Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 206 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 457 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Star formation rate density as a function of galaxy mass at z < 0.2 with MUSE and GAMA surveys (2410.08036v2)

Published 10 Oct 2024 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: The star formation rate density (SFRD) is an important tool in galaxy evolution that allows us to identify at which cosmic time galaxies are more efficient at forming stars. For low-mass star-forming galaxies, the SFRD as a function of stellar mass can be straightforwardly related to the galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF). Given the uncertainty of the GSMF at the low-mass end, due to the challenges in observing dwarf galaxies, deriving the SFRD with respect to mass may be crucial to understand galaxy formation. Measurement of SFRD is more complete than number density in a cosmological volume because galaxies with higher SFR are easier to detect and characterize. In this work, the SFRD is derived using two different samples, one using the MUSE WIDE and MUSE Hubble Ultra Deep Field IFU spectroscopic surveys, and another using the GAMA spectroscopic survey. The first sample comprised a total of 27 star-forming galaxies at z $<$ 0.2 (H$\alpha$ selected), whereas the second contained 7579 galaxies at z $<$ 0.06 ($r$-band selected). The star formation rates are derived from measurements of the H$\alpha$ emission line fluxes for the first sample, and using MagPhys SED fitting for the second one. The results show the behaviour of the SFRD to the lowest stellar masses of 10${5.5}$ $M_{\odot}$, consistent with a constant slope (in log SFRD versus log stellar mass) and thus no turn-over in the GSMF. The results also suggest that the volume considered for the MUSE WIDE and HUDF sample is underdense.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.