Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Message-Passing Monte Carlo: Generating low-discrepancy point sets via Graph Neural Networks (2405.15059v2)

Published 23 May 2024 in cs.LG, cs.NA, math.NA, and stat.ML

Abstract: Discrepancy is a well-known measure for the irregularity of the distribution of a point set. Point sets with small discrepancy are called low-discrepancy and are known to efficiently fill the space in a uniform manner. Low-discrepancy points play a central role in many problems in science and engineering, including numerical integration, computer vision, machine perception, computer graphics, machine learning, and simulation. In this work, we present the first machine learning approach to generate a new class of low-discrepancy point sets named Message-Passing Monte Carlo (MPMC) points. Motivated by the geometric nature of generating low-discrepancy point sets, we leverage tools from Geometric Deep Learning and base our model on Graph Neural Networks. We further provide an extension of our framework to higher dimensions, which flexibly allows the generation of custom-made points that emphasize the uniformity in specific dimensions that are primarily important for the particular problem at hand. Finally, we demonstrate that our proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance superior to previous methods by a significant margin. In fact, MPMC points are empirically shown to be either optimal or near-optimal with respect to the discrepancy for low dimension and small number of points, i.e., for which the optimal discrepancy can be determined. Code for generating MPMC points can be found at https://github.com/tk-rusch/MPMC.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (65)
  1. Quasi-randomized path planning. In Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 01CH37164), volume 2, pp.  1481–1487. IEEE, 2001.
  2. Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. arXiv:2104.13478, 2021.
  3. Spectral networks and locally connected networks on graphs. In 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, 2014.
  4. Valuation of mortgage-backed securities using brownian bridges to reduce effective dimension. Journal of Computational Finance, 1:27–46, 1997.
  5. Fully parallel hyperparameter search: Reshaped space-filling. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1338–1348. PMLR, 2020.
  6. Star discrepancy subset selection: problem formulation and efficient approaches for low dimensions. J. Complexity, 70:Paper No. 101645, 34, 2022. ISSN 0885-064X,1090-2708.
  7. Computing star discrepancies with numerical black-box optimization algorithms. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO ’23, pp.  1330–1338, New York, NY, USA, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9798400701191.
  8. Heuristic approaches to obtain low-discrepancy point sets via subset selection. J. Complexity, 83:Paper No. 101852, 2024. ISSN 0885-064X,1090-2708.
  9. Constructing optimal ℒ∞subscriptℒ\mathcal{L}_{\infty}caligraphic_L start_POSTSUBSCRIPT ∞ end_POSTSUBSCRIPT star discrepancy sets. Preprint, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17463.
  10. Convolutional neural networks on graphs with fast localized spectral filtering. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29:3844–3852, 2016.
  11. Eta prediction with graph neural networks in google maps. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pp.  3767–3776, 2021.
  12. Constructions of Lattice Rules, pp.  95–139. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022.
  13. Computing the discrepancy with applications to supersampling patterns. ACM Trans. Graph., 15(4):354–376, oct 1996. ISSN 0730-0301.
  14. Bounds and constructions for the star-discrepancy via δ𝛿\deltaitalic_δ-covers. J. Complexity, 21(5):691–709, 2005. ISSN 0885-064X,1090-2708. doi: 10.1016/j.jco.2005.05.002. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2005.05.002.
  15. Constructing low star discrepancy point sets with genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp.  789–796, New York, NY, USA, 2013. Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 9781450319638.
  16. Calculation of Discrepancy Measures and Applications, pp. 621–678. Springer International Publishing, 2014.
  17. Sequences, discrepancies and applications, volume 1651 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997. ISBN 3-540-62606-9. doi: 10.1007/BFb0093404. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0093404.
  18. Faure, H. Discrepance de suites associées à un système de numération (en dimension s). Acta Arithmetica, 41:337–351, 1982.
  19. Generalized halton sequences in 2008: A comparative study. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul., 19(4), 2009. ISSN 1049-3301.
  20. A general framework for adaptive processing of data structures. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 9(5):768–786, 1998.
  21. Low-discrepancy sequences: Monte carlo simulation of option prices. J. Deriv., pp.  63–83, 1997.
  22. Utilizing graph machine learning within drug discovery and development. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 22(6), 2021.
  23. Hardness of discrepancy computation and ϵitalic-ϵ\epsilonitalic_ϵ-net verification in high dimension. J. Complexity, 28(2):162–176, 2012. ISSN 0885-064X,1090-2708. doi: 10.1016/j.jco.2011.09.001. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2011.09.001.
  24. Neural message passing for quantum chemistry. In ICML, 2017.
  25. Glasserman, P. Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering. Springer, New York, 2004. ISBN 0387004513 9780387004518 1441918221 9781441918222.
  26. Finding optimal volume subintervals with k𝑘kitalic_k-points and calculating the star discrepancy are NP-hard problems. J. Complexity, 25(2):115–127, 2009. ISSN 0885-064X,1090-2708.
  27. Learning task-dependent distributed representations by backpropagation through structure. In ICNN, 1996.
  28. A new model for learning in graph domains. In IJCNN, 2005.
  29. Haber, S. Numerical evaluation of multiple integrals. SIAM Review, (12):481–526, 1970.
  30. Halton, J. H. On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numer. Math., 2:84–90, 1960.
  31. Hickernell, F. A generalized discrepancy and quadrature error bound. Mathematics of computation, 67(221):299–322, 1998.
  32. Hlawka, E. The theory of uniform distribution. A B Academic Publishers, Berkhamsted, 1984. ISBN 0-907360-02-5.
  33. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In ICLR, 2017.
  34. Golden ratio nets and sequences. Preprint, 2023. http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11696.
  35. Korobov, N. Number-theoretic methods of approximate analysis. Fitzmatgiz, Moscow, 1963. In Russian.
  36. Uniform distribution of sequences. Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley-Interscience [John Wiley & Sons], New York-London-Sydney, 1974.
  37. Lemieux, C. Monte Carlo and quasi-Monte Carlo sampling. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer, New York, 2009. ISBN 978-0-387-78164-8.
  38. Quasi-regression and the relative importance of the anova components of a function. In Fang, K.-T., Niederreiter, H., and Hickernell, F. J. (eds.), Monte Carlo and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods 2000, pp.  331–344, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  39. Higher-order quasi-monte carlo training of deep neural networks. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(6):A3938–A3966, 2021.
  40. L’Ecuyer, P. Quasi-monte carlo methods with applications in finance. Finance and Stochastics, 13:307–349, 2009.
  41. Nerf: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. Communications of the ACM, 65(1):99–106, 2021.
  42. Enhancing accuracy of deep learning algorithms by training with low-discrepancy sequences. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59(3):1811–1834, 2021.
  43. Geometric deep learning on graphs and manifolds using mixture model cnns. In CVPR, 2017.
  44. Quasi-random sequences and their discrepancies. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 15(6):1251–1279, 1994. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/0915077.
  45. Niederreiter, H. Discrepancy and convex programming. Annali di Matematica, 93:89–97, 1972.
  46. Niederreiter, H. Point sets and sequences with small discrepancy. Monatshefte für Mathematik, 104(4):273–337, 1987.
  47. Niederreiter, H. Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods. 1992.
  48. Tractability of multivariate problems. Volume II: Standard information for functionals, volume 12 of EMS Tracts in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich, 2010. ISBN 978-3-03719-084-5.
  49. Nuyens, D. The construction of good lattice rules and polynomial lattice rules, pp.  223–256. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2014.
  50. Matbuilder: Mastering sampling uniformity over projections. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 41(4):1–13, 2022.
  51. Roth, K. F. On irregularities of distribution. Mathematika, 1:73–79, 1954. ISSN 0025-5793.
  52. The graph neural network model. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 20(1):61–80, 2008.
  53. Graph neural networks in particle physics. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2(2):021001, 2020.
  54. Lattice Methods for Multiple Integration. Oxford University Press, 1994. ISBN 9780198534723.
  55. Sobol’, I. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 7(4):86–112, 1967. ISSN 0041-5553.
  56. Sperduti, A. Encoding labeled graphs by labeling RAAM. In NIPS, 1994.
  57. Supervised neural networks for the classification of structures. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 8(3):714–735, 1997.
  58. van der Corput, J. Verteilungsfunktionen i–ii. Proc. Akad. Amsterdam, 38:813–821, 1058–1066, 1935.
  59. Graph attention networks. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR, 2018.
  60. Why are high-dimensional finance problems often of low effective dimension? SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 27(1):159–183, 2005.
  61. Low discrepancy sequences in high dimensions: How well are their projections distributed? Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 213(2):366–386, 2008. ISSN 0377-0427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2007.01.005.
  62. Warnock, T. T. Computational investigations of low-discrepancy point sets. In Applications of number theory to numerical analysis, pp. 319–343. Elsevier, 1972.
  63. Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In KDD, 2018.
  64. Deep sets. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017.
  65. Graph neural networks: a review of methods and applications. arXiv:1812.08434v4, 2019.
Citations (4)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel GNN-based framework that generates low-discrepancy point sets optimized via message-passing techniques.
  • The method outperforms traditional sequences like Sobol' and Halton in star-discrepancy, ensuring near-optimal uniformity.
  • Extensive evaluations demonstrate superior performance in both low- and high-dimensional applications, notably in computational finance.

Overview of Message-Passing Monte Carlo: Generating Low-Discrepancy Point Sets via Graph Neural Networks

The paper "Message-Passing Monte Carlo: Generating Low-Discrepancy Point Sets via Graph Neural Networks" introduces a novel approach for generating low-discrepancy point sets using machine learning techniques, specifically Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). The primary objective of the research is to leverage the geometric nature of point distributions to achieve configurations with minimal discrepancy, a measure crucial for numerous applications in science and engineering.

Introduction and Motivation

Monte Carlo (MC) methods are well-established for approximating and simulating complex real-world systems. They rely on repeated random sampling, which, while effective, exhibits a convergence rate of O(N1/2)\mathcal{O}(N^{-1/2}) in the number of samples NN. This inefficiency necessitates a large number of samples to achieve high precision, rendering MC methods impractical for some complex problems. Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods address this by employing deterministic point sets that are uniformly distributed, thus achieving better convergence rates through low-discrepancy point sets. Despite advancements in QMC methods, constructing such point sets for specific dimensionalities and sample sizes remains challenging.

Methodology

The proposed method leverages GNNs within the framework of Geometric Deep Learning to address these challenges. The architecture constructs a computational graph based on nearest neighbors of the input points and processes these points through message-passing neural networks. The model is trained to minimize a closed-form solution of a specific discrepancy measure for its outputs.

Several key aspects of the methodology include:

  • Training Set Construction: The input points for the model can be uniform random samples, points from existing low-discrepancy sequences (e.g., Sobol', Halton), or randomly perturbed low-discrepancy points.
  • GNN Architecture: The GNN processes the input points using layers that iteratively update node features based on their neighbors. The graph structure is typically defined based on a radius from each point's nearest neighbors, ensuring a local connectivity structure that is advantageous for reducing discrepancy.
  • Training Objective: The training objective leverages the 2_2-discrepancy, specifically Warnock’s formula, due to its computational feasibility and differentiability. For higher dimensions, modifications based on Hickernell’s p_p-discrepancy using random projections are employed.

Empirical Evaluation

The efficacy of the proposed method is demonstrated through extensive empirical evaluations. Key findings include:

  • Low-Dimensional Performance: MPMC points outperformed existing low-discrepancy point sets such as Sobol', Halton, subset selection, Hammersley, and Fibonacci in terms of star-discrepancy. The discrepancy values for MPMC points were significantly lower on average.
  • Near-Optimal Performance: When compared to known optimal star-discrepancy sets for specific NN and dd, MPMC points exhibited near-optimal performance, closely matching or achieving similar discrepancy values.
  • High-Dimensional Efficacy: In a high-dimensional context, particularly a computational finance problem involving Asian call option pricing, MPMC points demonstrated significantly lower approximation errors than Sobol' and Halton sequences. This highlights the superior uniformity of MPMC points even in higher dimensions.

Ablation Studies

Several ablation studies were conducted to validate various components of the model:

  • Graph Structure: The choice of radius for nearest-neighbor graphs had a notable impact on performance, with non-zero radius values significantly enhancing the model's ability to reduce discrepancy.
  • GNN Architecture: Among different GNN architectures tested (GCN, GAT, MPNN), MPNNs yielded the lowest discrepancy values consistently.
  • Input Point Sets: Performance was slightly better when using Sobol' or randomized Sobol' points as inputs compared to purely random points, though the best-performing models for each input type yielded similar results.

Implications and Future Work

The implications of this research are manifold:

  • QMC Methods: MPMC points can enhance the effectiveness of QMC methods in various applications by providing superior low-discrepancy point sets.
  • Computational Efficiency: The ability to generate near-optimal point sets in near-real time is especially beneficial for computationally intensive tasks.
  • Adaptability: The model's framework allows for generating custom-made point sets tailored to specific dimensions important for particular problems.

Future research directions include extending MPMC to generate low-discrepancy sequences rather than fixed sets and applying the method to various practical applications in science and engineering to further validate its utility and performance.

Conclusion

The paper presents a pioneering machine learning approach for generating low-discrepancy point sets, demonstrating significant advancements over existing methods. By grounding the methodology in GNNs and optimizing for discrepancy measures computationally feasible for gradient-based learning, MPMC represents an innovative step forward in QMC point generation. The promising empirical results underscore the potential of this method to impact a wide range of scientific and engineering applications.