46): 23927–23942.
  29. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04173 .
  30. Zinage S, Mondal S and Sarkar S (2024a) Dkl-kan: Scalable deep kernel learning using kolmogorov-arnold networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21176 .
  31. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15159 .

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Slide Deck Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Whiteboard

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets