Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

EnIGMA: Enhanced Interactive Generative Model Agent for CTF Challenges (2409.16165v1)

Published 24 Sep 2024 in cs.AI
EnIGMA: Enhanced Interactive Generative Model Agent for CTF Challenges

Abstract: Although LLM (LM) agents are demonstrating growing potential in many domains, their success in cybersecurity has been limited due to simplistic design and the lack of fundamental features for this domain. We present EnIGMA, an LM agent for autonomously solving Capture The Flag (CTF) challenges. EnIGMA introduces new Agent-Computer Interfaces (ACIs) to improve the success rate on CTF challenges. We establish the novel Interactive Agent Tool concept, which enables LM agents to run interactive command-line utilities essential for these challenges. Empirical analysis of EnIGMA on over 350 CTF challenges from three different benchmarks indicates that providing a robust set of new tools with demonstration of their usage helps the LM solve complex problems and achieves state-of-the-art results on the NYU CTF and Intercode-CTF benchmarks. Finally, we discuss insights on ACI design and agent behavior on cybersecurity tasks that highlight the need to adapt real-world tools for LM agents.

EnIGMA: Enhanced Interactive Generative Model Agent for CTF Challenges

The research paper introduces EnIGMA, an Enhanced Interactive Generative Model Agent specifically designed to autonomously solve Capture The Flag (CTF) challenges. Unlike previous LLM (LM) agents, which have shown limited success in cybersecurity due to simplistic designs and inadequate features, EnIGMA is built with new Agent-Computer Interfaces (ACIs) tailored to the cybersecurity domain. EnIGMA represents a significant advancement in the application of LMs to the cybersecurity domain, offering a range of specialized tools to address the nuances and complexities of cybersecurity tasks.

Overview and Methodology

The primary contribution of the paper is the introduction of the Interactive Agent Tool (IAT), extending the ACI concept presented in the SWE-agent framework. IATs enable LM agents to utilize interactive command-line utilities such as debuggers and server connection tools, which are essential for CTF challenges. These challenges often require interactive engagement with debugging tools and communication with remote servers, and IATs provide a solution for these requirements.

EnIGMA is built with robust interfaces for two main interactive tools:

  1. EnIGMA Debugger: This interface incorporates commands for starting a gdb session, adding breakpoints, stepping through instructions, continuing execution, and executing arbitrary gdb commands. These capabilities are crucial for reverse engineering and dynamic program analysis tasks.
  2. EnIGMA Server Connection Tool: Utilizing the pwntools library, this tool facilitates connection to remote servers, allowing the agent to send and receive data interactively. It addresses the need for interaction with web exploitation or binary exploitation challenges often involving remote servers.

The authors conducted extensive evaluations of EnIGMA using a comprehensive set of over 350 CTF challenges derived from the NYU CTF, Intercode-CTF, and HackTheBox benchmarks. Results demonstrate that EnIGMA achieves state-of-the-art performance on these benchmarks, significantly outperforming existing agents, particularly on the NYU CTF and Intercode-CTF benchmarks.

Strong Numerical Results and Implications

EnIGMA's empirical analysis focuses on understanding which features are most beneficial to solving CTF challenges. Key results include:

  • EnIGMA solved more than three times as many challenges as prior agents on the NYU CTF benchmark, achieving up to 13.5% success on this benchmark using Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
  • The implementation of the LM summarization technique and the use of in-context learning through demonstrations resulted in improved handling of long context inputs and enhanced problem-solving capabilities.

These results highlight the effectiveness of the new IATs and ACI-driven interfaces in enhancing LM agent performance in cybersecurity. The results also emphasize the importance of using demonstrations and learning from successful problem-solving techniques to guide agents in similar challenges.

Future Implications in AI and Cybersecurity

The development of EnIGMA opens several avenues for future research. It suggests potential extensions for real-time cybersecurity applications, where LMs can be utilized not only for CTF challenges but also to automate intrusion detection and vulnerability management. Furthermore, the approach pioneered by EnIGMA could be adapted to automate other cybersecurity tasks that require a combination of dynamic and static program analysis.

The incorporation of well-designed interfaces tailored to LM agents' needs shows great potential beyond cybersecurity, reflecting a broader implication for LM's application in other specialized domains. The authors acknowledge potential solutions for challenges such as data leakage and soliloquizing, which arises from model exposure to training data during development. Addressing these challenges could further improve the accuracy and reliability of LM agents across various applications.

Overall, the paper presents a thoughtful and detailed contribution to the field of AI-driven cybersecurity tools, providing valuable insights for further research and development of LM agents capable of addressing real-world cybersecurity problems. As model architectures evolve and agents become more sophisticated, EnIGMA sets a solid precedent for future advancements in LM-driven cybersecurity solutions.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (16)
  1. Talor Abramovich (2 papers)
  2. Meet Udeshi (5 papers)
  3. Minghao Shao (16 papers)
  4. Kilian Lieret (11 papers)
  5. Haoran Xi (6 papers)
  6. Kimberly Milner (4 papers)
  7. Sofija Jancheska (3 papers)
  8. John Yang (22 papers)
  9. Carlos E. Jimenez (11 papers)
  10. Farshad Khorrami (73 papers)
  11. Prashanth Krishnamurthy (68 papers)
  12. Brendan Dolan-Gavitt (24 papers)
  13. Muhammad Shafique (204 papers)
  14. Karthik Narasimhan (82 papers)
  15. Ramesh Karri (92 papers)
  16. Ofir Press (21 papers)
Citations (4)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com