Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
2000 character limit reached

Reinforcement Learning-enabled Satellite Constellation Reconfiguration and Retasking for Mission-Critical Applications (2409.02270v1)

Published 3 Sep 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: The development of satellite constellation applications is rapidly advancing due to increasing user demands, reduced operational costs, and technological advancements. However, a significant gap in the existing literature concerns reconfiguration and retasking issues within satellite constellations, which is the primary focus of our research. In this work, we critically assess the impact of satellite failures on constellation performance and the associated task requirements. To facilitate this analysis, we introduce a system modeling approach for GPS satellite constellations, enabling an investigation into performance dynamics and task distribution strategies, particularly in scenarios where satellite failures occur during mission-critical operations. Additionally, we introduce reinforcement learning (RL) techniques, specifically Q-learning, Policy Gradient, Deep Q-Network (DQN), and Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), for managing satellite constellations, addressing the challenges posed by reconfiguration and retasking following satellite failures. Our results demonstrate that DQN and PPO achieve effective outcomes in terms of average rewards, task completion rates, and response times.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (16)
  1. H. E. alami, N. Mensi, and D. B. Rawat, “On the Study of Joint Naive Bayes and Multi-Layer Perception for Detecting GPS Jamming in UAS,” in GLOBECOM 2023-2023 IEEE Global Communications Conference.   IEEE, 2023, pp. 443–448.
  2. D. B. Rawat and M. Song, “Securing space communication systems against reactive cognitive jammer,” in 2015 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).   IEEE, 2015, pp. 1428–1433.
  3. K. Lu et al., “Applications and prospects of artificial intelligence in covert satellite communication: a review,” Science China Information Sciences, vol. 66, no. 2, p. 121301, 2023.
  4. P. Yue, J. An, J. Zhang, J. Ye, G. Pan, S. Wang, P. Xiao, and L. Hanzo, “Low earth orbit satellite security and reliability: Issues, solutions, and the road ahead,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2023.
  5. Q. Chen, W. Meng, S. Han, and C. Li, “Service-oriented fair resource allocation and auction for civil aircrafts augmented space-air-ground integrated networks,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 13 658–13 672, 2020.
  6. B. Wang, Z. Chang, S. Li, and T. Hämäläinen, “An efficient and privacy-preserving blockchain-based authentication scheme for low earth orbit satellite-assisted internet of things,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 5153–5164, 2022.
  7. J. Huang and J. Cao, “Recent development of commercial satellite communications systems,” in Artificial intelligence in China: Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence in China.   Springer, 2020, pp. 531–536.
  8. M. Strohmeier et al., “On the applicability of satellite-based air traffic control communication for security,” IEEE Comm Magazine, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 79–85, 2019.
  9. A. M. Wijata et al., “Taking artificial intelligence into space through objective selection of hyperspectral earth observation applications: To bring the “brain” close to the “eyes” of satellite missions,” IEEE Geoscience & Remote Sensing Mag., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 10–39, 2023.
  10. J. N. Pelton, “Conclusion: The many technical, market, economic, and practical aspects of the world of small satellites,” Handbook of Small Satellites Technology, Design, Manufacture, Applications, Economics and Regulation, pp. 1–19, 2020.
  11. D. Selva et al., “Distributed earth satellite systems: What is needed to move forward?” Journal of Aerospace Info Systems, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 412–438, 2017.
  12. N. Brown, B. Arguello, L. Nozick, and N. Xu, “A heuristic approach to satellite range scheduling with bounds using lagrangian relaxation,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 3828–3836, 2018.
  13. P. A. Servidia and M. España, “On autonomous reconfiguration of sar satellite formation flight with continuous control,” IEEE Trans on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 3861–3873, 2021.
  14. H. Jiaxin, Y. Leping, H. Huan, and Z. Yanwei, “Optimal reconfiguration of constellation using adaptive innovation driven multiobjective evolutionary algorithm,” Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1527–1538, 2021.
  15. Y. Zhang et al., “A self-reconfiguration planning strategy for cellular satellites,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 4516–4528, 2018.
  16. X. Bai et al., “Reconfiguration optimization of relative motion between elliptical orbits using lyapunov-floquet transformation,” IEEE Trans on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Whiteboard

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.