Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 88 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 81 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 450 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Correlations and fluctuations in a magnetized PNJL model with and without inverse magnetic catalysis effect (2410.10217v2)

Published 14 Oct 2024 in hep-ph, hep-lat, and nucl-th

Abstract: The correlation $\chi{BQ}_{11}$ and quadratic fluctuations $\chiB_2,\ \chiQ_2,\ \chiT_2$ of baryon number $B$, electric charge $Q$ and temperature $T$ are investigated in a two-flavor Polyakov loop extended Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (PNJL) model at finite temperature and magnetic field. The inverse magnetic catalysis (IMC) effect is introduced through the magnetic field dependent parameters $G(eB)$ or $T_0(eB)$, and we make comparison of the results in the cases with and without IMC effect. With nonvanishing magnetic field, the correlation $\chi{BQ}_{11}$ and fluctuations $\chiB_2,\ \chiQ_2,\ \chiT_2$ increase with temperature, and then show the peak around the pseudocritical temperatures of chiral restoration and deconfinement phase transitions in the cases with and without the IMC effect. The correlation and fluctuations along the phase transition line under external magnetic field are characterized by the scaled correlation ${\hat {\chi}}{11}{BQ}=\frac{\chi{11}{BQ}(eB,T_{pc}c(eB))}{\chi_{11}{BQ}(eB=0,T_{pc}c(eB=0))}$ and scaled fluctuations ${\hat {\chi}}2{B(Q,T)}=\frac{\chi_2{B(Q,T)}(eB,T{pc}c(eB))}{\chi_2{B(Q,T)}(eB=0,T_{pc}c(eB=0))}$ at the pseudocritical temperature $T_{pc}c$ of chiral restoration phase transition. ${\hat {\chi}}_{11}{BQ},\ {\hat {\chi}}_2{B}$, and ${\hat {\chi}}_2{Q}$ increase with magnetic fields, and the inclusion of IMC effect leads to some enhancement in their values. However, ${\hat {\chi}}_2{T}$ is altered by the IMC effect. Without IMC effect, ${\hat \chi}T_2$ slightly increases and then decreases with magnetic fields. Taking into account of the IMC effect by $G(eB)$, ${\hat \chi}T_2$ monotonically increases with magnetic fields, and by $T_0(eB)$, it is a nonmonotonic function of magnetic field.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube